Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Precision Oncology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj precision oncology
  3. articles
  4. article
T-cell receptor clonotypic diversity and specialization in digestive system cancers
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 January 2026

T-cell receptor clonotypic diversity and specialization in digestive system cancers

  • Lei Li1 na1,
  • Jia Li2 na1,
  • Fang Wang3 na1,
  • Runze Jiang4,
  • Hong Wang5,
  • Xiangze Li5 &
  • …
  • Ya’nan Zhen5 

npj Precision Oncology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer genomics
  • Predictive markers

Abstract

T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoires are central to antitumor immunity, yet their dynamics in digestive system cancers remain poorly defined. We profiled TCR repertoires from 415 tumors in 145 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC, n = 96), gastric cancer (GC, n = 47), and hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC, n = 2), integrating clinical and pathological features. Distinct repertoire architectures emerged: CRC was characterized by abundant TRB V–J combinations (e.g., TRBV10-2*00–TRBJ2-4*00), whereas GC showed higher abundance of TRG/TRD pairings (e.g., TRGV5P*00–TRGJP1*00, TRDV3*00–TRDJ1*00), reflecting tumor-specific immune surveillance. Conserved motifs (“CATWD,” “YKKLF”) across cancers indicate shared selective pressures, while antigen mapping revealed both common (KRAS, SF3B1, and BST2) and tumor-specific targets (MAGEA10, WT1 in CRC; PABPC1 in GC). In CRC, repertoire dynamics were tightly coupled to disease stage. Metastatic tumors (MT) displayed larger size, vascular invasion, and elevated serum markers, whereas primary tumors (PT) exhibited stronger immune infiltration with lymphocyte- and myeloid-driven responses. Tumor size was significantly and positively correlated with the number of TRD/TRG clonotypes shared between PT and MT. Shared clones were further classified into three categories, including stable, contracted, and expanded. Among these, expanded MT clones were dominated by the “NYGYTF” motif within the TRB chain (e.g., TRBV7-9*00–TRBJ1-2*00). The most abundant “NYGYTF”-containing clones recognized MLANA, a tumor-associated antigen linked to prognosis and therapeutic responsiveness, underscoring its potential role in CRC progression. Collectively, these findings delineate cancer- and stage-specific TCR repertoire alterations and antigen specificities, highlighting novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets to inform TCR-based diagnostics and personalized immunotherapies in CRC and GC.

Similar content being viewed by others

Preclinical application of a CD155 targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for digestive system cancers

Article 01 March 2025

Dynamics and specificities of T cells in cancer immunotherapy

Article 12 April 2023

Comprehensive application of AI algorithms with TCR NGS data for glioma diagnosis

Article Open access 04 July 2024

Data availability

The raw data generated in this study has been deposited at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1205408. Publicly available data utilized in this research were obtained from the TCGA-COAD transcriptomic expression dataset and associated clinical data. In addition, the GSE110224 dataset36 was obtained from the GEO database and comprises 17 normal tissue samples and 17 colorectal cancer (CRC) tumor samples.

Code availability

All the code used for the analysis can be accessed by the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Naimi, A. et al. Tumor immunotherapies by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the pros and cons. Cell Commun. Signal. 20, 44 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vafaei, S. et al. Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); a new frontier. Cancer Cell Int. 22, 1–27 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bassez, A. et al. A single-cell map of intratumoral changes during anti-PD1 treatment of patients with breast cancer. Nat. Med. 27, 820–832 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Du, K. et al. Pathway signatures derived from on-treatment tumor specimens predict response to anti-PD1 blockade in metastatic melanoma. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hammerl, D. et al. Spatial immunophenotypes predict response to anti-PD1 treatment and capture distinct paths of T cell evasion in triple negative breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–13 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joyce, J. A. & Fearon, D. T. T cell exclusion, immune privilege, and the tumor microenvironment. Science 348, 74–80 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Valkiers, S. et al. Recent advances in T-cell receptor repertoire analysis: bridging the gap with multimodal single-cell RNA sequencing. Immunoinformatics 5, 100009 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galon, J. et al. Towards the introduction of the ‘Immunoscore’in the classification of malignant tumours. J. Pathol. 232, 199–209 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, P., Li, L., Jiang, X. & Li, Q. Mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability-high as a predictor for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 1–14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yarahmadi, A. & Afkhami, H. The role of microbiomes in gastrointestinal cancers: new insights. Front. Oncol. 13, 1344328 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, L.-Y. et al. Role of the gut microbiota in anticancer therapy: from molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 201 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Porciello, N., Franzese, O., D’Ambrosio, L., Palermo, B. & Nisticò, P. T-cell repertoire diversity: friend or foe for protective antitumor response? J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 41, 356 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, R. et al. T-cell receptor sequencing reveals hepatocellular carcinoma immune characteristics according to Barcelona Clinic liver cancer stages within liver tissue and peripheral blood. Cancer Sci. 115, 94–108 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borràs, D. M. et al. Single cell dynamics of tumor specificity vs bystander activity in CD8+ T cells define the diverse immune landscapes in colorectal cancer. Cell Discov. 9, 114 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, H. et al. Characterization of the T-cell receptor repertoire associated with lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Front. Oncol. 14, 1354533 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ma, R., Yuan, D., Guo, Y., Yan, R. & Li, K. Immune effects of γδ T cells in colorectal cancer: a review. Front. Immunol. 11, 1600 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Conway. J. W. et al Unveiling the tumor immune microenvironment of organ-specific melanoma metastatic sites. J. Immunother. Cancer 10, e004884(2022),

  18. Bruni, D., Angell, H. K. & Galon, J. The immune contexture and immunoscore in cancer prognosis and therapeutic efficacy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 662–680 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mlecnik, B. et al. The tumor microenvironment and Immunoscore are critical determinants of dissemination to distant metastasis. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 327ra326–327ra326 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, Y. et al. Unraveling the spatial organization and development of human thymocytes through integration of spatial transcriptomics and single-cell multi-omics profiling. Nat. Commun. 15, 7784 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tanno, H. et al. Determinants governing T cell receptor α/β-chain pairing in repertoire formation of identical twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 532–540 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. George, A. J., Stark, J. & Chan, C. Understanding specificity and sensitivity of T-cell recognition. Trends Immunol. 26, 653–659 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vujovic, M. et al. T cell receptor sequence clustering and antigen specificity. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 2166–2173 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wong, W. K., Leem, J. & Deane, C. M. Comparative analysis of the CDR loops of antigen receptors. Front. Immunol. 10, 2454 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mayer-Blackwell, K. et al. TCR meta-clonotypes for biomarker discovery with tcrdist3 enabled identification of public, HLA-restricted clusters of SARS-CoV-2 TCRs. Elife 10, e68605 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Joglekar, A. V. & Li, G. T cell antigen discovery. Nat. Methods 18, 873–880 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, X., Li, H. & Xu, C. Structural understanding of T cell receptor triggering. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 17, 193–202 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goncharov, M. et al. VDJdb in the pandemic era: a compendium of T cell receptors specific for SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Methods 19, 1017–1019 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jin, Z. et al. Outcome of mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the Mayo Clinic experience. Oncologist 23, 1083–1091 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Laplante, P. et al. Effect of mismatch repair deficiency on metastasis occurrence in a syngeneic mouse model. Neoplasia 62, 101145 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yu, L. et al. Tumor-infiltrating gamma delta T-cells reveal exhausted subsets with remarkable heterogeneity in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 153, 1684–1697 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pan, L. et al. Progress of research on γδ T cells in colorectal cancer. Oncol. Rep. 52, 160 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, Y., Xu, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, J. & He, W. Novel insights based on the plasticity of T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Explor. Immunol. 2, 98–132 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stadinski, B. D. et al. Hydrophobic CDR3 residues promote the development of self-reactive T cells. Nat. Immunol. 17, 946–955 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stern, J. N. et al. Peptide 15-mers of defined sequence that substitute for random amino acid copolymers in amelioration of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1620–1625 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vlachavas, E. I. et al. Radiogenomic analysis of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and gene expression data elucidates the epidemiological complexity of colorectal cancer landscape. Computat. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 17, 177–185 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ye, X. et al. High-throughput sequencing-based analysis of T cell repertoire in lupus nephritis. Front. Immunol. 11, 1618 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bolotin, D. A. et al. MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat. Methods 12, 380–381 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, Y. et al. Immune phenotypic linkage between colorectal cancer and liver metastasis. Cancer Cell 40, 424–437.e5 (2022).

  40. Van der Loo, M. P. The stringdist package for approximate string matching. R. J. 6, 111 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bodenhofer, U., Bonatesta, E., Horejš-Kainrath, C. & Hochreiter, S. msa: an R package for multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 31, 3997–3999 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou, L. et al. ggmsa: a visual exploration tool for multiple sequence alignment and associated data. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac222 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kassambara, A., Kosinski, M., Biecek, P. & Fabian, S. Package ‘survminer’. Drawing survival curves using ‘ggplot2’(R package version 0.3.1) 2017.

  44. Brown, S. J., Goetzmann, W. N. & Ross, S. A. Survival. J. Financ. 50, 853–873 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e1821 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lifschitz, S. et al. Bio-strings: a relational database data-type for dealing with large biosequences. BioTech 11, 31 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bailey, T. L., Johnson, J., Grant, C. E. & Noble, W. S. The MEME suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W39–W49 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2025MS1517).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Lei Li, Jia Li, Fang Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy, Ji’nan, PR China

    Lei Li

  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Ji’nan, PR China

    Jia Li

  3. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Ji’nan, PR China

    Fang Wang

  4. Innovation Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ji’nan, PR China

    Runze Jiang

  5. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Shandong University, Ji’nan, PR China

    Hong Wang, Xiangze Li & Ya’nan Zhen

Authors
  1. Lei Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jia Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fang Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Runze Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hong Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiangze Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ya’nan Zhen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.n.Z conceived the study, applied for ethical approval, provided administrative support, and finalized the revised manuscript. L.L. conducted data analysis and drafted the manuscript, while J.L. organized clinical data, performed statistical analyses, and prepared the figures. F.W. collected and processed specimens and contributed to manuscript drafting, and R.J. carried out data analysis and figure preparation. H.W. was responsible for specimen processing, quality control, and guiding the writing and revision of the manuscript. X.L. performed data analysis and contributed to revising the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya’nan Zhen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables_S1-S6

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Li, J., Wang, F. et al. T-cell receptor clonotypic diversity and specialization in digestive system cancers. npj Precis. Onc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01294-4

Download citation

  • Received: 03 March 2025

  • Accepted: 16 January 2026

  • Published: 28 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01294-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. Onc.)

ISSN 2397-768X (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer