Abstract
The natural land carbon sink (SLAND) absorbs roughly 25–30% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, thus playing a critical role in offsetting climate warming. In the Global Carbon Budget (GCB), SLAND is estimated using model simulations that isolate the carbon response of land to environmental changes (i.e. rising atmospheric CO2, nitrogen deposition, and changes in climate). However, these simulations assume fixed pre-industrial land cover, failing to represent today’s human-altered landscapes. This leads to a systematic overestimation of forest area, and thus CO2 sink strength, in regions heavily altered by human activity. We present a new process-based approach to estimate SLAND using Dynamic Global Vegetation Models. Our corrected estimate reduces SLAND by ~20% (0.6 PgC yr-1) over 2015–2024, from 3.00 ± 0.94 to 2.42 ± 0.77 PgC yr-1. We incorporate this new SLAND estimate with emissions from land-use change from bookkeeping models, to estimate a net land sink of 1.19 ± 1.04 PgC yr-1, which aligns closely with atmospheric inversion constraints. This downward revision of SLAND reduces the magnitude of the budget imbalance for 2015–2024, indicating a more consistent partitioning of the global carbon budget.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All DGVM data is freely available to download from: https://globalcarbonbudgetdata.org/closed-access-requests.html. The SLAND and RSS estimates are available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17515195 Global Carbon Budget data is available from: https://globalcarbonbudget.org.
References
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2024. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 965–1039 (2025).
Houghton, R. A. Counting Terrestrial Sources and Sinks of Carbon. Clim. Change 48, 525–534 (2001).
Houghton, R. A., Davidson, E. A. & Woodwell, G. M. Missing sinks, feedbacks, and understanding the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the global carbon balance. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 12, 25–34 (1998).
Allen, M. R. et al. Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks. Nature 638, 343–350 (2025).
Sitch, S. et al. Trends and drivers of terrestrial sources and sinks of carbon dioxide: an overview of the TRENDY project. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 38, e2024GB008102 (2024).
Pongratz, J., Reick, C., Raddatz, T. & Claussen, M. A reconstruction of global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, (2008).
Pan, Y. et al. The enduring world forest carbon sink. Nature 631, 563–569 (2024).
Chen, C., Riley, W. J., Prentice, I. C. & Keenan, T. F. CO2 fertilization of terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from site to global scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115627119 (2022).
Strassmann, K. M., Joos, F. & Fischer, G. Simulating effects of land use changes on carbon fluxes: past contributions to atmospheric CO2 increases and future commitments due to losses of terrestrial sink capacity. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 60, 583 (2008).
Gitz, V. & Ciais, P. Amplifying effects of land-use change on future atmospheric CO2 levels: amplifying land-use effects on atmospheric CO2 levels. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17, (2003).
Pongratz, J., Reick, C. H., Raddatz, T. & Claussen, M. Effects of anthropogenic land cover change on the carbon cycle of the last millennium. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 23, (2009).
Gasser, T. et al. Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land cover change and their uncertainty. Biogeosciences 17, 4075–4101 (2020).
Obermeier, W. A. et al. Modelled land use and land cover change emissions – a spatio-temporal comparison of different approaches. Earth Syst. Dyn. 12, 635–670 (2021).
Dorgeist, L., Schwingshackl, C., Bultan, S. & Pongratz, J. A consistent budgeting of terrestrial carbon fluxes. Nat. Commun. 15, 7426 (2024).
Pongratz, J., Reick, C. H., Houghton, R. A. & House, J. I. Terminology as a key uncertainty in net land use and land cover change carbon flux estimates. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 177–195 (2014).
Pongratz, J. et al. Land use effects on climate: Current state, recent progress, and emerging topics. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 7, 99–120 (2021).
Walker, A. P. et al. Harmonizing direct and indirect anthropogenic land carbon fluxes indicates a substantial missing sink in the global carbon budget since the early 20th century. Plants People Planet https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10619. (2024).
Chini, L. et al. Land-use harmonization datasets for annual global carbon budgets. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 4175–4189 (2021).
McDowell, N. et al. Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests. N. Phytol. 219, 851–869 (2018).
Randerson, J. T. et al. The weak land carbon sink hypothesis. Sci. Adv. 11, eadr5489 (2025).
Klein Goldewijk, K., Dekker, S. C. & van Zanden, J. L. Per-capita estimations of long-term historical land use and the consequences for global change research. J. Land Use Sci. 12, 313–337 (2017).
Ciais, P. et al. Definitions and methods to estimate regional land carbon fluxes for the second phase of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Project (RECCAP-2). Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 1289–1316 (2022).
Acknowledgements
For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. No funding was granted for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.O.S. and J.P. designed the study with input from P.F., S.S., C.S., T.G., and P.C. V.A., E.K., J.K., E.M., T.N., Q.S., W.Y., X.U., and S.Z. provided the DGVM data. MOS wrote the first draft and all authors contributed to the writing of the submitted manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
O’Sullivan, M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S. et al. An improved approach to estimate the natural land carbon sink. npj Clim Atmos Sci (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01302-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01302-7
