Table 7 Correlational effect sizes compared by Chinese culture context (immersive vs. non-immersive) and Chinese language background (L1 vs. L2).
CMA-w.d. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese Culture Context | Chinese Language Background (L1 vs. L2) | Number of Correlations (k) | r | 95% CI (r) |
Chinese, Taipei | Chinese L1 | 7 | 0.50 | 0.43, 0.53 |
Chinese L2 | 1 | 0.76 | N.A. | |
HK, China | Chinese L1 | 20 | 0.40 | 0.36, 0.43 |
Chinese L2 | 3 | 0.51 | 0.24, 0.70 | |
mainland China | Chinese L1 | 43 | 0.32 | 0.29, 0.36 |
Chinese L2 | 1 | 0.28 | N.A. | |
Singapore | Chinese L1 | 2 | 0.60 | 0.50, 0.69 |
Chinese L2 | 2 | 0.47 | 0.11, 0.71 | |
Non-immersive | Chinese L2 | 8 | 0.37 | 0.26, 0.47 |
CMA-v. | ||||
Chinese Culture Context | Chinese Language Background (L1 vs. L2) | Number of Correlations (k) | r | 95% CI (r) |
Chinese, Taipei | Chinese L1 | 6 | 0.54 | 0.44, 0.63 |
HK, China | Chinese L1 | 48 | 0.39 | 0.35, 0.43 |
Chinese L2 | 1 | −0.01 | N.A. | |
mainland China | Chinese L1 | 71 | 0.39 | 0.36, 0.41 |
Chinese L2 | 14 | 0.52 | 0.46, 0.57 | |
Singapore | Chinese L1 | 1 | 0.42 | 0.29, 0.53 |
Chinese L2 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.19, 0.60 | |
Non-immersive | Chinese L2 | 13 | 0.38 | 0.28, 0.47 |
CMA-r.c. | ||||
Chinese Culture Context | Chinese Language Background (L1 vs. L2) | Number of Correlations (k) | r | 95% CI (r) |
Chinese, Taipei | Chinese L1 | 1 | 0.63 | N.A. |
HK, China | Chinese L1 | 19 | 0.39 | 0.35, 0.44 |
Chinese L2 | 1 | 0.80 | N.A. | |
mainland China | Chinese L1 | 69 | 0.34 | 0.31, 0.37 |
Chinese L2 | 10 | 0.44 | 0.35, 0.52 | |
Singapore | Chinese L1 | 1 | 0.61 | N.A. |
Chinese L2 | 2 | 0.46 | 0.37, 0.54 | |
Non-immersive | Chinese L2 | 7 | 0.37 | 0.27, 0.46 |
