Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
TGFBI promotes liver fibrosis through remodeling the profibrotic microenvironment by a positive feedback regulatory loop
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 February 2026

TGFBI promotes liver fibrosis through remodeling the profibrotic microenvironment by a positive feedback regulatory loop

  • Heming Wu1 na1,
  • Xueqian Yan1 na1,
  • Lijun Kuang1,
  • Yanfei Zhang2,
  • Shuting Ye2,
  • Rui Huang1,
  • Yuehua Zhang3,
  • Gaoliang Ouyang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2828-26902,
  • Tiantian Wu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-60522,
  • Fan Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-53234 &
  • …
  • Yingfu Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1626-40621 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cell growth
  • Cell signalling

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a major global health burden with limited treatment options. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced protein (TGFBI) is crucial in fibrotic diseases and tumors, however, its precise mechanism in liver fibrosis remains unclear. Here we show that TGFBI promotes liver fibrosis in male C57BL/6 mice. TGFBI is upregulated in fibrotic livers and derived from non-parenchymal cells. Genetic TGFBI deficiency alleviates liver fibrosis in both CCl4 (carbon tetrachloride) injection and bile duct ligation (BDL) models. Mechanistically, PDGFRβ is identified via RNA sequencing as a key downstream molecule upregulated by TGFBI in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) via the integrin αvβ3-FAK-STAT3 pathway, promoting HSC proliferation and activation. Meanwhile, TGFBI increases PDGF-B expression in macrophages through the integrin αvβ3-AKT-ERK pathway, driving their proliferation, migration and differentiation into the profibrotic TREM2+CD9+ subpopulation. Elevated PDGF-B reversely stimulates TGFBI production in macrophages, which creates a positive feedback loop. This TGFBI-mediated interaction between HSCs and macrophages remodels the profibrotic microenvironment to promote liver fibrosis, identifying a potential therapeutic target.

Data availability

The data generated in this study have been made publicly available to ensure verifiability. The RNA sequencing data are stored in the Science Data Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ScienceDB) and can be accessed publicly through the persistent identifier (DOI: 10.57760/sciencedb.35038). The quantitative source data of all figures in the text can be found in Supplementary Data 1. The untrimmed original blot images are included in Supplementary Fig. 16 of the supplementary information file. If there are any other material requirements, you can contact the corresponding author for assistance.

References

  1. Kisseleva, T. & Brenner, D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 151–166 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bataller, R. & Brenner, D. A. Liver fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 115, 209–218 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuchida, T. & Friedman, S. L. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14, 397–411 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen, N. S. et al. Biochemical mechanisms of aggregation in TGFBI-linked corneal dystrophies. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 77, 100843 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ruiz, M. et al. TGFBI secreted by mesenchymal stromal cells ameliorates osteoarthritis and is detected in extracellular vesicles. Biomaterials 226, 119544 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leibing, T. et al. Deficiency for scavenger receptors Stabilin-1 and Stabilin-2 leads to age-dependent renal and hepatic depositions of fasciclin domain proteins TGFBI and periostin in mice. Aging Cell 22, e13914 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, S. G. et al. TGFBI remodels adipose metabolism by regulating the Notch-1 signaling pathway. Exp. Mol. Med. 55, 520–531 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J., Lee, J., Sim, W. & Kim, J. H. Soluble TGFBI aggravates the malignancy of cholangiocarcinoma through activation of the ITGB1 dependent PPARgamma signalling pathway. Cell Oncol. 45, 275–291 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han, K. E. et al. Pathogenesis and treatments of TGFBI corneal dystrophies. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 50, 67–88 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Corona, A. & Blobe, G. C. The role of the extracellular matrix protein TGFBI in cancer. Cell Signal 84, 110028 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lecker, L. S. M. et al. TGFBI production by macrophages contributes to an immunosuppressive microenvironment in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 81, 5706–5719 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, J. et al. A novel role of TGFBI in macrophage polarization and macrophage-induced pancreatic cancer growth and therapeutic resistance. Cancer Lett. 578, 216457 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niu, L. et al. Plasma proteome profiling discovers novel proteins associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8793 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bochenek, M. L. et al. Endothelial overexpression of TGF-β-induced protein impairs venous thrombus resolution. JACC: Basic Transl. Sci. 9, 100–116 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shrestha, S., McFadden, M. J., Gramolini, A. O. & Santerre, J. P. Proteome analysis of secretions from human monocyte-derived macrophages post-exposure to biomaterials and the effect of secretions on cardiac fibroblast fibrotic character. Acta Biomater. 111, 80–90 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, K. et al. Transforming growth factor-beta induced protein regulates pulmonary fibrosis via the G-protein signaling modulator 2 /Snail axis. Peptides 155, 170842 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao, H. et al. Periostin deficiency reduces diethylnitrosamine-induced liver cancer in mice by decreasing hepatic stellate cell activation and cancer cell proliferation. J. Pathol. 255, 212–223 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Y. et al. Periostin protects against alcohol-related liver disease by activating autophagy by interacting with protein disulfide isomerase. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 1475–1504 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pellicoro, A., Ramachandran, P., Iredale, J. P. & Fallowfield, J. A. Liver fibrosis and repair: immune regulation of wound healing in a solid organ. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 181–194 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tacke, F. Targeting hepatic macrophages to treat liver diseases. J. Hepatol. 66, 1300–1312 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tacke, F. & Zimmermann, H. W. Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis. J. Hepatol. 60, 1090–1096 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olona, A. et al. Adipoclast: a multinucleated fat-eating macrophage. BMC Biol. 19, 246 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coelho, I., Duarte, N., Macedo, M. P. & Penha-Goncalves, C. Insights into macrophage/monocyte-endothelial cell crosstalk in the liver: a role for trem-2. J. Clin. Med. 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061248 (2021).

  24. Xiong, X. et al. Landscape of intercellular crosstalk in healthy and NASH liver revealed by single-cell secretome gene analysis. Mol. Cell 75, 644–660.e645 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Remmerie, A. et al. Osteopontin expression identifies a subset of recruited macrophages distinct from Kupffer cells in the fatty liver. Immunity 53, 641–657.e614 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Joshi, N. et al. A spatially restricted fibrotic niche in pulmonary fibrosis is sustained by M-CSF/M-CSFR signalling in monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages. Eur. Respir. J 55, https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00646-2019 (2020).

  27. Hou, J. et al. TREM2 sustains macrophage-hepatocyte metabolic coordination in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and sepsis. J. Clin. Invest 131, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI135197 (2021).

  28. Okada, H. et al. Acyclic retinoid targets platelet-derived growth factor signaling in the prevention of hepatic fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma development. Cancer Res. 72, 4459–4471 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ying, H. Z. et al. PDGF signaling pathway in hepatic fibrosis pathogenesis and therapeutics (Review). Mol. Med Rep. 16, 7879–7889 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, R. et al. Gomisin D alleviates liver fibrosis through targeting PDGFRbeta in hepatic stellate cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 235, 123639 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kocabayoglu, P. et al. beta-PDGF receptor expressed by hepatic stellate cells regulates fibrosis in murine liver injury, but not carcinogenesis. J. Hepatol. 63, 141–147 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, F. et al. Salvianolic acid B inhibits hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis by targeting PDGFRβ. Int. Immunopharmacol. 122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110550 (2023).

  33. Zhang, W. et al. Heterogeneity of hepatic stellate cells in fibrogenesis of the liver: insights from single-cell transcriptomic analysis in liver injury. Cells 10, 2129 (2021).

  34. Gijbels, E. et al. Robustness testing and optimization of an adverse outcome pathway on cholestatic liver injury. Arch. Toxicol. 94, 1151–1172 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Higashi, T., Friedman, S. L. & Hoshida, Y. Hepatic stellate cells as key target in liver fibrosis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 121, 27–42 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Han, B. et al. The role of TGFBI (betaig-H3) in gastrointestinal tract tumorigenesis. Mol. Cancer 14, 64 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Seidman, J. S. et al. Niche-specific reprogramming of epigenetic landscapes drives myeloid cell diversity in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Immunity 52, 1057–1074.e1057 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mooring, M. et al. Hepatocyte CYR61 polarizes profibrotic macrophages to orchestrate NASH fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eade3157 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Miller, C. R. & Hjelmeland, A. B. Breaking the feed forward inflammatory cytokine loop in the tumor microenvironment of PDGFB-driven glioblastomas. J. Clin. Invest. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI175127 (2023).

  40. Xie, H. et al. PDGF-BB secreted by preosteoclasts induces angiogenesis during coupling with osteogenesis. Nat. Med. 20, 1270–1278 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zaidi, M., Lizneva, D. & Yuen, T. The role of PDGF-BB in the bone-vascular relationship during aging. J. Clin. Invest. 131, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI153644 (2021).

  42. Czochra, P. et al. Liver fibrosis induced by hepatic overexpression of PDGF-B in transgenic mice. J. Hepatol. 45, 419–428 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hui, A. Y. & Friedman, S. L. Molecular basis of hepatic fibrosis. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 5, 1–23 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kocabayoglu, P. et al. β-PDGF receptor expressed by hepatic stellate cells regulates fibrosis in murine liver injury, but not carcinogenesis. J. Hepatol. 63, 141–147 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yang, J. et al. A positive feedback loop between Inactive VHL-triggered histone lactylation and PDGFRbeta signaling drives clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 3470–3483 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cui, Z. et al. Endothelial PDGF-BB/PDGFR-beta signaling promotes osteoarthritis by enhancing angiogenesis-dependent abnormal subchondral bone formation. Bone Res. 10, 58 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mabire, M. et al. MAIT cell inhibition promotes liver fibrosis regression via macrophage phenotype reprogramming. Nat. Commun. 14, 1830 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cai, B. et al. Macrophage MerTK promotes liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 31, 406–421.e407 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Davies, L. C. et al. Distinct bone marrow-derived and tissue-resident macrophage lineages proliferate at key stages during inflammation. Nat. Commun. 4, 1886 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Robbins, C. S. et al. Local proliferation dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nat. Med. 19, 1166–1172 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ramachandran, P. et al. Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level. Nature 575, 512–518 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Guilliams, M., Thierry, G. R., Bonnardel, J. & Bajenoff, M. Establishment and maintenance of the macrophage niche. Immunity 52, 434–451 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Borkham-Kamphorst, E. et al. Pro-fibrogenic potential of PDGF-D in liver fibrosis. J. Hepatol. 46, 1064–1074 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, Y. et al. Hepatocyte Ninjurin2 promotes hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis through the IGF1R/EGR1/PDGF-BB signaling pathway. Metabolism 140, 155380 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mo, H. et al. The role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver diseases and liver cancer: mechanisms and potential therapies. Angiogenesis 28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-025-09969-5 (2025).

  56. Winkler, M. et al. Endothelial GATA4 controls liver fibrosis and regeneration by preventing a pathogenic switch in angiocrine signaling. J. Hepatol. 74, 380–393 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Knorr, J. et al. Interleukin-18 signaling promotes activation of hepatic stellate cells in mouse liver fibrosis. Hepatology 77, 1968–1982 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Xia, P. et al. Therapeutic effects of recombinant human S100A6 and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products(sRAGE) on CCl(4)-induced liver fibrosis in mice. Eur. J. Pharm. 833, 86–93 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ma, H. et al. Periostin promotes colorectal tumorigenesis through integrin-FAK-Src pathway-mediated YAP/TAZ activation. Cell Rep. 30, 793–806.e796 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lee, H. R., Lee, J. & Kim, H. J. Differential effects of MEK inhibitors on rat neural stem cell differentiation: Repressive roles of MEK2 in neurogenesis and induction of astrocytogenesis by PD98059. Pharm. Res. 149, 104466 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Neef, M. et al. Oral imatinib treatment reduces early fibrogenesis but does not prevent progression in the long term. J. Hepatol. 44, 167–175 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Shi, R., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Leng, Y. & Chen, A. F. ASGR1 promotes liver injury in sepsis by modulating monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation via NF-kappaB/ATF5 pathway. Life Sci. 315, 121339 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mederacke, I., Dapito, D. H., Affo, S., Uchinami, H. & Schwabe, R. F. High-yield and high-purity isolation of hepatic stellate cells from normal and fibrotic mouse livers. Nat. Protoc. 10, 305–315 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82370623, 82571812, 82170600, 82070607, and 82273416) and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2022J01015).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Heming Wu, Xueqian Yan.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    Heming Wu, Xueqian Yan, Lijun Kuang, Rui Huang & Yingfu Liu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    Yanfei Zhang, Shuting Ye, Gaoliang Ouyang & Tiantian Wu

  3. Laboratory Animal Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    Yuehua Zhang

  4. State Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    Fan Liu

Authors
  1. Heming Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xueqian Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lijun Kuang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yanfei Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuting Ye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rui Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuehua Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gaoliang Ouyang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tiantian Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Fan Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yingfu Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.W. designed and conducted the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. X.Y. and Yan.Z2. conducted the experiments and collected the data. L.K. and Yue.Z3. conducted the experiments. R.H. and S.Y. provided technical support. G.O. inputs critical intellectual property. T.W. analyzed and interpreted the data. Fan L. and Y.L. designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, critically revised the manuscript, obtained funding, and supervised the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tiantian Wu, Fan Liu or Yingfu Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Biology thanks Martí Ortega-Ribera, Andrew Leask, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Dr Toshiro Moroishi and Dr Ophelia Bu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Data 1

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Reporting summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Yan, X., Kuang, L. et al. TGFBI promotes liver fibrosis through remodeling the profibrotic microenvironment by a positive feedback regulatory loop. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09601-2

Download citation

  • Received: 11 February 2025

  • Accepted: 16 January 2026

  • Published: 03 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09601-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing