Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Deep learning-based precision phenotyping of spine curvature identifies novel genetic risk loci for scoliosis in the UK Biobank
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 March 2026

Deep learning-based precision phenotyping of spine curvature identifies novel genetic risk loci for scoliosis in the UK Biobank

  • Michael Zeosky1 na1,
  • Eucharist Kun1 na1,
  • Siddharth Reddy1,
  • Devansh Pandey1,
  • Liaoyi Xu1,
  • Joyce Y. Wang1,
  • Chenfei Li1,
  • Ryan S. Gray2,3,
  • Carol A. Wise4,5,
  • Nao Otomo4,5 &
  • …
  • Vagheesh M. Narasimhan1,6 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1670 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Genetics
  • Medical research

Abstract

Scoliosis is the most common developmental spinal deformity, but its genetic underpinnings remain only partially understood. To identify scoliosis-related loci, we utilized dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from 57,588 individuals in the UK Biobank (UKB), and quantified spinal curvature using deep learning-based vertebral segmentation and landmarking to measure cumulative horizontal displacement. On a subset of 150 individuals, our automated image-derived curvature measurements showed a correlation of 0.83 with clinical Cobb angle assessments, supporting their validity as a proxy for scoliosis severity. To connect spinal curvature to genetics, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Our quantitative imaging phenotype identified 2 novel loci associated with scoliosis in a European population. These loci are in SEM1/SHFM1 and on an lncRNA on chr 3 located between EDEM1 and GRM7. Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant overlap between our image-based GWAS and ICD-10-based GWAS in the UKB and the Biobank of Japan. We show that our quantitative GWAS identifies more genome-wide significant loci than a case-control scoliosis dataset with ten times the sample size. Our results illustrate the potential of quantitative imaging phenotypes to uncover genetic associations that are challenging to capture with medical records alone and identify new loci for functional follow-up.

Similar content being viewed by others

Multivariate genome-wide analysis reveals shared genetic architecture and brain structural correlates of human cognitive abilities

Article Open access 24 November 2025

Characterizing aging-related genetic and physiological determinants of spinal curvature

Article Open access 12 July 2025

Genetic architecture reconciles linkage and association studies of complex traits

Article 07 October 2024

Data availability

All data used for this study were obtained from the UK Biobank under application number 65439. GWAS summary statistics are currently being uploaded to the GWAS catalog and are available at this Box link: https://utexas.box.com/s/0tyyxhzv2e5x8iucsdcd8dfutobnmcd2.

Code availability

Deep-learning and image processing tools can be found at https://github.com/reb12345/Scoliosis.

References

  1. Janicki, J. A. & Alman, B. Scoliosis: review of diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr. Child Health 12, 771 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aebi, M. The adult scoliosis. Eur. Spine J. 14, 925–948 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giampietro, P. F. Genetic aspects of congenital and idiopathic scoliosis. Science 2012, 152365 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kotwal, S., Pumberger, M., Hughes, A. & Girardi, F. Degenerative scoliosis: a review. HSS J. 7, 257 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Konieczny, M. R., Senyurt, H. & Krauspe, R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Child. Orthop. 7, 3 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi, Y. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies common variants near LBX1 associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat. Genet. 43, 1237–1240 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kou, I. et al. Genetic variants in GPR126 are associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat. Genet. 45, 676–679 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kou, I. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 14 previously unreported susceptibility loci for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Japanese. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–9 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma, S. et al. A PAX1 enhancer locus is associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis in females. Nat. Commun. 6, 6452 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khanshour, A. M. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis and replication studies in multiple ethnicities identify novel adolescent idiopathic scoliosis susceptibility loci. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, 3986–3998 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flynn, B. I. et al. Deep learning based phenotyping of medical images improves power for gene discovery of complex disease. npj Digit. Med. 6, 1–12 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faber, B. G. et al. The identification of distinct protective and susceptibility mechanisms for hip osteoarthritis: findings from a genome-wide association study meta-analysis of minimum joint space width and Mendelian randomisation cluster analyses. EBioMedicine 95, 104759 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jamaludin, A. et al. Automated measurement of size of spinal curve in population-based cohorts: validation of a method based on total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Bone 172, 116775 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, L. et al. The genetic architecture of and evolutionary constraints on the human pelvic form. Science 388, eadq1521 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kun, E. et al. The genetic architecture and evolution of the human skeletal form. Science 381, eadf8009 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weng, W. & Zhu, X. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. IEEE Access 9, 16591–16603 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 9351, 234–241 (2015).

  19. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 (2015).

  20. Brink, R. C. et al. Upright, prone, and supine spinal morphology and alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 12, 6 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hasegawa, K., Okamoto, M., Hatsushikano, S., Caseiro, G. & Watanabe, K. Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radio. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 19, 437 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bulik-Sullivan, B. et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ushiki, A. et al. Deletion of Pax1 scoliosis-associated regulatory elements leads to a female-biased tail abnormality. Cell Rep 43, 113907 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Crackower, M. A. et al. Characterization of the split hand/split foot malformation locus SHFM1 at 7q21.3-q22.1 and analysis of a candidate gene for its expression during limb development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 571–579 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mbatchou, J. et al. Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nat. Genet. 53, 1097–1103 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sollis, E. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D977–D985 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Watanabe, K. et al. A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat. Genet. 51, 1339–1348 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lonsdale, J. et al. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 45, 580–585 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brown, B. C., Ye, C. J., Price, A. L. & Zaitlen, N. Transethnic genetic-correlation estimates from summary statistics. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 76 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng, J. C. Y. et al. Generalized low areal and volumetric bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 15, 1587–1595 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Epstein, J. A., Epstein, B. S. & Jones, M. D. Symptomatic lumbar scoliosis with degenerative changes in the elderly. Spine (Philos. Pa. 1976) 4, 542–547 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gertzbein, S. D. Scoliosis Research Society. Multicenter spine fracture study. Spine (Philos. Pa. 1976) 17, 528–540 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wallin, J. et al. The role of Pax-1 in axial skeleton development. Development 120, 1109–1121 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Olivari, S. et al. EDEM1 regulates ER-associated degradation by accelerating de-mannosylation of folding-defective polypeptides and by inhibiting their covalent aggregation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 349, 1278–1284 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jacobs, W. B. & Fehlings, M. G. Ankylosing spondylitis and spinal cord injury: origin, incidence, management, and avoidance. Neurosurg. Focus 24, E12 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Guiliano, D. B. et al. EDEM1 targets misfolded HLA-B27 dimers for endoplasmic reticulum associated degradation. Arthritis Rheumatol. 66, 2976 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nicoletti, P. Regulatory elements in SEM1-DLX5-DLX6 (7q21.3) locus contribute to genetic control of coronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and bone density-related traits. Genet. Med. Open 2, 101851 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Otomo, N. et al. Polygenic risk score of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis for potential clinical use. J. Bone Miner. Res. 36, 1481–1491 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wright, V. J., Schwartzman, J. D., Itinoche, R. & Wittstein, J. The musculoskeletal syndrome of menopause. Climacteric 27, 466–472 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Urrutia, J., Diaz-Ledezma, C., Espinosa, J. & Berven, S. H. Lumbar scoliosis in postmenopausal women: prevalence and relationship with bone density, age, and body mass index. Spine 36, 737–740 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Van Der Walt, S. et al. Scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.453/FIG-5 (2014).

  45. Mason, D. et al. pydicom/pydicom: pydicom 2.3.0. (2022).

  46. Wada, K. Labelme: Image Polygonal Annotation with Python.

  47. Gehan, M. A. et al. PlantCV v2: Image analysis software for high-throughput plant phenotyping. PeerJ 5, e4088 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bradski, G. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobbas J. Softw. Tools 25, 122–125 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Blake, J. A. et al. Mouse Genome Database (MGD): knowledgebase for mouse-human comparative biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D981–D987 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

V.M.N. was supported on a grant from the Allen Discovery Center program, a Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group-advised program of the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Michael Zeosky, Eucharist Kun.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Michael Zeosky, Eucharist Kun, Siddharth Reddy, Devansh Pandey, Liaoyi Xu, Joyce Y. Wang, Chenfei Li & Vagheesh M. Narasimhan

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Dell Children’s Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin, TX, USA

    Ryan S. Gray

  3. Department of Nutritional Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Ryan S. Gray

  4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Carol A. Wise & Nao Otomo

  5. Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas, TX, USA

    Carol A. Wise & Nao Otomo

  6. Department of Statistics and Data Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Vagheesh M. Narasimhan

Authors
  1. Michael Zeosky
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eucharist Kun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siddharth Reddy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Devansh Pandey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liaoyi Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joyce Y. Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chenfei Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ryan S. Gray
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carol A. Wise
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nao Otomo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Vagheesh M. Narasimhan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.Z. and E.K. wrote the paper with input from all co-authors. M.Z., E.K., S.R., L.X., D.P., J.W., C.L., and N.O. performed the analysis. R.G., C.W. and V.M.N. supervised the analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vagheesh M. Narasimhan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures and Tables (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeosky, M., Kun, E., Reddy, S. et al. Deep learning-based precision phenotyping of spine curvature identifies novel genetic risk loci for scoliosis in the UK Biobank. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02540-6

Download citation

  • Received: 27 August 2025

  • Accepted: 02 March 2026

  • Published: 26 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02540-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing