Abstract
Addressing the urgent issues of climate change, resource scarcity, and environmental deterioration necessitates a shift toward a circular economy. However, there is a lack of research on the circumstances under which technological advancements influence the circular economy. This study explores the connection between technological innovation and the circular economy in the context of OECD economies, emphasizing the moderating effects of regulatory environment, human capital, and technological capacity. Utilizing the endogenous growth theory, we develop and evaluate a model using annual data from 37 OECD countries comprising 692 country-year observations from 2000 to 2022. Employing a panel fixed-effects regression model with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, instrumental variable estimation, and quantile regression, our findings based on the instrumental variable model indicate that technological innovation is positively and significantly associated with the circular economy indicator, indicating deteriorating circular performance as patenting activities increase. Although the quadratic term is negative and statistically significant, the marginal effects remain positive across the observed range, revealing a concave relationship in which the adverse environmental effects of technological innovation persist but diminish in magnitude at higher levels of technological innovation. The results further show that technological capacity positively moderates the relationship between technological innovation and the circular economy, whereas human capital has a negative moderating effect. Finally, environmental regulation strengthens the positive impact of technological innovation on a circular economy. The findings differ across the fixed effects and quantile regression models, highlighting the context-specific nature of the results and the importance of addressing endogeneity and distributional effects. Our results contribute to the theoretical understanding of the interplay between technological innovation and the circular economy, underscoring the significance of contextual factors. Practical implications for policymakers and businesses include prioritizing funding programs and incentives for sustainable technologies, monitoring innovation efforts, and creating a supportive regulatory landscape that encourages circular economy practices, while minimizing bureaucratic barriers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data for this study are secondary-sourced and openly available on public repositories.
References
Abubakar AA, Al-Mamary YH, Singh HP, Singh A, Alam F, Agrawal V (2024) Exploring factors influencing sustainable human capital development: Insights from Saudi Arabia. Heliyon, 10
Adao B, Narajabad B, Temzelides T (2024) Renewable technology adoption costs and economic growth. Energy Econ 129:107255
Ahmadova G, Delgado-Márquez BL, Pedauga LE, Leyva-de la Hiz DI (2022) Too good to be true: The inverted U-shaped relationship between home-country digitalization and environmental performance. Ecol Econ 196:107393
Anand S, Sen A (2000) The income component of the human development index. J Hum Dev 1:83–106
Anderson, DA, 2019. Environmental economics and natural resource management. Routledge
Archibugi D, Coco A (2004) A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Dev 32:629–654
Arruda EH, Melatto RAPB, Levy W, de Melo Conti D (2021) Circular economy: a brief literature review (2015–2020). Sustain Oper Comput 2:79–86
Arthur EE, Gyamfi S, Gerstlberger W, Stejskal J, Prokop V (2023) Towards circular economy: unveiling heterogeneous effects of government policy stringency, environmentally related innovation, and human capital within OECD countries. Sustainability 15:4959
Bag S, Dhamija P, Bryde DJ, Singh RK (2022) Effect of eco-innovation on green supply chain management, circular economy capability, and performance of small and medium enterprises. J Bus Res 141:60–72
Bai X, Wang KT, Tran TK, Sadiq M, Trung LM, Khudoykulov K (2022) Measuring China’s green economic recovery and energy environment sustainability: econometric analysis of sustainable development goals. Econ Anal Policy 75:768–779
Blichfeldt H, Faullant R (2021) Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation–a process-industry perspective. Technovation 105:102275
Broadstock DC, Li J, Zhang D (2016) Efficiency snakes and energy ladders: A (meta-) frontier demand analysis of electricity consumption efficiency in Chinese households. Energy Policy 91:383–396
Cantisani A (2006) Technological innovation processes revisited. Technovation 26:1294–1301
Cezarino LO, de Queiroz Murad M, Resende PV, Sales WF (2020) Being green makes me greener? An evaluation of sustainability rebound effects. J Clean Prod 269:121436
Chauhan C, Parida V, Dhir A (2022) Linking circular economy and digitalization technologies: a systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Technol Forecast Soc Change 177:121508
Ciaffi G, Deleidi M, Mazzucato M (2024) Measuring the macroeconomic responses to public investment in innovation: evidence from OECD countries. Ind Corp Change 33:363–382
Corsatea TD (2014) Technological capabilities for innovation activities across Europe: evidence from wind, solar and bioenergy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 37:469–479
Dantas TET, de-Souza ED, Destro IR, Hammes G, Rodriguez CMT, Soares SR (2021) How the combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain Prod Consum 26:213–227
Daoud JI (2017) Multicollinearity and regression analysis. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 949, p. 012009). IOP Publishing
De Fuentes C, Dutrenit G, Santiago F, Gras N (2015) Determinants of innovation and productivity in the service sector in Mexico. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 51:578–592
Dewick P, Bengtsson M, Cohen MJ, Sarkis J, Schröder P (2020) Circular economy finance: clear winner or risky proposition?. J Ind Ecol 24:1192–1200
Di Maio F, Rem PC, Baldé K, Polder M (2017) Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: a market value approach. Resour, Conserv Recycling 122:163–171
Donbesuur F, Ampong GOA, Owusu-Yirenkyi D, Chu I (2020) Technological innovation, organizational innovation, and international performance of SMEs: The moderating role of domestic institutional environment. Technol Forecast Soc Change 161:120252
Dunyo SK, Odei SA, Chaiwet W (2024) Relationship between CO2 emissions, technological innovation, and energy intensity: Moderating effects of economic and political uncertainty. J Clean Prod 440:140904
Dwivedi A, Sassanelli C, Agrawal D, Gonzalez ES, D’Adamo I (2023) Technological innovation toward sustainability in manufacturing organizations: a circular economy perspective. Sustain Chem Pharm 35:101211
Elia V, Gnoni MG, Tornese F (2017) Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. J Clean Prod 142:2741–2751
Ercan T (2019) Building the link between technological capacity strategies and innovation in construction companies. Sustainable Manage. Pract
Erdiaw-Kwasie MO, Owusu-Ansah KK, Abunyewah M (2024) Amplifying circular technological innovation for low greenhouse emissions: Empirical evidence from 30 advanced and emerging economies Sustain Dev 32(4):3708–3721
Fang Z, Yu J (2020) The role of human capital in energy-growth nexus: international evidence. Empir Econ 58:1225–1247
Fernando Y, Jabbour CJC, Wah WX (2019) Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: does service capability matter?. Resour Conserv Recycling 141:8–20
Font Vivanco D, Freire-González J, Galvin R, Santarius T, Walnum HJ, Makov T, Sala S (2022) Rebound effect and sustainability science: a review. J Ind Ecol 26:1543–1563
Galeotti M, Salini S, Verdolini E (2020) Measuring environmental policy stringency: Approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy 136:111052
Gariba MI, Prokop V (2024) Does women in politics and income inequality affect social and economic well-being? Insights from OECD countries. J Knowledge Economy, 1-22
Gariba MI, Odei SA, Febiri F, Provazníková R (2024) Exploring the mediating role of digital economy in the relationship between fiscal decentralization and the SDGs dimensions in the EU. Cogent Econ Financ 12:2367219
Gariba MI, Rehman FU, Prokop V, Giglio C (2024) Be digital to be sustainable! The mediating role of sustainable supply chain practices in triggering the effects of digitalisation on Sustainable Development Goals in the European Union. Oeconomia Copernicana 15:1383–1425
He P, Zhang S, Wang L, Ning J (2023) Will environmental taxes help to mitigate climate change? A comparative study based on OECD countries. Econ Anal Policy 78:1440–1464
Heckman JJ (2000) Policies to foster human capital. Res Econ 54:3–56
Heshmati A, Rashidghalam M (2021) Assessment of the urban circular economy in Sweden. J Clean Prod 310:127475
Hille E, Althammer W, Diederich H (2020) Environmental regulation and innovation in renewable energy technologies: does the policy instrument matter?. Technol Forecast Soc Change 153:119921
Hu GG (2021) Is knowledge spillover from human capital investment a catalyst for technological innovation? The curious case of fourth industrial revolution in BRICS economies. Technol Forecast Soc change 162: 120327
Imbens GW, Kolesar M (2016) Robust standard errors in small samples: Some practical advice. Rev Econ Stat 98:701–712
Jabbour CJC, Sarkis J, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Renwick DWS, Singh SK, Grebinevych O, Godinho Filho M (2019) Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the ‘human side’of the circular economy. J Clean Prod 222:793–801
Jiménez M, Matus JA, Martínez MA (2014) Economic growth as a function of human capital, internet, and work. Appl Econ 46:3202–3210
Junsheng H, Mu Y, Masud MM, Akhtar R, Saif ANM, Islam KM, Hafiz N (2024) Navigating the nexus: unraveling technological innovation, economic growth, trade openness, ICT, and CO2 emissions through symmetric and asymmetric analysis. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11:1–13
Khan A, Chenggang Y, Hussain J, Kui Z (2021) Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and the environment in belt & Road Initiative countries. Renew Energy 171:479–491
Khan K, Khurshid A (2024) Are technology innovation and circular economy remedy for emissions? Evidence from the Netherlands. Environ, Dev Sustain 26:1435–1449
Khan SAR, Piprani AZ, Yu Z (2022) Digital technology and circular economy practices: future of supply chains. Oper Manag Res 15:676–688
Khayyat NT, Lee JD (2015) A measure of technological capabilities for developing countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 92:210–223
Kim SK (2014) Explicit design of innovation performance metrics by using analytic hierarchy process expansion. Int J Math Math Sci 2014:125950
Kripfganz S, Sarafidis V (2021) Instrumental-variable estimation of large-T panel-data models with common factors. Stata J 21:659–686
Lange S, Pohl J, Santarius T (2020) Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?. Ecol Econ 176:106760
Laskurain-Iturbe I, Arana-Landín G, Landeta-Manzano B, Uriarte-Gallastegi N (2021) Exploring the influence of industry 4.0 technologies on the circular economy. J Clean Prod 321:128944
Lee JW, Lee H (2016) Human capital in the long run. J Dev Econ 122:147–169
Lehmann C, Cruz-Jesus F, Oliveira T, Damásio B (2022) Leveraging the circular economy: Investment and innovation as drivers. J Clean Prod 360:132146
Li P, Zou H, Coffman DM, Mi Z, Du H (2024) The synergistic impact of incentive and regulatory environmental policies on firms’ environmental performance. J Environ Manag 365:121646
Lin B, Luan R (2020) Do government subsidies promote efficiency in technological innovation of China’s photovoltaic enterprises?. J Clean Prod 254:120108
Ling Guo L, Qu Y, Tseng ML (2017) The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. J Clean Prod 162:894–902
MacArthur E (2013) Towards the circular economy. J Ind Ecol 2:23–44
Mariz-Pérez RM, Teijeiro-Álvarez MM, García-Álvarez MT (2012) The relevance of human capital as a driver for innovation. Cuad de Econía 35:68–76
Marrucci L, Daddi T, Iraldo F (2021) The contribution of green human resource management to the circular economy and performance of environmental certified organizations. J Clean Prod 319:128859
Martin R, Sunley P (1998) Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development. Econ Geogr 74:201–227
Meyer KE, VanWitteloostuijn A, Beugelsdijk S (2019) What’s in ap? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Research Methods in International Business. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 77–110 In
Mohtashami Z, Aghsami A, Jolai F (2020) A green closed loop supply chain design using queuing system for reducing environmental impact and energy consumption. J Clean Prod 242:118452
Moraga G, Huysveld S, Mathieux F, Blengini GA, Alaerts L, Van Acker K, Dewulf J (2019) Circular economy indicators: What do they measure?. Resour Conserv Recycling 146:452–461
Nandy S, Fortunato E, Martins R (2022) Green economy and waste management: An inevitable plan for materials science. Prog Nat Sci: Mater Int 32:1–9
Nasir MH, Zhang S (2024) Evaluating innovative factors of the global innovation index: A panel data approach. Innov Green Dev 3:100096
Navarro Zapata A, Arrazola M, de Hevia J (2024) Determinants of high-tech exports: New evidence from OECD countries. J Knowl Econ 15:1103–1117
Norkutė M, Sarafidis V, Yamagata T, Cui G (2021) Instrumental variable estimation of dynamic linear panel data models with defactored regressors and a multifactor error structure. J Econ 220:416–446
Odei SA, Soukal I (2024) Business strategies, bureaucratic ties, and firms’ innovation novelty: insights from the World Bank enterprise survey. J Innov Entrep 13: 63
Odei SA, Stejskal J, Prokop V (2021) Revisiting the factors driving firms’ innovation performances: The case of Visegrad countries. J Knowl Econ 12:1331–1344
Odei SA, Dunyo SK, Anderson HJ (2025) Research and development, economic growth, CO2 emissions and environmental Kuznets curve. Sustain Futures 9:100541
Odei SA, Adomako S (2025) The moderating role of financial institution development in the technological innovation and carbon emissions relationship: an effect size perspective. J Environ Manag 393:127154
Oluwatobi SO, Ogunrinola IO (2011) Government expenditure on human capital development: Implications for economic growth in Nigeria. J Sustain Dev 4:72
Omri A (2020) Technological innovation and sustainable development: Does the stage of development matter?. Environ Impact Assess Rev 83: 106398
Pagoropoulos A, Pigosso DC, McAloone TC (2017) The emergent role of digital technologies in the Circular Economy: A review. Procedia cirp 64:19–24
Parchomenko A, Nelen D, Gillabel J, Rechberger H (2019) Measuring the circular economy-a Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics. J Clean Prod 210:200–216
Pires A, Martinho G (2019) Waste hierarchy index for circular economy in waste management. Waste Manag 95:298–305
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Nair M, Bennett SE (2020) The dynamics among entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth in the Eurozone countries. J Policy Modeling 42:1106–1122
Prior T, Giurco D, Mudd G, Mason L, Behrisch J (2012) Resource depletion, peak minerals, and the implications for sustainable resource management. Glob Environ Change 22:577–587
Raghupathi V, Raghupathi W (2017) Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents. J Innov Entrep 6:1–20
Raj A, Dwivedi G, Sharma A, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Rajak S (2020) Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: an inter-country comparative perspective. Int J Prod Econ 224:107546
Ramanathan R, He Q, Black A, Ghobadian A, Gallear D (2017) Environmental regulations, innovation, and firm performance: a revisit of the Porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 155:79–92
Rashid S, Malik SH (2023) Transition from a Linear to a Circular Economy. In Renewable Energy in Circular Economy (pp. 1-20). Cham: Springer International Publishing
Rehman Khan SA, Yu Z, Sarwat S, Godil DI, Amin S, Shujaat S (2022) The role of block chain technology in circular economy practices to improve organizational performance. Int J Logist Res Appl 25:605–622
Ren Q, Albrecht J (2023) Toward circular economy: The impact of policy instruments on circular economy innovation for European small medium enterprises. Ecol Econ 207:107761
Rodríguez-Espíndola O, Cuevas-Romo A, Chowdhury S, Díaz-Acevedo N, Albores P, Despoudi S, Dey P (2022) The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: evidence from Mexican SMEs. Int J Prod Econ 248:108495
Romli A, Prickett P, Setchi R, Soe S (2015) Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development. Int J Prod Res 53:549–571
Salisu Y, Bakar LJA (2019) Technological capability, relational capability and firms’ performance: The role of learning capability. Rev de Gestão 27:79–99
Sánchez-García E, Martínez-Falcó J, Marco-Lajara B, Manresa-Marhuenda E (2024) Revolutionizing the circular economy through new technologies: a new era of sustainable progress. Environ Technol Innov 33:103509
Schandl H, Hatfield-Dodds S, Wiedmann T, Geschke A, Cai Y, West J, Owen A (2016) Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 132:45–56
Jr Schmitz JA (1989) Imitation, entrepreneurship, and long-run growth. J Political Econ 97(3):721–739
Sianesi B, Van Reenen J (2003) The returns to education: macroeconomics. J Econ Surv 17:157–200
Škrinjarić T (2020) Empirical assessment of the circular economy of selected European countries. J Clean Prod 255: 120246
Smol M, Kulczycka J, Avdiushchenko A (2017) Circular economy indicators in relation to eco-innovation in European regions. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:669–678
Su C, Urban F (2021) Circular economy for clean energy transitions: a new opportunity under the COVID-19 pandemic. Appl Energy 289:116666
Su Y, Fan QM (2022) Renewable energy technology innovation, industrial structure upgrading and green development from the perspective of China’s provinces. Technol Forecast Soc Change 180:121727
Sun P, Li S, Zhou K (2021a) Carbon emission and endogenous growth between two economic systems Front Energy Res 9:652832
Sun H, Edziah BK, Kporsu AK, Sarkodie SA, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2021b) Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover Technol Forecast Soc Change 167:120659
Tang D, Li Y, Zheng H, Yuan X (2022) Government R&D spending, fiscal instruments and corporate technological innovation. China J Account Res 15:100250
Teixeira AA, Queirós AS (2016) Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis. Res Policy 45:1636–1648
Twum FA, Long X, Salman M, Mensah CN, Kankam WA, Tachie AK (2021) The influence of technological innovation and human capital on environmental efficiency among different regions in Asia-Pacific. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:17119–17131
Wang H, Schandl H, Wang X, Ma F, Yue Q, Wang G, Zheng R (2020) Measuring progress of China’s circular economy. Resour, Conserv Recycling 163:105070
Wang N, Cui D, Dong Y (2023) Study on the impact of business environment on private enterprises’ technological innovation from the perspective of transaction cost. Innov Green Dev 2:100034
Wu J, Ma Z, Zhuo S (2017) Enhancing national innovative capacity: The impact of high-tech international trade and inward foreign direct investment. Int Bus Rev 26:502–514
Xiong F, Zang L, Gao Y (2022) Internet penetration as national innovation capacity: worldwide evidence on the impact of ICTs on innovation development. Inf Technol Dev 28:39–55
Xuhua H, Larbi-Siaw O, Thompson ET (2023) Diminishing returns or inverted U? The curvilinear relationship between eco-innovation and firms’ sustainable business performance: the impact of market turbulence. Kybernetes 53:4723–4746
Yao Y, Ivanovski K, Inekwe J, Smyth R (2019) Human capital and energy consumption: Evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ 84:104534
Yu H, Wang J, Hou J, Yu B, Pan Y (2023) The effect of economic growth pressure on green technology innovation: Do environmental regulation, government support, and financial development matter?. J Environ Manag 330:117172
Yuan B, Zhang Y (2020) Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: the moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement. J Clean Prod 243:118543
Zhang D, Zheng M, Feng GF, Chang CP (2022) Does an environmental policy bring to green innovation in renewable energy?. Renew Energy 195:1113–1124
Zhang J, Li S (2023) The impact of human capital on green technology innovation—moderating role of environmental regulations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20:4803
Zhou A, Li J (2022) How do trade liberalization and human capital affect renewable energy consumption? Evidence from the panel threshold model. Renew Energy 184:3
Zhou X, Li G, Wang Q, Zhou D (2024) U-shaped relationship between digitalization and low-carbon economy efficiency: Mediation and spillover effects. J Clean Prod 458:142535
Acknowledgements
The article is supported by the Excellence project no. 2206 at the Faculty of Informatics and Management of the University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MIG and EEA conceived and designed the study and completed the original manuscript. MIG, EEA, SOA, and IS completed the methodology and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This article does not include any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Ethical approval was not required as the study did not involve human participants.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gariba, M.I., Odei, s.A., Arthur, E.E. et al. Driving circular economy transformation through technological innovation: the moderating role of regulatory environment, human capital, and technological capacity. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06414-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06414-2


