Table 9 Thematic analysis of Cluster 2.
Sl. no | Variables | Methodology | Findings | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | • OI • National Culture • Attitudes and Behavior | Meta-analytic review of 86 papers. | Employee attitudes and behaviors significantly influence OI. | Causal directions between or among variables. |
2 | • OI • Moral disengagement • Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior (UPB) | Quantitative study; Three studies were conducted in the USA and China. | In the workplace, OI positively correlates with UPB. | Examining UPB with cultural differences. |
3 | • Workplace ostracism • OI • perceived job mobility • OCB | Longitudinal 2-wave study in China | OI reduced OCB by ostracizing workers. | To examine identification with workplace aggression. |
4 | • OI • Organization’s Reputation | Exploratory investigation. A sample of 803 legislative references. | High reputation is a burden when there is low identification, but it is beneficial when there is high stakeholder identification. | When negative events occur, it is necessary to investigate constructs such as organizational culture and leadership reputation. |
5 | • Leader Member Exchange • OI • Job satisfaction • Job security | 306 South China employees participated in a two-phase data survey. | There is a positive correlation between LMX and job satisfaction through OI. | Test other boundary constructs such as job type or job tenure. |
6 | • Theoretical research | Explored the “narcissistic OI” concept as a variant of OI. | A theoretical framework stating how the antecedents of conservative OI lead to narcissism. | Research on the extent to which narcissism is relevant to social collectives. |
7 | • Leader member exchange (LMX) • OI • Relative LMX • Knowledge hiding | The study is a 3-stage longitudinal study with a time lag of 2 months. | Based on the personalization between the leader and their subordinates, knowledge-hiding behaviors will emerge. | To examine the impact of knowledge hiding on organizational outcomes. |