Table 4 The clinical validation by grading actual and predicted visual field (VF)
HPA method | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The number of each category | ||||||
Original VFs | 169 | 64 | 65 | 298 | ||
VFs predicted by ROI | 183 | 55 | 60 | 298 | ||
VFs predicted by ROI + Clin | 184 | 57 | 57 | 298 | ||
Accuracy | ||||||
VFs predicted by ROI | 0.92 (0.88-0.96) | 0.53 (0.41-0.66) | 0.83 (0.74–0.92) | 0.82 (0.77-0.86) | ||
VFs predicted by ROI + Clin | 0.93 (0.90–0.97) | 0.56 (0.44–0.69) | 0.83 (0.74–0.92) | 0.83 (0.79–0.87) | ||
Voronoi method | Clear | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Diffuse | Total |
The number of each category | ||||||
Original VFs | 50 | 77 | 83 | 68 | 20 | 298 |
VFs predicted by ROI | 67 | 71 | 70 | 66 | 24 | 298 |
VFs predicted by ROI + Clin | 86 | 56 | 72 | 60 | 24 | 298 |
Accuracy | ||||||
VFs predicted by ROI | 0.80 (0.69-0.91) | 0.55 (0.43–0.66) | 0.61 (0.51-0.72) | 0.75 (0.64-0.86) | 0.65 (0.42-0.88) | 0.66 (0.61-0.72) |
VFs predicted by ROI + Clin | 0.86 (0.76-0.96) | 0.52 (0.41-0.63) | 0.72 (0.62-0.82) | 0.75 (0.64-0.86) | 0.75 (0.54-0.96) | 0.70 (0.65-0.75) |
