Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. humanities and social sciences communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Empathic perspective-taking in translation: a comparative analysis of three translations of Hong Lou Meng
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 April 2026

Empathic perspective-taking in translation: a comparative analysis of three translations of Hong Lou Meng

  • Hongyu Zhu1 &
  • Xingwei Miao1 

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 463 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Language and linguistics

Abstract

Translators’ empathic perspective-taking (EPT) influences their linguistic choices and reflects their emotional stance and translational positionality. This paper examines the EPT in three translations of Hong Lou Meng respectively by Xianyi Yang and Gladys Yang, Bencraft Joly, and David Hawkes. The analytical framework comprises three dimensions: person deixis, psychological engagement, and cultural empathy. The analysis aims to explore how EPT is manifested and textually encoded in translation. The results show that the translators exhibit distinct EPTs. Yang and Yang, for instance, present limited empathy with characters and frequently adopt a literal translation approach. Joly’s EPT aligns closely with that of the narrator, whereas Hawkes demonstrates profound empathy for the primary characters. These discrepancies are primarily attributed to factors such as political influence and reader awareness. This study seeks to illuminate a top-down approach for connecting emotional manifestations with high-level influencing factors and to stimulate further discussion on translator empathy.

Similar content being viewed by others

Multimodal world construals in English translations of Hongloumeng: a cognitive stylistic and systemic functional linguistic analysis

Article Open access 21 July 2025

Keeping balance between loyalty and modification: a Toulminian model as analytical framework

Article Open access 17 May 2024

Multiple translatorship in the digital age: Interactive dynamics in the production of online literary translation

Article Open access 19 February 2025

Data availability

The raw datasets supporting the findings of this study, including the original Chinese text of Hong Lou Meng and its three English translations (by David Hawkes, H. Bencraft Joly, and Xianyi Yang & Gladys Yang), are provided as supplementary files. Additionally, the full Chinese text and the translations by the Yangs and Hawkes can be accessed through the “Chinese-English Parallel Corpus of Hong Lou Meng” at [http://corpus.usx.edu.cn/hongloumeng/].

References

  • Adams RA, Shipp S, Friston KJ (2013) Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system. Brain Struct Funct 218(3):611–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22(4):577–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:617–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson CD (1991) Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. J Personal Soc Psychol 61:413–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson CD, Early S, Salvarani G (1997) Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 23(7):751–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson CD, Sager K, Garst E, Kang M, Rubchinsky K, Dawson K (1997) Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging? Personal Soc Psychol Bull 73:495–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthelon C, Mestre D (1990) Perception of a moving object during locomotion-application to car-driving. Trav Hum 53(1):17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge ME, Pickering MJ (2013) Perspective taking in language: integrating the spatial and action domains. Front Hum Neurosci 7:577

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanke O, Mohr C, Michel CM, Pascual-Leone A, Brugger P, Seeck M, Landis T, Thut G (2005) Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. J Neurosci 25(3):550–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourget J (2023) From witness to accomplice: the manipulation of readers’ empathy through consciousness representation in Patricia Highsmith’s The Talented Mr Ripley. J Lit Semant 52(2):145–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchheimer A (1963) The development of ideas about empathy. J Counseling Psychol 10(1):61

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Gao E (2005) Hong Lou Meng. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House

  • Caracciolo M (2020) Fictional characters, transparency, and Experiential sharing. Topoi 39(4):811–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale JL & Lewis, C (2006). How children develop social understanding. Malden, UK: Blackwell

  • Catmur C, Cross ES, Over H (2016) Understanding self and others: from origins to disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371 (1686)

  • Chandler MJ, Boyes M (1982) Social-cognitive development. In BB Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 387-402). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

  • Chen H, Jiang F (2003) The Translation of Hong Lou Meng into English: A Descriptive Study. Chinese Translators J (5), 48-54

  • Chopik WJ, O’Brien E, Konrath SH (2017) Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. J Cross-Cultural Psychol 48(1):23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini RB, Brown SL, Lewis BP, Luce C, Neuberg SL (1997) Reinterpreting the empathy—altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. J Personal Soc Psychol 73(3):481

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MH, Conklin L, Smith A, Luce C (1996) Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: a merging of self and other. J Personal Soc Psychol 70(4):713

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety J, Cowell JM (2014) The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends Cogn Sci 18(7):337–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety J, Jackson PL (2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3(2):71–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg N, Shea CL, Carlo G, Knight G (1991) Empathy related responding and cognition: A “chicken and the egg” dilemma. In W Kurtines & J Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, Vol. 2: Research (pp. 63-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

  • Erle TM, Topolinski S (2015) Spatial and empathic perspective-taking correlate on a dispositional level. Soc Cognition 33(3):187–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH, Zwaan RA (2008) Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol 61(6):825–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell JH (2004) Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 274-290

  • Fultner B (2012) Intersubjectivity in the lifeworld: Meaning, cognition, and affect. In A Foolen, UM Lüdtke, TP Racine, & J Zlatev (Eds.), Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language (pp. 197-219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company

  • Galinsky AD, Moskowitz GB (2000) Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. J Personal Soc Psychol 78(4):708

    Google Scholar 

  • Gast V, Deringer L, Haas F, Rudolf O (2015) Impersonal uses of the second person singular: A pragmatic analysis of generalization and empathy effects. J Pragmat 88:148–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers AR (2022) Feeling into empathic poetry…through the prison poems of Mahvash Sabet. N Writ 20(2):204–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg AM, Gallese V (2012) Action-based language: a theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex 48(7):905–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart JL (2019) Intercultural exchanges in the translation of poetry East and West: the private and the public, the scholar and the artist. Asia Pac Translation Intercultural Stud 6(2):111–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood MD, Farrar MJ (2006) Conflicting emotions: the connection between affective perspective taking and theory of mind. Br J Dev Psychol 24(2):401–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes D Trans. (1974) The Story of the Stone. Penguin Books Ltd

  • Hawkes D Trans. (1979a) The Story of the Stone. The Golden Days, vol, 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

  • Hawkes D Trans. (1979b) The Story of the Stone. The Warning Voice, vol. 3. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

  • House J (2020) Translation as a Prime Player in Intercultural Communication. Appl Linguist 41(1):10–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubscher-Davidson S (2017) Translation and emotion: a psychological perspective. Routledge

  • Hynes CA, Baird AA, Grafton ST (2006) Differential role of the orbital frontal lobe in emotional versus cognitive perspective-taking. Neuropsychologia 44(3):374–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Jami PY, Walker DI, Mansouri B (2024) Interaction of empathy and culture: a review. Curr Psychol 43(4):2965–2980

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly HB (2010) The Dream of the Red Chamber. Singapore: Tuttle Publishing

  • Kann T, Berman S, Cohen MS, Goldknopf E, Gülser M, Erlikhman G, Trinh K, Yokoyama OT, Zaidel E (2023) Linguistic empathy: behavioral measures, neurophysiological correlates, and correlation with psychological empathy. Neuropsychologia 191:108650

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Barnes-Holmes D (2020) The study of perspective-taking: Contributions from mainstream psychology and behavior analysis. Psychol Rec 70:581–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen S (2007) Empathy and the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press

  • Koopman EME (2016) Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychol Aesthet Creativity, Arts 10(1):82

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno S (1987) Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

  • Kuno S, Kaburaki E (1977) Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inq 8(4):627–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok HL, Moratto R, Liu K (2024) Activity versus descriptivity: a stylometric analysis of two english translations of Hongloumeng. Glottometrics 56:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczkó K (2010) Demonstrative pronouns in spatial deixis, discourse deixis, and anaphora. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(1):99–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm C, Batson CD, Decety J (2007) The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J Cogn Neurosci 19(1):42–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefevere A (1992) Translation, Rewriting & the Manipulation of Literary Fame. Routledge

  • Levinson SC (2006) ‘Deixis’, pp. 97-121. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Eds. Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward

  • Liddicoat AJ (2015) Intercultural mediation, intercultural communication and translation. Perspectives 24(3):354–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood PL (2016) The anatomy of empathy: Vicarious experience and disorders of social cognition. Behav Brain Res 311:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Main A, Kho C (2020) Relational goes beyond interpersonal: the development of empathy in the context of culture. Emot Rev 12(4):295–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín RM, de León CM (2020) Translation and cognitive science. In RM Martín, & CM de León (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of translation and cognition (pp. 52-68). Routledge

  • Martingano AJ, Konrath S (2022) How cognitive and emotional empathy relate to rational thinking: empirical evidence and meta-analysis. J Soc Psychol 162(1):143–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins-Nelson JL, Salekin RT, Leistico AMR (2006) Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: Implications for the successful psychopathy concept. Int J Forensic Ment Health 5(2):133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Neveux J (2023) I fucking love you! Emotional address in Fleabag, or how viewers’ empathy becomes voyeurism. J Lit Semant 52(2):213–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson RS, Butler SF, Carlin M (2011) Empathy and knowledge projection. In J Decety, & W Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 43-56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

  • Oatley K (2024) Enabling empathy and interpersonal understanding: aesthetics and effects of literary fiction. Tex Stud Lit Lang 66(4):451–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshima DY (2007) Syntactic direction and obviation as empathy-based phenomena: a typological approach. Linguistics 45(4):727–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald PA (1996) The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping. J Soc Psychol 136(5):613–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedwell C (2014) Affective Relations: The Transnational Politics of Empathy. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan

  • Piaget J, Inhelder B (1967) The child’s conception of space. New York: Norton

  • Preston SD (2007) A perception-action model for empathy. In TFD Farrow, & PWR Woodruff (Eds.), Empathy in mental illness (pp. 428-447). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Ren D, Gao Y (2019). Exploration of Institutionalized Translator. Fudan Forum on Foreign Languages and Literature, (01), 143-148

  • Richter T, Appel M, Calio F (2014) Stories can influence the self-concept. Soc Influence 9(3):172–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman RI (1980) The growth of interpersonal understanding. Orlando, FL: Academic Press

  • Sestir M, Green MC (2010) You are who you watch: Identification and transportation effects on temporary self-concept. Soc Influence 5(4):272–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory S (2009) Empathic processing: Its cognitive and affective dimensions and neuroanatomical basis. In J Decety & W Ickes (Eds.) (2009). The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (pp. 215-232). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

  • Stavroulia KE, Lanitis A (2023) The role of perspective-taking on empowering the empathetic behavior of educators in VR-based training sessions: an experimental evaluation. Comput Educ 197:104739

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdeón RA, Calafat C (2020) Introduction: the politics of translation and the translation of politics. Transl Interpret Int J Transl Interpret Res 12(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlow L, Ivanova I, Gollan TH (2014) The cognitive mechanisms underlying perspective taking between conversational partners: evidence from speakers with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 56:184–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf W (2007) Descriptions as a Transmedial Mode of Representation: General Features and Possibilities of Realization in Painting, Fiction and Music. In W Wolf, & W Bernhart (Eds.), Descriptions in Literature and Other Media (pp. 1-90). Amsterdam: Rodopi

  • Wu S, Keysar B (2007) The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychol Sci 18(7):600–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaghoubi Jami P, Mansouri B, Thoma SJ, Han H (2019) An investigation of the divergences and convergences of trait empathy across two cultures. J Moral Educ 48(2):214–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Yang G (1994) A Dream of Red Mansions. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press

  • Zaki J, Ochsner KN (2012) The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nat Neurosci 15(5):675–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L (2018) Rewritings in translation as clues of cultural mediation and ideological manipulation: a case study of Lin Shu’s translation of David Copperfield. Neohelicon 45(1):351–366

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that there was no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    Hongyu Zhu & Xingwei Miao

Authors
  1. Hongyu Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xingwei Miao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Hongyu Zhu wrote the main manuscript text, and Xingwei Miao gave important suggestions about analysis framework and provided analysing guidance on the cases. Both authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingwei Miao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not obtained—because the research does not involve human participants or their data.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Miao, X. Empathic perspective-taking in translation: a comparative analysis of three translations of Hong Lou Meng. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07131-0

Download citation

  • Received: 10 March 2025

  • Accepted: 18 March 2026

  • Published: 06 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07131-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Referee instructions
  • Editor instructions
  • Journal policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Events
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (Humanit Soc Sci Commun)

ISSN 2662-9992 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited