Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Notch3 regulates pericyte phenotypic plasticity in colorectal cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 30 January 2026

Notch3 regulates pericyte phenotypic plasticity in colorectal cancer

  • Niki Chalkidi1 na1,
  • Athanasia Stavropoulou1,2 na1,
  • Vasiliki-Zoi Arvaniti1,
  • Christina Paraskeva1,
  • Artemis Monogyiou1,
  • Maria Sakkou2,3,
  • Christoforos Nikolaou2 &
  • …
  • Vasiliki Koliaraki  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-69871 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 539 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer microenvironment
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Gastrointestinal models

Abstract

Pericytes, essential components of the tumor microenvironment, undergo phenotypic alterations that influence cancer progression, yet the molecular mechanisms governing these changes remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate the role of Notch3 signaling in pericyte phenotype and functions in colorectal cancer (CRC). Using lineage tracing approaches, we show that murine tumor pericytes originate from normal tissue-resident pericytes, which proliferate inside tumors. In vivo genetic manipulation reveals that Notch3 pathway activation promotes pericyte proliferation, while suppressing contractile protein expression, and leads to increased endothelial cell proliferation and reduced blood vessel integrity. In contrast, Notch3 deletion leads to decreased endothelial proliferation, blood vessel normalization, and a significant reduction in tumorigenesis in an advanced orthotopic mouse model. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis uncovers significant pericyte heterogeneity in both mouse colitis-associated cancer and human CRC. It specifically identifies distinct subpopulations characterized by differential Notch3 activity, which is enriched in a synthetic subset and absent in a contractile subset, further supporting our in vivo findings. Our results establish Notch3 as a key regulator of pericyte phenotypic plasticity in CRC and suggest that targeting this pathway could represent a promising strategy for improving therapeutic outcomes through vascular normalization.

Similar content being viewed by others

Pericytes promote metastasis by regulating tumor local vascular tone and hemodynamics

Article Open access 02 August 2025

Role of Notch gene receptors as prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer

Article Open access 30 September 2025

Single-cell RNA-seq analysis of cancer-endothelial cell interactions in primary tumor and peritoneal metastasis from a single patient with colorectal cancer

Article Open access 18 November 2024

Data availability

All in-house scRNA-seq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under the accession numbers GSE296872 and GSE296873. The numerical source data for the graphs can be found in Supplementary Data 2. All other data are available from the corresponding author (or other sources, as applicable) on reasonable request.

Code availability

All scripts used to generate the figures are available on GitHub [https://github.com/AthanasiaSt/Notch3-regulates-pericyte-phenotypic-plasticity-in-colorectal-cancer.git].

References

  1. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Wagle, N. S. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin. 73, 17–48 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sung, H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ganesh, K. et al. Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: rationale, challenges and potential. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 361–375 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanahan, D. & Coussens, L. M. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 21, 309–322 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pérez-González, A., Bévant, K. & Blanpain, C. Cancer cell plasticity during tumor progression, metastasis and response to therapy. Nat. Cancer 4, 1063–1082 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Armulik, A., Genove, G. & Betsholtz, C. Pericytes: developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, problems, and promises. Dev. Cell 21, 193–215 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morikawa, S. et al. Abnormalities in pericytes on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 160, 985–1000 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meng, M. B. et al. Pericytes: a double-edged sword in cancer therapy. Future Oncol. 11, 169–179 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johansson-Percival, A. et al. Intratumoral LIGHT restores pericyte contractile properties and vessel integrity. Cell Rep. 13, 2687–2698 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, Z. J. et al. Pericyte phenotype switching alleviates immunosuppression and sensitizes vascularized tumors to immunotherapy in preclinical models. J. Clin. Investig. 134, e179860 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. He, B. et al. Selective tubulin-binding drugs induce pericyte phenotype switching and anti-cancer immunity. EMBO Mol. Med. 17, 1071–1100 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Song, S., Ewald, A. J., Stallcup, W., Werb, Z. & Bergers, G. PDGFRbeta+ perivascular progenitor cells in tumours regulate pericyte differentiation and vascular survival. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 870–879 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Du, R. et al. HIF1alpha induces the recruitment of bone marrow-derived vascular modulatory cells to regulate tumor angiogenesis and invasion. Cancer Cell 13, 206–220 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clere, N., Renault, S. & Corre, I. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 747 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Viallard, C. & Larrivée, B. Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: alternative therapeutic targets. Angiogenesis 20, 409–426 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carmeliet, P. & Jain, R. K. Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 417–427 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siebel, C. & Lendahl, U. Notch signaling in development, tissue homeostasis, and disease. Physiol. Rev. 97, 1235–1294 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ntziachristos, P., Lim, J. S., Sage, J. & Aifantis, I. From fly wings to targeted cancer therapies: a centennial for notch signaling. Cancer Cell 25, 318–334 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aster, J. C., Pear, W. S. & Blacklow, S. C. The varied roles of Notch in cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 12, 245–275 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kopan, R. & Ilagan, M. X. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 137, 216–233 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Domenga, V. et al. Notch3 is required for arterial identity and maturation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Genes Dev. 18, 2730–2735 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Joutel, A. et al. Notch3 mutations in CADASIL, a hereditary adult-onset condition causing stroke and dementia. Nature 383, 707–710 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, H., Zhang, W., Kennard, S., Caldwell, R. B. & Lilly, B. Notch3 is critical for proper angiogenesis and mural cell investment. Circ. Res. 107, 860–870 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aburjania, Z. et al. The role of Notch3 in cancer. Oncologist 23, 900–911 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hu, W. et al. Notch3 pathway alterations in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 74, 3282–3293 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ozawa, T. et al. Nuclear Notch3 expression is associated with tumor recurrence in patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 21, 2650–2658 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Varga, J. et al. AKT-dependent NOTCH3 activation drives tumor progression in a model of mesenchymal colorectal cancer. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20191515 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Serafin, V. et al. Notch3 signalling promotes tumour growth in colorectal cancer. J. Pathol. 224, 448–460 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, X. W. et al. MicroRNA-206 attenuates tumor proliferation and migration involving the downregulation of NOTCH3 in colorectal cancer. Oncol. Rep. 33, 1402–1410 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Neufert, C. et al. Inducible mouse models of colon cancer for the analysis of sporadic and inflammation-driven tumor progression and lymph node metastasis. Nat. Protoc. 16, 61–85 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pan, X. et al. Tumour vasculature at single-cell resolution. Nature 632, 429–436 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kobayashi, H. et al. The origin and contribution of cancer-associated fibroblasts in colorectal carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 162, 890–906 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pelka, K. et al. Spatially organized multicellular immune hubs in human colorectal cancer. Cell 184, 4734–4752.e4720 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, H. O. et al. Lineage-dependent gene expression programs influence the immune landscape of colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 52, 594–603 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qi, J. et al. Single-cell and spatial analysis reveal interaction of FAP+ fibroblasts and SPP1+ macrophages in colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun. 13, 1742 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khaliq, A. M. et al. Refining colorectal cancer classification and clinical stratification through a single-cell atlas. Genome Biol. 23, 113 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cuervo, H. et al. PDGFRβ-P2A-CreER(T2) mice: a genetic tool to target pericytes in angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 20, 655–662 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hong, S. P. et al. Distinct fibroblast subsets regulate lacteal integrity through YAP/TAZ-induced VEGF-C in intestinal villi. Nat. Commun. 11, 4102 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vega, P. N. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts and squamous epithelial cells constitute a unique microenvironment in a mouse model of inflammation-induced colon cancer. Front. Oncol. 12, 878920 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fre, S. et al. Notch lineages and activity in intestinal stem cells determined by a new set of knock-in mice. PLoS ONE 6, e25785 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jin, S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun. 12, 1088 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Oh, P. et al. In vivo mapping of notch pathway activity in normal and stress hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell 13, 190–204 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ventura, A. et al. Restoration of p53 function leads to tumour regression in vivo. Nature 445, 661–665 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hamzah, J. et al. Vascular normalization in Rgs5-deficient tumours promotes immune destruction. Nature 453, 410–414 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Krebs, L. T. et al. Characterization of Notch3-deficient mice: normal embryonic development and absence of genetic interactions with a Notch1 mutation. Genesis 37, 139–143 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Roper, J. et al. In vivo genome editing and organoid transplantation models of colorectal cancer and metastasis. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 569–576 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566, 496–502 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chhabra, Y. & Weeraratna, A. T. Fibroblasts in cancer: Unity in heterogeneity. Cell 186, 1580–1609 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. De Palma, M. et al. Tie2 identifies a hematopoietic lineage of proangiogenic monocytes required for tumor vessel formation and a mesenchymal population of pericyte progenitors. Cancer Cell 8, 211–226 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Patenaude, A. et al. A novel population of local pericyte precursor cells in tumor stroma that require Notch signaling for differentiation. Microvasc. Res. 101, 38–47 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sweeney, C. et al. Notch 1 and 3 receptor signaling modulates vascular smooth muscle cell growth, apoptosis, and migration via a CBF-1/RBP-Jk dependent pathway. FASEB J. 18, 1421–1423 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Morrow, D. et al. Notch-mediated CBF-1/RBP-J{kappa}-dependent regulation of human vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 289, C1188–C1196 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Alarcon-Martinez, L., Yemisci, M. & Dalkara, T. Pericyte morphology and function. Histol. Histopathol. 36, 633–643 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dessalles, C. A., Babataheri, A. & Barakat, A. I. Pericyte mechanics and mechanobiology. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs240226 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jain, R. K. Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia. Cancer Cell 26, 605–622 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Melissari, M. T. et al. Col6a1+/CD201+ mesenchymal cells regulate intestinal morphogenesis and homeostasis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 1 (2021).

  59. Chalkidi, N. et al. Activation and functions of Col6a1+ fibroblasts in colitis-associated cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 148 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Koliaraki, V. & Kollias, G. Isolation of intestinal mesenchymal cells from adult mice. Bio-protocol 6, e1940 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sofia Grammenoudi for assistance in FACS sorting experiments. The authors would also like to thank Fleming’s Animal House and Flow Cytometry facilities. This work was funded by Worldwide Cancer Research (Grant No: 22-0126, to V.K.), and the project Fib3R (Grant No: 3001, to V.K.) was funded by the Hellenic Foundation of Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I.) under the “2nd Call for H.F.R.I. Research Projects to support Faculty members and Researchers.” The authors acknowledge support of this work by the project SingleOut (HFRI-FM17C3-3780) funded by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I.) under the “1st Call for H.F.R.I. Research Projects to support Faculty members and Researchers and the procurement of high-cost research equipment”. The authors also acknowledge support by the Research Infrastructure projects InfrafrontierGR (MIS 5002802) and pMedGR (MIS 5002802) funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014-2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund), as well as by project MIS 6004752 funded by the Regional Operational Programme “ATTICA” (NSRF 2021-2027) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund). The graphical abstract was created using BioRender (https://BioRender.com/kvnz47d).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Niki Chalkidi, Athanasia Stavropoulou.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Vari, Greece

    Niki Chalkidi, Athanasia Stavropoulou, Vasiliki-Zoi Arvaniti, Christina Paraskeva, Artemis Monogyiou & Vasiliki Koliaraki

  2. Institute for Bioinnovation, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Vari, Greece

    Athanasia Stavropoulou, Maria Sakkou & Christoforos Nikolaou

  3. Center of New Biotechnologies & Precision Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece

    Maria Sakkou

Authors
  1. Niki Chalkidi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Athanasia Stavropoulou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vasiliki-Zoi Arvaniti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christina Paraskeva
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Artemis Monogyiou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maria Sakkou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christoforos Nikolaou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Vasiliki Koliaraki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.C. and V.K. designed the study; N.C. V.Z.A, C.P., A.M., and M.S. performed experiments; A.S. performed the bioinformatics analysis; C.N. and V.K. supervised the bioinformatics analysis; N.C., A.S., and V.K. interpreted the experimental results, wrote the manuscript, and prepared the figures; V.K. supervised the study; all authors critically revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasiliki Koliaraki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Jiha Kim, Vikneshwari Natarajan, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Kaliya Georgieva. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Peer review file

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Reporting summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chalkidi, N., Stavropoulou, A., Arvaniti, VZ. et al. Notch3 regulates pericyte phenotypic plasticity in colorectal cancer. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09629-4

Download citation

  • Received: 30 June 2025

  • Accepted: 22 January 2026

  • Published: 30 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09629-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer