Table 8 Results of county heterogeneity test.

From: From poverty to prosperity: assessing of sustainable poverty reduction effect of “welfare-to-work” in Chinese counties

Explained variables

CMDI (10)

CMDI (30)

CMDI (50)

CMDI (70)

CMDI (90)

DID

0.092***

0.129***

0.181***

0.249***

0.403***

(0.014)

(0.013)

(0.015)

(0.019)

(0.034)

Urban-rural structure

0.112***

−0.027

−0.083***

−0.124***

−0.327***

(0.020)

(0.019)

(0.021)

(0.027)

(0.049)

Industrial scale

0.070***

0.069***

0.057***

0.040***

−0.001

(0.002)

(0.002)

(0.002)

(0.003)

(0.005)

Information level

−0.047***

−0.076***

−0.074***

−0.052***

−0.020*

(0.005)

(0.004)

(0.005)

(0.006)

(0.011)

Social consumption power

0.033***

0.070***

0.088***

0.139***

0.215***

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.005)

(0.006)

(0.011)

County population density

0.000***

0.000***

0.000***

0.000***

−0.000

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

Constant term

−0.273***

−0.041

0.235***

0.576***

1.450***

(0.028)

(0.027)

(0.030)

(0.038)

(0.069)

Observed value

33,740.000

33,740.000

33,740.000

33,740.000

33,740.000

R2

0.2181

0.2475

0.2489

0.2280

0.1734

Time fixed sample

0.092***

0.129***

0.181***

0.249***

0.403***

Individual fixed sample

(0.014)

(0.013)

(0.015)

(0.019)

(0.034)

  1. ***, * Indicate the significance at 1% and 10% levels, respectively, with robust standard error in brackets.
Back to article page