Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Comprehensive analysis of non-tumor lung, liver, and kidney transcriptomes in canine metastatic osteosarcoma
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 March 2026

Comprehensive analysis of non-tumor lung, liver, and kidney transcriptomes in canine metastatic osteosarcoma

  • Jessica A. Beck  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0145-76061,2,
  • Anjali Garg  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9981-36072,
  • Peter L. Choyke3,
  • Christina Mazcko2 &
  • …
  • Amy K. LeBlanc  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7656-98592 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 692 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bone cancer
  • Cancer microenvironment

Abstract

The non-tumor tissue adjacent to metastases can appear morphologically unremarkable under a microscope; however, it is exposed to a milieu of secretory factors and proteins derived from tumor cells, stromal cells, and immune cells within the surrounding tumor microenvironment. Studies investigating the peritumoral tissue (PTT) or so-called Normal tissue Adjacent to Tumor tissue (NAT) have identified distinct differences between the genomic and transcriptomic profiles of healthy and tumor-adjacent non-tumor tissues. These alterations are hypothesized to have significant implications in local tumor progression, metastasis, and patient outcome. Most NAT/PTT studies focus on the primary tumor microenvironment (TME) with comparisons between patients with and without cancer. The study described herein expands upon this work by investigating the metastatic TME with comparisons between met-recipient and met-free tissues, both derived from a canine osteosarcoma clinical trial. Our study identifies shared and tissue-specific changes in met-recipient non-tumor lung, liver, and kidney which overlap with transcriptional alterations described in human cancers. These findings improve our understanding of the landscape of the peritumoral TME of metastatic osteosarcoma and further underscore the translational relevance of the canine patient as a model of human disease.

Similar content being viewed by others

Peritumoral tissue (PTT): increasing need for naming convention

Article Open access 02 September 2024

Insights into the post-translational modification and its emerging role in shaping the tumor microenvironment

Article Open access 20 December 2021

The tumor microenvironment of metastatic osteosarcoma in the human and canine lung

Article Open access 15 May 2025

Data availability

The canine clinical trial datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the GEO database (RRID:SCR_005012; accession ID: GSE309676). Source data is available in Supplementary Data 2.

Code availability

Codes are deposited at GitHub (https://github.com/Anjaligarg006/NAT.git).

References

  1. Beird, H. C. et al. Osteosarcoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 8, 77 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aljubran, A. H., Griffin, A., Pintilie, M. & Blackstein, M. Osteosarcoma in adolescents and adults: survival analysis with and without lung metastases. Ann. Oncol. 20, 1136–1141 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, Z. L., Chen, H. H., Zheng, L. L., Sun, L. P. & Shi, L. Angiogenic signaling pathways and anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 8, 198 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, D., Liu, J., Qian, H. & Zhuang, Q. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: from basic science to anticancer therapy. Exp. Mol. Med. 55, 1322–1332 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaikwad, S., Agrawal, M. Y., Kaushik, I., Ramachandran, S. & Srivastava, S. K. Immune checkpoint proteins: signaling mechanisms and molecular interactions in cancer immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 86, 137–150 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cappell, K. M. & Kochenderfer, J. N. Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 20, 359–371 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beck, J. et al. Canine and Murine models of osteosarcoma. Vet. Pathol. 59, 399–414 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. LeBlanc, A. K. & Mazcko, C. N. Improving human cancer therapy through the evaluation of pet dogs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 727–742 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Silver, K. I. et al. Patterns of metastatic progression and association with clinical outcomes in canine osteosarcoma: A necropsy study of 83 dogs. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 21, 646–655 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chi, S. N. et al. The patterns of relapse in osteosarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 42, 46–51 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jeffree, G. M., Price, C. H. & Sissons, H. A. The metastatic patterns of osteosarcoma. Br. J. Cancer 32, 87–107 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koca, D., Abedi-Ardekani, B., LeMaoult, J. & Guyon, L. Peritumoral tissue (PTT): increasing need for naming convention. Br. J. Cancer 131, 1111–1115 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aran, D. et al. Comprehensive analysis of normal adjacent to tumor transcriptomes. Nat. Commun. 8, 1077 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heaphy, C. M., Griffith, J. K. & Bisoffi, M. Mammary field cancerization: molecular evidence and clinical importance. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 118, 229–239 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morla-Barcelo, P. M. et al. Unraveling malignant phenotype of peritumoral tissue: transcriptomic insights into early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 26, 89 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Troester, M. A. et al. Activation of host wound responses in breast cancer microenvironment. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 7020–7028 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, J. et al. Transcriptomes of the tumor-adjacent normal tissues are more informative than tumors in predicting recurrence in colorectal cancer patients. J. Transl. Med. 21, 209 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hou, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of tumor and adjacent non-tumor proteomic data reveals SERPINH1 as a recurrence biomarker and drug target in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 20, 5191–5207 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michot, A. et al. Analysis of the peritumoral tissue unveils cellular changes associated with a high risk of recurrence. Cancers (Basel) 15, 3450 (2023).

  20. Huang, X., Stern, D. F. & Zhao, H. Transcriptional profiles from paired normal samples offer complementary information on cancer patient survival-evidence from TCGA pan-cancer data. Sci. Rep. 6, 20567 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. LeBlanc, A. K. et al. Adjuvant sirolimus does not improve outcome in pet dogs receiving standard-of-care therapy for appendicular osteosarcoma: a prospective, randomized trial of 324 dogs. Clin. Cancer Res. 27, 3005–3016 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hassan, S., Syed, S. & Kehar, S. I. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a mesenchymal marker of early hepatic stellate cells activation in liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection. Pak. J. Med Sci. 30, 1027–1032 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mulugeta, S. & Beers, M. F. Surfactant protein C: its unique properties and emerging immunomodulatory role in the lung. Microbes Infect. 8, 2317–2323 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Patkar, S. et al. Large-scale comparative analysis of canine and human osteosarcomas uncovers conserved clinically relevant tumor microenvironment subtypes. Clin. Cancer Res. 30, 5630–5642 (2024).

  25. Eigenbrood, J. et al. Spatial profiling identifies regionally distinct microenvironments and targetable immunosuppressive mechanisms in pediatric osteosarcoma pulmonary metastases. Cancer Res. 85, 2320–2337 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ammons, D. T. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of treatment-naive primary osteosarcoma in dogs. Commun. Biol. 7, 496 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kang, M.-J. et al. Inhibition of hepatic stellate cell activation suppresses tumorigenicity of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 191, 2219–2230 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kang, N., Gores, G. J. & Shah, V. H. Hepatic stellate cells: partners in crime for liver metastases? Hepatology 54, 707–713 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cogliati, B., Yashaswini, C. N., Wang, S., Sia, D. & Friedman, S. L. Friend or foe? The elusive role of hepatic stellate cells in liver cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 20, 647–661 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kiefer, A. et al. DMBT1 is upregulated in cystic fibrosis, affects ciliary motility, and is reduced by acetylcysteine. Mol. Cell. Pediatr. 9, 4 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ruaro, B. et al. The history and mystery of alveolar epithelial type II cells: focus on their physiologic and pathologic role in lung. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 2566 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. McGee, L. E. et al. The tumor microenvironment of metastatic osteosarcoma in the human and canine lung. Commun. Biol. 8, 756 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reinecke, J. B. et al. Aberrant activation of wound-healing programs within the metastatic niche facilitates lung colonization by osteosarcoma cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 31, 414–429 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Regan, D. P. et al. The angiotensin receptor blocker losartan suppresses growth of pulmonary metastases via AT1R-independent inhibition of CCR2 signaling and monocyte recruitment. J. Immunol. 202, 3087–3102 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Regan, D. P. et al. Losartan blocks osteosarcoma-elicited monocyte recruitment, and combined with the kinase inhibitor toceranib, exerts significant clinical benefit in canine metastatic osteosarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 662–676 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Klosowski, M. et al. Naturally occurring canine sarcomas: bridging the gap from mouse models to human patients through cross-disciplinary research partnerships. Front Oncol. 13, 1130215 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wightman, S. C. et al. Oncogenic CXCL10 signalling drives metastasis development and poor clinical outcome. Br. J. Cancer 113, 327–335 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, M., Guo, S. & Stiles, J. K. The emerging role of CXCL10 in cancer (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2, 583–589 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Flores, R. J. et al. A novel prognostic model for osteosarcoma using circulating CXCL10 and FLT3LG. Cancer 123, 144–154 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tokunaga, R. et al. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11/CXCR3 axis for immune activation - A target for novel cancer therapy. Cancer Treat. Rev. 63, 40–47 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ohmori, Y. et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces cell type and tissue-specific expression of chemoattractant cytokines in vivo. Am. J. Pathol. 142, 861–870 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ohmori, Y., Schreiber, R. D. & Hamilton, T. A. Synergy between interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in transcriptional activation is mediated by cooperation between signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and nuclear factor kappaB. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14899–14907 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gordon, I., Paoloni, M., Mazcko, C. & Khanna, C. The comparative oncology trials consortium: using spontaneously occurring cancers in dogs to inform the cancer drug development pathway. PLoS Med. 6, e1000161 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Paoloni, M., Lana, S., Thamm, D., Mazcko, C. & Withrow, S. The creation of the comparative oncology trials consortium pharmacodynamic core: infrastructure for a virtual laboratory. Vet. J. 185, 88–89 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Talhouk, A. et al. Single-patient molecular testing with nanostring ncounter data using a reference-based strategy for batch effect correction. PLoS One 11, e0153844 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 26, 139–140 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innov. (Camb.) 2, 100141 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 16, 284–287 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Becht, E. et al. Estimating the population abundance of tissue-infiltrating immune and stromal cell populations using gene expression. Genome Biol. 17, 218 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hao, Y. et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 293–304 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the NCI-COTC member institutions, canine clinical trials teams, and the families who enrolled their dogs into COTC-021/022. We would also like to acknowledge the Molecular Histopathology Laboratory for their assistance with FFPE RNA isolation, and the Genomics Technology Laboratory for their assistance with RNA isolation and the NanoString IO Panel. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program (Z01-BC006161) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The contributions of the NIH author(s) were made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered Works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Figure 1 (https://biorender.com/w5r5qeg), Fig. 2D (https://biorender.com/t9y5khn), and Fig. 5 (https://biorender.com/r7ef8fg) were created in BioRender.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Jessica A. Beck

  2. Comparative Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Jessica A. Beck, Anjali Garg, Christina Mazcko & Amy K. LeBlanc

  3. Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Peter L. Choyke

Authors
  1. Jessica A. Beck
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anjali Garg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter L. Choyke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christina Mazcko
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amy K. LeBlanc
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.A.B.: conceptualization, methodology, project administration, data curation, investigation, visualization, writing—original draft; A.G.: formal analysis, visualization, writing—review & editing; P.C.: resources, supervision, writing—review & editing; C.M.: data curation, writing—review & editing; A.L.: supervision, project administration, writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica A. Beck.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Bruce Smith, Berkley Gryder and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Christina Karlsson Rosenthal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary data 2 (download XLSX )

Summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, J.A., Garg, A., Choyke, P.L. et al. Comprehensive analysis of non-tumor lung, liver, and kidney transcriptomes in canine metastatic osteosarcoma. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09870-x

Download citation

  • Received: 28 April 2025

  • Accepted: 05 March 2026

  • Published: 23 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09870-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Cancer-host reciprocal interactions

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer