Abstract
This study integrates social-psychological perspectives on intergroup relations with critical discourse analysis (CDA) to conduct a corpus-assisted discourse study of media representations of international conflict. Focusing on the South China Morning Post’s (SCMP) reporting of the Sino-U.S. trade dispute, the analysis employs keyword, collocation, and concordance techniques to examine how media discourse constructs and negotiates multiple identities amid shifting global dynamics. Findings reveal that SCMP frames the conflict within a broader international context, representing diverse actors with complex identities and group affiliations. While the inherent nature of conflict reinforces in-group/out-group categorization, the newspaper employs discursive recategorization strategies to construct a superordinate global identity that underscores Sino-U.S. interconnectedness and offers nuanced portrayals of China beyond simplistic binary frames. These findings illuminate how media discourse can foster intergroup cooperation while acknowledging the complex interplay of competing national interests. The study provides practical implications for journalistic practices and international communication strategies, particularly in an era of deepening economic interdependence and geopolitical complexity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Arcimaviciene L, Baglama SH (2018) Migration, metaphor and myth in media representations: the ideological dichotomy of ‘them’ and ‘us’. SAGE Open 8(2):215824401876865. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018768657
Augoustinos M (2001) Social categorization: Towards theoretical integration. In: Deaux K, Philogene G (eds) Representations of the social. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 201–216
Baker P, Gabrielatos C, KhosraviNik M, Krzyżanowski M, McEnery T, Wodak R (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse Soc 19(3):273–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962
Baker P, Gabrielatos C, Mcenery T (2013) Discourse analysis and media attitudes: the representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Bergsten CF (2018) China and the United States: the contest for global economic leadership. China World Econ 26(5):12–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12254
Bhabha HK (2012) The location of culture. Routledge, New York
Bhatia A (2016) Occupy Central’ and the rise of discursive illusions: a discourse analytical study. Text Talk 36(6):661–682. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0029
Bodenhausen GV, Peery D (2009) Social categorization and stereotyping in vivo: the VUCA challenge. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 3(2):133–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00167.x
Bray C (2022) Cooperation and demotion: a corpus-based critical discourse analysis of Aboriginal people(s) in Australian print news. Discourse Commun 16(5):504–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221099193
Brown D (2000) Globalisation and nationalism: the case of Singapore. In: Brown D (ed) Contemporary nationalism: civic, ethnocultural and multicultural politics. Routledge, London, pp 87–103
Bucholtz M, Hall K (2005) Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Stud 7(4–5):585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
Chan M (2012) The discursive reproduction of ideologies and national identities in the Chinese and Japanese English-language press. Discourse Commun 6(4):361–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312457496
Chan M (2013) (Re)categorizing intergroup relations and social identities through news discourse. J Lang Soc Psychol 33(2):144–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x13508125
Chen F, Wang G (2022) A war or merely friction? Examining news reports on the current Sino-U.S. trade dispute in The New York Times and China Daily. Crit Discourse Stud 19(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1844252
Dyvik Cardona M (2022) More than just an immigrant: the semantic patterns of (im)migrant/predicate-pairings in news stories about Mexican and Central American (im)migrants to the USA. A corpus-assisted discourse study. Discourse Commun 16(3):285–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221101821
Edwards D (1997) Discourse and cognition. Sage Publication, London
Flowerdew J, Li DCS, Tran S (2002) Discriminatory news discourse: some Hong Kong data. Discourse Soc 13(3):319–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013003052
Freud S (1927) The ego and the id: authorized translation. Woolf, London
Gabrielatos C, Baker P (2008) Fleeing, sneaking, flooding. J Engl Linguist 36(1):5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247
Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2014) Reducing intergroup bias: the common ingroup identity model. Routledge, New York
García-Perdomo V, Harlow S, Brown DK (2024) Framing the Colombian peace process: between peace and war journalism. Journal Pract 18(4):991–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2062428
Guo S (2011) Framing distance: local vs. non-local news in Hong Kong press. Chin J Commun 4(1):21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2011.544080
Hammack PL (2008) Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 12(3):222–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308316892
Hogg MA, Terry DI (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):121–140
Jost JT, Baldassarri DS, Druckman JN (2022) Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nat Rev Psychol 1(10):560–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5
Kapustina L, Lipková Ľ, Silin Y, Drevalev A (2020) US-China trade war: causes and outcomes. SHS Web Conf 73(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207301012
Kim M (2019) A real driver of US-China trade conflict. Int Trade Politics Dev 3(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/itpd-02-2019-003
Krueger JI, DiDonato TE (2008) Social categorization and the perception of groups and group differences. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 2(2):733–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00083.x
Li J (2021) US-China trade negotiation discourses in the press. J Lang Politics 20(6):932–953. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20062.li
Liu M, Li C (2017) Competing discursive constructions of China’s smog in Chinese and Anglo-American English-language newspapers: a corpus-assisted discourse study. Discourse Commun 11(4):386–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317707379
Mansson N (2008) Bauman on strangers-Unwanted peculiarities. In: Jacobsen M, Poder P (eds) The sociology of Zygmunt Bauman: challenges and critique. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 155–171
Liu M, Ma J (2022) The politics of fear in Hong Kong protest representations. J Lang Politics 21(1):37–59. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21019.liu
Nolan D, Farquharson K, Politoff V, Marjoribanks T (2011) Mediated multiculturalism: newspaper representations of Sudanese migrants in Australia. J Intercult Stud 32(6):655–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2011.618109
O’Doherty K, Lecouteur A (2007) ‘Asylum seekers’, ‘boat people’ and ‘illegal immigrants’: social categorisation in the media*. Aust J Psychol 59(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530600941685
Partington A (2004) Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In: Partington A, Morley J, Haarman L (eds) Corpora and discourse. Peter Lang, Bern, pp 11–20
Rasmussen J (2017) Recent research on the discursive construction of national identity. J Multicult Discourses 12(2):181–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2017.1303103
Reisigl M, Wodak R (2009) The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In: Wodak R, Meyer M (eds) Methods for critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications, London, pp 87–121
Roccas S, Brewer MB (2002) Social identity complexity. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 6(2):88–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0602_01
Roy S (2012) Culturally unconscious: intercultural implications of the New York Times representation of the Israel–Palestine conflict in 2009 and 2011. Int Commun Gaz 74(6):556–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512454823
Salahshour N (2016) Liquid metaphors as positive evaluations: a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the representation of migrants in a daily New Zealand newspaper. Discourse Context Media 13:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.07.002
Savrum MY, Miller L (2015) The role of the media in conflict, peace building and international relations. Int J World Peace 32(4):13–34
Seate AA (2017) Intergroup communication: media influence on. In: The international encyclopedia of media effects. pp 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0158
Serafis D, Raimondo C, Assimakopoulos S, Greco S, Rocci A (2021) Argumentative dynamics in representations of migrants and refugees: evidence from the Italian press during the ‘refugee crisis. Discourse Commun 15(5):559–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211017706
Sherman DK, Brookfield J, Ortosky L (2017) Intergroup conflict and barriers to common ground: a self-affirmation perspective. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 11(12):e12364. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12364
Sökefeld M (1999) Debating self, identity, and culture in anthropology. Curr Anthropol 40(4):417–448. https://doi.org/10.1086/200042
Stewart CO, Pitts MJ, Osborne H (2011) Mediated intergroup conflict: the discursive construction of ‘illegal immigrants’ in a regional U.S. newspaper. J Lang Soc Psychol 30(1):8–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x10387099
Stryker S, Burke PJ (2000) The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc Psychol Q 63(4):284–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840
Sun X (2019) USA, China and global leadership: analysis in the perspective of conceptualisation. India Q A J Int Aff 75(2):190–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928419841785
Swenson DL, Woo WT (2019) The politics and economics of the U.S.-China trade war. Asian Econ Pap 18(3):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00710
Tajfel H (2010) Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin W, Worchel S (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA
Tajfel H, Turner JC (2004) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Jost JT, Sidanius J (eds) Political psychology. Routledge, New York, pp 276–293
Van Dijk TA (1995) Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse Soc 6(2):243–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006
Van Dijk TA (2001) Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity. In: Wodak R, Meyer M (eds) Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage, London, pp 95–120
Van Dijk TA (2015a) Critical discourse analysis. In: Tannen D, Hamilton HR, Schiffrin D (eds) The handbook of discourse analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 466–485
Van Dijk TA (2015b) Critical discourse studies: a sociocognitive approach. In: Wodak R, Meyer M (eds) Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage, London, pp 62–85
Vraga EK, Tully M (2016) Effective messaging to communicate news media literacy concepts to diverse publics. Commun Public 1(3):305–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047316670409
Wang G (2022) Britain as a protector, a mediator or an onlooker? Lang, Politics Media 21(1):17–36. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21018.wan
Wang G, Liu M, Xin Y (2022) Categorizations of developed and developing countries in UN news on climate change. Soc Semiotics 34(1):82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2052275
Wang H, Ge Y (2020) Negotiating national identities in conflict situations: the discursive reproduction of the Sino-US trade war in China’s news reports. Discourse Commun 14(1):65–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319893406
Wang Z, Zeng J (2020) From economic cooperation to strategic competition: understanding the US-China trade disputes through the transformed relations. J Chin Polit Sci 25(1):49–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09652-0
Wei L (2019) Towards economic decoupling? Mapping Chinese discourse on the China-US trade war. Chin J Int Politics 12(4):519–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poz017
Wiebrecht F (2018) Cultural co-orientation revisited: the case of the South China Morning Post. Glob Media China 3(1):32–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436418778306
Wodak R, Meyer M (2016) Critical discourse studies: history, agenda, theory, methodology. In: Wodak R, Meyer M (eds) Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage, London, pp 1–22
Wong TC, Lo WH, Cheung MFM (2021) Shifting power centers and news sources: the practices and struggles of Hong Kong’s political journalists since the handover. Journal Stud 22(14):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2021.1979424
Wright D, Brookes G (2019) ‘This is England, speak English!’: a corpus-assisted critical study of language ideologies in the right-leaning British press. Crit Discourse Stud 16(1):56–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1511439
Wu S (2023) Evaluating ‘exemplary data journalism’ from Asia: an exploration into South China Morning Post’s data stories on China and the world. Journalism 24(9):2042–2058. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221093509
Wu DD, Ng P (2011) Becoming global, remaining local: the discourses of international news reporting by CCTV-4 and Phoenix TV Hong Kong. Crit Arts 25(1):73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2011.552211
Wu DD, Huang Y, Liu M (2015) Competing and hybridized discourses in Chinese news reporting: case studies of three key newspapers in Southern China. J Multicult Discourses 10(1):67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2014.946037
Zeng W, Sparks C (2020) Popular nationalism: global times and the US-China trade war. Int Commun Gaz 82(1):26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519880723
Zhu L (2022) Framing the political conflict discourse in Chinese media. J Lang Politics 21(6):867–889. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21005.zhu
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Philosophical and Social Science Project of Hainan Province, grant number HNSK(ZC) 21-154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZD: writing-original draft preparation, conceptualization and methodology, formal analysis, software, validation; ZD and ZY: review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
This research did not involve human participants; informed consent was therefore not required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, D., Zhang, Y. Beyond binary categorization: discursive construction of multiple identities and common ground in Hong Kong media’s coverage of international conflict. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06860-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06860-6
