Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. humanities and social sciences communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Driving circular economy transformation through technological innovation: the moderating role of regulatory environment, human capital, and technological capacity
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 December 2025

Driving circular economy transformation through technological innovation: the moderating role of regulatory environment, human capital, and technological capacity

  • Mohammed Ibrahim Gariba1,
  • samuel Amponsah Odei1,
  • Emmanuel Ebo Arthur1 &
  • …
  • Ivan soukal1 

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , Article number:  (2025) Cite this article

  • 2174 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Economics
  • Environmental studies
  • Information systems and information technology

Abstract

Addressing the urgent issues of climate change, resource scarcity, and environmental deterioration necessitates a shift toward a circular economy. However, there is a lack of research on the circumstances under which technological advancements influence the circular economy. This study explores the connection between technological innovation and the circular economy in the context of OECD economies, emphasizing the moderating effects of regulatory environment, human capital, and technological capacity. Utilizing the endogenous growth theory, we develop and evaluate a model using annual data from 37 OECD countries comprising 692 country-year observations from 2000 to 2022. Employing a panel fixed-effects regression model with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, instrumental variable estimation, and quantile regression, our findings based on the instrumental variable model indicate that technological innovation is positively and significantly associated with the circular economy indicator, indicating deteriorating circular performance as patenting activities increase. Although the quadratic term is negative and statistically significant, the marginal effects remain positive across the observed range, revealing a concave relationship in which the adverse environmental effects of technological innovation persist but diminish in magnitude at higher levels of technological innovation. The results further show that technological capacity positively moderates the relationship between technological innovation and the circular economy, whereas human capital has a negative moderating effect. Finally, environmental regulation strengthens the positive impact of technological innovation on a circular economy. The findings differ across the fixed effects and quantile regression models, highlighting the context-specific nature of the results and the importance of addressing endogeneity and distributional effects. Our results contribute to the theoretical understanding of the interplay between technological innovation and the circular economy, underscoring the significance of contextual factors. Practical implications for policymakers and businesses include prioritizing funding programs and incentives for sustainable technologies, monitoring innovation efforts, and creating a supportive regulatory landscape that encourages circular economy practices, while minimizing bureaucratic barriers.

Similar content being viewed by others

Theoretical relationship between circular economy and social innovation from a sustainable development perspective

Article Open access 30 September 2025

How does the circular economy achieve social change? Assessment in terms of sustainable development goals

Article Open access 29 May 2024

Stakeholders’ perceptions of and willingness to pay for circular economy in the construction sector

Article Open access 24 October 2024

Data availability

The data for this study are secondary-sourced and openly available on public repositories.

References

  • Abubakar AA, Al-Mamary YH, Singh HP, Singh A, Alam F, Agrawal V (2024) Exploring factors influencing sustainable human capital development: Insights from Saudi Arabia. Heliyon, 10

  • Adao B, Narajabad B, Temzelides T (2024) Renewable technology adoption costs and economic growth. Energy Econ 129:107255

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadova G, Delgado-Márquez BL, Pedauga LE, Leyva-de la Hiz DI (2022) Too good to be true: The inverted U-shaped relationship between home-country digitalization and environmental performance. Ecol Econ 196:107393

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand S, Sen A (2000) The income component of the human development index. J Hum Dev 1:83–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, DA, 2019. Environmental economics and natural resource management. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi D, Coco A (2004) A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Dev 32:629–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Arruda EH, Melatto RAPB, Levy W, de Melo Conti D (2021) Circular economy: a brief literature review (2015–2020). Sustain Oper Comput 2:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur EE, Gyamfi S, Gerstlberger W, Stejskal J, Prokop V (2023) Towards circular economy: unveiling heterogeneous effects of government policy stringency, environmentally related innovation, and human capital within OECD countries. Sustainability 15:4959

    Google Scholar 

  • Bag S, Dhamija P, Bryde DJ, Singh RK (2022) Effect of eco-innovation on green supply chain management, circular economy capability, and performance of small and medium enterprises. J Bus Res 141:60–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai X, Wang KT, Tran TK, Sadiq M, Trung LM, Khudoykulov K (2022) Measuring China’s green economic recovery and energy environment sustainability: econometric analysis of sustainable development goals. Econ Anal Policy 75:768–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Blichfeldt H, Faullant R (2021) Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation–a process-industry perspective. Technovation 105:102275

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadstock DC, Li J, Zhang D (2016) Efficiency snakes and energy ladders: A (meta-) frontier demand analysis of electricity consumption efficiency in Chinese households. Energy Policy 91:383–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantisani A (2006) Technological innovation processes revisited. Technovation 26:1294–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Cezarino LO, de Queiroz Murad M, Resende PV, Sales WF (2020) Being green makes me greener? An evaluation of sustainability rebound effects. J Clean Prod 269:121436

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan C, Parida V, Dhir A (2022) Linking circular economy and digitalization technologies: a systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Technol Forecast Soc Change 177:121508

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciaffi G, Deleidi M, Mazzucato M (2024) Measuring the macroeconomic responses to public investment in innovation: evidence from OECD countries. Ind Corp Change 33:363–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsatea TD (2014) Technological capabilities for innovation activities across Europe: evidence from wind, solar and bioenergy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 37:469–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantas TET, de-Souza ED, Destro IR, Hammes G, Rodriguez CMT, Soares SR (2021) How the combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain Prod Consum 26:213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Daoud JI (2017) Multicollinearity and regression analysis. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 949, p. 012009). IOP Publishing

  • De Fuentes C, Dutrenit G, Santiago F, Gras N (2015) Determinants of innovation and productivity in the service sector in Mexico. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 51:578–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewick P, Bengtsson M, Cohen MJ, Sarkis J, Schröder P (2020) Circular economy finance: clear winner or risky proposition?. J Ind Ecol 24:1192–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maio F, Rem PC, Baldé K, Polder M (2017) Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: a market value approach. Resour, Conserv Recycling 122:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Donbesuur F, Ampong GOA, Owusu-Yirenkyi D, Chu I (2020) Technological innovation, organizational innovation, and international performance of SMEs: The moderating role of domestic institutional environment. Technol Forecast Soc Change 161:120252

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunyo SK, Odei SA, Chaiwet W (2024) Relationship between CO2 emissions, technological innovation, and energy intensity: Moderating effects of economic and political uncertainty. J Clean Prod 440:140904

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi A, Sassanelli C, Agrawal D, Gonzalez ES, D’Adamo I (2023) Technological innovation toward sustainability in manufacturing organizations: a circular economy perspective. Sustain Chem Pharm 35:101211

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia V, Gnoni MG, Tornese F (2017) Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. J Clean Prod 142:2741–2751

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercan T (2019) Building the link between technological capacity strategies and innovation in construction companies. Sustainable Manage. Pract

  • Erdiaw-Kwasie MO, Owusu-Ansah KK, Abunyewah M (2024) Amplifying circular technological innovation for low greenhouse emissions: Empirical evidence from 30 advanced and emerging economies Sustain Dev 32(4):3708–3721

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Z, Yu J (2020) The role of human capital in energy-growth nexus: international evidence. Empir Econ 58:1225–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando Y, Jabbour CJC, Wah WX (2019) Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: does service capability matter?. Resour Conserv Recycling 141:8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Font Vivanco D, Freire-González J, Galvin R, Santarius T, Walnum HJ, Makov T, Sala S (2022) Rebound effect and sustainability science: a review. J Ind Ecol 26:1543–1563

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti M, Salini S, Verdolini E (2020) Measuring environmental policy stringency: Approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy 136:111052

    Google Scholar 

  • Gariba MI, Prokop V (2024) Does women in politics and income inequality affect social and economic well-being? Insights from OECD countries. J Knowledge Economy, 1-22

  • Gariba MI, Odei SA, Febiri F, Provazníková R (2024) Exploring the mediating role of digital economy in the relationship between fiscal decentralization and the SDGs dimensions in the EU. Cogent Econ Financ 12:2367219

    Google Scholar 

  • Gariba MI, Rehman FU, Prokop V, Giglio C (2024) Be digital to be sustainable! The mediating role of sustainable supply chain practices in triggering the effects of digitalisation on Sustainable Development Goals in the European Union. Oeconomia Copernicana 15:1383–1425

    Google Scholar 

  • He P, Zhang S, Wang L, Ning J (2023) Will environmental taxes help to mitigate climate change? A comparative study based on OECD countries. Econ Anal Policy 78:1440–1464

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (2000) Policies to foster human capital. Res Econ 54:3–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati A, Rashidghalam M (2021) Assessment of the urban circular economy in Sweden. J Clean Prod 310:127475

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille E, Althammer W, Diederich H (2020) Environmental regulation and innovation in renewable energy technologies: does the policy instrument matter?. Technol Forecast Soc Change 153:119921

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu GG (2021) Is knowledge spillover from human capital investment a catalyst for technological innovation? The curious case of fourth industrial revolution in BRICS economies. Technol Forecast Soc change 162: 120327

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbens GW, Kolesar M (2016) Robust standard errors in small samples: Some practical advice. Rev Econ Stat 98:701–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbour CJC, Sarkis J, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Renwick DWS, Singh SK, Grebinevych O, Godinho Filho M (2019) Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the ‘human side’of the circular economy. J Clean Prod 222:793–801

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez M, Matus JA, Martínez MA (2014) Economic growth as a function of human capital, internet, and work. Appl Econ 46:3202–3210

    Google Scholar 

  • Junsheng H, Mu Y, Masud MM, Akhtar R, Saif ANM, Islam KM, Hafiz N (2024) Navigating the nexus: unraveling technological innovation, economic growth, trade openness, ICT, and CO2 emissions through symmetric and asymmetric analysis. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Chenggang Y, Hussain J, Kui Z (2021) Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and the environment in belt & Road Initiative countries. Renew Energy 171:479–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan K, Khurshid A (2024) Are technology innovation and circular economy remedy for emissions? Evidence from the Netherlands. Environ, Dev Sustain 26:1435–1449

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Piprani AZ, Yu Z (2022) Digital technology and circular economy practices: future of supply chains. Oper Manag Res 15:676–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Khayyat NT, Lee JD (2015) A measure of technological capabilities for developing countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 92:210–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SK (2014) Explicit design of innovation performance metrics by using analytic hierarchy process expansion. Int J Math Math Sci 2014:125950

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripfganz S, Sarafidis V (2021) Instrumental-variable estimation of large-T panel-data models with common factors. Stata J 21:659–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange S, Pohl J, Santarius T (2020) Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?. Ecol Econ 176:106760

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskurain-Iturbe I, Arana-Landín G, Landeta-Manzano B, Uriarte-Gallastegi N (2021) Exploring the influence of industry 4.0 technologies on the circular economy. J Clean Prod 321:128944

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Lee H (2016) Human capital in the long run. J Dev Econ 122:147–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann C, Cruz-Jesus F, Oliveira T, Damásio B (2022) Leveraging the circular economy: Investment and innovation as drivers. J Clean Prod 360:132146

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zou H, Coffman DM, Mi Z, Du H (2024) The synergistic impact of incentive and regulatory environmental policies on firms’ environmental performance. J Environ Manag 365:121646

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Luan R (2020) Do government subsidies promote efficiency in technological innovation of China’s photovoltaic enterprises?. J Clean Prod 254:120108

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling Guo L, Qu Y, Tseng ML (2017) The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. J Clean Prod 162:894–902

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur E (2013) Towards the circular economy. J Ind Ecol 2:23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariz-Pérez RM, Teijeiro-Álvarez MM, García-Álvarez MT (2012) The relevance of human capital as a driver for innovation. Cuad de Econía 35:68–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrucci L, Daddi T, Iraldo F (2021) The contribution of green human resource management to the circular economy and performance of environmental certified organizations. J Clean Prod 319:128859

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Sunley P (1998) Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development. Econ Geogr 74:201–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer KE, VanWitteloostuijn A, Beugelsdijk S (2019) What’s in ap? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Research Methods in International Business. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 77–110 In

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohtashami Z, Aghsami A, Jolai F (2020) A green closed loop supply chain design using queuing system for reducing environmental impact and energy consumption. J Clean Prod 242:118452

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraga G, Huysveld S, Mathieux F, Blengini GA, Alaerts L, Van Acker K, Dewulf J (2019) Circular economy indicators: What do they measure?. Resour Conserv Recycling 146:452–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy S, Fortunato E, Martins R (2022) Green economy and waste management: An inevitable plan for materials science. Prog Nat Sci: Mater Int 32:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir MH, Zhang S (2024) Evaluating innovative factors of the global innovation index: A panel data approach. Innov Green Dev 3:100096

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro Zapata A, Arrazola M, de Hevia J (2024) Determinants of high-tech exports: New evidence from OECD countries. J Knowl Econ 15:1103–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Norkutė M, Sarafidis V, Yamagata T, Cui G (2021) Instrumental variable estimation of dynamic linear panel data models with defactored regressors and a multifactor error structure. J Econ 220:416–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Odei SA, Soukal I (2024) Business strategies, bureaucratic ties, and firms’ innovation novelty: insights from the World Bank enterprise survey. J Innov Entrep 13: 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Odei SA, Stejskal J, Prokop V (2021) Revisiting the factors driving firms’ innovation performances: The case of Visegrad countries. J Knowl Econ 12:1331–1344

    Google Scholar 

  • Odei SA, Dunyo SK, Anderson HJ (2025) Research and development, economic growth, CO2 emissions and environmental Kuznets curve. Sustain Futures 9:100541

    Google Scholar 

  • Odei SA, Adomako S (2025) The moderating role of financial institution development in the technological innovation and carbon emissions relationship: an effect size perspective. J Environ Manag 393:127154

    Google Scholar 

  • Oluwatobi SO, Ogunrinola IO (2011) Government expenditure on human capital development: Implications for economic growth in Nigeria. J Sustain Dev 4:72

    Google Scholar 

  • Omri A (2020) Technological innovation and sustainable development: Does the stage of development matter?. Environ Impact Assess Rev 83: 106398

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagoropoulos A, Pigosso DC, McAloone TC (2017) The emergent role of digital technologies in the Circular Economy: A review. Procedia cirp 64:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Parchomenko A, Nelen D, Gillabel J, Rechberger H (2019) Measuring the circular economy-a Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics. J Clean Prod 210:200–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires A, Martinho G (2019) Waste hierarchy index for circular economy in waste management. Waste Manag 95:298–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Nair M, Bennett SE (2020) The dynamics among entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth in the Eurozone countries. J Policy Modeling 42:1106–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior T, Giurco D, Mudd G, Mason L, Behrisch J (2012) Resource depletion, peak minerals, and the implications for sustainable resource management. Glob Environ Change 22:577–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghupathi V, Raghupathi W (2017) Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents. J Innov Entrep 6:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj A, Dwivedi G, Sharma A, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Rajak S (2020) Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: an inter-country comparative perspective. Int J Prod Econ 224:107546

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R, He Q, Black A, Ghobadian A, Gallear D (2017) Environmental regulations, innovation, and firm performance: a revisit of the Porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 155:79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid S, Malik SH (2023) Transition from a Linear to a Circular Economy. In Renewable Energy in Circular Economy (pp. 1-20). Cham: Springer International Publishing

  • Rehman Khan SA, Yu Z, Sarwat S, Godil DI, Amin S, Shujaat S (2022) The role of block chain technology in circular economy practices to improve organizational performance. Int J Logist Res Appl 25:605–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren Q, Albrecht J (2023) Toward circular economy: The impact of policy instruments on circular economy innovation for European small medium enterprises. Ecol Econ 207:107761

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Espíndola O, Cuevas-Romo A, Chowdhury S, Díaz-Acevedo N, Albores P, Despoudi S, Dey P (2022) The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: evidence from Mexican SMEs. Int J Prod Econ 248:108495

    Google Scholar 

  • Romli A, Prickett P, Setchi R, Soe S (2015) Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development. Int J Prod Res 53:549–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisu Y, Bakar LJA (2019) Technological capability, relational capability and firms’ performance: The role of learning capability. Rev de Gestão 27:79–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-García E, Martínez-Falcó J, Marco-Lajara B, Manresa-Marhuenda E (2024) Revolutionizing the circular economy through new technologies: a new era of sustainable progress. Environ Technol Innov 33:103509

    Google Scholar 

  • Schandl H, Hatfield-Dodds S, Wiedmann T, Geschke A, Cai Y, West J, Owen A (2016) Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 132:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Jr Schmitz JA (1989) Imitation, entrepreneurship, and long-run growth. J Political Econ 97(3):721–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Sianesi B, Van Reenen J (2003) The returns to education: macroeconomics. J Econ Surv 17:157–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Škrinjarić T (2020) Empirical assessment of the circular economy of selected European countries. J Clean Prod 255: 120246

    Google Scholar 

  • Smol M, Kulczycka J, Avdiushchenko A (2017) Circular economy indicators in relation to eco-innovation in European regions. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:669–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Su C, Urban F (2021) Circular economy for clean energy transitions: a new opportunity under the COVID-19 pandemic. Appl Energy 289:116666

    Google Scholar 

  • Su Y, Fan QM (2022) Renewable energy technology innovation, industrial structure upgrading and green development from the perspective of China’s provinces. Technol Forecast Soc Change 180:121727

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun P, Li S, Zhou K (2021a) Carbon emission and endogenous growth between two economic systems Front Energy Res 9:652832

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Edziah BK, Kporsu AK, Sarkodie SA, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2021b) Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover Technol Forecast Soc Change 167:120659

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang D, Li Y, Zheng H, Yuan X (2022) Government R&D spending, fiscal instruments and corporate technological innovation. China J Account Res 15:100250

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira AA, Queirós AS (2016) Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis. Res Policy 45:1636–1648

  • Twum FA, Long X, Salman M, Mensah CN, Kankam WA, Tachie AK (2021) The influence of technological innovation and human capital on environmental efficiency among different regions in Asia-Pacific. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:17119–17131

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Schandl H, Wang X, Ma F, Yue Q, Wang G, Zheng R (2020) Measuring progress of China’s circular economy. Resour, Conserv Recycling 163:105070

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Cui D, Dong Y (2023) Study on the impact of business environment on private enterprises’ technological innovation from the perspective of transaction cost. Innov Green Dev 2:100034

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Ma Z, Zhuo S (2017) Enhancing national innovative capacity: The impact of high-tech international trade and inward foreign direct investment. Int Bus Rev 26:502–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong F, Zang L, Gao Y (2022) Internet penetration as national innovation capacity: worldwide evidence on the impact of ICTs on innovation development. Inf Technol Dev 28:39–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuhua H, Larbi-Siaw O, Thompson ET (2023) Diminishing returns or inverted U? The curvilinear relationship between eco-innovation and firms’ sustainable business performance: the impact of market turbulence. Kybernetes 53:4723–4746

  • Yao Y, Ivanovski K, Inekwe J, Smyth R (2019) Human capital and energy consumption: Evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ 84:104534

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Wang J, Hou J, Yu B, Pan Y (2023) The effect of economic growth pressure on green technology innovation: Do environmental regulation, government support, and financial development matter?. J Environ Manag 330:117172

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Zhang Y (2020) Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: the moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement. J Clean Prod 243:118543

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Zheng M, Feng GF, Chang CP (2022) Does an environmental policy bring to green innovation in renewable energy?. Renew Energy 195:1113–1124

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Li S (2023) The impact of human capital on green technology innovation—moderating role of environmental regulations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20:4803

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou A, Li J (2022) How do trade liberalization and human capital affect renewable energy consumption? Evidence from the panel threshold model. Renew Energy 184:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Li G, Wang Q, Zhou D (2024) U-shaped relationship between digitalization and low-carbon economy efficiency: Mediation and spillover effects. J Clean Prod 458:142535

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The article is supported by the Excellence project no. 2206 at the Faculty of Informatics and Management of the University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

    Mohammed Ibrahim Gariba, samuel Amponsah Odei, Emmanuel Ebo Arthur & Ivan soukal

Authors
  1. Mohammed Ibrahim Gariba
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. samuel Amponsah Odei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emmanuel Ebo Arthur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ivan soukal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MIG and EEA conceived and designed the study and completed the original manuscript. MIG, EEA, SOA, and IS completed the methodology and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohammed Ibrahim Gariba, samuel Amponsah Odei, Emmanuel Ebo Arthur or Ivan soukal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not include any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Ethical approval was not required as the study did not involve human participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gariba, M.I., Odei, s.A., Arthur, E.E. et al. Driving circular economy transformation through technological innovation: the moderating role of regulatory environment, human capital, and technological capacity. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06414-2

Download citation

  • Received: 17 February 2025

  • Accepted: 03 December 2025

  • Published: 27 December 2025

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06414-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Referee instructions
  • Editor instructions
  • Journal policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Events
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (Humanit Soc Sci Commun)

ISSN 2662-9992 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited