Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ecological risk assessment of marine plastic pollution

Abstract

Plastic pollution poses serious ecological risks to marine organisms through various pathways, yet a comprehensive risk assessment is lacking. Here we assess the global risks of plastic ingestion, entanglement, pollutant adsorption (methylmercury, MeHg; perfluorooctane sulfonate, PFOS) and additive leaching (bisphenol A; phthalate esters) by integrating a marine plastic model and multisize marine organism data, as well as MeHg and PFOS datasets. Our analysis reveals that ingestion risks vary with the body size of organisms, and are influenced by both biomass distribution and plastic concentration patterns. Entanglement hotspots align with regions of flourishing coastal fisheries, highlighting a substantial threat to marine species. Ingestion risks and toxicity from leached additives are concentrated in the mid-latitude North Pacific Ocean, mid-latitude Atlantic Ocean and northern Indian Ocean. Plastics exhibit high adsorption of PFOS in the North Atlantic and East and Southeast Asian coasts (0.1–0.3 pg m−2) and of MeHg in the northern Indian and southwestern Atlantic oceans (1–18 pg m−2). Using future emission scenarios, we project plastic concentrations and estimate reduced risks under emission control strategies. These findings emphasize the urgent need for targeted mitigation efforts and policy interventions to curb escalating impacts of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Plastic ingestion risk by marine organism size and type.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Ingestion risk index for varied organisms of different body sizes contributed by different plastic types.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Plastic entanglement risk for marine organisms.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Global distribution of and exposure risk of organisms to pollutants adsorbed and conveyed by plastics.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Global distributions of leached PAEs and BPA from plastics.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6: Marine plastic concentration and risk index ratios across various pathways between 2060 and 2018.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available in the text, in Supplementary Information or on the website. Plastic data are available at https://www.ebmg.online/plastics/plastic. The biomass datasets are available via Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/records/1460596 (ref. 77).

PFOS data are available at https://www.ebmg.online/plastics/PFOS. MeHg data are available at https://www.ebmg.online/plastics/MeHg.

Code availability

All model code is available at the research group website:

https://www.ebmg.online/plastics/MITgcm-code.

References

  1. Haward, M. Plastic pollution of the world’s seas and oceans as a contemporary challenge in ocean governance. Nat. Commun. 9, 667 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lebreton, L. C. M. et al. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat. Commun. 8, 15611 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann, M., Sandhop, N., Schewe, I. & D’Hert, D. Observations of floating anthropogenic litter in the Barents Sea and Fram Strait, Arctic. Polar Biol. 39, 553–560 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gall, S. C. & Thompson, R. C. The impact of debris on marine life. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 92, 170–179 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Savoca, M. S., McInturf, A. G. & Hazen, E. L. Plastic ingestion by marine fish is widespread and increasing. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2188–2199 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert, J. M., Reichelt-Brushett, A. J., Bowling, A. C. & Christidis, L. Plastic ingestion in marine and coastal bird species of southeastern Australia. Mar. Ornithol. 44, 21–26 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan, P. G. Intraspecific variation in plastic ingestion by seabirds and the flux of plastic through seabird populations. Condor 90, 446–452 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Puskic, P. S., Lavers, J. L. & Bond, A. L. A critical review of harm associated with plastic ingestion on vertebrates. Sci. Total Environ. 743, 140666 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilcox, C., Van Sebille, E. & Hardesty, B. D. Threat of plastic pollution to seabirds is global, pervasive, and increasing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11899–11904 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Compa, M. et al. Risk assessment of plastic pollution on marine diversity in the Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 678, 188–196 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jâms, I. B., Windsor, F. M., Poudevigne-Durance, T., Ormerod, S. J., & Durance, I. Estimating the size distribution of plastics ingested by animals. Nat. Commun. 11, 1594 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pegado, T. D. E. S. et al. First evidence of microplastic ingestion by fishes from the Amazon River estuary. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 133, 814–821 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Senko, J. F. et al. Understanding individual and population-level effects of plastic pollution on marine megafauna. Endanger. Species Res. 43, 234–252 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stelfox, M., Hudgins, J. & Sweet, M. A review of ghost gear entanglement amongst marine mammals, reptiles and elasmobranchs. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 111, 6–17 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilman, E., Chopin, F., Suuronen, P. & Kuemlangan, B. Abandoned, Lost and Discarded Gillnets and Trammel Nets: Methods to Estimate Ghost Fishing Mortality, and the Status of Regional Monitoring and Management Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 600, 1–59, 61–79, IV (FAO, 2016).

  16. Wilcox, C., Mallos, N. J., Leonard, G. H., Rodriguez, A. & Hardesty, B. D. Using expert elicitation to estimate the impacts of plastic pollution on marine wildlife. Mar. Policy 65, 107–114 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McIntosh, R. R., Kirkwood, R., Sutherland, D. R. & Dann, P. Drivers and annual estimates of marine wildlife entanglement rates: a long-term case study with Australian fur seals. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 101, 716–725 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Afonso, A. S. & Fidelis, L. The fate of plastic-wearing sharks: entanglement of an iconic top predator in marine debris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 194, 115326 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duncan, E. M. et al. A global review of marine turtle entanglement in anthropogenic debris: a baseline for further action. Endanger. Species Res. 34, 431–448 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodríguez, Y. et al. Litter ingestion and entanglement in green turtles: an analysis of two decades of stranding events in the NE Atlantic. Environ. Pollut. 298, 118796 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prunier, J. et al. Trace metals in polyethylene debris from the North Atlantic subtropical gyre. Environ. Pollut. 245, 371–379 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhan, Z. W. et al. Sorption of 3,3′,4,4′-tetrachlorobiphenyl by microplastics: a case study of polypropylene. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 110, 559–563 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Islam, N. et al. Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) adsorbed to polyethylene microplastics: accumulation and ecotoxicological effects in the clam. Mar. Environ. Res. 164, 105249 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, J. et al. Effects of microplastics on the accumulation and neurotoxicity of methylmercury in zebrafish larvae. Mar. Environ. Res. 176, 105615 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Teuten, E. L. et al. Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 2027–2045 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cormier, B. et al. Sorption and desorption kinetics of PFOS to pristine microplastic. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 4497–4507 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, F., Shih, K. M. & Li, X. Y. The partition behavior of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanesulfonamide (FOSA) on microplastics. Chemosphere 119, 841–847 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guerrini, F., Mari, L. & Casagrandi, R. A coupled Lagrangian–Eulerian model for microplastics as vectors of contaminants applied to the Mediterranean Sea. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 024038 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fauser, P., Vorkamp, K. & Strand, J. Residual additives in marine microplastics and their risk assessment—a critical review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 177, 113467 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Oehlmann, J. et al. A critical analysis of the biological impacts of plasticizers on wildlife. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 2047–2062 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoiberg, M. A., Woods, J. S. & Verones, F. Global distribution of potential impact hotspots for marine plastic debris entanglement. Ecol. Indic. 135, 108509 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, Y. X. et al. Plastic waste discharge to the global ocean constrained by seawater observations. Nat. Commun. 14, 1372 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maury, O. et al. Modeling environmental effects on the size-structured energy flow through marine ecosystems. Part 1: The model. Prog. Oceanogr. 74, 479–499 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo, R. X. et al. Bioaccumulation and elimination of bisphenol a (BPA) in the alga and the potential for trophic transfer to the rotifer. Environ. Pollut. 227, 460–467 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mi, L. J. et al. Air–sea exchange and atmospheric deposition of phthalate esters in the South China Sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 11195–11205 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Onink, V., Wichmann, D., Delandmeter, P. & van Sebille, E. The role of Ekman currents, geostrophy, and Stokes drift in the accumulation of floating microplastic. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 1474–1490 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gregg, W. W. & Conkright, M. E. Decadal changes in global ocean chlorophyll. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 20-1–20-4 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liang, Z., Letscher, R. T. & Knapp, A. N. Dissolved organic phosphorus concentrations in the surface ocean controlled by both phosphate and iron stress. Nat. Geosci. 15, 651–657 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cózar, A. et al. The Arctic Ocean as a dead end for floating plastics in the North Atlantic branch of the thermohaline circulation. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600582 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Collard, F. & Ask, A. Plastic ingestion by Arctic fauna: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 786, 147462 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Clere, I. K. et al. Quantification and characterization of microplastics in commercial fish from southern New Zealand. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 184, 114121 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Grosvik, B. E. et al. Assessment of marine litter in the Barents Sea, a part of the Joint Norwegian Russian Ecosystem Survey. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 72 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kroodsma, D. A. et al. Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science 359, 904–907 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Watson, R. A. & Tidd, A. Mapping nearly a century and a half of global marine fishing: 1869–2015. Mar. Policy 93, 171–177 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Perez-Venegas, D. J. et al. Towards understanding the effects of oceanic plastic pollution on population growth for a South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis australis) colony in Chile. Environ. Pollut. 279, 116881 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Parton, K. J., Galloway, T. S. & Godley, B. J. Global review of shark and ray entanglement in anthropogenic marine debris. Endanger. Species Res. 39, 173–190 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Perez-Venegas, D. J., Hardesty, B. D., Wilcox, C. & Galbán-Malagón, C. The hotspots of entanglement for pinnipeds of the world. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 195, 115491 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, X. M., Zhang, Y. X., Dassuncao, C., Lohmann, R. & Sunderland, E. M. North Atlantic Deep Water formation inhibits high Arctic contamination by continental perfluorooctane sulfonate discharges. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 1332–1343 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Y. X., Soerensen, A. L., Schartup, A. T. & Sunderland, E. M. A global model for methylmercury formation and uptake at the base of marine food webs. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 34, e2019GB006348 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chubarenko, I., Bagaev, A., Zobkov, M. & Esiukova, E. On some physical and dynamical properties of microplastic particles in marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 108, 105–112 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Suhrhoff, T. J. & Scholz-Böttcher, B. M. Qualitative impact of salinity, UV radiation and turbulence on leaching of organic plastic additives from four common plastics—a lab experiment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 102, 84–94 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gulizia, A. M. et al. Understanding plasticiser leaching from polystyrene microplastics. Sci. Total Environ. 857, 159099 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cao, Y. R. et al. Significant riverine inputs of typical plastic additives—phthalate esters from the Pearl River Delta to the northern South China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 849, 157744 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Net, S., Sempéré, R., Delmont, A., Paluselli, A. & Ouddane, B. Occurrence, fate, behavior and ecotoxicological state of phthalates in different environmental matrices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 4019–4035 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Paluselli, A. & Kim, S. K. Horizontal and vertical distribution of phthalates acid ester (PAEs) in seawater and sediment of East China Sea and Korean South Sea: traces of plastic debris? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 151, 110831 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Heemken, O. P., Reincke, H., Stachel, B. & Theobald, N. The occurrence of xenoestrogens in the Elbe river and the North Sea. Chemosphere 45, 245–259 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Shi, J. H., Liu, X. W., Chen, Q. C. & Zhang, H. Spatial and seasonal distributions of estrogens and bisphenol A in the Yangtze River Estuary and the adjacent East China Sea. Chemosphere 111, 336–343 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Naveira, C., Rodrigues, N., Santos, F. S., Santos, L. N. & Neves, R. A. F. Acute toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA) to tropical marine and estuarine species from different trophic groups. Environ. Pollut. 268, 115911 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen, X. N., Hang, X. M., Ke, W. B., Ma, Z. Y. & Sun, Y. Q. Acute and subacute toxicity of bisphenol A on zebrafish (Danio rerio). Adv. Mater. Res. 356–360, 138–141 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lebreton, L. & Andrady, A. Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal. Palgrave Commun. 5, 6 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Falk-Andersson, J., Haarr, M. L. & Havas, V. Basic principles for development and implementation of plastic clean-up technologies: what can we learn from fisheries management? Sci. Total Environ. 745, 141117 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 2024: A record-breaking year for The Ocean Cleanup. The Ocean Cleanup https://theoceancleanup.com/updates/2024-a-record-breaking-year-for-the-ocean-cleanup/ (2024).

  63. Falk-Andersson, J. et al. Cleaning up without messing up: maximizing the benefits of plastic clean-up technologies through new regulatory approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 13304–13312 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Onink, V., Jongedijk, C. E., Hoffman, M. J., van Sebille, E. & Laufkötter, C. Global simulations of marine plastic transport show plastic trapping in coastal zones. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 064053 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Purba, N. P. et al. Coastal clean-up in Southeast Asia: lessons learned, challenges, and future strategies. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1250736 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bergmann, M. et al. Plastic pollution in the Arctic. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 323–337 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilcox, C. & Hardesty, B. D. Biodegradable nets are not a panacea, but can contribute to addressing the ghost fishing problem. Anim. Conserv. 19, 322–323 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hardesty, B. D. & Wilcox, C. A risk framework for tackling marine debris. Anal. Methods 9, 1429–1436 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Roman, L., Hardesty, B. D. & Schuyler, Q. A systematic review and risk matrix of plastic litter impacts on aquatic wildlife: a case study of the Mekong and Ganges river basins. Sci. Total Environ. 843, 156858 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Mai, L. et al. Global riverine plastic outflows. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 10049–10056 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Lebreton, L. C. M., Greer, S. D. & Borrero, J. C. Numerical modelling of floating debris in the world’s oceans. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 64, 653–661 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Welden, N. A. & Cowie, P. R. Degradation of common polymer ropes in a sublittoral marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 118, 248–253 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Luijendijk, A. et al. The state of the world’s beaches. Sci. Rep. 8, 6641 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Weiss, L. et al. The missing ocean plastic sink: gone with the rivers. Science 373, 107–111 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Biber, N. F. A., Foggo, A. & Thompson, R. C. Characterising the deterioration of different plastics in air and seawater. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 141, 595–602 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Aumont, O., Maury, O., Lefort, S. & Bopp, L. Evaluating the potential impacts of the diurnal vertical migration by marine organisms on marine biogeochemistry. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 1622–1643 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Aumont, O., Maury, O., Bopp, L. & Lefort, S. Dataset and code of NEMO-PISCES-APECOSM. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1460596 (2018).

  78. Koojiman, S. A. L. M. Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  79. Maury, O., Shin, Y. J., Faugeras, B., Ben Ari, T. & Marsac, F. Modeling environmental effects on the size-structured energy flow through marine ecosystems. Part 2: Simulations. Prog. Oceanogr. 74, 500–514 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Lefort, S. et al. Spatial and body-size dependent response of marine pelagic communities to projected global climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 154–164 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Wilcox, C. et al. Ghostnet impacts on globally threatened turtles, a spatial risk analysis for northern Australia. Conserv. Lett. 6, 247–254 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Keskin, I. & Ekici, A. Effects of environmental factors and food availability in Northern Aegean sea on the cultivation of Mediterranean mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). Aquac. Res. 52, 65–76 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Higgins, C. P. & Luthy, R. G. Sorption of perfluorinated surfactants on sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 7251–7256 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Hermabessiere, L. et al. Occurrence and effects of plastic additives on marine environments and organisms: a review. Chemosphere 182, 781–793 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. da Costa, J. P., Avellan, A., Mouneyrac, C., Duarte, A. & Rocha-Santos, T. Plastic additives and microplastics as emerging contaminants: mechanisms and analytical assessment. Trends Anal. Chem. 158, 116898 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Cao, Y. R. et al. Microplastics: a major source of phthalate esters in aquatic environments. J. Hazard. Mater. 432, 128731 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Plastics—The Facts 2017: An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data (Plastics Europe, 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge O. Aumont et al. for providing their data and insights, which substantially contributed to this research. The data utilized in this study were sourced from their article ‘Evaluating the potential impacts of the diurnal vertical migration by marine organisms on marine biogeochemistry’, published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles76. Additionally, we appreciate the support and contributions of M. Egger for his review and suggestions on our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Z. and Z.Z. conceived the study. Z.Z., P.W., X.W., Q.P. and X.Z. developed the methodology. Z.Z., P.W. and Y.W. performed the visualization. Y.Z. administered the project and provided overall supervision. Z.Z. and Y.Z. prepared the original draft of the manuscript. Y.Z., Z.Z., X.Z., E.Y.Z., K.K. and L.L. contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanxu Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Gabriel De la Torre, Valentina H. Pauna and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Table 1 Additive mass and leaching rates from ocean plastics in 2018

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Discussion, Figs. 1–19 and Tables 1–3.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Wu, P., Wang, X. et al. Ecological risk assessment of marine plastic pollution. Nat Sustain 8, 1143–1153 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01620-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01620-x

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene