Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Longitudinal human transcriptomic and spatial gene profiling at the incisional edge during long surgical procedures
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 December 2025

Longitudinal human transcriptomic and spatial gene profiling at the incisional edge during long surgical procedures

  • Matthew R. Sapio  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-54191,
  • Evelyn Li1,
  • Anthony F. Domenichiello  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-84032,3,
  • Taichi Goto  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7140-81754,
  • Dragan Maric  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2912-79215,
  • Allison P. Manalo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3616-54161,
  • Tracy S. Williams1,
  • Saber Tadros6,
  • Jonathan M. Hernandez7,
  • David S. Schrump8,
  • Jeremy L. Davis  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-69367,
  • Andrew M. Blakely  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5013-38517,
  • Michael J. Iadarola  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-98101 &
  • …
  • Andrew J. Mannes  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-56671 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2025) Cite this article

  • 2065 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • 5 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Experimental models of disease
  • Pain
  • Transcriptomics

Abstract

Post-surgical pain remains a widespread problem reducing quality of life. The present study investigates the initial molecular changes underlying nociceptive sensitization through longitudinal, temporal sampling at the surgical wound edge. Using RNA-Seq and multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization, we examined the most significant genes induced by tissue injury including those coding for the secreted factors interleukin 6, oncostatin M and leukemia inhibitory factor, and localized these induction events to several cutaneous structures including the epidermis, vascular endothelia, hair follicles, and sweat glands. Our data also demonstrate the receptors for these key secreted factors are expressed by dorsal root ganglion neurons, indicating long-range signaling from damaged skin to spinal cord, thereby leading to pain. This study provides a novel understanding of tissue structures and the molecular interactome activated following tissue injury by elucidating the inflammatory and tissue repair transcriptional milieu induced by surgery in human skin excision biopsies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Nociceptor-immune interactomes reveal insult-specific immune signatures of pain

Article Open access 28 May 2024

A transcriptome data set for comparing skin, muscle and dorsal root ganglion between acute and chronic postsurgical pain rats

Article Open access 14 November 2024

Formalin-evoked pain triggers sex-specific behavior and spinal immune response

Article Open access 12 June 2023

Data availability

Sequencing data were deposited in public databases (Sequence Read Archive, BioProject# PRJNA1154260; dbGaP: phs003890) alongside sample-level patient-reported outcomes and data dictionaries. Large supplementary data tables (Supplementary Tables 1–5) are also available on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27384174). Source data underlying all graphs in the manuscript can be found in Supplementary Data 1.

References

  1. Glare, P., Aubrey, K. R. & Myles, P. S. Transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Lancet 393, 1537–1546 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neuman, M. D., Bateman, B. T. & Wunsch, H. Inappropriate opioid prescription after surgery. Lancet 393, 1547–1557 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan, T. J. Pathophysiology of postoperative pain. Pain 152, S33–S40 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer, R. A., Ringkamp, M., Campbell, J. N. & Raja, S. N. Peripheral mechanisms of cutaneous nociception. In Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of Pain (eds McMahon, S. B. & Koltzenburg, M.) 3–34 (Elsevier, London, 2006).

  5. Goto, T. et al. Longitudinal peripheral tissue RNA-Seq transcriptomic profiling, hyperalgesia, and wound healing in the rat plantar surgical incision model. FASEB J. 35, e21852 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gold, M. S. & Gebhart, G. F. Nociceptor sensitization in pain pathogenesis. Nat. Med. 16, 1248–1257 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, S. P., Vulchanova, L., Hargreaves, K. M., Elde, R. & McCleskey, E. W. Distinct ATP receptors on pain-sensing and stretch-sensing neurons. Nature 387, 505–508 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goto, T. et al. Longitudinal transcriptomic profiling in carrageenan-induced rat hind paw peripheral inflammation and hyperalgesia reveals progressive recruitment of innate immune system components. J. Pain. 22, 322–343 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brennan, T. J., Vandermeulen, E. P. & Gebhart, G. F. Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain. Pain 64, 493–502 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cleeland, C. S. & Ryan, K. M. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 23, 129–138 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melzack, R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain 30, 191–197 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. LaPaglia, D. M. et al. RNA-Seq investigations of human post-mortem trigeminal ganglia. Cephalalgia 38, 912–932 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, C. et al. The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 926–932 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sapio, M. R., Goswami, S. C., Gross, J. R., Mannes, A. J. & Iadarola, M. J. Transcriptomic analyses of genes and tissues in inherited sensory neuropathies. Exp. Neurol. 283, 375–395 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lessard, J. C. et al. Keratin 16 regulates innate immunity in response to epidermal barrier breach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19537–19542 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, P. H. et al. Zinc in wound healing modulation. Nutrients 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10010016 (2017).

  17. Wolf, C. L., Pruett, C., Lighter, D. & Jorcyk, C. L. The clinical relevance of OSM in inflammatory diseases: a comprehensive review. Front. Immunol. 14, 1239732 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mwirigi, J. et al. Oncostatin M induces nociceptive signaling in human dorsal root ganglia. J. Pain. 24, 16–16 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tseng, P. Y. & Hoon, M. A. Oncostatin M can sensitize sensory neurons in inflammatory pruritus. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabe3037 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ghitani, N. et al. Specialized mechanosensory nociceptors mediating rapid responses to hair pull. Neuron 95, 944–954.e944 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. von Buchholtz, L. J. et al. Decoding cellular mechanisms for mechanosensory discrimination. Neuron 109, 285–298.e285 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, H. et al. Leveraging deep single-soma RNA sequencing to explore the neural basis of human somatosensation. Nature Neurosci. 27, 2326–2340 (2024).

  23. Caterina, M. J. et al. The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389, 816–824 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ma, W. et al. Anatomical analysis of transient potential vanilloid receptor 1 (Trpv1+) and Mu-opioid receptor (Oprm1+) co-expression in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 15, 926596 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sapio, M. R. et al. Expression pattern analysis and characterization of the hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy 2 A (HSAN2A) gene with no lysine kinase (WNK1) in human dorsal root ganglion. Exp. Neurol. 370, 114552 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sapio, M. R. et al. Analgesic candidate adenosine A 3 receptors are expressed by perineuronal peripheral macrophages in human dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord microglia. Pain 165, 2323–2343 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tavares-Ferreira, D. et al. Spatial transcriptomics of dorsal root ganglia identifies molecular signatures of human nociceptors. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabj8186 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Staedtler, E. S. et al. The mu-opioid receptor differentiates two distinct human nociceptive populations relevant to clinical pain. Cell Rep. Med. 5, 101788 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rittie, L., Sachs, D. L., Orringer, J. S., Voorhees, J. J. & Fisher, G. J. Eccrine sweat glands are major contributors to reepithelialization of human wounds. Am. J. Pathol. 182, 163–171 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Futagami, A., Ishizaki, M., Fukuda, Y., Kawana, S. & Yamanaka, N. Wound healing involves induction of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in rat skin. Lab. Investig. 82, 1503–1513 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Loynes, C. A. et al. PGE(2) production at sites of tissue injury promotes an anti-inflammatory neutrophil phenotype and determines the outcome of inflammation resolution in vivo. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar8320 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. De Jongh, R. F. et al. The role of interleukin-6 in nociception and pain. Anesth. Analg. 96, 1096–1103 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wei, X. H. et al. The up-regulation of IL-6 in DRG and spinal dorsal horn contributes to neuropathic pain following L5 ventral root transection. Exp. Neurol. 241, 159–168 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sole-Boldo, L. et al. Single-cell transcriptomes of the human skin reveal age-related loss of fibroblast priming. Commun. Biol. 3, 188 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Raithel, S. J., Sapio, M. R., LaPaglia, D. M., Iadarola, M. J. & Mannes, A. J. Transcriptional changes in dorsal spinal cord persist after surgical incision despite preemptive analgesia with peripheral resiniferatoxin. Anesthesiology 128, 620–635 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spofford, C. M. & Brennan, T. J. Gene expression in skin, muscle, and dorsal root ganglion after plantar incision in the rat. Anesthesiology 117, 161–172 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Segelcke, D. et al. Phenotype- and species-specific skin proteomic signatures for incision-induced pain in humans and mice. Br. J. Anaesth. 130, 331–342 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brummett, C. M. et al. New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in US adults. JAMA Surg. 152, e170504 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Alam, A. et al. Long-term analgesic use after low-risk surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Arch. Intern. Med. 172, 425–430 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sapio, M. R. et al. The persistent pain transcriptome: identification of cells and molecules activated by hyperalgesia. J. Pain. 22, 1146–1179 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Parisien, M. et al. Acute inflammatory response via neutrophil activation protects against the development of chronic pain. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabj9954 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huerta, M. Á. et al. The role of neutrophils in pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies. Pain 166, 1230–1249 (9900).

  43. Mitchell, M. E. et al. Interleukin-6 induces nascent protein synthesis in human dorsal root ganglion nociceptors primarily via MNK-eIF4E signaling. Neurobiol. Pain 16, 100159 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jawa, R. S., Anillo, S., Huntoon, K., Baumann, H. & Kulaylat, M. Analytic review: interleukin-6 in surgery, trauma, and critical care: part I: basic science. J. Intensive Care Med. 26, 3–12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morellini, N. M. et al. Exogenous metallothionein-IIA promotes accelerated healing after a burn wound. Wound Repair Regen. 16, 682–690 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Das, A. et al. Oncostatin M improves cutaneous wound re-epithelialization and is deficient under diabetic conditions. J. Investig. Dermatol. 142, 679–691.e673 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Langeslag, M. et al. Oncostatin M induces heat hypersensitivity by gp130-dependent sensitization of TRPV1 in sensory neurons. Mol. Pain. 7, 102 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Spofford, C. M., Mohan, S., Kang, S., Jang, J. H. & Brennan, T. J. Evaluation of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) in a rat model of postoperative pain. J. Pain. 12, 819–832 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Banner, L. R., Patterson, P. H., Allchorne, A., Poole, S. & Woolf, C. J. Leukemia inhibitory factor is an anti-inflammatory and analgesic cytokine. J. Neurosci. 18, 5456–5462 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smith, A. F., Plumb, A. N., Berardi, G. & Sluka, K. A. Sex differences in the transition to chronic pain. J. Clin. Investig. 135, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI191931 (2025).

  51. Schreiber, K. L. et al. Prediction of persistent pain severity and impact 12 months after breast surgery using comprehensive preoperative assessment of biopsychosocial pain modulators. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 28, 5015–5038 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dworkin, R. H. et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 113, 9–19 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chen, E. Y. et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinform. 14, 128 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sapio, M. R. et al. Efficient removal of naturally-occurring lipofuscin autofluorescence in human nervous tissue using high-intensity white light. J. Pain 30, 105359 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Maric, D. et al. Whole-brain tissue mapping toolkit using large-scale highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging and deep neural networks. Nat. Commun. 12, 1550 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sapio, M. R. et al. Comparative analysis of dorsal root, nodose and sympathetic ganglia for the development of new analgesics. Front. Neurosci. 14, 615362 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Harding, S. D. et al. The IUPHAR/BPS guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1438–D1449 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Binder, J. X. et al. COMPARTMENTS: unification and visualization of protein subcellular localization evidence. Database 2014, bau012 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Stelzer, G. et al. The GeneCards Suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 54, 1 30 31–31 30 33 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  60. UniProt, C. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D480–D489 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ray, P. R. et al. A pharmacological interactome between COVID-19 patient samples and human sensory neurons reveals potential drivers of neurogenic pulmonary dysfunction. Brain Behav. Immun. 89, 559–568 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (ZIACL090034-09, ZIACL090035-08, ZIACL0033-09 to A.J.M.) and of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Supplementary funding was provided by the Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research and from a Bench to Bedside Grant from the NIH. T.G. was the recipient of a JSPS Overseas Research Fellowship from April 2018 to March 2020 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This work was funded by the National institutes of Health. The contributions of the NIH author(s) are considered Works of the United States Government. The findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Funding

Open access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Perioperative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Matthew R. Sapio, Evelyn Li, Allison P. Manalo, Tracy S. Williams, Michael J. Iadarola & Andrew J. Mannes

  2. Lipid Peroxidation Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Anthony F. Domenichiello

  3. Office of Pain Policy and Planning, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Anthony F. Domenichiello

  4. Symptoms Biology Unit, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Taichi Goto

  5. Flow and Imaging Cytometry Core Facility, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Dragan Maric

  6. Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

    Saber Tadros

  7. Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Jonathan M. Hernandez, Jeremy L. Davis & Andrew M. Blakely

  8. Thoracic Surgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

    David S. Schrump

Authors
  1. Matthew R. Sapio
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evelyn Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anthony F. Domenichiello
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Taichi Goto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dragan Maric
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Allison P. Manalo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tracy S. Williams
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Saber Tadros
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jonathan M. Hernandez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. David S. Schrump
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jeremy L. Davis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Andrew M. Blakely
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Michael J. Iadarola
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Andrew J. Mannes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This study was conceptualized and designed by M.R.S., with input from M.J.I. and A.J.M. M.R.S. led the project from inception through completion, including protocol development, data acquisition, analysis, and manuscript preparation. M.R.S. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with input and editing from A.J.M., E.L., T.G., and D.M. All authors reviewed and approved the final version. Clinical protocol development was led by M.R.S. with supervision and guidance from T.S.W. and A.J.M., with additional consultation from M.J.I., J.L.D., and D.S.S. Surgeries and tissue excision were performed by A.M.B., J.L.D., J.M.H., and D.S.S. Sample collection was coordinated by M.R.S. and A.F.D., with subsequent processing by TG. Histological assessments were performed by S.T. In situ hybridization experiments were conducted by E.L. and A.P.M., with additional consultation regarding interpretation from S.T. and D.M. Microscopy was performed by E.L. and A.P.M., with supervision and experimental design consultation from D.M. Visualizations and data figures were designed and generated by M.R.S. and E.L. Formal data analysis was led by M.R.S. with contributions from T.G. Project supervision and coordination were carried out by M.R.S. with input from A.J.M. and T.S.W. Funding support was provided by A.J.M.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Mannes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Daniel Segelcke, Nynke J. van Den Hoogen, and the other anonymous reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary handling editors: Joao Valente.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sapio, M.R., Li, E., Domenichiello, A.F. et al. Longitudinal human transcriptomic and spatial gene profiling at the incisional edge during long surgical procedures. Commun Biol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09366-0

Download citation

  • Received: 02 December 2024

  • Accepted: 03 December 2025

  • Published: 22 December 2025

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09366-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Neurobiology of chronic pain

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing