Table 4 Endogeneity test.

From: Behind the green veil: board characteristics, greenwashing, and the fraud triangle

 

1

2

3

4

Symbol

GMM

2SLS-first stage

2SLS-second stage

PSM

L.GW

0.545***

   
 

(15.85)

   

Female_mean

 

-0.595***

  
  

(-10.72)

  

Female

−0.556**

 

-1.377**

−0.234*

 

(−2.19)

 

(-2.13)

( − 1.87)

Indep

−5.327**

0.002

-1.088***

−1.335***

 

(−2.49)

(0.05)

(-3.77)

( − 4.20)

Tenure

−0.007***

0.000

-0.007***

−0.007***

 

(−2.78)

(0.20)

(-8.59)

( − 7.87)

Meeting

0.035***

0.000

0.009***

0.007*

 

(3.47)

(1.03)

(2.64)

(1.94)

Bsize

–0.032

-0.001

-0.001

0.001

 

(–0.87)

(-0.99)

(-0.06)

(0.05)

Dual

2.895***

0.012**

0.093**

0.115***

 

(3.59)

(2.02)

(2.31)

(2.68)

Control

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Year

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Industry

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

Constant

–4.444

0.349***

 

0.491

 

(–1.27)

(5.50)

 

(0.98)

Observations

10,488

12,290

12,290

9284

Kleibergen–Paap rk LM statistic

 

64.006

68.150

 

p-value

 

0

  

Kleibergen–Paap rk Wald F statistic (IV F-stat)

 

114.925

  

p-value

 

0

  

Stock–Yogo test at 10%

 

16.38

  

Anderson-Rubin test p-value

 

0.030

  

Wu–Hausman test p-value

 

0.074

  

AR (1) p-value

0

   

AR (2) p-value

0.541

   

Hansen test p-value

0.285

0

  
  1. Robust t-statistics in parentheses.
  2. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1.