Table 5 Decision model parameters

From: Cost-effectiveness of AI for pediatric diabetic eye exams from a health system perspective

Parameter Description

Base-case estimate

Low

High

Distribution

Sources

Population-level metrics

Prevalence of DR in T1D

5.6%

3.4%

20.1%

Beta

23,24,25

Prevalence of DR in T2D

9.1%

6.0%

51.0%

Beta

23,24,26

Diagnostic accuracy metrics

Sensitivity of ECP

33%

0%

100%

Beta

27,28,29

Specificity of ECP

95%

70%

100%

Beta

28

Sensitivity of autonomous AI

89.3%

42.1%

99.6%

Beta

30,31,32,33

Specificity of autonomous AI

88.2%

74.3%

93.7%

Beta

30,31,32,33

 Diagnosability of autonomous AI

96.8%

94.6%

97.3%

Beta

30,33

Human-behavior factors

Probability of patient going for initial ECP-based screening

52.0%

15.3%

72%

Beta

4, 34

Probability of patient accepting AI- based screening

95-96.4%

50%

100%

Beta

33,35

Probability of patient following up with ECP after ECP screening yielded positive result

29%

0

100%

Beta

36

Probability of patient following up with ECP after AI autonomous screening yielded positive result

65%

55.4%

100%

Beta

35,37

Autonomous AI Costs to the Health System

Acquisition (equipment, camera, system) per site

$10,000

$1000

$100,000

Log normal

Stakeholder interviews

IT integration (including health system and vendor) per site

$3000

$1000

$20,000

Log normal

Stakeholder interviews

Ongoing support fee (including health system and vendor)/ per site

$10,000

$1000

$100,000

Log normal

Stakeholder interviews

Facility Space Allocation Cost for AI Device per site

$2800

$0

$8500

Log normal

42,43

tion

$33.00/hour

$7.25/hour

$42.00/hour

Gamma

39,40,41

Optician Productivity Rate

2 patients screened/hour

1 patient screened/hour

4 patients screened/hour

Poisson

33

Standard of Care (ECP) Costs to the Health System

Cost of service per patient

$172

$110

$240

Log normal

44