Table 4 Statistical comparison of Dice (%) and Hausdorff Distance (HD, mm) between CoreFormer and other SOTA methods on LIDC-IDRI

From: CoreFormer high fidelity pulmonary nodule segmentation with structural core priors and geodesic implicit fields

Method

Dice (%)

HD (mm)

 

Mean ± Std

p-val

Mean ± Std

p-val

3D U-Net

84.2 ± 4.3

<0.001

3.64 ± 1.12

<0.001

V-Net

85.0 ± 3.9

<0.001

3.45 ± 1.05

<0.001

Attention U-Net

85.8 ± 3.7

0.002

3.31 ± 1.01

0.003

nnU-Net

86.5 ± 3.6

0.007

3.21 ± 0.94

0.011

STUNet

87.1 ± 3.2

0.021

2.98 ± 0.85

0.034

UNETR

86.3 ± 3.4

0.013

3.05 ± 0.91

0.020

CoreFormer (Ours)

88.7 ± 2.6

-

2.54 ± 0.72

-

  1. Results are reported as mean ± Std over the test set. p values are computed using paired t-tests. Values in bold indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Back to article page