Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. humanities and social sciences communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Enabling Agri Energy Justice: Incorporating agricultural and energy justice into utility-scale onshore wind development on agricultural land
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 January 2026

Enabling Agri Energy Justice: Incorporating agricultural and energy justice into utility-scale onshore wind development on agricultural land

  • Madeline Taylor1 &
  • Chris Sounness2 

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Development studies
  • Social policy

Abstract

This study aims to examine the critical socio-legal interaction between agriculture and onshore wind by offering a novel Agri Energy Justice (AEJ) framework. The AEJ Framework builds on existing energy justice conceptualisations and emphasises the significance of addressing agricultural interests and risks as a foundational step for onshore wind development through the unique pillar of ‘nexus justice’. The Australian state of Victoria is undertaking a significant socio-technical energy transition in response to net-zero policies and increasing climate change risks. While immense renewable energy potential exists in Victoria, including onshore wind energy, successful development requires a reoriented strategic approach to co-locate with agriculture and provide a potential blueprint for regions hosting wind development. In examining legal gaps and stakeholder perspectives in the Wimmera Southern Mallee (WSM) region of Victoria, Australia, this study highlights the often-perceived conflicting policy objectives of concurrently achieving energy decarbonisation and agricultural land preservation. We adopt a mixed-methods socio-legal and qualitative approach, including semi-structured interviews with experts from the agricultural and energy sectors in the WSM, to capture critical stakeholder perspectives. Building on existing energy transition literature, we identify several factors and regulatory principles to enable or potentially limit agricultural activity coexistence with onshore wind and identify key themes from semi-structured interviews categorised in the four principles of the AEJ framework. Our proposed AEJ framework introduces a new paradigm recognising agricultural landholders and activities as an essential sociotechnical and legal process relevant to countries aiming to align onshore wind development with agricultural land uses. AEJ can clarify the values embedded in agricultural sectors, reduce social conflicts, enhance economic benefits, and ultimately, lower socio-technical risks associated with onshore wind development. The resulting study provides insights into the need for proactive legal reform to ensure countries prioritising agricultural land uses can simultaneously achieve justice, decarbonisation, and sustained agricultural output enshrined in AEJ principles.

Similar content being viewed by others

On-device AI for climate-resilient farming with intelligent crop yield prediction using lightweight models on smart agricultural devices

Article Open access 25 August 2025

Agricultural carbon footprints, renewable energy and sustainable development in Asia

Article Open access 02 October 2025

Transforming offshore wind farms into synergistic aggregators to enhance renewable integration and grid flexibility—an Eastern China example

Article Open access 08 December 2025

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to participants' privacy and confidentiality requirements, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Agyeman J (2005) Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. New York University Press

  • Albanito F, Roberts S, Shepherd A, Hastings A (2022) Quantifying the land-based opportunity carbon costs of onshore wind farms. J Clean Prod 262: 132480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132480

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkon AH, Agyeman J (2011) Introduction: The food movement as polyculture, in: Cultivating food justice race, class, and sustainability, Alkon, A and Agyeman, J (eds.), Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1–20

  • Australian Agricultural Sustainability Framework (2024) The Framework. https://aasf.org.au/the-framework/ (accessed 28 October 2024)

  • Bacchiocchi E, Sant I, Bates A (2022) Energy justice and the co-opting of indigenous narratives in U.S. offshore wind development. Renew Energy Focus 41:133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2022.02.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S (2022) Theoretical design for ascertaining sustainability of energy systems with special reference to the competing renewable energy schemes. Resour Environ Sustain 7: 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100048

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerling DJ, Kantzas EP, Lomas MR et al. (2025) Transforming US agriculture for carbon removal with enhanced weathering. Nature 638:425–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08429-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessettee D, Mills S (2021) Farmers vs. lakers: Agriculture, amenity, and community in predicting opposition to United States wind energy development. Energy Res Soc Sci 73: 101873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101873

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell D, Sovacoool B (2023) Uneasy tensions in energy justice and systems transformation. Nat Energy 8:317. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01217-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Bégou B, Clement F, Coolsaet B, Darmet L, Gingembre M, Harmáčková ZV, Martin A, Nohlová B, Barnaud C (2024) Conceptualising rural environmental justice in Europe in an age of climate-influenced landscape transformations. J Peasant Stud 110: 103371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103371

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechler S, Martinez-Molina K (2021) Energy justice, renewable energy, and the rural-urban divide: Insights from the Southwest U.S. Energy Clim Change 2:100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100048

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard RD (Ed.). (2005) The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. Sierra Club Books

  • Cambou D (2020) Uncovering injustices in the green transition: Sámi rights in the development of wind energy in Sweden. Arct Rev Law Politics 11:310. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2293

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan M (2020) The rural problem: justice in the countryside. Rural Socio 85(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12278

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan M (2020) The rural problem: Justice in the countryside. Rural Sociol., 85(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12278

  • Celermajer D, Schlosberg D, Rickards L, Stewart-Harawira M, Thaler M, Tschakert P, Verlie B, Winter C (2021) Multispecies justice: Theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics. Environ Polit 30(1–2):119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1827608

    Google Scholar 

  • Chewinski M, Anders S, Parkins JR (2023) Agricultural landowner perspectives on wind energy development in Alberta, Canada: insights from the lens of energy justice and democracy. Environ Sociol 9(4):477–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2023.2247627

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciplet D (2021) From energy privilege to energy justice: A framework for embedded sustainable development. Energy Res Soc Sci 75: 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101996

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin J. Strauss A (2008) Theoretical sampling in: Basics of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications (online)

  • Cownie F (2004) Legal Academics: Culture and Identities. Hart Publishing

  • Crawford J, Bessette D, Mills S (2022) Rallying the anti-crowd: Organized opposition, democratic deficit, and a potential social gap in large-scale solar energy. Energy Res Soc Sci 90: 102597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102597

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis S, Gesler W, Smith G, Washburn S (2000) Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health. Soc Sci Med 50:1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00350-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva G, Parkins J, Sherren K (2021) Do methods used in social impact assessment adequately capture impacts? An exploration of the research-practice gap using hydroelectricity in Canada. Energy Res Soc Sci 39: 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102188

    Google Scholar 

  • De Looze A, Caaat S, Maiello A, Jhagro S, Cuppen E (2024) Temporalities of energy justice: Changing justice conceptions in Dutch energy policy between 1974 and 2022. Energy Pol 191: 114174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114174

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright P, Sherry-Brennan F (2019) Where do you draw the line? Legitimacy and fairness in constructing community benefit fund boundaries for energy infrastructure projects. Energy Res Soc Sci 54:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugstad A, Grimsrud K, Kipperberg G, Lindhjem H, Navrud S (2023) Place attachment and preferences for wind energy – A value-based approach. Energy Res Soc Sci 100: 103094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103094

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupraz C, Marrou H, Talbot G, Dufour L, Nogier A, Ferard Y (2011) Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: Towards new agrivoltaic schemes Renew. Energy 36(10):2725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.00

    Google Scholar 

  • EESC (2024) Wind Power Package. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/news-media/press-summaries/wind-power-package (accessed 3 August 2024)

  • Emmel N (2013) Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications (online)

  • Energy Grid Alliance (2024) https://www.energygridalliance.com.au/6-victorian-renewable-energy-zones-rezs/ (accessed 3 November 2024)

  • Essential Services Commission (2024) Getting to Fair. https://www.esc.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/Getting%20to%20fair_Final%20report_08082024.pdf (accessed 1 December 2024)

  • Freiberg A (2017) Regulation in Australia. 1st ed. Annandale, N.S.W.: Federation Press

  • Garcia I, Guillamon A, Cascales M, Garvia A (2024) Multi-factorial methodology for Wind Power Plant repowering optimization: A Spanish case study. Energy Rep 11:179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.11.044

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan H, Ganesh L (2022) Integrating energy governance and environmental justice: Role of renewable energy. Renew Energy Focus 42:24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2022.08.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso M, Sacchi S (2015) Impure procedural justice in climate governance systems. Environ Values 24(6):777–798. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14420732702699

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso M (2022) Legitimacy and procedural justice: How might stratospheric aerosol injection function in the public interest?. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9:187. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01213-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosse-Heilmann M, Cristiano E, Deidda R, Viola F (2024) Durum wheat productivity today and tomorrow: A review of influencing factors and climate change effects. Resour Environ Sustain 17: 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100170

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18:59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X052799

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall N, Ashworth P, Devine-Wright P (2013) Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Pol 58:200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.009

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeter J, Reames T (2022) Incorporating energy justice into utility-scale photovoltaic deployment: A policy framework. Renew Energy Focus 42:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2022.04.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffron R, De Fontenelle L (2023) Implementing energy justice through a new social contract. J Energy Nat Resour Law 41:141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2023.2186626

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffron RJ, McCauley D (2017) The concept of energy justice across the disciplines. Energy Policy 105:658–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.018

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldeweg M, Saintier S (2020) Renewable energy communities as ‘socio-legal institutions’: A normative frame for energy decentralization?. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 119:109518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109518

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry J, Tatum M, Jorgensen M, Howard-Wagner D (2018) Indigenous Justice. UK: Palgrave Macmillan

  • Herbes C, Rilling B, Holstenkamp L (2021) Ready for new business models? Human and social capital in the management of renewable energy cooperatives in Germany. Energy Pol 156:122417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112417

    Google Scholar 

  • Hielscher S, Wittmayer J, Progscha S, Wientjes A, Sharp H (2025) Speeding-up wind energy developments: Exploring notions of acceleration and justice in regions within Germany and the Netherlands. Energy Res Soc Sci 119: 103909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103909

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner G, Leschinger V, Müller FJY, Pohl J (2023) Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model. Energ Policy 173: 113360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113360

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson T, Duncan N (2012) Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Rev 17(1):84

    Google Scholar 

  • Huybrechts B, Pérez-Suárez M, Sánchez-Torné I, Cobe M (2024) Energy co-operatives in Spain: The role of social enterprises in the energy transition. Futures 160: 103381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2024.103381

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyldmo H, Rye S, Vela-Almeida D (2024) A globally just and inclusive transition? Questioning policy representations of the European Green Deal. Glob Environ Change 89:102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102946

    Google Scholar 

  • International Co-operative Alliance (2025) International Cooperative Alliance. https://ica.coop/en (Accessed: 23 September 2025)

  • Jenkins K, McCauley D, Heffron R, Stephan H, Rehner R (2016) Energy justice: A conceptual review Energy Res Soc Sci 11:174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins KEH, Stephens JC, Reames TG, Hernández D (2020) Towards impactful energy justice research: Transforming the power of academic engagement. Energy Res Soc Sci 67:101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101510

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones DS, Clarke PA. Aboriginal culture and food-landscape relationships In Australia. In Zeunert J, Waterman T (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Landscape and Food, 1st ed., 20. Routledge, London, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647692

  • Jett TR (2020) Fighting for farming justice: Diversity, food accessand the USDA. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429401053

  • Kandy D, Mortberg U, Wretling V, Kuhlefelt A, Bystrom G, Polatidis H, Barney A, Balford B (2024) Spatial multicriteria framework for sustainable wind-farm planning – Accounting for conflicts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 189:113856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113856

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko I (2025) ‘Rural exploitation’ in solar energy development? A field survey experiment in South Korea on solar energy support in ruralareas. Energy Res Soc Sci 119:103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103837

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolapo A, Didunyemi A, Aniyi O, Obembe O (2022) Adoption of multiple sustainable land management practices and its effects on productivity of smallholder maize farmers in Nigeria. Resour Environ Sustain 10:100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100084

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn A, Merk C, Wunsch A (2025) Carbon dioxide removal through ecosystem restoration: Public perceptions and political participation. Ambio 54:57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02063-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai H-L, Devine-Wright P, Hamilton J, Mander S, Clery D, Rattle I, Martin A, Ryder S, Taylor P (2025) A place-based, Just Transition framework can guide industrial decarbonisation with a social licence. Energy Res Soc Sci 121:103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.103967

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer K, Wooliscrof B (2018) The acceptance of wind energy in a leading country and low deployment country of wind energy: A cross-national comparative analysis. Renew Energy Focus 27:111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2018.09.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Leknoi U, Rosset P, Likitlersuang S (2023) Multi-criteria social sustainability assessment of highland maize monoculture in Northern Thailand using the SAFA tool. Resour Environ Sustain 12:100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z, Wang P, Tang L, Wang Z, Mckechnie J, Li B, Chen W-Q, Chan FKS (2025) Public water risk concerns triggered by energy-transition-mineral mining. Resour Environ Sustain 19: 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100196

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Vrachioli M, Li H, Wang Y, Sauer J (2025) Sustainable water and emissions management in agriculture: The water-emissions-food nexus in China. Resour Environ Sustain 19:100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100187

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Nemecio J, Tobon S, Juarez-Hernadez L (2020) Sustainability-based on socioformation and complex thought or sustainable social development. Resour Environ Sustain 2:100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2020.100007

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma N et al (2023) Comprehensive review of food-energy-water nexus at the community scale. J Clean Prod 420:138211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138311

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon M, Woods M, Farrell M, Jones R, Goodwin-Hawkins B (2023) A spatial justice perspective on EU rural sustainability as territorial cohesion. Sociol Ruralis 63:683–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12444

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitre J (2024) Price or public participation? Community benefits for onshore wind in Ireland, Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Res Soc Sci 114:103605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103605

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley D, Heffron R, Stephan H, Jenkins K (2013) Advancing energy justice: the triumvirate of tenets. Int Energy Law Rev 32:107

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrudden C (2006) Legal Research and the Social Sciences. Law Q Rev 122:632

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna R, Lilliestam J, Heinrichs HU, Weinand J, Schmidt J, Staffell I, Hahmann AN, Burgherr P, Burdack A, Bucha M, Chen R, Klingler M, Lehmann P, Lowitzsch J, Novo R, Price J, Sacchi R, Scherhaufer P, Schöll EM, Visconti P, Ramirez Camargo L (2024) System impacts of wind energy developments: Key research challenges and opportunities. Joule 9:101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2024.11.0.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejia-Montero A, Jenkins K, van der Horst D, Lane M (2023) An intersectional approach to energy justice: Individual and collective concerns around wind power on Zapotec land. Energy Res Soc Sci 98: 103015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103015

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton C, Allouche J, Gyawali D, Allen S (2015) The rise and implications of the water-energy-food nexus in Southeast Asia through an environmental justice lens. Water Alter 8(1):627–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Minadakis P, Vega-Araujo J (2024) Rethinking the social license to operate? A theoretical exploration of its synergies with social acceptance and energy justice for a just transition. Energy Res Soc Sci 113:103552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103552

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore L, Clapp J, Anderson M, Broad R, Messer E, Pogge T, Wise T (2013) How we count hunger matters. Ethics Int’l Aff 27:251. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0892679413000191

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson T, Nolan T, Gilmore J (2021) What’s next for the Renewable Energy Target – resolving Australia’s integration of energy and climate change policy?. J Agric Resour Econ 66(1):136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12457

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell P (2022) Climate justice. J Peasant Stud 49(5):915–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2080062

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilson R, Stedman R (2023) Reacting to the Rural Burden: Understanding Opposition to Utility-Scale Solar Development in Upstate New York. Rural Socio 88(2):578–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12486

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy C (2008) Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 11(4):327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan K, Gloubschikov O, Mehmood A (2020) Uneven energy transitions: Understanding continued energy peripheralization in rural communities. Energy Pol 138: 111288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111288

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaks CA (2025) Rural exploitation” in solar energy development? A field survey experiment in South Korea on solar energy support in rural areas. Energy Res Soc Sci 119: 103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103837

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas L et al. (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 42(5):533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey G, Lyden S, Franklin E, Harrison M (2025) Agrivoltaics as an SDG enabler: Trade-offs and co-benefits for food security, energy generation and emissions mitigation. Resour Environ Sustain 19: 100186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100186

    Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Sun-Jin U, Kongjang C (2024) Energy justice: Lessons from offshore wind farm siting conflicts in South Korea. Energ Policy 185: 113972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113972

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellow DN (2016) Environmental justice and rural studies: A critical conversation and invitation to collaboration. J Rural Stud 47:381–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.018

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch T (1996) The social construction of technology: A review, in: Fox, R (ed.) Technological change: Methods and themes in the history of technology, Harwood, USA, pp. 44–56

  • Perez-Sindin XS, Lee J, Nielsen T (2022) Exploring the spatial characteristics of energy injustice: A comparison of the power generation landscapes in Spain, Denmark, and South Korea. Energy Res Soc Sci 91:102682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102682

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter E, Johanson K, Molan D (2024) Activating rural infrastructures in regional communities: Cultural funding, silo art works and the challenge of local benefit. J Rural Stud 106: 103239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103239

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulter H, Britton J, Rattle I, Bolton R, Webb J, Taylor P (2025) Accelerating transitions? Planning for decarbonisation in local and regional energy systems. Energy Res Soc Sci 120: 103875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103875

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan P, Joshi S, Dahal K, Hu Y, Subedi DR, Putra MPIF, Vaidya S, Pant LP, Dhakal S, Hubacek K, Rupakheti M, Roberts DC, van den Hurk B (2025) Policy relevance of IPCC reports for the Sustainable Development Goals and beyond. Resour Environ Sustain 19:100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100192

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (2025) Investing in Cheaper, Cleaner Energy and the Net Zero Transformation: Interim Report. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/net-zero/interim/net-zero-interim.pdf (accessed 5 September 2025)

  • Queensland Government (2024) Australia-first code for renewable projects to help communities. https://statements.qld.gov.au/statements/100120 (accessed 2 August 2024)

  • Ragin C (2023) Analytic Induction for Social Research. University of California Press, USA

  • Regional Development Victoria (2024) Wimmera Southern Mallee Regional Partnership. https://www.rdv.vic.gov.au/regional-partnerships/wimmera-southern-mallee (accessed 2 November 2024)

  • Regional Development Victoria (2025) Grampians’ Wimmera Southern Mallee Region https://www.rdv.vic.gov.au/victorias-regions/grampians/wimmera-southern-mallee (accessed 3 August 2025)

  • Ruggiero S, Onkila T, Kuittinen V (2014) Realizing the social acceptance of community renewable energy: A process-outcome analysis of stakeholder influence. Energy Res Soc Sci 4:53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.09.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren Q, Panikkar B, Mares T, Berlin L, Golder C (2023) Food justice in Vermont’s environmentally vulnerable communities. Agric Hum Values 40:1465–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10431-9

  • Santos Ayllón LM, Jenkins KEH, Kerr S (2025) Justice by design: Integrating energy justice and responsible research and innovation (RRI) to deliver just energy futures. Energy Res Soc Sci 125:103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.103998

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarantakos S (2005) Social Research, 3rd edn, Macmillan Education, Melbourne

  • Saunders, M et al. (2009) Research Methods for Business Students. Prentice Hall, USA

  • Schlosberg D (2007) Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001

  • Schlosberg D (2012a) Climate justice and capabilities: A framework for adaptation policy. Ethics Int Aff 26(4):445–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S08926794120006

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D 2012b. Justice, ecological integrity, and climate change. In: Thompson, A & Bendik-Keymer, J (Eds.), Ethical adaptation to climate change, 165–183. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262017534.003.0009

  • Schlosberg D (2009) Defining Environmental Justice. Oxford University Press, UK

  • Scottish Renewables (2015) Good Practice during Wind Farm Construction. https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/2018-08/Guidance%20-%20Good%20Practice%20during%20wind%20farm%20construction.pdf (accessed 12 November 2024)

  • Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines. An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Serdar M, Lahlou F, Al-Ansari T (2024) Enhancing resilience to climate change: Addressing cascading risks within the energy, water and food nexus. Prog Disaster Sci 24: 100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100390

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoeib E, Renski H, Infield E (2022) Who benefits from Renewable Electricity? The differential effect of wind power development on rural counties in the United States. Energy Res Soc Sci 85:102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102398

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool B (2010) Exploring the Conditions for CooperativeEnergy Governance: A Comparative Study of Two Asian Pipelines. Asian Stud Rev 34(4):489. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2010.527918

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK, Devine-Wright P, Mander S, Rowley J, Ryder S (2025) Realising a locally-embedded just transition: Sense of place, lived experience, and social perceptions of industrial decarbonisation in the United Kingdom. Glob Environ Change 94: 103051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103051

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool B, Barnacle M, Smith A, Brisbois M (2022) Towards improved solar energy justice: exploring the complex inequities of household adoption of photovoltaic panels. Energy Pol 164:112868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112868

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK, Axsen J, Sorrell S (2018) Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy Res Soc Sci 45:12–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool B, Dworkin M (2015) Energy justice: conceptual insights and practical applications. Appl Energy 142:435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetter C, Wielert H, Breitner M (2022) Hidden repowering potential of non-repowerable onshore wind sites in Germany. Energy Pol 168: 113168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113168

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock R (2023) Power for the Plantationocene: solar parks as the colonial form of an energy plantation. J Peasant Stud 50(1):162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2120812

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohr T, Wohlmuth B, Kutz J, Lesemann L, Pletz S, Zimmermann F, Huger J (2024) Analysis and installation of H2 value chains in rural areas. Int J Hydrog Energy 49:530. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2120812

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana F (Ed.) (2025) Confronting climate coloniality: Decolonizing pathways for climate justice. Routledge

  • Taylor M, McDonnell N, Davies P, Trueck S (2025) Scaling agrivoltaics: planning, legal, and market pathways to readiness. Sustain Sci 20:1499–1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01668-w

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M (2024) Enabling Justice-Driven AgriWind (JAW): Creating Onshore Wind Energy and Agricultural Socio-Legal Synergies in the Wimmera Southern Mallee Region. https://wsm.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Justice-DrivenAgriWind_MT_FinalSubmission_9.9.24_Update.pdf (accessed 10 October 2024)

  • Taylor M, Pettit J, Sekiyama T, Sokolowski M (2023) Justice-driven agrivoltaics: Facilitating agrivoltaics embedded in energy justice. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 188:113815

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M, Pettit J, Sekiyama T, Sokolowski M (2023) Renew Sustain Energy Rev 188:113815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113815

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambo J, Barake E, Kouevi A, Munthali G (2020) Copyright or copyleft: An assessment of farmer-innovators’ attitudes towards intellectual property rights. J Rural Stud 74:133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasfarmers (2024) Code of Cnduct. https://tasfarmers.com.au/uploads/documents/Flyer-Factsheets/TasFarmers-VFF-Farm-Access-Code-of-Conduct.pdf (accessed 3 September 2024)

  • Timmermann, C 2020. Social Justice and Agricultural Innovation. Springer, Switzerland

  • Upham P, Sovacool B, Ghosh B (2022) Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: a framework for innovation, participation, and justice. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 167(4):112699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112699

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Horst D (2007) NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energ Policy 35:2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Uffelen N (2022) Revisiting recognition in energy justice. Energy Res Soc Sci 92: 102764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102764

    Google Scholar 

  • VicGrid (2024) Appendix A Strategic Land Use Assessment. https://engage.vic.gov.au/victransmissionplan> (accessed 1 September 2024)

  • VicGrida (2025) https://engage.vic.gov.au/victorian-access-regime (accessed 29 September 2025)

  • VicGridb (2025) https://engage.vic.gov.au/download/document/42651 (accessed 29 September 2025)

  • VicGridc (2025) https://engage.vic.gov.au/download/document/42202 (accessed 29 September 2025)

  • Victorian Government (2021a) Victorian Climate Change Strategy. https://www.climatechange.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/522169/Victorian-Climate-Change-Strategy-Accessible.pdf (accessed 21 August 2024)

  • Victorian Government (2021b) Victorian Renewable Energy Zones Development Plan. https://www.energy.vic.gov.au/renewable-energy/vicgrid/renewable-energy-zones (accessed 4 June 2024)

  • Victorian Government (2023) Planning Guidelines for Development of Wind Energy Facilities. www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/570630/Development-of-wind-energy-facilities.pdf (accessed 4 May 2024)

  • Victorian Government (2024) Ministerial guidelines for assessment of environmental effects under the Environment Effects Act 1978. https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0028/682453/DTP0497-Ministerial-Guidelines-8th-edition-web-FA44.pdfa (accessed 1 September 2024)

  • Victorian Government (2025) Renewable Energy Zones. https://www.energy.vic.gov.au/renewable-energy/vicgrid/renewable-energy-zones (accessed 13 September 2025)

  • Vivoda V, Bazilian M, Khadim A, Ralph N, Krame G (2024) Lithium nexus: Energy, geopolitics, and socio-environmental impacts in Mexico’s Sonora project. Energy Res Soc Sci 108:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103393

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yuan Z, Tang Y (2021) Enhancing food security and environmental sustainability: A critical review of food loss and waste management. Resour Environ Sustain 4: 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100023

    Google Scholar 

  • Wekerle GR (2004) Food justicemovements. J Planning Edu Res 23:378–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmer J, Christ B, Grenz J, Norgrove L (2024) Agrivoltaics, a promising new tool for electricity and food production: A systematic review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 192: 114277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114277

    Google Scholar 

  • WSM (2024) Strategic Plan. https://wsm.org.au/about-us/strategic-plan/ (accessed 3 November 2024)

  • Zheng Y, Wang K, Hao R (2025) Dynamic mechanisms of land use spatial conflicts in mining cities: A case study of Xintai City, China. Resour Environ Sustain 19:100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100197

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Pei J (2023) Carbon border adjustment mechanism: a systematic literature review of the latest developments. Clim Policy 24(2):22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2190074

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimm C, Mintz-Woo K, Brutschin E et al (2024) Justice considerations in climate research. Nat Clim Chang 14:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01869-0

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the generosity and willingness of the stakeholder interviewee participants and the feedback of the Wimmera Mallee Community at the Energy and Agriculture Information Day on 10th September 2024. This study is limited to an examination of Victorian laws up to and including April 2025. This study is based upon work funded and supported by Wimmera Mallee Development Corporation, Victoria, Australia under Award Number DE-EE0008990 and its resulting output, Taylor, M’ Justice-Driven Agriwind’ (2024) https://wsm.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/2024/09/JusticeDrivenAgriWind_MT_FinalSubmission_9.9.24_Update.pdf.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Madeline Taylor

  2. Wimmera Southern Mallee Development Corporation, Horsham, VIC, Australia

    Chris Sounness

Authors
  1. Madeline Taylor
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Sounness
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MT wrote the main manuscript text and CS prepared Table 2. All authors reviewed and provided feedback on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madeline Taylor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Associate Professor Madeline Taylor holds interests as a Board Member of ReAlliance, Fellow of the Climate Council, and Australian Research Council Industry Fellow Partnerships with the NSW Department of Primary Industries and Spark Renewables. Associate Professor Madeline Taylor is a Guest Editor for the Special Issue this manuscript is submitted to for consideration (SI: Climate action with justice: aligning climate and energy transition policies with energy equity). Chris Sounness serves as a Board Member of the Regional Leadership Collective and the Wimmera Southern Mallee Local Learning Network. He is also a member of the Soils Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) Research and Development Committee and a State Government-appointed member of the Wimmera Southern Mallee Regional Partnership. Additionally, Wimmera Southern Mallee Development (WSM Development) has a Memorandum of Understanding with The Energy Charter, through which both organizations collaborate to enhance regional outcomes.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was obtained by the Macquarie University Research Ethics Subcommittee on 19/08/2024, Reference No: 520241807258842 and Project ID: 18072. All research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines/regulations applicable when human participants are involved pursuant to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2023. All participants consented to participate in the research study by undertaking interviews, and participants received basic project information about this research via the Human Research Ethics Application (HREA) Project Description form, and Participant Information and Consent Form (PCIFC) were reviewed and signed by all participants.

Informed consent

Informed written consent to participate in interviews was obtained between 4/08/2024 and 29/08/2024 before the commencement of each interview pursuant to the Macquarie University Research Ethics Subcommittee requirements and the Participant Information and Consent Form (PCIF). All participants were made aware of the scope of the research project within both the Human Research Ethics Application (HREA) Project Description form and the Informed Participation and Consent Form. Participation was explicitly stated as being voluntary and provided the option for participants to withdraw at any time without giving a reason. All raw data is anonymised due to any sensitive economic or political opinions and will remain confidential.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, M., Sounness, C. Enabling Agri Energy Justice: Incorporating agricultural and energy justice into utility-scale onshore wind development on agricultural land. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06522-7

Download citation

  • Received: 23 April 2025

  • Accepted: 14 January 2026

  • Published: 28 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06522-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Climate action with justice: aligning climate and energy transition policies with energy equity

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Referee instructions
  • Editor instructions
  • Journal policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Events
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (Humanit Soc Sci Commun)

ISSN 2662-9992 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited