Fig. 2: In the analysis adjusted using sIPTW, Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to compare OS outcomes among different treatments for T1a-M3/T1b esophageal cancer. | npj Digital Medicine

Fig. 2: In the analysis adjusted using sIPTW, Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to compare OS outcomes among different treatments for T1a-M3/T1b esophageal cancer.

From: Therapeutic outcomes of different treatment approaches for T1a-M3/T1b esophageal cancer and development of a prognostic prediction model

Fig. 2

Survival outcomes of different treatments: endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy (a), endoscopic therapy and CRT (b), endoscopic therapy and endoscopic therapy combined with CRT (c), endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy combined with CRT (d), endoscopic therapy combined with CRT and esophagectomy (e), endoscopic therapy combined with CRT and esophagectomy combined with CRT (f), endoscopic therapy combined with CRT and CRT (g), esophagectomy and CRT (h), esophagectomy and esophagectomy combined with CRT (i), and esophagectomy combined with CRT and CRT (j). sIPTW stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, OS overall survival, CRT chemoradiotherapy.

Back to article page