Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
3D Spatiotemporal cardiac reconstruction for predicting MACE in acute myocardial infarction
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 March 2026

3D Spatiotemporal cardiac reconstruction for predicting MACE in acute myocardial infarction

  • Qiang Gao1,2 na1,
  • Jingping Wu3 na1,
  • Yingshuang Gao1,2,
  • Yongyong Ren1,4,
  • Xiaolei Wang1,2,
  • Guojun Zhu3,
  • Jinyi Xiang3,
  • Dongaolei An3,
  • Lei Xu5,
  • Yan Zhou3,
  • Jun Pu nAff8,
  • Dan Mu6,7,
  • Lei Zhao5,
  • Hui Lu1,2,4 &
  • …
  • Lian-Ming Wu3 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1657 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cardiology
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Medical research

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has made significant strides in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, most existing methods rely solely on tabular variables derived from clinical data and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), without fully leveraging the predictive potential of the CMR imaging modality itself. Moreover, these approaches often overlook the synergistic benefits of multimodal integration between imaging and tabular data. In addition, current models primarily focus on short-term MACE risk assessment (e.g., within 6 months or 1 year), limiting their applicability for long-term prognostication. To address these limitations, we first developed ReconSeg3D, a model that reconstructs short-axis cine CMR stacks into temporally-resolved 3D bi-ventricular volumes, capturing fine-grained cardiac anatomy and dynamic motion. These bi-ventricular sequences were then integrated with 45 clinical and CMR-derived variables using spatiotemporal decomposition and cross-attention mechanisms to construct a multimodal MACE prediction model—HeartTTable. HeartTTable achieved a 5-year time-dependent AUC of 0.934 (95% CI 0.907–0.959) and a Harrell’s C-index of 0.897 for predicting MACE risk, significantly outperforming models based solely on clinical and CMR-derived tabular features, and demonstrated strong capabilities in postoperative risk stratification. Our study contributes to improved long-term postoperative management for AMI patients by offering clinicians an objective, data-driven decision-support tool.

Similar content being viewed by others

Comprehensive characterization of cardiac contraction for improved post-infarction risk assessment

Article Open access 18 April 2024

Systematic review and meta-analysis for the value of cardiac magnetic resonance strain to predict cardiac outcomes

Article Open access 11 January 2024

Time and event-specific deep learning for personalized risk assessment after cardiac perfusion imaging

Article Open access 01 May 2023

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy, ethical, and legal considerations, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The code of the model in this paper is available at https://github.com/qiang-Blazer/MACE_pred.

Code availability

The code of the model in this paper is available at https://github.com/qiang-Blazer/MACE_pred.

References

  1. Shang, P. et al. Association between medication adherence and 1-year major cardiovascular adverse events after acute myocardial infarction in China. J. Am. Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.011793 (2019).

  2. Schuster, A. et al. Fully automated cardiac assessment for diagnostic and prognostic stratification following myocardial infarction. JAHA 9, e016612 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antman, E. M. et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MIA method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 284, 835–842 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, K. A. A. et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ 333, 1091 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, Y. J., Saqlian, M. & Lee, J. Y. Deep learning–based prediction model of occurrences of major adverse cardiac events during 1-year follow-up after hospital discharge in patients with AMI using knowledge mining. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 26, 259–267 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sherazi, S. W. A., Bae, J.-W. & Lee, J. Y. A soft voting ensemble classifier for early prediction and diagnosis of occurrences of major adverse cardiovascular events for STEMI and NSTEMI during 2-year follow-up in patients with acute coronary syndrome. PLoS ONE 16, e0249338 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chopannejad, S., Sadoughi, F., Bagherzadeh, R. & Shekarchi, S. Predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome: a scoping review of machine learning approaches. Appl. Clin. Inform. 13, 720–740 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, Z., Lu, Y. & Dong, W. Utilizing electronic health records to predict multi-type major adverse cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndrome. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 60, 1725–1752 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kong, S. et al. A prognostic nomogram for long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 21, 253 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, J. et al. Risk prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events occurrence within 6 months after coronary revascularization: Machine Learning study. JMIR Med. Inform. 10, e33395 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, P. et al. Machine learning for early prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events after first percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIR Form. Res. 8, e48487 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Backhaus, S. J. et al. Artificial intelligence fully automated myocardial strain quantification for risk stratification following acute myocardial infarction. Sci. Rep. 12, 12220 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stiermaier, T. et al. Optimized prognosis assessment in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction using a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging risk score. Circ: Cardiovasc. Imaging 10, e006774 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bulluck, H. et al. A noncontrast CMR risk score for long-term risk stratification in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging 15, 431–440 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qiao, M. et al. A personalized time-resolved 3D mesh generative model for unveiling normal heart dynamics. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 800–811 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collet, J.-P. et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 42, 1289–1367 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hagström, E. et al. Cardiovascular event rates after myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke in patients with additional risk factors: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Adv. Ther. 38, 4695–4708 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miao, B. et al. Incidence and predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established atherosclerotic disease or multiple risk factors. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9, e014402 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klug, G. et al. Prognostic value at 5 years of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 14, 52 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, N. et al. Deep learning for diagnosis of chronic myocardial infarction on nonenhanced cardiac Cine MRI. Radiology https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182304 (2019).

  21. Zucker, E. J., Sandino, C. M., Kino, A., Lai, P. & Vasanawala, S. S. Free-breathing accelerated cardiac MRI using deep learning: validation in children and young adults. Radiology https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021202624 (2021).

  22. Lehmann, D. H. et al. Prediction of diagnosis and diastolic filling pressure by AI-enhanced cardiac MRI: a modelling study of hospital data. Lancet Digit. Health 6, e407–e417 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Banerjee, A. et al. A completely automated pipeline for 3D reconstruction of human heart from 2D cine magnetic resonance slices. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.379, 20200257 (2021).

  24. Chang, Q. et al. DeepRecon: joint 2D cardiac segmentation and 3D volume reconstruction via a structure-specific generative method. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2022. Vol. 13434, 567–577 (Springer Nature, 2022).

  25. Bai, W. et al. A bi-ventricular cardiac atlas built from 1000+ high resolution MR images of healthy subjects and an analysis of shape and motion. Med. Image Anal. 26, 133–145 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meng, Q., Bai, W., O’Regan, D. P. & Rueckert, D. DeepMesh: mesh-based cardiac motion tracking using deep learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 43, 1489–1500 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Beetz, M., Banerjee, A. & Grau, V. Modeling 3D cardiac contraction and relaxation with point cloud deformation networks. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 28, 4810–4819 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bello, G. A. et al. Deep-learning cardiac motion analysis for human survival prediction. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 95–104 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhuang, X. & Shen, J. Multi-scale patch and multi-modality atlases for whole heart segmentation of MRI. Med. Image Anal. 31, 77–87 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bernard, O. et al. Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 2514–2525 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, H. et al. Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study. eLife 12, e83662 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zolotarev, A. M., Khan, A. K. R., Slabaugh, G. & Roney, C. H. Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Outcome with Siamese Multi-modal Fusion and Cardiac Digital Twins. In Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning. 250, 1927–1938 (PMLR, 2024).

  33. Ding, J.-E., Hsu, C.-C. & Liu, F. Parkinson’s disease classification using contrastive graph cross-view learning with multimodal fusion of spect images and clinical features. In 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 1–5 (IEEE, 2024).

  34. Liu, Z., Wei, J., Li, R. & Zhou, J. SFusion: Self-attention based N-to-one multimodal fusion block. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023. Vol. 14221, 159–169 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023).

  35. Simon, B. D., Ozyoruk, K. B., Gelikman, D. G., Harmon, S. A. & Türkbey, B. The future of multimodal artificial intelligence models for integrating imaging and clinical metadata: a narrative review. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2024.242631 (2024).

  36. Brown, A. J. et al. Plaque structural stress estimations improve prediction of future major adverse cardiovascular events after intracoronary imaging. Circ: Cardiovasc. Imaging 9, e004172 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Qiao, M. et al. CHeart: a conditional spatio-temporal generative model for cardiac anatomy. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 43, 1259–1269 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Amano, Y. et al. Three-dimensional cardiac MR imaging: related techniques and clinical applications. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 16, 183–189 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Alkassar, M. et al. Comparative study of 2D-cine and 3D-wh volumetry: revealing systemic error of 2D-cine volumetry. Diagnostics (Basel) 13, 3162 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pandey, R. K. & Rathore, Y. K. Deep learning in 3D cardiac reconstruction: a systematic review of methodologies and dataset. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03273-y (2025).

  41. Ye, M., Yang, D., Kanski, M., Axel, L. & Metaxas, D. Neural deformable models for 3D bi-ventricular heart shape reconstruction and modeling from 2D sparse cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. In 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 14201–14210 (IEEE, 2023).

  42. Duan, J. et al. Automatic 3D bi-ventricular segmentation of cardiac images by a shape-refined multi- task deep learning approach. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 2151–2164 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tayebi Arasteh, S. et al. Automated segmentation of 3D cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10, 1167500 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hutyra, M., Paleček, T. & Hromádka, M. The use of echocardiography in acute cardiovascular care. Summary of the document prepared by the Czech Society of Cardiology. Cor Vasa 60, e70–e88 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Koo, T. K. & Li, M. Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 15, 155–163 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bonett, D. G. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat. Med. 21, 1331–1335 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bulluck, H., Dharmakumar, R., Arai, A. E., Berry, C. & Hausenloy, D. J. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 137, 1949–1964 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Liu, T. et al. Intramyocardial hemorrhage and the ‘wave front’ of reperfusion injury compromising myocardial salvage. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 79, 35–48 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hicks, K. A. et al. 2014 ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for cardiovascular endpoint events in clinical trials. JACC 66, 403–469 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hicks, K. A. et al. 2017 cardiovascular and stroke endpoint definitions for clinical trials. JACC 71, 1021–1034 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thygesen, K. et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 138, e618–e651 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Andersen, B. K. et al. Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularisation guidance (FAVOR III Europe): a Multicentre, Randomised, Non-inferiority Trial. Lancet 404, 1835–1846 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nguyen, T. L. et al. Prognostic value of high sensitivity troponin T after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Heart J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes 2, 164–171 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. van Rijsingen, I. A. W. et al. Gender-specific differences in major cardiac events and mortality in lamin A/C mutation carriers. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 15, 376–384 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rueckert, D. et al. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18, 712–721 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Youth Talent Support Program, National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171884, 82471931), Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Medical Innovation Research Special Project (23Y11906900), Shanghai “Yiyuan New Star” Outstanding Youth Talent (Excellent Program), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM) (Nos. 23JS1400700, 24JS2840200, and 25JS2850100), the Neil Shen’s SJTU Medical Research Fund.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Jun Pu

    Present address: Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

  2. These authors contributed equally: Qiang Gao, Jingping Wu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Technical Center for Digital Medicine, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Qiang Gao, Yingshuang Gao, Yongyong Ren, Xiaolei Wang & Hui Lu

  2. Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Qiang Gao, Yingshuang Gao, Xiaolei Wang & Hui Lu

  3. Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Jingping Wu, Guojun Zhu, Jinyi Xiang, Dongaolei An, Yan Zhou & Lian-Ming Wu

  4. Center for Biomedical Informatics, Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Big Data in Pediatric Precision Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai, China

    Yongyong Ren & Hui Lu

  5. Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Lei Xu & Lei Zhao

  6. Department of Radiology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    Dan Mu

  7. Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    Dan Mu

Authors
  1. Qiang Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingping Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yingshuang Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongyong Ren
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaolei Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guojun Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinyi Xiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dongaolei An
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lei Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yan Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jun Pu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dan Mu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Lei Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hui Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Lian-Ming Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Q.G., J.W., H.L., and L.W. developed the concept for the manuscript. Q.G. and J.W. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. Q.G. designed the model and presented the results. Q.G. and J.W. analyzed the data. Y.G., Y.R., X.W., D.M., L.Z., H.L., and L.W. contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. G.Z., J.X., D.A., L.X., Y.Z., J.P., and L.Z. contributed to providing medical data and advice.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun Pu, Dan Mu, Lei Zhao, Hui Lu or Lian-Ming Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Q., Wu, J., Gao, Y. et al. 3D Spatiotemporal cardiac reconstruction for predicting MACE in acute myocardial infarction. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02449-0

Download citation

  • Received: 28 August 2025

  • Accepted: 08 February 2026

  • Published: 06 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02449-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing