Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Ancestral protein reconstruction reveals the mechanism of substrate specificity in FN3K-mediated deglycation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Ancestral protein reconstruction reveals the mechanism of substrate specificity in FN3K-mediated deglycation

  • Jenet K. Matlack1,2,
  • Robert E. Miner III  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0007-0297-44302,3,
  • Jameela Lokhandwala2 &
  • …
  • Jennifer M. Binning  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5871-686X2 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Kinases
  • Post-translational modifications

Abstract

Protein glycation is a detrimental byproduct of carbohydrate metabolism, and nearly all organisms encode kinases that facilitate the removal of early glycation products. In humans, these repair functions are performed by Fructosamine-3 and Ketosamine-3 kinases (FN3K, KT3K). Recent structural studies identified conserved residues essential for FN3K activity, but the molecular basis for substrate discrimination between FN3K and KT3K remains unknown. Here, we show that substrate-binding residues are highly conserved and do not confer specificity in the FN3K family. Using APR, we resurrected four ancestral fructosamine kinases that recapitulate the distinct substrate preferences of FN3K and KT3K. Through mutational studies and structural analysis, we identify an evolutionarily tuned allosteric network that modulates substrate selection through long-range intramolecular interactions. Our findings define the mechanism of substrate selectivity within the FN3K family and establish a framework for the development of selective FN3K inhibitors.

Similar content being viewed by others

The molecular basis of Human FN3K mediated phosphorylation of glycated substrates

Article Open access 22 January 2025

Multi-omics reveals new links between Fructosamine-3-Kinase (FN3K) and core metabolic pathways

Article Open access 03 June 2024

Evolutionary sequence and structural basis for the distinct conformational landscapes of Tyr and Ser/Thr kinases

Article Open access 02 August 2024

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Ancestral reconstruction and plasmid sequence data are available through Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17965681). Uncropped blot images can be found in Supplementary Fig. 11. Experimental data generated in this study is available in Supplementary Data. Previously published structures used in this study can be accessed using PDB codes 8UE1 and 9CX8.

References

  1. Ahmed, M. U., Thorpe, S. R. & Baynes, J. W. Identification of N epsilon-carboxymethyllysine as a degradation product of fructoselysine in glycated protein. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 4889–4894 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teerlink, T., Barto, R., Ten Brink, H. J. & Schalkwijk, C. G. Measurement of Nε-(Carboxymethyl)lysine and Nε-(Carboxyethyl)lysine in human plasma protein by stable-isotope-dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 50, 1222–1228 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krook, M., Ghosh, D., Strömberg, R., Carlquist, M. & Jörnvall, H. Carboxyethyllysine in a protein: native carbonyl reductase/NADP(+)-dependent prostaglandin dehydrogenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 502–506 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sell, D. R., Lapolla, A., Odetti, P., Fogarty, J. & Monnier, V. M. Pentosidine formation in skin correlates with severity of complications in individuals with long-standing IDDM. Diabetes 41, 1286–1292 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nagaraj, R. H., Shipanova, I. N. & Faust, F. M. Protein cross-linking by the Maillard reaction. Isolation, characterization, and in vivo detection of a lysine-lysine cross-link derived from methylglyoxal. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19338–19345 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin, M. S., Jacob-Dolan, J. W., Pham, V. T. T., Sjoblom, N. M. & Scheck, R. A. The chemical language of protein glycation. Nat. Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41589-024-01644-Y (2024).

  7. Schmidt, A. M. et al. Rage: a novel cellular receptor for advanced glycation end products. Diabetes 45, S77–S80 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laughlin, T. et al. Autophagy activators stimulate the removal of advanced glycation end products in human keratinocytes. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 34, 12–18 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zawada, A. et al. Accumulation of advanced glycation end-products in the body and dietary habits. Nutrients 14, 3982 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delpierre, G. et al. Identification, cloning, and heterologous expression of a mammalian fructosamine-3-kinase. Diabetes 49, 1627–1634 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collard, F., Delpierre, G., Stroobant, V., Matthijs, G. & Van Schaftingen, E. A mammalian protein homologous to fructosamine-3-kinase is a ketosamine-3-kinase acting on psicosamines and ribulosamines but not on fructosamines. Diabetes 52, 2888–2895 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fortpied, J., Gemayel, R., Stroobant, V. & Van Schaftingen, E. Plant ribulosamine/erythrulosamine 3-kinase, a putative protein-repair enzyme. Biochem. J. 388, 795–802 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gemayel, R. et al. Many fructosamine 3-kinase homologues in bacteria are ribulosamine/erythrulosamine 3-kinases potentially involved in protein deglycation. FEBS J. 274, 4360–4374 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, S., Lu, H. & Bai, Y. Nrf2 in cancers: a double-edged sword. Cancer Med. 8, 2252 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, Y., Li, W., Su, Z. Y. & Kong, A. N. The complexity of the Nrf2 pathway: beyond the antioxidant response. J. Nutr. Biochem. 26, 1401–1413 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sanghvi, V. R. et al. The oncogenic action of NRF2 depends on de-glycation by fructosamine-3-kinase. Cell 178, 807–819.e21 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garg, A. et al. The molecular basis of Human FN3K mediated phosphorylation of glycated substrates. Nat. Commun. 16, 1–14 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lokhandwala, J. et al. Structural basis for FN3K-mediated protein deglycation. Structure 32, 1711–1724.e5 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harms, M. J. & Thornton, J. W. Analyzing protein structure and function using ancestral gene reconstruction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 20, 360–366 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thornton, J. W. Resurrecting ancient genes: experimental analysis of extinct molecules. Nat. Rev. Genet 5, 366–375 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Trudeau, D. L., Kaltenbach, M. & Tawfik, D. S. On the potential origins of the high stability of reconstructed ancestral proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 2633–2641 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor, S. S. & Kornev, A. P. Protein kinases: evolution of dynamic regulatory proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 65–77 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kornev, A. P. & Taylor, S. S. Dynamics driven allostery in protein kinases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 628 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shim, G. seong, Manandhar, S., Shin, D. ha, Kim, T. H. & Kwak, M. K. Acquisition of doxorubicin resistance in ovarian carcinoma cells accompanies activation of the NRF2 pathway. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 47, 1619–1631 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hayden, A. et al. The Nrf2 transcription factor contributes to resistance to cisplatin in bladder cancer. Urol. Oncol. 32, 806–814 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Niture, S. K. & Jaiswal, A. K. Nrf2-induced antiapoptotic Bcl-xL protein enhances cell survival and drug resistance. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 57, 119–131 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, J., Zhang, L., Li, H., Wu, S. & Liu, Z. Nrf2 induced cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer by promoting CD99 expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 518, 698–705 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dinkova-Kostova, A. T. & Copple, I. M. Advances and challenges in therapeutic targeting of NRF2. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 44, 137–149 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Buda, K., Miton, C. M., Fan, X. C. & Tokuriki, N. Molecular determinants of protein evolvability. Trends Biochem. Sci. 48, 751–760 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bloom, J. D., Labthavikul, S. T., Otey, C. R. & Arnold, F. H. Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5869–5874 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tokuriki, N., Stricher, F., Schymkowitz, J., Serrano, L. & Tawfik, D. S. The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed. J. Mol. Biol. 369, 1318–1332 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tokuriki, N., Stricher, F., Serrano, L. & Tawfik, D. S. How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Comput Biol. 4, e1000002 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mashiba, S., Uchida, K., Okuda, S. & Tomita, S. Measurement of glycated albumin by the nitroblue tetrazolium colorimetric method. Clin. Chim. Acta 212, 3–15 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walker, S. W., Howie, A. F. & Smith, A. F. The measurement of glycosylated albumin by reduction of alkaline nitro-blue tetrazolium. Clin. Chim. Acta 156, 197–206 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Consortium, T. U. et al. UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D609–D617 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Potter, S. C. et al. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W200–W204 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li, W. et al. The EMBL-EBI bioinformatics web and programmatic tools framework. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W580–W584 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Madeira, F. et al. The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W521–W525 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lefort, V., Longueville, J. E. & Gascuel, O. SMS: smart model selection in PhyML. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2422–2424 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Felline, A., Seeber, M. & Fanelli, F. webPSN v2.0: a webserver to infer fingerprints of structural communication in biomacromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, W94–W103 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ferruz, N., Schmidt, S. & Höcker, B. ProteinTools: a toolkit to analyze protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W559–W566 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Binning and Luca labs for their suggestions and technical assistance. The authors also acknowledge the Chemical Biology Core at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, which is supported in part by a National Cancer Institute (NCI) support grant (P30-CA076292). The protein structure network was adapted using Biorender.com. This study was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health grant R35 GM143004 to J.M.B. Figure 6B was created in BioRender. https://BioRender.com/0xc7owf.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Jenet K. Matlack

  2. Department of Molecular Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

    Jenet K. Matlack, Robert E. Miner III, Jameela Lokhandwala & Jennifer M. Binning

  3. Cancer Biology PhD Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Robert E. Miner III

Authors
  1. Jenet K. Matlack
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert E. Miner III
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jameela Lokhandwala
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer M. Binning
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.K.M. and J.M.B. designed the research and wrote the manuscript. J.K.M. performed all biochemical studies of FN3Ks and variants, ancestral protein reconstruction, structural analysis, and protein structure network analysis. R.E.M. performed the colorimetric assay on glycated substrates and cloned HsFN3K variants. J.L. performed conservation analysis of HsFN3K, cloned HsFN3K variants, and aided in the design of the research. J.M.B. conceptualized, supervised, provided resources, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer M. Binning.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Gareth Surman and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Dr. Nilanjan Banerjee and Dr. Dr Michele Repetto.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Materials (download PDF )

Supplementary Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matlack, J.K., Miner, R.E., Lokhandwala, J. et al. Ancestral protein reconstruction reveals the mechanism of substrate specificity in FN3K-mediated deglycation. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09967-3

Download citation

  • Received: 25 August 2025

  • Accepted: 20 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09967-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing