Table 6 Summary of KANO model analysis results.

From: A home health management app designed in the post-epidemic era using empirical evidence based on the demand collection of elderly users

Number

A

O

M

I

R

Q

Classification results

Better

Worse

A

8

10

6

16

10

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.45

− 0.40

B

10

4

7

19

10

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.35

− 0.28

C

9

9

9

16

7

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.42

− 0.42

D

10

5

13

10

12

0

Must-be quality attribute

0.39

− 0.47

E

7

3

8

20

12

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.26

− 0.29

F

9

9

12

11

9

0

Must-be quality attribute

0.44

− 0.51

G

6

4

17

11

12

0

Must-be quality attribute

0.26

− 0.55

H

9

15

8

9

9

0

One-dimensional quality attribute

0.59

− 0.56

I

8

3

18

15

6

0

Must-be quality attribute

0.25

− 0.48

J

16

7

6

10

11

0

Attractive quality attribute

0.59

− 0.33

K

5

6

9

20

10

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.28

− 0.38

L

12

4

5

19

10

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.40

− 0.23

M

10

5

10

18

7

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.35

− 0.35

N

8

5

11

16

10

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.33

− 0.40

O

12

5

8

18

7

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.40

− 0.30

P

9

5

8

18

10

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.35

− 0.33

Q

20

6

6

10

8

0

Attractive quality attribute

0.62

− 0.29

R

9

8

6

16

11

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.44

− 0.36

S

16

7

6

8

13

0

Attractive quality attribute

0.62

− 0.35

T

9

6

10

16

9

0

Indifferent quality attribute

0.37

− 0.39