Table 2 Description of the Included Studies on the Ovisankina Effect and Averaged Effect Sizes Across Conditions.

From: Interruption, recall and resumption: a meta-analysis of the Zeigarnik and Ovsiankina effects

Author Year

Sample

Sample Description

Nr. Tasks

Task

Resumption Rate

Birk et al., 2020

875

Online-Sample

1

Bejeweld Online Game

73.85%

Liberman et al., 1999

351

Students

3

Describing three figures

63.47%

Reeve et al., 1986

181

Students

5

Puzzles

62.97%

McGraw and Fiala, 1982

40

Students

1

Jiggsaw Puzzle

72.70%

Malerstein, 1969

50

Staff members, hospitalized alcoholics, Korsakoff patients

1

Puzzle

56.94%

Bechtel and Sroka, 1966

178

Students

1

Stringing 25 beads

49.91%

Sternlicht and Wanderer, 1966

90

Students

6

Heterogenous Tasks

60.33%

Weiner, 1965

25

Students

10

Tracing geometrical forms

48.00%

Gordon and Thurlow, 1958

32

Children

6

Heterogenous Tasks

75.00%

Rösler, 1955

224

Healthy children, children with mental disability

16–22

Heterogenous Tasks

35.54%

Henle and Aull, 1953

20

Students

1

Puzzle

100.00%

Henle, 1944

38

NA

1

Heterogenous Tasks

61.00%

Chorus, 1942

9

Helthy children, children with hyperactivity disorder

1

Tracing a figure

44.44%

Henle, 1942

241

Students

1

Heterogenous Tasks

67.06%

Nowlis, 1941

180

Students

1

Puzzle

70.50%

Rethlingshafer, 1941

99

Students, Children, Persons with mental disabilities

11

Heterogenous Tasks

72.67%

Adler and Kounin, 1939

22

Children

1

Build a toy house

91.00%

Katz, 1938

177

Children

6

Heterogenous Tasks

88.67%

Rickers-Ovsiankina, 1937

169

Adults, Persons with schizophrenia

5

Heterogenous Tasks

61.42%

Mahler, 1933

155

Children, Adults

1–12

Heterogenous Tasks

77.59%

Ovsiankina, 1928

28

Students, Children, Adults

8–12

Heterogenous Tasks

91.00%

  1. For the Ovsiankina effect, only the first experiment is presented.