Table 4 The results of comparative experiments on the Twitter16 dataset.
From: TRGCN: a hybrid framework for social network rumor detection
Method | Acc | NR F1 | FR F1 | TR F1 | UR F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTC | 0.473 | 0.254 | 0.080 | 0.190 | 0.482 |
RFC | 0.585 | 0.752 | 0.415 | 0.547 | 0.563 |
SVM-TS | 0.574 | 0.755 | 0.420 | 0.571 | 0.526 |
SVM-HK | 0.511 | 0.648 | 0.434 | 0.473 | 0.451 |
GRU-RNN | 0.633 | 0.617 | 0.715 | 0.577 | 0.527 |
BU-RVNN | 0.718 | 0.723 | 0.712 | 0.779 | 0.659 |
Rumor2vec | 0.852 | 0.857 | 0.769 | 0.927 | 0.850 |
HDGCN | 0.865 | 0.820 | 0.863 | 0.930 | 0.863 |
GCRES | 0.888 | 0.801 | 0.877 | 0.912 | 0.919 |
GT-Base | 0.834 | 0.815 | 0.813 | 0.885 | 0.797 |
Bert-TRGCN | 0.365 | 0.4774 | 0.295 | 0.143 | 0.325 |
TRGCN | 0.901 | 0.870 | 0.939 | 0.872 | 0.905 |