Table 7 Analysis of cultural heterogeneity among green investors and alliance partners.

From: Environmental protection strategic alliance and enterprise green innovation

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

 

Ginv

Ginv

Ginv

Ginv

 

There are green investors

No green investors

Alliance partner cooperation culture is strong

Alliance partner cooperation culture is weak

GAlliance

0.076* (1.87)

0.037* (1.65)

0.140** (2.47)

−0.002 (−0.04)

Size

0.034 (1.30)

0.043*** (5.68)

−0.104** (−2.30)

−0.099* (−1.74)

LEV

0.064 (0.82)

−0.013 (−0.47)

−0.051 (−0.22)

0.236 (1.21)

ROA

−0.220 (−1.33)

−0.049 (−0.72)

1.036 (1.62)

−0.401 (−0.72)

TOP1

−0.000 (−0.04)

−0.000 (−0.49)

0.004 (1.21)

0.007 (1.21)

Mshare

0.001 (1.04)

0.001* (1.67)

0.007* (1.76)

−0.000 (−0.05)

Board

0.025 (0.36)

−0.030 (−1.01)

−0.081 (−0.41)

0.092 (0.43)

Loss

−0.060* (−1.92)

−0.010 (−0.93)

0.104 (0.95)

−0.046 (−0.52)

Balance1

−0.032 (−0.50)

−0.007 (−0.29)

0.160 (1.17)

0.134 (0.81)

_cons

−0.556 (−0.94)

−0.818*** (−4.47)

1.774* (1.79)

2.248* (1.90)

Test for differences between groups

−0.021***

0.080***

N

14,270

22,793

877

599

r2

0.079

0.034

0.177

0.119

  1. Table 7 depicts the impact of environmentally conscious shareholders and collaborative alliance culture on the relationship between environmental protection strategic partnerships and a firm’s green innovation efforts. Columns (1) and (2) present the differences in green investor shareholdings. Column (1) reveals how strategic environmental alliances influence green innovation in situations involving green investors as shareholders, while Column (2) shows this influence in situations without shareholder participation from green investors. Columns (3) and (4) present the variability in cooperation culture among alliance partners. Column (3) reveals how environmental protection strategic alliances affect green innovation under conditions of a highly collaborative culture among alliance members, while Column (4) shows the same relationship when partners exhibit a relatively weaker collaborative culture. Asterisks indicate the significance levels: *10%, **5%, and ***1%. Corresponding t-values are shown in parentheses.