Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Digital biomarkers for brain health: passive and continuous assessment from wearable sensors
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 January 2026

Digital biomarkers for brain health: passive and continuous assessment from wearable sensors

  • Igor Matias1,2,
  • Maximilian Haas2,3,
  • Eric J. Daza4,5,
  • Matthias Kliegel2 &
  • …
  • Katarzyna Wac1 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2481 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Health care
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

Continuous and scalable monitoring of cognition and affective states is critical for the early detection of brain health, which is currently limited by the burden of active assessments. This study investigated the potential of consumer-grade wearable and mobile technologies to passively predict 21 cognitive and mental health outcomes in real-world conditions. We collected data from 82 cognitively healthy adults, including passively measured behaviour, physiology, and environmental exposures longitudinally, for 10 months. Active data were gathered in four waves using validated patient- and performance-reported outcomes. Data quality assurance involved a data filtering resulting in average wearable data coverage of 96% per day. Artificial Intelligence-powered prediction was applied, and performance was assessed using subject- and wave-dependent cross-validation. Cognitive and affective outcomes were predicted with low scaled errors. Patient-reported outcomes were more predictable than performance-based ones. Environmental and physiological metrics emerged as the most informative predictors. Passive multimodal data captured meaningful variability in cognition and affect, demonstrating the feasibility of low-burden, scalable approaches to continuous brain-health monitoring. Feature-importance analyses suggested that environmental exposures better explained inter-individual differences, whereas physiological and behavioural rhythms captured within-person changes. These findings highlight the potential of everyday technologies for population-level tracking of brain-health and deviations from expected trajectories.

Similar content being viewed by others

Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methods

Article Open access 11 January 2022

Challenges and opportunities of wearable molecular sensors in endocrinology and metabolism

Article 08 September 2025

A translationally informed approach to vital signs for psychiatry: a preliminary proof of concept

Article Open access 26 August 2024

Data availability

Deidentified participant data underlying the findings of this study, along with the data dictionary, will be made available upon reasonable request to the first author. Access to the raw data is restricted due to ethical and privacy constraints and will require a data access agreement. Access to the raw data may be granted to researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the study team.

References

  1. Gamaldo, A. A. & Allaire, J. C. Daily fluctuations in everyday cognition: is it meaningful? J. Aging Health 28, 834–849 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanushek, E. A., Kinne, L., Witthöft, F. & Woessmann, L. Age and cognitive skills: use it or lose it. Sci. Adv. 11 (2025).

  3. Brain health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/brain-health#tab=tab_1.

  4. Gamaldo, A. A. & Allaire, J. C. Daily fluctuations in everyday cognition. J. Aging Health 28, 834–849 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brasier, N. et al. Next-generation wearable sensors for biopsychosocial care in mental health: a narrative review. BMJ Digital Health AI 1, e000018 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, R. et al. Developing measures of cognitive impairment in the real world from consumer-grade multimodal sensor streams. In Proc. ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 11, 2145–2155 (2019).

  7. Sliwinski, M. J. et al. Reliability and validity of ambulatory cognitive assessments. Assessment 25, 14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Powell, D. et al. Exploring the potential of digital biomarkers as a measure of brain health ‘capital. NPJ Digit Med. 8, 1–4 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kourtis, L. C., Regele, O. B., Wright, J. M. & Jones, G. B. Digital biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the mobile/wearable devices opportunity. NPJ Digit Med. 2, 1–9 (2019).

  10. Baglioni, C. et al. Interactions between insomnia, sleep duration and emotional processes: an ecological momentary assessment of longitudinal influences combining self-report and physiological measures. J. Sleep. Res. 33, e14001 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beattie, L., Kyle, S. D., Espie, C. A. & Biello, S. M. Social interactions, emotion and sleep: a systematic review and research agenda. Sleep. Med. Rev. 24, 83–100 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Magnon, V. et al. Does heart rate variability predict better executive functioning? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cortex 155, 218–236 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keller, M. C. et al. A warm heart and a clear head. Psychol. Sci. 16, 724–731 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor, L., Watkins, S. L., Marshall, H., Dascombe, B. J. & Foster, J. The impact of different environmental conditions on cognitive function: a focused review. Front Physiol. 6, 372 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, T., Wang, J., Huang, J., Kelly, F. J. & Li, G. Long-term exposure to multiple ambient air pollutants and association with incident depression and anxiety. JAMA Psychiatry 80, 305–313 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bhui, K. et al. Air quality and mental health: evidence, challenges and future directions. BJPsych Open 9, e120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Der Roest, H. G. et al. Subjective needs of people with dementia: a review of the literature. Int. Psychogeriatr. 19, 559–592 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ford, E., Milne, R. & Curlewis, K. Ethical issues when using digital biomarkers and artificial intelligence for the early detection of dementia. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 13 (2023).

  19. Juul Rasmussen, I. & Frikke-Schmidt, R. Modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and genetics for targeted prevention of dementia. Eur. Heart J. 44, 2526–2543 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Butler, P. M. et al. Smartwatch- and smartphone-based remote assessment of brain health and detection of mild cognitive impairment. Nat. Med. 1–11. (2025).

  21. Iulita, M. F., Streel, E. & Harrison, J. Digital biomarkers: Redefining clinical outcomes and the concept of meaningful change. Alzheimer’s. Dement.: Transl. Res. Clin. Interventions 11, e70114 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou, H. et al. Digital biomarkers of cognitive frailty: the value of detailed gait assessment beyond gait speed. Gerontology 68, 224–233 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Exler, A., Klebsattel, C., Schankin, A. & Beigl, M. A wearable system for mood assessment considering smartphone features and data from mobile ECGs. UbiComp 2016 Adjunct—Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 1153–1161 (2016).

  24. Cormack, F. et al. Wearable technology for high-frequency cognitive and mood assessment in major depressive disorder: Longitudinal observational study. JMIR Ment. Health 6, e12814 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hickman, R., D’Oliveira, T. C., Davies, A. & Shergill, S. Monitoring daily sleep, mood, and affect using digital technologies and wearables: a systematic review. Sensors 24, 4701 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matias, I., Kliegel, M. & Wac, K. In UbiComp Companion 2024—Companion of the 2024 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 743–751 (Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2024).

  27. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–83 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Walls, T. A. & Schafer, J. L. Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data. Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data (Oxford University Press, 2012).

  29. Buss, A. H. & Durkee, A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. J. Consult Psychol. 21, 343–349 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Haas, M., Scheibe, S. & El Khawli, E. Online assessment of cognitive functioning across the adult lifespan using the eCOGTEL: a reliable alternative to laboratory testing. Eur. J. Ageing. 19, 609–619 (2022).

  31. Zigmond, A. S. & Snaith, R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 67, 361–370 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jorm, A. F. & Jacomb, P. A. The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): Socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms. Psychol. Med 19, 1015–1022 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith, G., Della Sala, S., Logie, R. H. & Maylor, E. A. Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: a questionnaire study. Memory 8, 311–321 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24, 385–396 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ward, T. et al. Finger-Tapping Test. In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1296–1296 (Springer, 2013).

  37. Eriksen, B. A. & Eriksen, C. W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 143–149 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Deary, I. J., Liewald, D. & Nissan, J. A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: The Deary-Liewald reaction time task. Behav. Res Methods 43, 258–268 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tombaugh, T. N. Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 19, 203–214 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nucci, M., Mapelli, D. & Mondini, S. Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq): a new instrument for measuring cognitive reserve. Aging Clin. Exp. Res 24, 218–226 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Panagiotakos, D. B., Pitsavos, C. & Stefanadis, C. Dietary patterns: A Mediterranean diet score and its relation to clinical and biological markers of cardiovascular disease risk. Nutr., Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 16, 559–568 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Berrocal, A., Manea, V., de Masi, A. & Wac, K. MQOL lab: Step-by-step creation of a flexible platform to conduct studies using interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous devices. In Procedia Computer Science Vol. 175, 221–229 (Elsevier, 2020).

  43. Helmer, P. et al. Accuracy and systematic biases of heart rate measurements by consumer-grade fitness trackers in postoperative patients: prospective clinical trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 24 (2022).

  44. Ferguson, T., Rowlands, A. V., Olds, T. & Maher, C. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act 12 (2015).

  45. An, H. S., Jones, G. C., Kang, S. K., Welk, G. J. & Lee, J. M. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps? Eur. J. Sport Sci. 17, 360–368 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bartels, C., Wegrzyn, M., Wiedl, A., Ackermann, V. & Ehrenreich, H. Practice effects in healthy adults: A longitudinal study on frequent repetitive cognitive testing. BMC Neurosci. 11, 118 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Butler, P. M. et al. Smartwatch- and smartphone-based remote assessment of brain health and detection of mild cognitive impairment. Nat. Med. 31, 829–839 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Salthouse, T. A. Frequent assessments may obscure cognitive decline. Psychol. Assess. 26, 1063 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tudor-Locke, C., Camhi, S. M. & Troiano, R. P. A catalog of rules, variables, and definitions applied to accelerometer data in the national health and nutrition examination Survey, 2003-2006. Prev. Chronic Dis. 9 (2012).

  50. Di, J. et al. Considerations to address missing data when deriving clinical trial endpoints from digital health technologies. Contemp. Clin. Trials 113 (2022).

  51. Speed, C. et al. Measure by measure: Resting heart rate across the 24-hour cycle. PLOS Digital Health 2, e0000236 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kapoor, S. & Narayanan, A. Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science. Patterns 4, 100804 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A special acknowledgment is addressed to all the participants of the Providemus alz study, who have contributed their time and efforts to make this research a reality. The first author also thanks all the co-authors, and all the collaborators who helped build the tools and reasoning upon the collected data in this project, namely Dr. Alexandre De Masi, Dr. Paweł Prociow, and Dr. Clauirton De Siebra. The authors are grateful to the reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback, which greatly improved the clarity, depth, and rigor of this manuscript. This research obtained funding from AGE-INT Swissuniversities, the Centre Universitaire d’Informatique of the University of Geneva, Société Académique de Genève, EU SHIELD (101156751), and by the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: Life course perspectives, which is financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number: 51NF40-185901). During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used ChatGPT to help draft Python scripts for data analysis and refine the writing of specific areas of the manuscript. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication. All data processing and analysis were conducted locally using non-AI-powered tools. No participant’s data was transmitted by any means to any AI tool.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Quality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Igor Matias & Katarzyna Wac

  2. Cognitive Aging Lab, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Igor Matias, Maximilian Haas & Matthias Kliegel

  3. Faculty of Psychology, UniDistance Suisse, Geneva, Switzerland

    Maximilian Haas

  4. Stats-of-1, Menlo Park, California, United States of America

    Eric J. Daza

  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, California, United States of America

    Eric J. Daza

Authors
  1. Igor Matias
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maximilian Haas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric J. Daza
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthias Kliegel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Katarzyna Wac
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

I.M. led the study design, participant recruitment and management, data collection, preprocessing, implementation of methods, statistical analysis, results interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. M.H. made substantial contributions to manuscript revision and improvement. The remaining authors (E.J.D., M.K., K.W.) provided critical feedback on the study design and supervised closely how the study was conducted. E.J.D., M.K., and K.W. also provided critical feedback and revisions to the manuscript draft and its development at various stages. All authors (I.M., M.H., E.J.D., M.K., K.W.) reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Matias.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Eric J. Daza is a full-time employee of Boehringer Ingelheim and is the founder and chief editor of Stats-of-1. Katarzyna Wac is an Associate Editor of npj Digital Medicine. She was not involved in any part of the peer-review process, editorial assessment, or decision-making for this manuscript. The other authors declare not having competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matias, I., Haas, M., Daza, E.J. et al. Digital biomarkers for brain health: passive and continuous assessment from wearable sensors. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02340-y

Download citation

  • Received: 05 August 2025

  • Accepted: 01 January 2026

  • Published: 14 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02340-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research