Fig. 1: Comparative analysis of m6A modification detection by scDART-seq, scm6A-seq, sn-m6A-CT, and Scm6A at the single-cell level. | Communications Biology

Fig. 1: Comparative analysis of m6A modification detection by scDART-seq, scm6A-seq, sn-m6A-CT, and Scm6A at the single-cell level.

From: Systematic evaluation of tools used for single-cell m6A identification

Fig. 1: Comparative analysis of m6A modification detection by scDART-seq, scm6A-seq, sn-m6A-CT, and Scm6A at the single-cell level.

A The bar chart visually represents the proportion of miCLIP-validated m6A-modified genes among those identified by each method. Blue indicates m6A sites detected by the method that match miCLIP sequencing results, while yellow indicates those that do not match. B The distribution patterns of m6A sites detected by each method across different regions of the mRNA transcript, including the 5’ UTR, CDS, and 3’ UTR. C Sequence motif analysis of m6A sites identified by the four methods and two miCLIP reference datasets, demonstrating the preference of different detection methods for specific motif sequences.

Back to article page