Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. brief communications
  4. article
Distance-stratified sociodemographic differences in telemedicine use in surgical oncology clinics at an academic medical center
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Brief Communication
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 February 2026

Distance-stratified sociodemographic differences in telemedicine use in surgical oncology clinics at an academic medical center

  • Vijaya Parameswaran1,2 na1,
  • Sean Tsung3,4 na1,
  • Yan Bo Zeng3,5,
  • Marci Miller2,
  • Joshua Pritchett6,
  • Bart M. Demaerschalk7,
  • Leah Rosengaus2,
  • Christopher Sharp1,2,
  • Byrne Lee8 na2 &
  • …
  • Sumit Shah9 na2 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 236 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Health care
  • Medical research
  • Oncology

Abstract

We examined telemedicine use across 38,883 surgical oncology visits (2021-2023) at a Northern California cancer center. At ≥20 miles from clinics, Hispanic (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.68,0.85]), Asian/Pacific Islander (OR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.66,0.84]), interpreter-needing (OR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.59,0.77]), and Medicaid patients (OR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.76,0.96]) had lower telemedicine use, while low-income patients showed higher utilization (OR = 1.67, 95% CI [1.46,1.91]). At <20 miles, no differences were observed for Hispanic, interpreter-needing, Medicaid, or low-income patients, but Asian/Pacific Islanders showed higher use (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.04-1.30]). Geographic distance modifies telemedicine access patterns.

Data availability

The data contain protected health information and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration. Telehealth policy updates. https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/telehealthpolicy/telehealth-policy-updates (2026).

  2. Paro, A. et al. Telehealth utilization among surgical oncology patients at a large academic cancer center. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 29, 7267–7276 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xiao, K., Yeung, J. C. & Bolger, J. C. The safety and acceptability of using telehealth for follow-up of patients following cancer surgery: a systematic review. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 49, 9–15 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parameswaran, V. et al. Telemedicine trends in ambulatory surgical oncology: a five-year analysis of visit volume and utilization at a high-volume academic center. Ann. Surg. Oncol. https://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-025-17592-3 (2025).

  5. Waseem, N., Boulanger, M., Yanek, L. R. & Feliciano, J. L. Disparities in telemedicine success and their association with adverse outcomes in patients with thoracic cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2220543 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hsueh, L. et al. Disparities in use of video telemedicine among patients with limited English proficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2133129 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts, E. T. & Mehrotra, A. Assessment of disparities in digital access among medicare beneficiaries and implications for telemedicine. JAMA Intern. Med. 180, 1386–1389 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Osmanlliu, E., Johari, R. & Scheinker, D. Health and healthcare disparities associated with the digital divide. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/166083 (2021).

  9. Adepoju, O. E., Chae, M., Ojinnaka, C. O., Shetty, S. & Angelocci, T. Utilization gaps during the COVID-19 pandemic: racial and ethnic disparities in telemedicine uptake in federally qualified health center clinics. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 37, 1191–1197 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marcondes, F. O. et al. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Telemedicine Use. JAMA Health Forum 5, e240131 (2024).

  11. Grenda, T. R., Whang, S. & Evans, N. R. I. Transitioning a surgery practice to telehealth during COVID-19. Ann. Surg. 272, e168 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hilty, D. M. et al. Telehealth for rural diverse populations: telebehavioral and cultural competencies, clinical outcomes and administrative approaches. Mhealth 6, 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Swenson, W. T. et al. The role of income and rurality in US cancer mortality: a SEER analysis. JCO 43, e13828 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pritchett, J. C. et al. Patient- and provider-level factors associated with telehealth utilization across a multisite, multiregional cancer practice from 2019 to 2021. JCO Oncol. Pract. 19, 750–758 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kruse, C. et al. Utilization barriers and medical outcomes commensurate with the use of telehealth among older adults: systematic review. JMIR Med. Inf. 8, e20359 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shao, C. C. et al. Inequity in telemedicine use among patients with cancer in the deep south during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oncologist 27, 555–564 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Osmanlliu, E. et al. Sociodemographic disparities in the use of cardiovascular ambulatory care and telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. Heart J. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870323001667 (2023).

  18. Ranji, U., Frederiksen, B., Salganicoff, A. & Long, M. Women, work, and family during COVID-19: findings from the KFF Women’s Health Survey. Women’s Health Policy. (2021).

  19. Cunha, A. S., Pedro, A. R. & Cordeiro, J. V. Facilitators of and barriers to accessing hospital medical specialty telemedicine consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e44188 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lazar, M. & Davenport, L. Barriers to health care access for low income families: a review of literature. J. Community Health Nurs. 35, 28–37 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cyr, M. E., Etchin, A. G., Guthrie, B. J. & Benneyan, J. C. Access to specialty healthcare in urban versus rural US populations: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19, 974 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moen, E. L. et al. Cross-state travel for cancer care and implications for telehealth reciprocity. JAMA Netw. open 8, e2461021–e2461021 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Patient Navigation. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/php/interventions/patient-navigation.html (2023).

  24. Larson, K. E. et al. Are patients traveling for intraoperative radiation therapy? Int. J. Breast Cancer 2017, 6395712 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Silverwood, S. M. et al. The relationship between travel distance for treatment and outcomes in patients undergoing radiation therapy: a systematic review. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 9, 101652 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Vijaya Parameswaran, Sean Tsung.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Byrne Lee, Sumit Shah.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Vijaya Parameswaran & Christopher Sharp

  2. Digital Health Care Integration Team, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

    Vijaya Parameswaran, Marci Miller, Leah Rosengaus & Christopher Sharp

  3. Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Sean Tsung & Yan Bo Zeng

  4. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

    Sean Tsung

  5. Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA

    Yan Bo Zeng

  6. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

    Joshua Pritchett

  7. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

    Bart M. Demaerschalk

  8. Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Byrne Lee

  9. Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Sumit Shah

Authors
  1. Vijaya Parameswaran
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sean Tsung
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Bo Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marci Miller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joshua Pritchett
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bart M. Demaerschalk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Leah Rosengaus
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christopher Sharp
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Byrne Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sumit Shah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

VP (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), ST (Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing), YBZ (Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing), MM (Data extraction and curation), JP (Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing), BD (Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing), LR (Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing), CS (Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing), BL (Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review & editing), SS (Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing). All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijaya Parameswaran.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parameswaran, V., Tsung, S., Zeng, Y.B. et al. Distance-stratified sociodemographic differences in telemedicine use in surgical oncology clinics at an academic medical center. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02411-0

Download citation

  • Received: 01 August 2025

  • Accepted: 25 January 2026

  • Published: 14 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02411-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Digital Health Equity and Access

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer