Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Precision Oncology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj precision oncology
  3. articles
  4. article
An antibody-drug conjugate designed through clone and isotype selection restricts the growth of CSPG4-expressing triple-negative breast cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 March 2026

An antibody-drug conjugate designed through clone and isotype selection restricts the growth of CSPG4-expressing triple-negative breast cancer

  • Benjamina Esapa1 na1,
  • Yi Liu1 na1,
  • Alicia M. Chenoweth1,2,
  • Katie Stoker1,3,
  • Natalia Łabędź4,
  • Pablo Romero-Clavijo1,
  • Kristina M. Ilieva1,2,
  • Jennifer Trendell2,
  • Blanca Navarro-Llinas2,
  • Erin Suriawinata2,
  • Tobias Butcher5,
  • Ning Wang5,
  • Melanie Grandits1,
  • Lais C. G. F. Palhares1,
  • Alexandra McCraw1,
  • Silvia Crescioli1,
  • Annelie Johansson2,6,
  • Sheeba Irshad2,
  • Anita Grigoriadis2,6,
  • Patrycja Gazinska4,7,
  • Sophia Tsoka3,
  • Vijay Chudasama5,
  • James R. Baker5,
  • Andrew N. J. Tutt2,8,
  • Anthony Cheung1,2,
  • David E. Thurston9 &
  • …
  • Sophia N. Karagiannis1,2 

npj Precision Oncology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2465 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Drug discovery
  • Oncology

Abstract

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) demonstrate therapeutic potential, but aggressive triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) require precise target selection and antibody optimisation. We identified chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) expression in neoadjuvant treatment-resistant TNBC to guide ADC development. Three anti-CSPG4 IgG1 antibodies with distinct variable regions (225.28S, 763.74, and 9.2.27) were engineered and compared. 225.28S IgG1 demonstrated the most efficient internalisation and potent cancer cell cytotoxicity when conjugated to the tubulin inhibitor MMAE. To determine the optimal isotype, we generated 225.28S IgG4 and directly compared it with 225.28S IgG1. The IgG1 isotype showed superior internalisation and killing activity as an MMAE-conjugated ADC. Conjugation of 225.28S IgG1 to the topoisomerase inhibitor DXd produced an ADC with a drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 8. This ADC was capable of robust internalisation into cancer cells and tumour cell cytotoxicity in vitro, and significant growth restriction of two CSPG4-expressing TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDX) implanted orthotopically in mouse mammary fat pads. Unconjugated 225.28S IgG1 also limited TNBC xenograft growth in immunodeficient mice engrafted with human immune cells, confirming Fc-mediated functional activity. These studies identify 225.28S IgG1 as the optimal clone and isotype, supporting a next-generation DXd-conjugated ADC as a promising therapeutic strategy for hard-to-treat CSPG4-expressing TNBC.

Similar content being viewed by others

Antibody–drug conjugates in breast cancer: mechanisms of resistance and future therapeutic perspectives

Article Open access 29 September 2025

Exploring the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates

Article 08 January 2024

A new immunochemical strategy for triple-negative breast cancer therapy

Article Open access 21 July 2021

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding authors. Publicly available datasets used in this study include Km Plotter https://kmplot.com/, GSE16152927, and GSE21061628.

References

  1. Zhou, J. et al. Stem cells and cellular origins of breast cancer: updates in the rationale, controversies, and therapeutic implications. Front. Oncol. 9, 820 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hua, Z., White, J. & Zhou, J. Cancer stem cells in TNBC. Semin. Cancer Biol. 82, 26–34 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Waks, A. G. & Winer, E. P. Breast cancer treatment: a review. JAMA 321, 288–300 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang, S. Y., Park, S. & Kwon, Y. Recent therapeutic trends and promising targets in triple negative breast cancer. Pharm. Ther. 199, 30–57 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vagia, E., Mahalingam, D. & Cristofanilli, M. The landscape of targeted therapies in TNBC. Cancers 12, 916 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lev, S. Targeted therapy and drug resistance in triple-negative breast cancer: the EGFR axis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 48, 657–665 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Metrangolo, V. & Engelholm, L. H. Antibody-drug conjugates: the dynamic evolution from conventional to next-generation constructs. Cancers 16, 447 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Antibody Society. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies approved or in review in the EU or US. www.antibodysociety.org/resources/approved-antibodies (2025).

  9. Jang, S. et al. Phase 1 dose escalation study of MGC018, an anti-B7-H3 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 2631–2631 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beerli, R. R. et al. Abstract LB-197: NBE-002, an anthracycline-based immune-stimulatory antibody drug conjugate (iADC) targeting ROR1 for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 79, LB-197–LB-197 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ma, Y. et al. BL-B01D1, a first-in-class EGFR-HER3 bispecific antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours: a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 25, 901–911 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coates, J. T. et al. Parallel genomic alterations of antigen and payload targets mediate polyclonal acquired clinical resistance to sacituzumab govitecan in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 11, 2436–2445 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ilieva, K. M. et al. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 and its potential as an antibody Immunotherapy target across different tumor types. Front. Immunol. 8, 1911 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price, M. A. et al. CSPG4, a potential therapeutic target, facilitates malignant progression of melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 24, 1148–1157 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, B. S. et al. Distribution and molecular characterization of a cell-surface and a cytoplasmic antigen detectable in human melanoma cells with monoclonal antibodies. Int. J. Cancer 28, 293–300 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Veillard, N. et al. Chapter 16 Pyridinobenzodiazepines (PDDs) as sequence-selective DNA mono-alkylating antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) payloads. In Cytotoxic Payloads for Antibody–Drug Conjugates, Thurston, D. E. & Jackson, P.J.M. (eds) The Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 349–363 (2019)

  17. Hoffmann, R. M. et al. A novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) delivering a DNA mono-alkylating payload to chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG4)-expressing melanoma. Cancers 12, 1029 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, X. et al. CSPG4 protein as a new target for the antibody-based immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 102, 1496–1512 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu, N. C. et al. High chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 expression correlates with poor outcome in patients with breast cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 441, 514–518 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eng, M. S. et al. Enhanced targeting of triple-negative breast carcinoma and malignant melanoma by photochemical internalization of CSPG4-targeting immunotoxins. Photochem. Photobio. Sci. 17, 539–551 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mungra, N. et al. CSPG4 as a target for the specific killing of triple-negative breast cancer cells by a recombinant SNAP-tag-based antibody-auristatin F drug conjugate. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 149, 12203–12225 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. de Goeij, B. E. C. G. et al. HER2 monoclonal antibodies that do not interfere with receptor heterodimerization-mediated signaling induce effective internalization and represent valuable components for rational antibody-drug conjugate design. mAbs 6, 392–402 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bluemel, C. et al. Epitope distance to the target cell membrane and antigen size determine the potency of T cell-mediated lysis by BiTE antibodies specific for a large melanoma surface antigen. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 59, 1197–1209 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rispens, T. et al. Mechanism of immunoglobulin G4 Fab-arm exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 10302–10311 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vidarsson, G., Dekkers, G. & Rispens, T. IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions. Front. Immunol. 5, 520 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Parker, J. S. et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 1160–1167 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, Y. et al. R code and downstream analysis objects for the scRNA-seq atlas of normal and tumorigenic human breast tissue. Sci. Data 9, 96 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bassiouni, R. et al. Spatial transcriptomic analysis of a diverse patient cohort reveals a conserved architecture in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 83, 34–48 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matzku, S. et al. Melanoma targeting with a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies to distinct determinants of the human HMW-MAA. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 390–397 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bumol, T. F. & Reisfeld, R. A. Unique glycoprotein-proteoglycan complex defined by monoclonal antibody on human melanoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 1245–1249 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Riemer, A. B. et al. High-molecular-weight melanoma-associated antigen mimotope immunizations induce antibodies recognizing melanoma cells. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 54, 677–684 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mittelman, A. et al. Identification of monoclonal anti-HMW-MAA antibody linear peptide epitope by proteomic database mining. J. Invest. Dermatol. 123, 670–675 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Geiser, M. et al. Identification of the human melanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan antigen epitope recognized by the antitumor monoclonal antibody 763.74 from a peptide phage library. Cancer Res. 59, 905–910 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chang, C.-C. et al. Structural basis of antigen mimicry in a clinically relevant melanoma antigen system*. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 41546–41552 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dodev, T. S. et al. A tool kit for rapid cloning and expression of recombinant antibodies. Sci. Rep. 4, 5885 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ilieva, K. M. et al. Functionally active Fc mutant antibodies recognizing cancer antigens generated rapidly at high yields. Front. Immunol. 8, 1112 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hui, J. Z. et al. LASIC: light activated site-specific conjugation of native IgGs. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 1456–1460 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Silva, J. P. et al. The S228P mutation prevents in vivo and in vitro IgG4 Fab-arm exchange as demonstrated using a combination of novel quantitative immunoassays and physiological matrix preparation. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 5462–5469 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yamato, M. et al. DS-7300a, a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, DXd-based antibody–drug conjugate targeting B7-H3, exerts potent antitumor activities in preclinical models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 21, 635–646 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hashimoto, Y. et al. A novel HER3-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, U3-1402, exhibits potent therapeutic efficacy through the delivery of cytotoxic payload by efficient internalization. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 7151–7161 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Okajima, D. et al. Datopotamab deruxtecan, a novel TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrates potent antitumor activity by efficient drug delivery to tumor cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 20, 2329–2340 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Suzuki, H. et al. Raludotatug deruxtecan, a CDH6-targeting antibody-drug conjugate with a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor DXd, is efficacious in human ovarian and kidney cancer models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 23, 257–271 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ogitani, Y. et al. DS-8201a, a novel HER2-targeting ADC with a novel DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, demonstrates a promising antitumor efficacy with differentiation from T-DM1. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 5097–5108 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bardia, A. et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1529–1541 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schiffer, D. et al. The significance of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) in human gliomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2724 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liu, X. et al. Human immunoglobulin G hinge regulates agonistic anti-CD40 immunostimulatory and antitumour activities through biophysical flexibility. Nat. Commun. 10, 4206 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. White, A. L. et al. Conformation of the human immunoglobulin G2 hinge imparts superagonistic properties to immunostimulatory anticancer antibodies. Cancer Cell 27, 138–148 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Foss, S. et al. Potent TRIM21 and complement-dependent intracellular antiviral immunity requires the IgG3 hinge. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabj1640 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tsuchikama, K. et al. Exploring the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 21, 203–223 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. The Antibody Society. Antibody therapeutics in late-stage clinical studies. www.antibodysociety.org/antibodies-in-late-stage-clinical-studies/ (2025).

  51. Ogitani, Y. et al. Bystander killing effect of DS-8201a, a novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody-drug conjugate, in tumors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterogeneity. Cancer Sci. 107, 1039–1046 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Staudacher, A. H. & Brown, M. P. Antibody drug conjugates and bystander killing: is antigen-dependent internalisation required? Br. J. Cancer 117, 1736–1742 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Karagiannis, P. et al. IgG4 subclass antibodies impair antitumor immunity in melanoma. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 1457–1474 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Patel, N. et al. Integrated genomics and functional validation identifies malignant cell specific dependencies in triple negative breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 9, 1044 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Saal, L. H. et al. The Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network - Breast (SCAN-B) Initiative: a large-scale multicenter infrastructure towards implementation of breast cancer genomic analyses in the clinical routine. Genome Med. 7, 20 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Staaf, J. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of triple-negative breast cancers in a population-based clinical study. Nat. Med. 25, 1526–1533 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Curtis, C. et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486, 346–352 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Brasó-Maristany, F. et al. PIM1 kinase regulates cell death, tumor growth and chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer. Nat. Med. 22, 1303–1313 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Koboldt, D. C. et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61–70 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences. Nature 534, 47–54 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gazinska, P. et al. Comparison of basal-like triple-negative breast cancer defined by morphology, immunohistochemistry and transcriptional profiles. Mod. Pathol. 26, 955–966 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bracher, M. et al. Three-colour flow cytometric method to measure antibody-dependent tumour cell killing by cytotoxicity and phagocytosis. J. Immunol. Methods 323, 160–171 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Created in BioRender. Karagiannis, S. N. https://BioRender.com/2832qh8 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T008709/1, BB/Y002180/1), Breast Cancer Now (147; KCL-BCN-Q3), the British Skin Foundation (006/R/22), Cancer Research UK City of London Centre (C7893/A31530), Worldwide Cancer Research (24-0087). This research was supported by the King’s Health Partners Centre for Translational Medicine. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of King’s Health Partners. We thank the Nikon Imaging Centre at King’s College London for help with light microscopy. The authors acknowledge the Advanced Cytometry Platform team, located in the R&D Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT. We thank Roman Laddach for his guidance on the analysis of the transcriptomic data.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Benjamina Esapa, Yi Liu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, & KHP Centre for Translational Medicine, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK

    Benjamina Esapa, Yi Liu, Alicia M. Chenoweth, Katie Stoker, Pablo Romero-Clavijo, Kristina M. Ilieva, Melanie Grandits, Lais C. G. F. Palhares, Alexandra McCraw, Silvia Crescioli, Anthony Cheung & Sophia N. Karagiannis

  2. Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Innovation Hub, Guy’s Cancer Centre, London, UK

    Alicia M. Chenoweth, Kristina M. Ilieva, Jennifer Trendell, Blanca Navarro-Llinas, Erin Suriawinata, Annelie Johansson, Sheeba Irshad, Anita Grigoriadis, Andrew N. J. Tutt, Anthony Cheung & Sophia N. Karagiannis

  3. Department of Informatics, Faculty of Natural, Mathematical and Engineering Sciences, King’s College London, Bush House, London, UK

    Katie Stoker & Sophia Tsoka

  4. Biobank Research Group and Section of the Biobank Medical Facility, Population Diagnostics Center, Łukasiewicz Research Network—PORT Polish Center for Technology Development, Wrocław, Poland

    Natalia Łabędź & Patrycja Gazinska

  5. Department of Chemistry, University College London, London, UK

    Tobias Butcher, Ning Wang, Vijay Chudasama & James R. Baker

  6. Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Cancer Centre, London, UK

    Annelie Johansson & Anita Grigoriadis

  7. Department of Oncology and Haematology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Patrycja Gazinska

  8. The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK

    Andrew N. J. Tutt

  9. Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK

    David E. Thurston

Authors
  1. Benjamina Esapa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alicia M. Chenoweth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katie Stoker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Natalia Łabędź
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pablo Romero-Clavijo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kristina M. Ilieva
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jennifer Trendell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Blanca Navarro-Llinas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Erin Suriawinata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tobias Butcher
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ning Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Melanie Grandits
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Lais C. G. F. Palhares
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Alexandra McCraw
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Silvia Crescioli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Annelie Johansson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Sheeba Irshad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Anita Grigoriadis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Patrycja Gazinska
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Sophia Tsoka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Vijay Chudasama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  23. James R. Baker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Andrew N. J. Tutt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Anthony Cheung
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  26. David E. Thurston
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Sophia N. Karagiannis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.N.K. and D.E.T. designed and conceived the study. B.E., Y.L., A.M.C., A.C., and S.N.K. developed the methodology. B.E., Y.L., A.M.C., K.S., N.Ł., P.R.C., K.M.I., B.N.L., E.S., J.T., T.B., N.W., M.G., L.C.G.F.P., A.M., S.C., A.J., P.G., V.C., J.R.B., D.E.T., and S.N.K. acquired the data or helped with the data analysis. B.E., Y.L., A.C., A.M.C., S.N.K., and D.E.T. discussed and interpreted the data, and wrote and edited the manuscript. A.M.C., S.I., A.G., P.G., S.T., V.C., J.R.B., A.N.J.T., A.C., D.E.T., and S.N.K. were responsible for supervising data acquisition and for securing funding. S.N.K. and D.E.T. led and oversaw the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the submitted version. All authors agree to all manuscript contents, the author list and its order, and the author contribution statements.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David E. Thurston or Sophia N. Karagiannis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.N.K. is the founder and shareholder of Epsilogen Ltd. S.N.K., A.M.C., and A.C. declare patents on antibodies for cancer. D.E.T. is a co-founder of Pheon Therapeutics Ltd. The authors declare no pending patents. The other authors do not declare any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary figures (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esapa, B., Liu, Y., Chenoweth, A.M. et al. An antibody-drug conjugate designed through clone and isotype selection restricts the growth of CSPG4-expressing triple-negative breast cancer. npj Precis. Onc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01341-0

Download citation

  • Received: 31 August 2025

  • Accepted: 16 February 2026

  • Published: 07 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01341-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Antibody-drug conjugates for solid tumors

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. Onc.)

ISSN 2397-768X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer