Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Advancing diagnostic equity through artificial intelligence chest radiograph screening for osteoporosis in Asian populations
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 March 2026

Advancing diagnostic equity through artificial intelligence chest radiograph screening for osteoporosis in Asian populations

  • Shu-Han Chen1,2,3,
  • Ray-E Chang3,
  • Chia-En Lien4,
  • Dun-Jhu Yang5,
  • Pei Yao6,
  • Meng-Lu Wu6 &
  • …
  • Kun-Hui Chen7,8,9 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1400 Accesses

  • 5 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

Early identification of abnormal bone mineral density (BMD) through opportunistic screening is critical for preventing osteoporotic fractures. We validated an AI model in 2384 asymptomatic adults (57.7% female; mean age 43.6 years) undergoing health examinations in Taiwan. Using DXA as the reference, the model identified 255 suspected abnormal BMD cases, with 94 (3.9%) DXA-confirmed positive. Population-level performance was robust, yielding an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.99) and sensitivity of 79.7% (95% CI 71.3–86.5%). Although BMI distributions paralleled East Asian regional trends, intersectional subgroup analyses remain exploratory due to small event counts. Decision curve analysis indicated superior net benefit for AI-based referral over “refer all” or “refer none” strategies, particularly for women with normal BMI (18.5–23 kg/m²). This AI tool offers precise triage for Asian health examination populations, though further validation in multi-center cohorts is required to confirm broad generalizability.

Similar content being viewed by others

Osteoporosis screening using machine learning and electromagnetic waves

Article Open access 08 August 2023

Automated bone mineral density prediction and fracture risk assessment using plain radiographs via deep learning

Article Open access 16 September 2021

Bone mineral density response prediction following osteoporosis treatment using machine learning to aid personalized therapy

Article Open access 05 July 2021

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are de-identified, but due to patient data confidentiality and Institutional Review Board requirements, they are not publicly available. They can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The custom code used for this study is proprietary to Acer Medical Inc. and cannot be made publicly available due to company confidentiality and intellectual property restrictions. The code was implemented using Python (version 3.12) and C# (version 7.3). Specific variables and parameters used for model training and statistical analysis are described in the “Methods” section and Supplementary Information, providing sufficient information for independent reproduction of the results.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis: Report of a WHO Scientific Group (World Health Organization, Geneva, 2003).

  2. Kanis, J. A. et al. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 9, 1137–1141 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferizi, U., Honig, S. & Chang, G. Artificial intelligence, osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 31, 368–375 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dimai, H. P. New horizons: artificial intelligence tools for managing osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 108, 775–783 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gatineau, G. et al. Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management. J. Bone Miner. Res. 39, 1553–1573 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amani, F. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in prediction of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 25, 991 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. He, Y., Lin, J., Zhu, S., Zhu, J. & Xu, Z. Deep learning in the radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis: a literature review. J. Int. Med. Res. 52, 3000605241244754 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paderno, A. et al. Artificial intelligence-enhanced opportunistic screening of osteoporosis in CT scan: a scoping review. Osteoporos. Int. 35, 1681–1692 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, X., Ye, C. & Xiang, L. Application of artificial neural network in the diagnostic system of osteoporosis. Neurocomputing 214, 376–381 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iliou, T., Anagnostopoulos, C. N., Stephanakis, I. M. & Anastassopoulos, G. A novel data preprocessing method for boosting neural network performance: a case study in osteoporosis prediction. Inf. Sci. 380, 92–100 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nam, K. H. et al. Machine learning model to predict osteoporotic spine on CT. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 62, 442–449 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pickhardt, P. J. et al. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann. Intern. Med. 158, 588–595 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pickhardt, P. J. et al. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 2194–2203 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cosman, F. et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 25, 2359–2381 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD). 2023 ISCD Official Positions - Adult. ISCD.org. https://iscd.org/learn/official-positions/adult-positions/ (2023).

  16. US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.27154 (2025).

  17. Yang, J. et al. Criteria for osteoporosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of osteoporosis diagnostic studies with DXA and QCT. eClinicalMedicine 83, 103244 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ong, W. et al. Artificial intelligence applications for osteoporosis classification using computed tomography. Bioengineering 10, 1364 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hong, N. et al. Deep-learning-based detection of vertebral fracture and osteoporosis using lateral spine X-ray radiography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 38, 887–895 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, C. et al. Osteoporotic precise screening using chest radiography and artificial neural network: the OPSCAN randomized controlled trial. Radiology 311, e231937 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, F. et al. Lumbar bone mineral density estimation from chest X-ray images: anatomy-aware attentive multi-ROI modeling. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 42, 257–267 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ou Yang, W. Y. et al. Development of machine learning models for prediction of osteoporosis from clinical health examination data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 7635 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shim, J. G., Kim, D. W. & Ryu, K. H. Application of machine learning approaches for osteoporosis risk prediction in postmenopausal women. Arch. Osteoporos. 15, 169 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bui, H. M. et al. Predicting the risk of osteoporosis in older Vietnamese women using machine learning approaches. Sci. Rep. 12, 20160 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tu, J. et al. Using machine learning techniques to predict the risk of osteoporosis based on nationwide chronic disease data. Sci. Rep. 14, 5245 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, L. et al. A hierarchical opportunistic screening model for osteoporosis using machine learning applied to clinical data and CT images. BMC Bioinform. 23, 63 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tseng, S. C. et al. Clinical validation of a deep learning-based software for lumbar bone mineral density and T-score prediction from chest X-rays. Diagnostics 14, 1208 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. World Health Organization. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment (Health Communications Australia, 2000).

  29. Wright, N. C. et al. The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J. Bone Miner. Res. 29, 2520–2526 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bliuc, D. et al. Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 301, 513–521 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chandran, M. et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and incidence of related fractures in developed economies in the Asia Pacific region: a systematic review. Osteoporosis. Int. 34, 1037–1053 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, Y. et al. The effect of overweight or obesity on osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. 42, 2457–2467 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Taiwan Health Promotion Administration. National Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan 2017–2020 (NAHSIT). Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan (2021).

  34. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. National Health and Nutrition Survey 2022. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan (2022).

  35. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2019–2021. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea (2022).

  36. Biro, J. M. et al. Opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence in patient portal messaging in primary care. npj Digit. Med. 8, 222 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chandran, M. et al. Development of the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) Framework: clinical standards of care for the screening, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region. Osteoporos. Int. 32, 1249–1275 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). The global call to action to close the osteoporosis care gap. https://www.osteoporosis.foundation. Accessed Oct 2025.

  39. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020-2025. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/global-strategy-on-digital-health-2020-2025.pdf. Accessed Oct 2025.

  40. Vickers, A. J. & Elkin, E. B. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med. Decis. Making 26, 565–574 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by St. Paul’s Hospital (grant number SPMRP-U1-8002), awarded to S.-H.C., and partially supported by Acer Medical Inc., with funding awarded to K.-H.C. to support the technical development and external validation of the AI system. We acknowledge Acer Medical Inc. for technical assistance during model deployment, and Taichung Veterans General Hospital for providing the internal dataset used to pre-train the AI model prior to external validation. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, or the decision to publish.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, St. Paul’s Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Shu-Han Chen

  2. Health Management Center, St. Paul’s Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Shu-Han Chen

  3. Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Shu-Han Chen & Ray-E Chang

  4. Acer Medical Inc., New Taipei City, Taiwan

    Chia-En Lien

  5. Acer Inc., Taipei City, Taiwan

    Dun-Jhu Yang

  6. Information Technology Department, St. Paul’s Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Pei Yao & Meng-Lu Wu

  7. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Kun-Hui Chen

  8. Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Kun-Hui Chen

  9. Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Providence University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Kun-Hui Chen

Authors
  1. Shu-Han Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ray-E Chang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chia-En Lien
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dun-Jhu Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pei Yao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Meng-Lu Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kun-Hui Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.-H.C. and R.-E.C. conceptualized and designed the study, led the clinical data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. S.-H.C. additionally contributed to data collection, analysis, and interpretation. C.-E.L. provided technical supervision and contributed to model conceptualization. D.-J.Y. was responsible for data curation, software development, and model validation. M.-L.W. and P.Y. coordinated data extraction and de-identification. K.-H.C. oversaw technical development and supervised external validation. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ray-E Chang or Kun-Hui Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

K.-H.C. received research funding from Acer Medical Inc. to support the technical development of the AI model published in the previous work (Reference 23). C.-E.L. is an employee of Acer Medical Inc. D.-J.Y. is an employee of Acer Inc. All other authors declare no competing interests. The study was independently designed and conducted by the clinical team. Commercial collaborators had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript preparation.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, SH., Chang, RE., Lien, CE. et al. Advancing diagnostic equity through artificial intelligence chest radiograph screening for osteoporosis in Asian populations. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02484-x

Download citation

  • Received: 24 July 2025

  • Accepted: 14 February 2026

  • Published: 19 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02484-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Digital Health Equity and Access

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing