Fig. 5: Difference in Spatial gradient patterns.
From: Dynamic face-related eye movement representations in the human ventral pathway
a The counts that the spatial gradient pattern for ‘SF – SH’ emerged earlier than the spatial gradient pattern for ‘OF – OH’ along the y and z dimensions. The latency difference between the two R2 time courses was estimated with a cross-correlation method and was tested using a bootstrapping method (see Methods). Dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. b The predicted coordinates sorted by the ERF amplitudes in the Image Session are shown as a function of the predicted coordinates in the Gaze Session along the y (left column) and the z (right column) dimensions. Upper row for ‘SF – SH’ and lower row for ‘OF – OH’.
