Abstract
This paper examines the reshaping of systemic risk in China’s bank‑dominated financial system amid intensifying competitive homogeneity, expanding business scale, and adjustments to macro deleveraging and transition policies. Methodologically, we develop a unified measurement–network–identification framework: we employ the Relative Systemic Risk Index (SRISK) to quantify institutions’ systemic contributions, balancing robustness and interpretability across leverage, size, and interconnectedness; we construct a multilayer contagion network via a threshold approach that integrates three principal channels—interbank lending, real estate, and equity markets; and we employ Spatial Durbin panel models to separate direct effects from network spillovers and to validate transmission pathways. Results show that the expansion of off‑balance‑sheet activities, interbank shadow credit, and on‑balance‑sheet regulatory arbitrage raises interbank leverage and amplifies contagion. The constructed network exhibits scale‑free and small‑world properties, being robust to random shocks yet vulnerable to shocks targeting central nodes, with rapid diffusion. Direct effects indicate that multiple‑network centrality, capital adequacy, investor sentiment, broad money growth, and foreign‑exchange deposit growth increase capital shortfall risk, while interest income, loan‑to‑deposit structure, nonperforming loan ratio, and foreign‑exchange loan growth mitigate it. Policy implications support strengthening the dual‑pillar macroprudential framework and introducing time‑varying contagion damping over the financial cycle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset for the empirical analysis can be derived from the Wind Information Database.
References
Abedifar P, Giudici P, Hashem SQ (2017) Heterogeneous market structure and systemic risk: evidence from dual banking systems. J Financ Stab 33:96–119
Acharya VV, Engle R, Richardson M (2012) Capital shortfall: a new approach to ranking and regulating systemic risks. Am Econ Rev 102:59–64
Acharya VV, Pedersen LH, Philippon T, Richardson MP (2017) Measuring Systemic Risk. CEPR Discuss Pap 29:85–119
Acharya VV, Thakor AV (2016) The dark side of liquidity creation: leverage and systemic risk. J Financ Intermediation 28:4–21
Acosta-Smith J, Grill M, Lang JH (2020) The leverage ratio, risk-taking and bank stability. J Financ Stab
Adrian T, Brunnermeier MK (2016) CoVaR. Am Econ Rev 106:1705–1741
Alter A, Beyer A (2014) The dynamics of spillover effects during the European sovereign debt turmoil. J Bank Financ 42:134–153
Bernardi M, Durante F, Jaworski P (2017) CoVaR of families of copulas. Stat Probab Lett 120:8–17
Billio M, Getmansky M, Lo AW, Pelizzon L (2012) Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. J Financ Econ 104:535–559
Boako G, Alagidede P (2017) Examining evidence of shift-contagion in African stock markets: a CoVaR-copula approach. Rev Dev Financ 7:142–156
Brownlees C, Chabot B, Ghysels E, Kurz C (2020) Back to the future: backtesting systemic risk measures during historical bank runs and the great depression. J Bank Financ 113:105736
Cipollini F, Giannozzi A, Menchetti F, Roggi O (2020) The beauty contest between systemic and systematic risk measures: assessing the empirical performance. J Empir Financ 58:316–332
Davydov D, Vhmaa S, Yasar S (2021) Bank liquidity creation and systemic risk. J Bank Financ 123:106031
Diebold FX, Yılmaz K (2014) On the network topology of variance decompositions: measuring the connectedness of financial firms. J Econ 182:119–134
Dinger V, Hagen JV (2010) Does interbank borrowing reduce bank risk? J Money Credit Bank 41:491–506
Gandy A, Veraart LAM (2017) A Bayesian methodology for systemic risk assessment in financial networks. Manag Sci 63:4428–4446
Ghysels E, Hill JB, Motegi K (2016) Testing for Granger causality with mixed frequency data. J Econ 192:207–230
Girardi G, Erguen AT (2013) Systemic risk measurement: multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR. J Bank Financ 37:3169–3180
Hué S, Lucotte Y, Tokpavi S (2019) Measuring network systemic risk contributions: a leave-one-out approach. J Econ Dyn Control 100:86–114
Huynh TLD, Nasir MA, Nguyen SP, Duong D (2020) An assessment of contagion risks in the banking system using non-parametric and copula approaches. Econ Anal Policy 65:105–116
Kelejian HH, Tavlas GS, Hondroyiannis GA (2006) Spatial modelling approach to contagion among emerging economies. Open Econ Rev 17:423–441
Kristjanpoller W, Minutolo MC (2015) Gold price volatility: a forecasting approach using the artificial neural network–GARCH model. Expert Syst Appl 42:7245–7251
Lai Y, Hu Y (2021) A study of systemic risk of global stock markets under COVID-19 based on complex financial networks. Phys A Stat Mech its Appl 566: 125613
Li F, Wei W, Wang Z (2020) A comprehensive recognition research of systemic import local government: a perspective of individual risk and information infection risk. Theory Pract Financ Econ 41:78–85
Wang Z, Zhao Q, Zhu M, Pang T (2020) Jump aggregation, volatility prediction, and nonlinear estimation of banks’ sustainability risk. Sustainability 12:8849
Zhang W, Zhuang X, Wang J, Lu Y (2020) Connectedness and systemic risk spillovers analysis of Chinese sectors based on tail risk network. North Am J Econ Financ 54: 101248
Zhu B, Zhou X, Liu X, He K, Wang H, He K, Wang P (2019) Exploring the risk spillover effects among china’s pilot carbon markets: a regular vine copula-CoES approach. J Clean Prod 242: 118455
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by General project of NSFC: Research on multidimensional and multiple contagions of Banking Systemic Financial Risk in structural change, grant number (71973098).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, ZW and WW; methodology, ZW and YW; software, ZW and WW; formal analysis, ZW and WW; investigation, ZW, WW, YW and YS; resources, YS; data curation, WW; writing—original draft preparation, WW and YW; writing—review and editing, ZW and YS; visualization, WW and YW; supervision, ZW and YS; project administration, ZW; funding acquisition, ZW. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A conflict exists in the submission of this manuscript that S., Y. P. on the paper is the member of this journal’s editorial board. We have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical Approval
This manuscript does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the author.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, W., Wang, Z., Wang, Y. et al. Transfer entropy, multidimensional multiple correlation network, and risk contagion of bank capital shortage. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07085-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07085-3


