Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Distinct adaptation and ancestral retention signals in African and European indigenous cattle genomes
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 March 2026

Distinct adaptation and ancestral retention signals in African and European indigenous cattle genomes

  • Junxin Gao  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0003-9308-16461,
  • Catarina Ginja2,
  • Ying Liu1,
  • Juha Kantanen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-63733,
  • Nasser Ghanem4,
  • Donald Kugonza5,
  • Mahlako Makgahlela  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-45586,7,
  • Rodney Okwasiimire3,8,
  • Henk Bovenhuis  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9074-53341,
  • Martien A. M. Groenen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-45451 &
  • …
  • Richard P. M. A. Crooijmans  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-99721 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1213 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Agricultural genetics
  • Animal breeding
  • Evolutionary genetics
  • Genetic hybridization

Abstract

Domestic cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus) underpin food security and livelihoods worldwide but face intensifying pressures from climate change, infectious disease, and inconsistent feed supplies. African and European indigenous cattle provide a natural comparative framework spanning gradients of climate, pathogen burden, and husbandry, and possess genomic mosaics comprising African taurine, European taurine, and indicine ancestry. We analyzed whole-genome sequences from 519 cattle across 24 African and European indigenous populations and 117 publicly available genomes from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. This dataset reveals admixture mosaics among major lineages and identifies 36 candidate genes exhibiting adaptive retention of ancestral alleles associated with response to heat stress (e.g., HSPA12B, DDIT3), immunity (IRAK3), productivity (ACSF3), and reproductivity (SSMEM1, SPEF1). Our study suggests that historical admixture introduced variation shaped by local ecological selection, clarifying how environmental heterogeneity drives the retention of advantageous alleles and informing sustainable breeding and diversity conservation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Genome-wide local ancestry and the functional consequences of admixture in African and European cattle populations

Article 08 November 2024

Genomic diversity and selection signatures in Asian Zebu Cattle: insights into adaptation and genetic erosion

Article Open access 29 September 2025

Global genetic diversity, introgression, and evolutionary adaptation of indicine cattle revealed by whole genome sequencing

Article Open access 28 November 2023

Data availability

Population-level variant calls (VCF files) for the 636 indigenous and reference cattle analyzed in this study have been deposited in the European Variation Archive under accession PRJEB102975 (ERP184337)141. Whole-genome sequence data for the 519 African and European indigenous cattle analyzed in this study are available from the European Nucleotide Archive under accessions PRJEB90914142 and PRJEB90816143. Publicly available reference variant datasets were obtained from the 1000 Bull Genomes Project (PRJNA391427; ERZ14211345)144 and the African Genomic Reference Resource (PRJEB74565; Muturu)145. Sample IDs for the ancestry reference panels (AFT, n = 34; EUT, n = 29; AFI, n = 25; AAI, n = 29) are provided in Supplementary Data 1. Supplementary Data 2 contains genome-wide haplotype-mosaic files for locus-level inspection, provided for two AFT reference configurations (N’Dama + Muturu and Muturu only). Supplementary Data 3 lists putative ancestry-retention genes together with retention rates. Supplementary Data 4 provides window-based nucleotide diversity (π) and genetic differentiation (weighted Fst) for Mertolenga and EUT populations. All supplementary datasets are available via the project repository on GitHub: https://github.com/junxingao888/ancestral_retention_signals_cattle/. Source data underlying the figures are provided as follows: Supplementary Table 3 (Fig. 2a,b), Supplementary Table 4 (Fig. 2c,d), Supplementary Table 5 (Fig. 4c), Supplementary Table 6 (Fig. 4e), and Supplementary Data 4 (Fig. 5d,e).

Code availability

All custom code and workflows (Linux shell, R, and Python) for read processing, variant calling, local-ancestry inference, selection scans, and figure generation are available at GitHub (https://github.com/junxingao888/ancestral_retention_signals_cattle/tree/main/Code_availability) and Zenodo140.

References

  1. Godde, C. M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Mayberry, D. E., Thornton, P. K. & Herrero, M. Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain; a review of the evidence. Glob. Food Secur. 28, 100488 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, K. et al. The mosaic genome of indigenous African cattle as a unique genetic resource for African pastoralism. Nat. Genet. 52, 1099–1110 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Felius, M. Cattle Breeds of the World. (BRILL, 2024).

  4. Malek, Ž et al. Improving the representation of cattle grazing patterns in the European Union. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 114077 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedrich, J. et al. Mapping restricted introgression across the genomes of admixed indigenous African cattle breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 55, 91 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ward, J. A. et al. Genome-wide local ancestry and evidence for mitonuclear coadaptation in African hybrid cattle populations. iScience 25, 104672 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, N. et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals world-wide ancestry and adaptive introgression events of domesticated cattle in East Asia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2337 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Achilli, A. et al. Mitochondrial genomes of extinct aurochs survive in domestic cattle. Curr. Biol. 18, R157–R158 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, N. et al. Global genetic diversity, introgression, and evolutionary adaptation of indicine cattle revealed by whole genome sequencing. Nat. Commun. 14, 7803 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bollongino, R. et al. Modern taurine cattle descended from a small number of Near Eastern founders. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 2101–2104 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, S. et al. Zebu cattle are an exclusive legacy of the South Asia neolithic. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1–6 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loftus, R. T., MacHugh, D. E., Bradley, D. G., Sharp, P. M. & Cunningham, P. Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91, 2757–2761 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scheu, A. et al. The genetic prehistory of domesticated cattle from their origin to the spread across Europe. BMC Genet. 16, 54 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brito, L. F. et al. Review: Genetic selection of high-yielding dairy cattle toward sustainable farming systems in a rapidly changing world. Animal 15, 100292 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flori, L. et al. The genome response to artificial selection: a case study in dairy cattle. PLoS One 4, e6595 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Park, S. D. et al. Genome sequencing of the extinct Eurasian wild aurochs, Bos primigenius, illuminates the phylogeography and evolution of cattle. Genome Biol. 16, 234 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verdugo, M. P. et al. Ancient cattle genomics, origins, and rapid turnover in the Fertile Crescent. Science 365, 173–176 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wragg, D. et al. A locus conferring tolerance to Theileria infection in African cattle. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010099 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kambal, S. et al. Candidate signatures of positive selection for environmental adaptation in indigenous African cattle: A review. Anim. Genet. 54, 689–708 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naessens, J. Bovine trypanotolerance: A natural ability to prevent severe anaemia and haemophagocytic syndrome?. Int J. Parasitol. 36, 521–528 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolotti, M. & Guérin, C. Le zébu (Bos indicus) dans l’Egypte ancienne. Archaeozoologia 5, 87–108 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hanotte, O. et al. African pastoralism: genetic imprints of origins and migrations. Science 296, 336–339 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Epstein, H. The origin of the domestic animals of Africa. Vol. II. 2 (1971).

  24. Gifford-Gonzalez, D. & Hanotte, O. Domesticating animals in Africa: implications of genetic and archaeological findings. J. World Prehist. 24, 1–23 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fuller, D. Q. & Boivin, N. Crops, cattle and commensals across the Indian Ocean. Current and potential archaeobiological evidence. Études Océ Indien 13, 46 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Felius, M. Cattle breeds: An encyclopedia. (1995).

  27. Mwai, O., Hanotte, O., Kwon, Y.-J. & Cho, S. African indigenous cattle: unique genetic resources in a rapidly changing world. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 28, 911 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beja-Pereira, A. et al. The origin of European cattle: evidence from modern and ancient DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 8113–8118 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scholtz, M. & Theunissen, A. The use of indigenous cattle in terminal cross-breeding to improve beef cattle production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Anim. Genet. Resour. 46, 33–39 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  30. da Fonseca, R. R. et al. Consequences of breed formation on patterns of genomic diversity and differentiation: the case of highly diverse peripheral Iberian cattle. BMC Genomics 20, 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cymbron, T., Loftus, R. T., Malheiro, M. I. & Bradley, D. G. Mitochondrial sequence variation suggests an African influence in Portuguese cattle. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 266, 597–603 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Decker, J. E. et al. Worldwide patterns of ancestry, divergence, and admixture in domesticated cattle. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004254 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Upadhyay, M. et al. Deciphering the patterns of genetic admixture and diversity in southern European cattle using genome-wide SNPs. Evolut. Appl. 12, 951–963 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kim, J. et al. The genome landscape of indigenous African cattle. Genome Biol. 18, 34 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nielsen, R., Hellmann, I., Hubisz, M., Bustamante, C. & Clark, A. G. Recent and ongoing selection in the human genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 857–868 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huerta-Sánchez, E. et al. Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature 512, 194–197 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Qiu, Q. et al. The yak genome and adaptation to life at high altitude. Nat. Genet. 44, 946–949 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Scholtz, M., Bester, J., Mamabolo, J. & Ramsay, K. Results of the national cattle survey undertaken in South Africa, with emphasis on beef. Appl. Anim. Husb. Rural. Develop. 1, 1–9 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kim, E.-S. & Rothschild, M. F. Genomic adaptation of admixed dairy cattle in East Africa. Front. Genet. 5, 443 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Upadhyay, M. Genomic variation across European cattle: contribution of gene flow. (Wageningen University and Research, 2019).

  41. Daetwyler, H. D. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle. Nat. Genet. 46, 858–865 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hayes, B. J. & Daetwyler, H. D. 1000 bull genomes project to map simple and complex genetic traits in cattle: applications and outcomes. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 7, 89–102 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moorjani, P. et al. The history of African gene flow into Southern Europeans, Levantines, and Jews. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001373 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liang, M., Shishkin, M., Mikhailova, A., Shchur, V. & Nielsen, R. Estimating the timing of multiple admixture events using 3-locus linkage disequilibrium. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010281 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dias-Alves, T., Mairal, J. & Blum, M. G. Loter: a software package to infer local ancestry for a wide range of species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 2318–2326 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Racimo, F., Sankararaman, S., Nielsen, R. & Huerta-Sánchez, E. Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 359–371 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Garattini, E., Mendel, R., Romão, M. J., Wright, R. & Terao, M. Mammalian molybdo-flavoenzymes, an expanding family of proteins: structure, genetics, regulation, function and pathophysiology. Biochem. J. 372, 15–32 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Huntley, S. et al. A comprehensive catalog of human KRAB-associated zinc finger genes: insights into the evolutionary history of a large family of transcriptional repressors. Genome Res. 16, 669–677 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kobayashi, K. et al. IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell 110, 191–202 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Harding, H. P. et al. Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 6, 1099–1108 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schroer, T. A. Dynactin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 759–779 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Utsunomiya, Y. et al. Genomic clues of the evolutionary history of Bos indicus cattle. Anim. Genet. 50, 557–568 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Li, M. et al. DDIT3 directs a dual mechanism to balance glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation during glutamine deprivation. Adv. Sci. 8, 2003732 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pereira, A. M., Baccari, F., Titto, E. A. & Almeida, J. A. Effect of thermal stress on physiological parameters, feed intake and plasma thyroid hormones concentration in Alentejana, Mertolenga, Frisian and Limousine cattle breeds. Int. J. Biometeorol. 52, 199–208 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ginja, C. et al. Iron age genomic data from Althiburos-Tunisia renew the debate on the origins of African taurine cattle. Iscience 26 (2023).

  56. Mengistie, D. Origin of cattle breeds in East Africa and introduction to general breeding science: A–review. World N. Nat. Sci. 49, 88–110 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Murray, M., Trail, J., Davis, C. & Black, S. J. Genetic resistance to African trypanosomiasis. J. Infect. Dis. 149, 311–319 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zegeye, T., Belay, G., Vallejo-Trujillo, A., Han, J. & Hanotte, O. Genome-wide diversity and admixture of five indigenous cattle populations from the Tigray region of northern Ethiopia. Front. Genet. 14, 1050365 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kim, K. et al. Inference of Admixture Origins in Indigenous African Cattle. Mol. Biol. Evol. 40, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msad257 (2023).

  60. Hanotte, O. et al. Geographic distribution and frequency of a taurine Bos taurus and an indicine Bos indicus Y specific allele amongst sub-saharan African cattle breeds. Mol. Ecol. 9, 387–396 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Dai, S. et al. Global pangenome analysis highlights the critical role of structural variants in cattle improvement and identifies a unique event as a novel enhancer in IGFBP7+ cells. Mol. Biol. Evol. 42, msaf205 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Coffey, E., Horan, B., Evans, R. & Berry, D. Milk production and fertility performance of Holstein, Friesian, and Jersey purebred cows and their respective crosses in seasonal-calving commercial farms. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 5681–5689 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Xia, X. et al. Global dispersal and adaptive evolution of domestic cattle: a genomic perspective. Stress Biol. 3, 8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Taye, M. et al. Exploring the genomes of East African Indicine cattle breeds reveals signature of selection for tropical environmental adaptation traits. Cogent Food Agric. 4, 1552552 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jonsson, N., Piper, E. & Constantinoiu, C. Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick R hipicephalus microplus. Parasite Immunol. 36, 553–559 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Magee, D. A., MacHugh, D. E. & Edwards, C. J. Interrogation of modern and ancient genomes reveals the complex domestic history of cattle. Anim. Front. 4, 7–22 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Martín-Burriel, I. et al. Genetic diversity, structure, and breed relationships in Iberian cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 89, 893–906 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Groh, J. S. & Coop, G. The temporal and genomic scale of selection following hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2309168121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sankararaman, S. et al. The genomic landscape of Neanderthal ancestry in present-day humans. Nature 507, 354–357 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Smetko, A. et al. Trypanosomosis: potential driver of selection in African cattle. Front. Genet. 6, 137 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hunter, C. A. & Kastelein, R. Interleukin-27: balancing protective and pathological immunity. Immunity 37, 960–969 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lamp, O. et al. Metabolic Heat Stress Adaption in Transition Cows: Differences in Macronutrient Oxidation between Late-Gestating and Early-Lactating German Holstein Dairy Cows. PLoS One 10, e0125264 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ma, Z., Tanis, J. E., Taruno, A. & Foskett, J. K. Calcium homeostasis modulator (CALHM) ion channels. Pflug. Arch. 468, 395–403 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Liu, D. et al. Genome-wide selection signatures detection in Shanghai Holstein cattle population identified genes related to adaption, health and reproduction traits. BMC Genomics 22, 747 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kusano, T., Nishino, T., Okamoto, K., Hille, R. & Nishino, T. The mechanism and significance of the conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to xanthine oxidase in mammalian secretory gland cells. Redox Biol. 59, 102573 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Chen, C. et al. Dermatan sulfate: structure, biosynthesis, and biological roles. Biomolecules 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15081158 (2025).

  77. Larkin, D. M. et al. Whole-genome resequencing of two elite sires for the detection of haplotypes under selection in dairy cattle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 7693–7698 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Nayeri, S. et al. Genome-wide association analysis for β-hydroxybutyrate concentration in Milk in Holstein dairy cattle. BMC Genet. 20, 58 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Nozawa, K. et al. Knockout of serine-rich single-pass membrane protein 1 (Ssmem1) causes globozoospermia and sterility in male mice†. Biol. Reprod. 103, 244–253 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mulim, H. A. et al. Detection and evaluation of parameters influencing the identification of heterozygous-enriched regions in Holstein cattle based on SNP chip or whole-genome sequence data. BMC Genomics 25, 726 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  81. He, W. et al. Function identification of bovine ACSF3 gene and its Association with lipid metabolism traits in beef cattle. Front. Vet. Sci. 8, 766765 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Dirandeh, E., Ansari-Pirsaraei, Z. & Thatcher, W. Melatonin as a smart protector of pregnancy in dairy cows. Antioxidants. 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020292 (2022).

  83. de Camargo, G. M. et al. Polymorphisms in TOX and NCOA2 genes and their associations with reproductive traits in cattle. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 27, 523–528 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Wang, T. et al. The biological properties of the FAS and TACR3 genes and the association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms with milk quality traits in Gannan Yak. Foods 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091575 (2025).

  85. Jiang, L.-Y. et al. Ring finger protein 145 (RNF145) is a ubiquitin ligase for sterol-induced degradation of HMG-CoA reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 4047–4055 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rothi, M. H. et al. The 18S rRNA methyltransferase DIMT-1 regulates lifespan in the germline later in life. Nat. Commun. 16, 6944 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Benfica, L. F. et al. Genome-wide association study between copy number variation and feeding behavior, feed efficiency, and growth traits in Nellore cattle. BMC Genomics 25, 54 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Singh, A. et al. Genomewide expression analysis of the heat stress response in dermal fibroblasts of Tharparkar (zebu) and Karan-Fries (zebu× taurine) cattle. Cell Stress Chaperones 25, 327–344 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tijjani, A. et al. Genomic signatures for drylands adaptation at gene-rich regions in African zebu cattle. Genomics 114, 110423 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Gujar, G. et al. Characterization of thermo-physiological, hematological, and molecular changes in response to seasonal variations in two tropically adapted native cattle breeds of Bos indicus lineage in hot arid ambience of Thar Desert. Int. J. Biometeorol. 66, 1515–1529 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Mengistie Yirsaw, D. Genome-Wide Signature of Positive Selection, Breed-Specific SNPs and Linkage Disequilibrium in Ethiopian Indigenous and European Beef Cattle Breeds, Addis Ababa University, (2021).

  92. Liu, Y. et al. Hypoxia-induced GPCPD1 depalmitoylation triggers mitophagy via regulating PRKN-mediated ubiquitination of VDAC1. Autophagy 19, 2443–2463 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Freihat, L. A. et al. IRAK3 modulates downstream innate immune signalling through its guanylate cyclase activity. Sci. Rep. 9, 15468 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Flori, L. et al. A genomic map of climate adaptation in Mediterranean cattle breeds. Mol. Ecol. 28, 1009–1029 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Shinoda, K. et al. The dystonia gene THAP1 controls DNA double-strand break repair choice. Mol. Cell 81, 2611–2624.e2610 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Bressler, K. R. et al. Depletion of eukaryotic initiation factor 5B (eIF5B) reprograms the cellular transcriptome and leads to activation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). Cell Stress Chaperones 26, 253–264 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Ruthig, V. A. et al. The RNA-binding protein DND1 acts sequentially as a negative regulator of pluripotency and a positive regulator of epigenetic modifiers required for germ cell reprogramming. Development 146, dev175950 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Purfield, D. C., Bradley, D. G., Evans, R. D., Kearney, F. J. & Berry, D. P. Genome-wide association study for calving performance using high-density genotypes in dairy and beef cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 47, 47 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Guzmán, L. F. et al. Expression of heat shock protein genes in Simmental cattle exposed to heat stress. Anim. Biosci. 36, 704 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Kim, J. et al. Expansion of the HSP70 gene family in Tegillarca granosa and expression profiles in response to zinc toxicity. Cell Stress Chaperones 29, 97–112 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Chen, Q. et al. A brown fat-enriched adipokine Adissp controls adipose thermogenesis and glucose homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 13, 7633 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Bo, D. et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals genetic diversity and growth trait-related genes in Pinan cattle. Animals 14, 2163 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Asai, Y. et al. Transgenic Tmc2 expression preserves inner ear hair cells and vestibular function in mice lacking Tmc1. Sci. Rep. 8, 12124 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Steiner, P. & Zierler, S. Inter-Organellar Ca(2+) Homeostasis in plant and animal systems. Cells 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14151204 (2025).

  105. Almhanna, H. et al. Comparison of Siglec-1 protein networks and expression patterns in sperm and male reproductive tracts of mice, rats, and humans. Vet. World 17, 645–657 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Spetter, M. J. et al. Genetic diversity, Admixture, and selection signatures in a Rarámuri Criollo cattle population introduced to the Southwestern United States. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 4649 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Almhanna, H. et al. Comparison of Siglec-1 protein networks and expression patterns in sperm and male reproductive tracts of mice, rats, and humans. Vet. World 17, 645 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Jones, J. M. & First, N. L. Expression of the cell cycle control protein cdc25 in cleavage stage bovine embryos. Zygote 3, 133–139 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Tijjani, A. et al. Genomic reference resource for African cattle: genome sequences and high-density array variants. Sci. Data 11, 801 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Chen, S. Ultrafast one-pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. Imeta 2, e107 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Vasimuddin, M., Misra, S., Li, H. & Aluru, S. in 2019 IEEE International Parallel And Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). 314–324 (IEEE).

  112. Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Okonechnikov, K., Conesa, A. & García-Alcalde, F. Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32, 292–294 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Garrison, E. & Marth, G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.3907 (2012).

  115. Browning, B. L., Zhou, Y. & Browning, S. R. A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 103, 338–348 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Browning, B. L., Tian, X., Zhou, Y. & Browning, S. R. Fast two-stage phasing of large-scale sequence data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 108, 1880–1890 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Lindenbaum, P. JVarkit: Java-based utilities for Bioinformatics. figshare 10, m9 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Chen, C. et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13, 1194–1202 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Ayalew, W. et al. Whole genome scan uncovers candidate genes related to milk production traits in Barka Cattle. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 6142 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Gómez-Rubio, V. ggplot2-elegant graphics for data analysis. J. stat. softw. 77, 1–3 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucl. Acids Res., gkae268 (2024).

  124. Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655–1664 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Qanbari, S. & Wittenburg, D. Male recombination map of the autosomal genome in German Holstein. Genet. Sel. Evol. 52, 73 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Patterson, N. et al. Ancient admixture in human history. Genetics 192, 1065–1093 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  127. Peter, B. M. Admixture, population structure, and F-statistics. Genetics 202, 1485–1501 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Chintalapati, M., Patterson, N. & Moorjani, P. The spatiotemporal patterns of major human admixture events during the European Holocene. Elife 11, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77625 (2022).

  129. Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. fly 6, 80–92 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Holsinger, K. E. & Weir, B. S. Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F ST. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 639–650 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Durrett, R. & Durrett, R. Probability models for DNA sequence evolution. 2 (Springer, 2008).

  133. Nei, M. & Li, W.-H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76, 5269–5273 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Pan, B. et al. TMC1 and TMC2 are components of the mechanotransduction channel in hair cells of the mammalian inner ear. Neuron 79, 504–515 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. evolution, 1358–1370 (1984).

  136. Borowsky, R. L. Estimating nucleotide diversity from random amplified polymorphic DNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18, 143–148 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  137. McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 1–14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  138. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  139. Meng, E. C. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci. 32, e4792 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  140. Gao, J. Ancestral retention signals cattle [Workflow]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18378574 (2026).

  141. EVA European Variation Archive. https://identifiers.org/ena.embl:PRJEB102975 (2025).

  142. ENA European Nucleotide Archive. https://identifiers.org/ena.embl:PRJEB90914 (2025).

  143. ENA European Nucleotide Archive. https://identifiers.org/ena.embl:PRJEB90816 (2026).

  144. ENA European Nucleotide Archive. https://identifiers.org/ena.embl:PRJNA391427 (2017).

  145. ENA European Nucleotide Archive. https://identifiers.org/ena.embl:PRJEB74565 (2024).

  146. Hamada, M. et al. Prognostic association of starvation-induced genes in head and neck cancer. (2021).

  147. Kumar, A. et al. 2-Deoxyglucose drives plasticity via an adaptive ER stress-ATF4 pathway and elicits stroke recovery and Alzheimer’s resilience. Neuron 111, 2831–2846. e2810 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  148. Oyadomari, S. & Mori, M. Roles of CHOP/GADD153 in endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Death Differ. 11, 381–389 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  149. Baral, K. & Rotwein, P. ZMAT2 in Humans and Other Primates: A Highly Conserved and Understudied Gene. Evol. Bioinform. Online 16, 1176934320941500 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  150. Warmack, R. A. et al. Human Protein-l-isoaspartate O-Methyltransferase Domain-Containing Protein 1 (PCMTD1) Associates with Cullin-RING Ligase Proteins. Biochemistry 61, 879–894 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  151. Sdiri, C., Ben Souf, I., Ben Salem, I., M’Hamdi, N. & Ben Hamouda, M. Assessment of Genetic and Health Management of Tunisian Holstein Dairy Herds with a Focus on Longevity. Genes. 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030670 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Long-term EU-Africa Research and Innovation Partnership on Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture (LEAP-Agri) as part of the OPTIBOV project (LEAP-Agri-326), and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (grant agreement No. 727715). Additional funding was provided by Fundação Nacional para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal (Leap Agri-326/LEAPAgri/0003/2017 and 2020.02754.CEECIND, C.G.); the Research Council of Finland (319987); the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-WOTRO, 2018/WOTRO/00488849); the Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority of Egypt (STDF, LEAP-Agri 326); the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations of Uganda (MoSTI/LEAP-11); the National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF, 115577); and the China Scholarship Council (CSC, 202208610017). The funding bodies had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing.

We thank all collaborators for their assistance with sample collection, laboratory work, and technical support, including Bert Dibbits, Kimberley Laport, Rania Agamy, Mohamed Hamada Elsawy, Filipe Ribeiro, Ricardo Loureiro, Daniel Gaspar, Ludmilla Blaschikoff, Ana Elisabete Pires, Carolina Bruno-de-Sousa, Heli Lindberg, Tiina Reilas, Dr. Avhashoni Zwane, Khanyisani Nxumalo, Maano Malima, and all breeders and breed associations involved. We also acknowledge the 1000 Bull Genomes consortium and the African Genomic Reference Resource for providing sequence data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Junxin Gao, Ying Liu, Henk Bovenhuis, Martien A. M. Groenen & Richard P. M. A. Crooijmans

  2. BIOPOLIS, Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal and CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal

    Catarina Ginja

  3. Natural Resources Institute Finland, Jokioinen, Finland

    Juha Kantanen & Rodney Okwasiimire

  4. Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Nasser Ghanem

  5. Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

    Donald Kugonza

  6. Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production Institute, Irene, South Africa

    Mahlako Makgahlela

  7. Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

    Mahlako Makgahlela

  8. Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Rodney Okwasiimire

Authors
  1. Junxin Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catarina Ginja
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ying Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juha Kantanen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nasser Ghanem
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Donald Kugonza
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mahlako Makgahlela
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rodney Okwasiimire
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Henk Bovenhuis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Martien A. M. Groenen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Richard P. M. A. Crooijmans
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.G. and R.C. conceived the study. J.G. drafted the manuscript and interpreted the results. C.G. defined reference data sets. J.G. and Y.L. participated in data analysis. C.G., J.K., N.G., D.K., M.M., R.O., and R.C. collected the samples. H.B., M.G., and R.C. supervised the study. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junxin Gao or Richard P. M. A. Crooijmans.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Alana Alexander and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: George Inglis. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Materials (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 3 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 4 (download XLSX )

Reporting summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, J., Ginja, C., Liu, Y. et al. Distinct adaptation and ancestral retention signals in African and European indigenous cattle genomes. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09856-9

Download citation

  • Received: 16 July 2025

  • Accepted: 03 March 2026

  • Published: 19 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09856-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing