Table 1 Frequencies and descriptives for items on the teaching presence subscale (N = 110).

From: Saudi female students’ perceptions of the Community of Inquiry in online learning environments

Item

Percentage

  
 

SD/D

N

A/SA

M

SD

Design and organization

 T1- The instructor clearly communicated important course topics.

3.6

4.6

91.8

4.36

0.78

 T2- The instructor clearly communicated important course goals.

2.7

8.2

89.1

4.34

0.78

 T3- The instructor provided clear instructions on how to participate in course learning activities.

1.8

9.1

89.1

4.40

0.77

 T4- The instructor clearly communicated important due dates/time frames for learning activities.

3.6

10.0

86.4

4.32

0.83

Facilitation

 T5- The instructor was helpful in identifying areas of agreement and disagreement on course topics that helped me to learn.

2.7

10.9

86.4

4.17

0.80

 T6- The instructor was helpful in guiding the class towards understanding course topics in a way that helped me clarify my thinking.

2.7

10.0

87.2

4.26

0.82

 T7- The instructor helped to keep course participants engaged and participating in productive dialog.

4.5

14.5

80.9

4.15

0.93

 T8- The instructor helped keep the course participants on task in a way that helped me to learn.

2.7

9.1

88.2

4.25

0.81

 T9- The instructor encouraged course participants to explore new concepts in this course.

3.6

9.1

87.3

4.23

0.83

 T10- Instructor actions reinforced the development of a sense of community among course participants.

5.5

10.0

84.5

4.15

0.94

Direct Instruction

 T11- The instructor helped to focus discussion on relevant issues in a way that helped me to learn.

4.5

13.7

81.8

4.17

0.90

 T12- The instructor provided feedback that helped me understand my strengths and weaknesses relative to the course’s goals and objectives.

6.4

10.9

82.7

4.14

0.88

 T13- The instructor provided feedback in a timely fashion.

2.7

10.1

87.2

4.27

0.79

  1. Scale ranging from 1-Strongly Disagree to 5-Strongly Agree.