Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Precision Oncology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj precision oncology
  3. articles
  4. article
Pan-cancer multi-omic ERBB2-HER2 characterization using next-generation sequencing and quantitative proteomics
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 March 2026

Pan-cancer multi-omic ERBB2-HER2 characterization using next-generation sequencing and quantitative proteomics

  • Allison L. Hunt1,2,
  • Jamie Randall3,
  • Jonathan D. Ogata2,4,
  • Laura Johnston3,
  • Whitney Swain3,
  • Savannah Melvin3,
  • Meenakshi Sharma3,
  • Valerie Calvert5,
  • G. Larry Maxwell1,
  • Nicholas W. Bateman2,4,
  • Emanuel F. Petricoin5 na1,
  • Thomas P. Conrads1,2 na1 &
  • …
  • Timothy L. Cannon3 na1 

npj Precision Oncology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1445 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Cancer
  • Molecular biology
  • Oncology

Abstract

The recent successes of HER2-targeting agents, even in tumors characterized by FDA-approved molecular testing as HER2-negative or non-amplified, have underscored the limitations of current diagnostic approaches for accurately identifying patients with actionable HER2/EGFR activation/phosphorylation. We therefore performed a multi-omic investigation integrating clinical next-generation sequencing with a CLIA-certified reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) assay and laser microdissection-enriched tumor samples to characterize ERBB2/HER2 at the DNA, RNA, protein, and phosphoprotein level in patients with advanced pan-cancer solid tumor malignancies. Functional pathway activation mapping by RPPA revealed several patients with ERBB2 genomic or transcriptomic alterations and/or HER2Total-positivity by immunohistochemistry who exhibited no significant HER2Y1248 activation/phosphorylation. In contrast, other patients lacking ERBB2 genomic/transcriptomic alterations demonstrated significant HER2Y1248 activation/phosphorylation with co-activation of EGFRY1173, a marker associated with prognostic significance. Our results highlight the weak concordance between ERBB2 genomic/transcriptomic alterations and downstream activation of HER family signaling and support the inclusion of functional proteomic/phosphoproteomic analysis as an essential component of precision oncology pipelines to more accurately guide selection of HER2- and EGFR-targeted therapies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Post-transcriptional screen of cancer amplified genes identifies ERBB2/Her2 signaling as AU-rich mRNA stability-promoting pathway

Article Open access 17 September 2021

HER2DX ERBB2 mRNA score in first-line advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab

Article Open access 25 April 2025

Survival outcomes of ERBB2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy

Article Open access 08 December 2025

Data availability

Sequencing data supporting the findings of this study were generated by Tempus AI, Inc. The deidentified data used in the research were collected in a real-world healthcare setting and are subject to controlled access for privacy and proprietary reasons. When possible, derived data supporting the findings of this study have been made available within the paper and its supplementary figures and tables. The RPPA abundance data is available in Supplementary Data 1.

Code availability

Code sharing is not applicable to this article as no custom codes were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Cheng, X. A comprehensive review of HER2 in cancer biology and therapeutics. Genes 15 (2024).

  2. Yarden, Y. & Sliwkowski, M. X. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 127–137 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sergina, N. V. & Moasser, M. M. The HER family and cancer: emerging molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Trends Mol. Med. 13, 527–534 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, B. T. et al. 654O Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients (pts) with solid tumors harboring specific HER2-activating mutations (HER2m): Primary results from the international phase II DESTINY-PanTumor01 (DPT-01) study. Ann. Oncol. 34, S459–S460 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meric-Bernstam, F. et al. Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients (pts) with HER2-expressing solid tumors: DESTINY-PanTumor02 (DP-02) interim results. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, LBA3000–LBA3000 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tarantino, P. et al. HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Pathological and Clinical Landscape. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 1951–1962 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schettini, F. et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 7, 1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Modi, S. et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 9–20 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston, L. E. et al. Proteomics based selection achieves complete response to HER2 therapy in HER2 IHC 0 breast cancer. npj Precis. Oncol. 8, 203 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Randall, J. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of HER2 protein expression in PDAC tumors. Clin. Proteom. 21, 24 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wulfkuhle, J. D. et al. Molecular analysis of HER2 signaling in human breast cancer by functional protein pathway activation mapping. Clin. Cancer Res 18, 6426–6435 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wulfkuhle, J. D. et al. HER family protein expression and activation predicts response to combination T-DM1/pertuzumab in HER2+ patients in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 3133–3133 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wulfkuhle, J. D. et al. Evaluation of the HER/PI3K/AKT family signaling network as a predictive biomarker of pathologic complete response for patients with breast cancer treated with Neratinib in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. JCO Precis. Oncol. 1–20 (2018).

  14. Hunt, A. L. et al. Real-time functional proteomics enhances therapeutic targeting in precision oncology molecular tumor boards. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 9, 111 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mosele, F. et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in metastatic breast cancer with variable HER2 expression: the phase 2 DAISY trial. Nat. Med. 29, 2110–2120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pierobon, M. et al. Multi-omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial. Mol. Oncol. 16, 104–115 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gallagher, R. I. et al. Protein signaling and drug target activation signatures to guide therapy prioritization: Therapeutic resistance and sensitivity in the I-SPY 2 Trial. Cell Rep. Med. 4, 101312 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tarantino, P. et al. Quantitative pre-treatment assessment of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) antibody target (HER2) and payload target (topoisomerase 1, Topo1) to predict outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J. Clin. Oncol. 43, 1032–1032 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schlam, I., Tarantino, P. & Tolaney, S. M. Overcoming Resistance to HER2-directed therapies in breast cancer. Cancers 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163996 (2022).

  20. Esserman, L. J. et al. Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results From the I-SPY 1 TRIAL—CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 3242–3249 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edfors, F. et al. Gene-specific correlation of RNA and protein levels in human cells and tissues. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 883 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ørntoft, T. F., Thykjaer, T., Waldman, F. M., Wolf, H. & Celis, J. E. Genome-wide study of gene copy numbers, transcripts, and protein levels in pairs of non-invasive and invasive human transitional cell carcinomas. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 1, 37–45 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Greenbaum, D., Colangelo, C., Williams, K. & Gerstein, M. Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale. Genome Biol. 4, 117 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hunt, A. L. et al. Extensive three-dimensional intratumor proteomic heterogeneity revealed by multiregion sampling in high-grade serous ovarian tumor specimens. iScience 24, 102757 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burdett, N. L. et al. Multiomic analysis of homologous recombination-deficient end-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-023-01320-2 (2023).

  26. Hunt, A. L. et al. Mapping three-dimensional intratumor proteomic heterogeneity in uterine serous carcinoma by multiregion microsampling. Clin. Proteom. 21, 4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tian, Q. et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 3, 960–969 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, G. et al. Discordant protein and mRNA expression in lung adenocarcinomas. Mol. Cell Proteom. 1, 304–313 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bateman, N. W. et al. Proteogenomic analysis of enriched HGSOC tumor epithelium identifies prognostic signatures and therapeutic vulnerabilities. npj Precis. Oncol. 8, 68 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gonçalves, E. et al. Widespread post-transcriptional attenuation of genomic copy-number variation in cancer. Cell Syst. 5, 386–398.e384 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hunter, F. W. et al. Mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 122, 603–612 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Saleh, K. et al. Mechanisms of action and resistance to anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer. Cancer Drug Resist. 7, 22 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Luque-Cabal, M., García-Teijido, P., Fernández-Pérez, Y., Sánchez-Lorenzo, L. & Palacio-Vázquez, I. Mechanisms behind the resistance to Trastuzumab in HER2-amplified breast cancer and strategies to overcome it. Clin. Med Insights Oncol. 10, 21–30 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Unni, A. M., Lockwood, W. W., Zejnullahu, K., Lee-Lin, S. Q. & Varmus, H. Evidence that synthetic lethality underlies the mutual exclusivity of oncogenic KRAS and EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. Elife 4, e06907 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, S. M. & Oh, H. RAS/RAF mutations and microsatellite instability status in primary colorectal cancers according to HER2 amplification. Sci. Rep. 14, 11432 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D980–D985 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Suzuki, R. & Shimodaira, H. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22, 1540–1542 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Clark, A. S. et al. Neoadjuvant T-DM1/pertuzumab and paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab for HER2(+) breast cancer in the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. Nat. Commun. 12, 6428 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Balk, E. M. et al. Effects of Statins on nonlipid serum markers associated with cardiovascular disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 139, 670–682 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vogel, C. & Marcotte, E. M. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 227–232 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  41. de Sousa Abreu, R., Penalva, L. O., Marcotte, E. M. & Vogel, C. Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1512–1526 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li, X., Zhao, L., Li, W., Gao, P. & Zhang, N. HER2-targeting CAR-T cells show highly efficient anti-tumor activity against glioblastoma both in vitro and in vivo. Genes Immun. 25, 201–208 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ahmed, N. et al. HER2-specific T cells target primary glioblastoma stem cells and induce regression of autologous experimental tumors. Clin. Cancer Res 16, 474–485 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, C. et al. ErbB2/HER2-Specific NK cells for targeted therapy of Glioblastoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 108, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv375 (2015).

  45. Ramezani, M., Siami, S., Rezaei, M., Khazaei, S. & Sadeghi, M. An immunohistochemical study of HER2 expression in primary brain tumors. Biomedicine 10, 21–27 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xu, B. et al. The expression and prognostic value of the epidermal growth factor receptor family in glioma. BMC Cancer 21, 451 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Beaubier, N. et al. Clinical validation of the Tempus xT next-generation targeted oncology sequencing assay. Oncotarget 10 (2019).

  48. Beaubier, N. et al. Integrated genomic profiling expands clinical options for patients with cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1351–1360 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tempus A. I., I. Tempus xT Validation Summary. Tempus AI, Inc. Official Website. https://www.tempus.com/resources/document-library/Tempus-xT_Validation (2024).

  50. Hunt, A. L. et al. Integration of multi-omic data in a molecular tumor board reveals EGFR-associated ALK-inhibitor resistance in a patient with inflammatory myofibroblastic cancer. Oncologist https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad129 (2023).

  51. Baldelli, E. et al. in Molecular Profiling: Methods and Protocols Vol. 1606 (ed Virginia Espina) 149–169 (Springer New York, 2017).

  52. Youden, W. J. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3, 32–35 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  53. R Core Team _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2024).

  54. Wickham, H. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4 https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686 (2019).

  55. Pantano, L. et al. DEGreport: Report of DEG analysis. https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.DEGreport, R package version 1.44.0, https://bioconductor.org/packages/DEGreport, https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DEGreport.html (2025).

  56. Aragon T epitools: Epidemiology Tools. R package version 0.5-10.1, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=epitools (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia for histopathology image analysis support.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Emanuel F. Petricoin, Thomas P. Conrads, Timothy L. Cannon.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Women’s Health Integrated Research Center, Women’s Service Line, Inova Health System, Annandale, VA, USA

    Allison L. Hunt, G. Larry Maxwell & Thomas P. Conrads

  2. Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women’s Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Allison L. Hunt, Jonathan D. Ogata, Nicholas W. Bateman & Thomas P. Conrads

  3. Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Jamie Randall, Laura Johnston, Whitney Swain, Savannah Melvin, Meenakshi Sharma & Timothy L. Cannon

  4. The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA

    Jonathan D. Ogata & Nicholas W. Bateman

  5. Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA

    Valerie Calvert & Emanuel F. Petricoin

Authors
  1. Allison L. Hunt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jamie Randall
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan D. Ogata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura Johnston
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Whitney Swain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Savannah Melvin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Meenakshi Sharma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Valerie Calvert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. G. Larry Maxwell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nicholas W. Bateman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Emanuel F. Petricoin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Thomas P. Conrads
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Timothy L. Cannon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: T.L.C., E.F.P., T.P.C. Management of clinical records: J.R., L.J., W.S. Data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation: A.L.H., J.D.O., S.M., M.S., V.C., T.P.C., E.F.P., T.L.C. Writing and/or reviewing: A.L.H., J.R., J.D.O., L.J., W.S., V.C., G.L.M., N.W.B., T.P.C., E.F.P., T.L.C. All authors gave final approval of the completed work and are accountable for accuracy and integrity. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Department of the Navy, Department of the Air Force, Department of the Army, Department of War, or the United States Government. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Emanuel F. Petricoin, Thomas P. Conrads or Timothy L. Cannon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

T.P.C. is a Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. SAB member and receives research funding from AbbVie. E.F.P. receives research funding from Genentech, Pfizer, Mirati, Springworks Therapeutics, Deciphera, AbbVie, and is a co-inventor of the RPPA Technology described herein, and related HER2 biomarker patents, and receives royalties on the related license agreements.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Supplementary data1 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hunt, A.L., Randall, J., Ogata, J.D. et al. Pan-cancer multi-omic ERBB2-HER2 characterization using next-generation sequencing and quantitative proteomics. npj Precis. Onc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01351-y

Download citation

  • Received: 10 October 2025

  • Accepted: 20 February 2026

  • Published: 05 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01351-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. Onc.)

ISSN 2397-768X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer