Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. humanities and social sciences communications
  3. articles
  4. article
To “persist” or to “exit”? A study on the subjective well-being of over-age migrant workers in the Chinese context
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 May 2026

To “persist” or to “exit”? A study on the subjective well-being of over-age migrant workers in the Chinese context

  • Li He1,2,
  • Guo Chen3,
  • Haoran Hu4,
  • Zhilu Tian5,
  • Yue Yu6 &
  • …
  • Liu Jiang7 

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Health humanities
  • Politics and international relations
  • Social policy

Abstract

As a product of the intersection of China’s hukou system and population aging, over-age migrant workers (OMW) face a unique “dual identity threat”: institutional economic insecurity stemming from their migrant worker status and the risk of social isolation associated with their over-age status. According to identity-based health theory, this structural predicament should theoretically diminish their subjective well-being (SWB). However, a widespread phenomenon of “persisting” in labor rather than “exiting” persists among OMW. To uncover the actual impact of this decision, this study employs a two-way fixed effects model based on panel data from the 2011–2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The findings reveal that, contrary to the theoretical prediction of identity threat, the subjective well-being of OMW is significantly higher than that of unemployed older adults with agricultural hukou (UOAAH). Mechanism analysis identifies earned income and social participation as the core pathways mediating this positive effect. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that this “happiness dividend” is substantial among low-human-capital groups but diminishes in high-human-capital groups. The theoretical contribution of this study lies in constructing an “identity threat–agential response” framework by integrating identity-based health theory and productive aging theory. We argue that the “continued labor” of OMW is not merely an economic behavior but an agential practice that counteracts structural identity threats and reconstructs well-being.

Similar content being viewed by others

Social cognition, socioeconomic status and subjective well-being of Chinese migrant workers

Article Open access 19 March 2024

Socio-economic status and trajectories of a novel multidimensional metric of Active and Healthy Ageing: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Article Open access 13 April 2023

Work stress, health and wellbeing: evidence from the older adults labor market in India

Article Open access 16 June 2022

Acknowledgements

Data used in this study were partly from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), conducted by the National School of Development of Peking University, China. This research was supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (25FZZB002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Discipline Inspection and Supervision (School of State Governance), Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China

    Li He

  2. The United Research Center of the Chinese Government Development, Nankai University, Tianjin, China

    Li He

  3. Department of Sociology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Guo Chen

  4. School of Government, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Haoran Hu

  5. School of Politics and International Relations, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China

    Zhilu Tian

  6. School of Education, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

    Yue Yu

  7. School of Marxism, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Liu Jiang

Authors
  1. Li He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guo Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haoran Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhilu Tian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yue Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liu Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study is based on secondary data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and the China City Statistical Yearbook. The CHARLS survey was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-11015). All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the Declaration of Helsinki. The present study uses anonymized, publicly available secondary data and does not involve direct interaction with human participants. The China City Statistical Yearbook data are publicly available aggregated statistical data published by the National Bureau of Statistics of China and contain no individual-level information. Therefore, no ethical approval was required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the original CHARLS survey at the time of data collection. For the present study, only de-identified secondary data were used, and no additional informed consent was required. The China City Statistical Yearbook data do not involve human participants and are publicly available in aggregated form. Therefore, informed consent was not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download TXT )

Supplementary Information (download XLS )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, L., Chen, G., Hu, H. et al. To “persist” or to “exit”? A study on the subjective well-being of over-age migrant workers in the Chinese context. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07564-7

Download citation

  • Received: 14 May 2024

  • Accepted: 29 April 2026

  • Published: 21 May 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07564-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Referee instructions
  • Editor instructions
  • Journal policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Events
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (Humanit Soc Sci Commun)

ISSN 2662-9992 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited