Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. humanities and social sciences communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Emotion vs fact: the power of social media news framing in motivating young boycotters
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 March 2026

Emotion vs fact: the power of social media news framing in motivating young boycotters

  • Dessy Kurnia Sari1,
  • Donard Games1,
  • Eri Besra1,
  • Nurul Afifah Usman2 &
  • …
  • Laura Amelia Triani1 

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 948 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Business and management
  • Cultural and media studies

Abstract

Digital platform has become the main source of information and references for the younger generation. The information spread online can be good or bad, right or wrong that trigger various responses. As consumers, young people have unique characteristics that need to be explored. This study attempts to discover the major reasons for young boycotters in responding to news framing in social media. The boycott impacts were focusing on food brands that have become boycott targets. The data was collected from 328 young boycotters (aged 18–25 years old) in Indonesia. These young boycotters have experience accessing social media news related to boycott content. A structural equation modeling (SEM) is performed to examine the hypothesized relationships among variables to explore the reasons for respondents in boycotting food brands. The findings indicate that emotional and factual news framing have significant effects on trust in social media. Emotional News Framing has a direct effect on boycott intention, while Factual News Framing has a significant effect on negative brand image. Results further show that Trust in social media has an effect on the negative brand image of foreign food brands as boycotted targets and has an impact on the positive brand image of local brands, that prompt the purchase intention as a replacement for foreign brands that were boycotted.

Similar content being viewed by others

Following news on social media boosts knowledge, belief accuracy and trust

Article Open access 27 June 2025

Empowering consumers to purchase safe ready-to-eat chicken from street restaurants in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: impact of a multi-media behavior change campaign

Article Open access 21 October 2024

Softly empowering a prosocial expert in the family: lasting effects of a counter-misinformation intervention in an informational autocracy

Article Open access 23 May 2024

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study have been made publicly available by the authors in the Figshare repository and are accessible at: https://url-shortener.me/H9C6

References

  • Abbas SO, Soharwardi SMN, Ameer A (2024) The influence of social media platforms on public opinion: a case study of the Gaza-Israel conflict. Insights J Hum Media Stud Rev 1(1):22–36. https://doi.org/10.63290/a4hrn338

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah NAHN, Singam PSK (2014) The impact of negative social media communication, boycott campaign, and brand trust on Generation Y intention to purchase fast food products. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 8(12):39–46. ISSN 1991-8178

    Google Scholar 

  • Amora JT (2021) Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: a loadings-driven approach. Data Anal Perspect J 2(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad S (2024) The effect of social media influencers on brand trust and the moderating role of brand reputation on brand commitment and brand loyalty. Mark Forces 19(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Avci H(2024) Factors influencing the boycott intentions of Turkish consumers amid the Israel-Palestine conflict. Rev Brasileira Gestão Negócios 26(4):e20240035. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v26i4.4282

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin E (2021) The web of hate: fragmentation of media authority and its link to online hate speech. Rev Brasileira Gestão Negócios 23(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v26i4.4282

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden C (2019) Framing the news. The handbook of journalism studies. Routledge, pp 229–245. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497

  • Bravo OSAC, Chapa S (2024) Testing the effects of moral intensity news frames on consumer boycott intention. J Consum Mark 41(2):226–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo OSAC (2020) To boycott or not? The impact of high moral intensity framing on consumer boycott decision-making. The Florida State University

  • Cambefort M, Pecot F (2020) Theorizing rightist anti-consumption. Mark Theory 20(3):385–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593119882513

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29

  • Dalakas V, Melancon JP, Szczytynski I (2023) Brands in the eye of the storm: navigating political consumerism and boycott calls on social media. Qual Mark Res Int J 26(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2021-0089

    Google Scholar 

  • Delistavrou A (2022) Theory of planned behaviour and boycotting: the moderating role of socio-political control and demographics. EuroMed J Bus 17(2):179–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-02-2021-0020

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim RS(2020) The role of trust in understanding the impact of social media marketing on brand equity and brand loyalty. J Relation Market 19:287–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2019.1705742

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan M, Weiming C (2022) An qualitative research on regional brand image and its effect on purchase intention. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Socio 40(10):824–834. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2022/v40i1031148

    Google Scholar 

  • Gala H, Afifah N, Heriyadi H, Pebrianti W (2024) The effect of political consumerism, moral intensity news framing, and peer pressure on boycott intention. Manag J Binaniaga 9(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.33062/mjb.v9i02.73

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson WA, Modigliani A (1987) The changing culture of affirmative action. In zBraungart RZ, Braungart, MM (eds) Research in political sociology, vol. 3. JAI Press, pp 137–177

  • Gunawan G, Keni K (2022) Pengaruh brand awareness, brand image, dan marketing mix terhadap purchase intention Kopi Bubuk Lokal di Bali. J Manaj Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan 6(4):353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Hult GT, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2022) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd edn. Sage Publication, Inc

  • Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pr 19:139–151. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammouda A, Elkeerany A (2024) The moderating role of boycott participation on brand commitment and loyalty. Soc Justice Res Behav Sci 38(4):1993–2041. https://doi.org/10.21608/sjrbs.2024.333571.1812

    Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Yu J, Chua BL, Lee S, Kim W (2019) Impact of core-product and service-encounter quality, attitude, image, trust and love on repurchase: Full-service vs low-cost carriers in South Korea. Int J Contemp Hospit Manag 31(4):1588–1608. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2018-0376

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberger B (2021) External communication in social media during asymmetric conflicts: a theoretical model and empirical case study of the conflict in Israel and Palestine. Columbia University Press

  • Hong C (2018) Boycotting or buycotting? An investigation of consumer emotional responses towards brand activism. University of Miami

  • Hydock C, Paharia N, Blair S (2020) Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of corporate political advocacy. J Mark Res 57(6):1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720947682

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakarta Globe (2024) KFC Indonesia closes dozens of outlets and lays off 2,274 workers amid heavy losses and boycott calls. APSN

  • Jakopović H (2017) Predicting the strength of online news frames. INDECS 15(3):209–221. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.15.3.5

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalli N (2025) Viral Justice: TikTok activism, misinformation, and the fight for social change in Southeast Asia. Sage J. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251318122

  • Jedicke A, Arnold E, Lindenmeier J (2025) Boycott intention using viewpoint compatibility. https://d-nb.info/1351941879/34. https://jakartaglobe.id/business/kfc-indonesia-closes-dozens-of-outlets-and-lays-off-2274-workers-amid-heavy-losses-and-boycott-calls#goog_rewarded

  • John A, Klein J (2003) The boycott puzzle: consumer motivations for purchase sacrifice. J Mark Res 40(2):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.2.219.19229

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen S, Taboubi S, Zaccour G (2003) Retail promotions with negative brand image effects: Is cooperation possible. Eur J Oper Res 150(2):395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00641-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Kam CD, Deichert M (2020) Boycotts, buycotts, and the psychology of political consumerism. J Politics 82(1):72–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/705882

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanol D, Nat M (2017) Interest groups and social media: an examination of cause and sectional groups’ social media strategies in the EU. J Public Aff. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1649

  • Karduni A, Wesslen R, Markant D, Dou W (2023) Images, emotions, and credibility: Effect of emotional facial expressions on perceptions of news content bias and source credibility in social media. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, 17:470-481s. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22161

  • Kucukemiroglu O, Kara A (2022) The role of trust and distrust in the relationship between corporate social irresponsibility and boycott intentions: a parallel mediation analysis. J Bus Res 145:1–10. https://doi.org/10.31743/ntz.14548

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni H, Joshi P, Chande P (2019) Computational Psychology to Embed Emotions into Product to Increase Customer Affinity. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Communication Technologies (pp. 36-46). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8461-5_5

  • Zubair M, Wang X, Iqbal S, Awais M, Wang R (2020) Attentional and emotional brain response to message framing in context of green marketing. Heliyon, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04912

  • Lecheler S, de Vreese CH (2019) News framing effects: theory and practice. Routledge, pp 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208077

  • Lee A (2020) Youth, media activism, and communication counterpower: a comparative study. Harvard University. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/37365921

  • Bravo OSAC ChapaS (2024) Testing the effects of moral intensity news frames on consumer boycott intention. Journal of Consumer Marketing 41(2):226–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2022-5413

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian JW, Yen DC (2014) Online shopping drivers and barriers for older adults: age and gender differences. Comput Hum Behav 37:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.028

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren E, Lindholm T, Vliegenthart R, Boomgaarden HG, Damstra A, Strömbäck J, Tsfati Y (2024) Trusting the facts: the role of framing, news media as a (trusted) source, and opinion resonance for perceived truth in statistical statements. J Mass Commun Q 101(4):981–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221117117

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarem SC, Jae H (2016) Consumer boycott behavior: an exploratory analysis of Twitter feeds. J Consum Aff 50(1):193–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12108

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardhatillah A (2020) Model of intention to behave in online product purchase for Muslim fashion in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. J Islamic Mark 11(6):1419–1441. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2018-0159

    Google Scholar 

  • Munaro AC, Barcelos RH, Maffezzolli ECF, Rodrigues JPS, Paraiso EC (2021) To engage or not engage? The features of video content on YouTube affecting digital consumer engagement. J Consum Behav 20(5):1234–1245. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cb.1903

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman WR, Just MR, Crigler AN (1992) Common knowledge: news and the construction of political meaning. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Neureiter M, Bhattacharya CB (2021) Why do boycotts sometimes increase sales? Consumer activism in the age of political polarization. Bus Horiz 64(5):611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.020

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil J, Eisenmann M (2017) An examination of how source classification impacts credibility and consumer behavior. Public Relat Rev 43(2):278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.01.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo TTA, Vuong BL, Le MD, Nguyen TT, Tran MM, Nguyen QK (2024) The impact of eWOM information in social media on the online purchase intention of Generation Z. Cogent Bus Manag 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2316933

  • Ramadhani JY, Prasasti A (2023) Brand trust capacity in mediating social media marketing activities and purchase intention: a case of a local brand that go-global during pandemic. IJBE 9(1):81

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasoolimanesh SM (2022) Discriminant validity assessment in PLS-SEM: a comprehensive composite-based approach. Data Anal Perspect J 3(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Salma SY, Aji HM (2023) What drives Muslims to boycott French brands? The moderating role of brand judgment and counterargument. J Islamic Mark 14(5):1003–1021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2021-0128

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari DK, Games D (2024) Investigating young consumer’s boycott behavior in an emerging market. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2362444

  • Sari DK, Mizerski D, Liu F (2017) Boycotting foreign products: a study of Indonesian Muslim consumers. J Islamic Mark 8(1):16–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2014-0078

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt M, Hair J, Nitzl C, Ringle C, Howard M (2020) Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses. Int J Mark Res 62:288–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Sembiring BKF, Hasibuan BK, Sugiharto S, Maas LT (2024) Brand trust in social media marketing: the role of brand engagement. In: Proceedings of the 3rd economics and business international conference, EBIC 2022. EUDL. https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.22-9-2022.2337418

  • Sen S, Bhattacharya CB, Gurhan-Canli Z (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Mark Res 38(2):225–243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838

    Google Scholar 

  • Snapchart.Global (2024) A year has passed is the boycott action still a trend in Indonesia. https://snapcart.global/a-year-has-passed-is-the-boycott-action-still-a-trend-in-indonesia

  • Suhartanto D, Helmi Ali M, Tan KH, Sjahroeddin F, Kusdibyo L (2019) Loyalty toward Islamic banking: Service quality, emotional or religious driven? J Islamic Mark 10(2):498–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2018-0007

    Google Scholar 

  • Miri A, Karimi-Shahanjarin A, Afshari M, Tapak L, Bashirian S (2024) The impact of emotional vs rational message framing on social media users' detection and sharing of misinformation: an experimental study. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 22(3):321–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-10-2023-0124

    Google Scholar 

  • The Washington Post (2006) For Danish firms, boycott in mideast a ‘Nightmare’. Available via The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/02/11/for-danish-firms-boycott-in-mideast-a-nightmare-span-classbankheadmillions-of-dollars-in-sales-are-lost-as-markets-that-were-built-over-decades-disappear-in-daysspan/ba717851-f441-4981-82e2-ee3277f2d581. Accessed 10 Jan 2025

  • Trisatya AA (2024) Brand trust for local brands in Medan. In: Proceedings of the 3rd economics and business international conference, EBIC 2022. https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.22-9-2022.2337400

  • Valenzuela S, Piña M, Ramírez J (2017) Behavioral effects of framing on social media users: how conflict, economic, human interest, and morality frames drive news sharing. J Commun 67(5):803–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12325

    Google Scholar 

  • Woinowsky E (2019) The effects of emotional versus rational message framing on brand attachment and brand loyalty. University of Nevada, Las Vegas Theses/Dissertations/Professional Papers. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/3702/digitalscholarship.unlv.edu+1digitalscholarship.unlv.edu+1

  • Zhang C, Han B (2024) How perceived brand localness affects purchase intentions: examining the role of brand authenticity. J Glob Scholars Mark Sci 35(1):76–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2024.2400955

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Directorate of Research, Technology, and Community Service, Directorate General of Research and Technology, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, Republic of Indonesia (BIMA) under the regular fundamental scheme in accordance with research contract number: 041/E5/PG.02.00.PL/2024 for the 2024 fiscal year.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia

    Dessy Kurnia Sari, Donard Games, Eri Besra & Laura Amelia Triani

  2. Department of Vocation, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia

    Nurul Afifah Usman

Authors
  1. Dessy Kurnia Sari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donard Games
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eri Besra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nurul Afifah Usman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laura Amelia Triani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DKS: first and corresponding author, conceptualization, methodology, writing and paper preparation, investigation, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, and supervision. DG: conceptualization, methodology, writing the paper, investigation, and writing—review and editing. EB: methodology, writing the paper, and data collection. LAT: data collection, writing, editing. NAU: writing the paper and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dessy Kurnia Sari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Boards (ERB), Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia, under approval no. 237/UN16.05.WD1/PT.01/2025, January 27th, 2025. All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee of ERB, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia. The scope of the approval covered the recruitment, informed consent, data collection, and analysis of data related to social media news framing and boycott activities for young people.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained in written form through an online consent statement embedded in the Google Form used for data collection. All participants were required to read the information about the study and indicate their agreement to participate before accessing the survey questions. Consent was obtained prior to the start of data collection in January 2025. The study was conducted online, and participation was voluntary and anonymous.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sari, D.K., Games, D., Besra, E. et al. Emotion vs fact: the power of social media news framing in motivating young boycotters. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06987-6

Download citation

  • Received: 10 May 2025

  • Accepted: 06 March 2026

  • Published: 21 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06987-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Youth in action: protest, activism and advocacy

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Referee instructions
  • Editor instructions
  • Journal policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Events
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (Humanit Soc Sci Commun)

ISSN 2662-9992 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited