Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Stable bioreactor control reveals acidic pH–driven metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial dysfunction in human lymphoblastoid cells
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 15 April 2026

Stable bioreactor control reveals acidic pH–driven metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial dysfunction in human lymphoblastoid cells

  • Samhan Alsolami1,2 na1,
  • Yingzi Zhang1,2 na1,
  • Upendra Singh3,4,
  • Yiqing Jin1,2,
  • Nadia Steiner  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2940-26741,2,
  • Kacper Szczepski1,2,
  • Shannon G. Klein  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-31885,
  • Baolei Yuan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-33191,2,
  • Chongwei Bi1,2,
  • Mengge Wang1,2,
  • Siyi Fu1,2,
  • Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-88752,6,
  • Pierre J. Magistretti1,2,
  • Carlos M. Duarte  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1213-13615,
  • Lukasz Jaremko  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-93593,4 &
  • …
  • Mo Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0827-89071,2 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Epigenomics
  • Gene expression
  • Homeostasis
  • Metabolomics

Abstract

Human cells require pH regulation to maintain physiological function, yet the molecular consequences of acidic environments remain incompletely understood. Here, we employ a gas-only bioreactor to control pH, oxygen, and temperature. Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal that acidic pH induces a glycolytic metabolic shift, suppresses proliferation, and promotes accumulation of lactate and oncometabolites alongside mitochondrial dysfunction. Acidic conditions increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activate inflammatory and immune pathways, leading to heteroplasmic enrichment of a pathogenic mitochondrial mutation. Acidic pH depletes intracellular NAD⁺, partly driven by PARP1 activation. Restoring NAD⁺ through nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) supplementation partially rescues proliferation and stress-associated transcription, while elevating NAD+ levels by NMN or PARP1 inhibition reverses heteroplasmic enrichment of mutant mitochondrial DNA. These findings underscore the role of pH homeostasis in coordinating metabolism, redox balance, and immune signaling, and identify NAD⁺ metabolism as a mechanistic link between acidic microenvironments, mitochondrial genome instability, and immune–metabolic remodeling.

Data availability

Raw bulk RNA-seq and ATAC-seq sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository. The bulk RNA-seq datasets are available under accession numbers GSE254130 and GSE317794, and the bulk ATAC-seq dataset is available under accession number GSE254130. Processed data used for downstream analyses, including RNA-seq gene expression matrices, ATAC-seq accessibility matrices, NMR data, and source data underlying the graphs presented in the main figures, are provided as Supplementary Data 1–5. Uncropped and unedited Western blot images are provided in Supplementary Fig. 6. All other data are available from the corresponding author (or other sources, as applicable) on reasonable request.

Materials availability

Materials related to the bioreactor system will be available upon request. Information related to cell culture and reagents is present in the methods found in this study.

References

  1. Wittenberg, B. A. & Wittenberg, J. B. Transport of oxygen in muscle. Annu Rev. Physiol. 51, 857–878 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muoio, V., Persson, P. B. & Sendeski, M. M. The neurovascular unit - concept review. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 210, 790–798 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paulev, P. E. & Zubieta-Calleja, G. R. Essentials in the diagnosis of acid-base disorders and their high altitude application. J. Physiol. Pharm. 56, 155–170 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frassetto, L. A., Morris, R. C. Jr. & Sebastian, A. Effect of age on blood acid-base composition in adult humans: role of age-related renal functional decline. Am. J. Physiol. 271, F1114–F1122 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mousa, H. A. Health Effects of Alkaline Diet and Water, Reduction of Digestive-tract Bacterial Load, and Earthing. Alter. Ther. Health Med 22, 24–33 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Decker, Y. et al. Decreased pH in the aging brain and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 101, 40–49 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heuer, R. M. & Grosell, M. Physiological impacts of elevated carbon dioxide and ocean acidification on fish. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 307, R1061–R1084 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delli Castelli, D., Ferrauto, G., Cutrin, J. C., Terreno, E. & Aime, S. In vivo maps of extracellular pH in murine melanoma by CEST-MRI. Magn. Reson Med 71, 326–332 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thistlethwaite, A. J., Leeper, D. B., Moylan, D. J. 3rd & Nerlinger, R. E. pH distribution in human tumors. Int J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 11, 1647–1652 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, X., Lin, Y. & Gillies, R. J. Tumor pH and its measurement. J. Nucl. Med 51, 1167–1170 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. van den Berg, A. P., Wike-Hooley, J. L., van den Berg-Blok, A. E., van der Zee, J. & Reinhold, H. S. Tumour pH in human mammary carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 18, 457–462 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rofstad, E. K., Mathiesen, B., Kindem, K. & Galappathi, K. Acidic extracellular pH promotes experimental metastasis of human melanoma cells in athymic nude mice. Cancer Res 66, 6699–6707 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart, J. B. & Chinnery, P. F. The dynamics of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy: implications for human health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 530–542 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123, 309–314 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace, D. C. Mitochondrial diseases in man and mouse. Science 283, 1482–1488 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Passos, J. F. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction accounts for the stochastic heterogeneity in telomere-dependent senescence. PLoS Biol. 5, e110 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan, Y. et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of mitochondrial genomes in human cancers. Nat. Genet 52, 342–352 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bi, C. et al. Single-cell individual full-length mtDNA sequencing by iMiGseq uncovers unexpected heteroplasmy shifts in mtDNA editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, e48–e48 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bi, C. et al. Quantitative haplotype-resolved analysis of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in Human single oocytes, blastoids, and pluripotent stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 51, 3793–3805 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bender, A. et al. High levels of mitochondrial DNA deletions in substantia nigra neurons in aging and Parkinson disease. Nat. Genet 38, 515–517 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Duarte, C. M., Jaremko, L. & Jaremko, M. Hypothesis: Potentially Systemic Impacts of Elevated CO(2) on the Human Proteome and Health. Front Public Health 8, 543322 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klein, S. G. et al. A prevalent neglect of environmental control in mammalian cell culture calls for best practices. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 787–792 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klein, S. G. et al. In situ monitoring reveals cellular environmental instabilities in human pluripotent stem cell culture. Commun. Biol. 5, 119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michl, J., Park, K. C. & Swietach, P. Evidence-based guidelines for controlling pH in mammalian live-cell culture systems. Commun. Biol. 2, 144 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Arossa, S. et al. A gas-only bioreactor system maintains stable culture environments and reveals that moderate pH deviations trigger transcriptome-wide responses in human cells cultured in physioxia and physiological buffers. Life Med. 1, 236–240 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoshan, L. et al. Effective bioreactor pH control using only sparging gases. Biotechnol. Prog. 35, e2743 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pereira, J. P., Kelly, L. M. & Cyster, J. G. Finding the right niche: B-cell migration in the early phases of T-dependent antibody responses. Int Immunol. 22, 413–419 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lanzavecchia, A. Antigen-specific interaction between T and B cells. Nature 314, 537–539 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kang, Y. P. et al. PHGDH supports liver ceramide synthesis and sustains lipid homeostasis. Cancer Metab. 8, 6 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshida, K. et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase gene causes severe neurodevelopmental defects and results in embryonic lethality. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 3573–3577 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu, Y., Wang, W. & Wang, X. Roles of transcriptional factor 7 in production of inflammatory factors for lung diseases. J. Transl. Med 13, 273 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, D. et al. TCF7 and LEF-1 downregulation in sepsis promotes immune suppression by inhibiting CD4(+) T cell proliferation. Micro. Pathog. 184, 106362 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gounari, F. & Khazaie, K. TCF-1: a maverick in T cell development and function. Nat. Immunol. 23, 671–678 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gautam, A. & Pandit, B. IL32: The multifaceted and unconventional cytokine. Hum. Immunol. 82, 659–667 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, M., Yue, S. & Yang, Z. Downregulation of PSAT1 inhibits cell proliferation and migration in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 13, 4081 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yang, X., Li, C. & Chen, Y. Phosphoserine Aminotransferase 1: A Metabolic Enzyme Target of Cancers. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 23, 171–186 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kikuchi, R. et al. Hypercapnia Accelerates Adipogenesis: A Novel Role of High CO(2) in Exacerbating Obesity. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 57, 570–580 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shigemura, M. et al. Elevated CO(2) regulates the Wnt signaling pathway in mammals, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Rep. 9, 18251 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li, M. et al. Dynamic WNT signaling controls differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Sci. China Life Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-024-2816-0 (2025).

  40. Goul, C., Peruzzo, R. & Zoncu, R. The molecular basis of nutrient sensing and signalling by mTORC1 in metabolism regulation and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 857–875 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yao, Z. et al. Establishment and Validation of an MTORC1 Signaling-Related Gene Signature to Predict Overall Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 6299472 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zeng, H. et al. mTORC1 signaling suppresses Wnt/beta-catenin signaling through DVL-dependent regulation of Wnt receptor FZD level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E10362–E10369 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Oshi, M. et al. High G2M Pathway Score Pancreatic Cancer is Associated with Worse Survival, Particularly after Margin-Positive (R1 or R2) Resection. Cancers (Basel) 12 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102871 (2020).

  44. Huang, R., Liao, X. & Li, Q. Identification of key pathways and genes in TP53 mutation acute myeloid leukemia: evidence from bioinformatics analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 11, 163–173 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hernandez Borrero, L. J. & El-Deiry, W. S. Tumor suppressor p53: Biology, signaling pathways, and therapeutic targeting. Biochim Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1876, 188556 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liu, T., Zhang, L., Joo, D. & Sun, S. C. NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2, 17023 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gasparini, C. & Feldmann, M. NF-kappaB as a target for modulating inflammatory responses. Curr. Pharm. Des. 18, 5735–5745 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Barnabei, L., Laplantine, E., Mbongo, W., Rieux-Laucat, F. & Weil, R. NF-kappaB: At the Borders of Autoimmunity and Inflammation. Front Immunol. 12, 716469 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Woodward, A. M., Di Zazzo, A., Bonini, S. & Argueso, P. Endoplasmic reticulum stress promotes inflammation-mediated proteolytic activity at the ocular surface. Sci. Rep. 10, 2216 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kovacs, L. A., Furedi, N., Ujvari, B., Golgol, A. & Gaszner, B. Age-Dependent FOSB/DeltaFOSB Response to Acute and Chronic Stress in the Extended Amygdala, Hypothalamic Paraventricular, Habenular, Centrally-Projecting Edinger-Westphal, and Dorsal Raphe Nuclei in Male Rats. Front Aging Neurosci. 14, 862098 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou, L. et al. c-Fos is a mechanosensor that regulates inflammatory responses and lung barrier dysfunction during ventilator-induced acute lung injury. BMC Pulm. Med 22, 9 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bailey, C. M. & Hendrix, M. J. IRF6 in development and disease: a mediator of quiescence and differentiation. Cell Cycle 7, 1925–1930 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zengin, T., Ekinci, B., Kucukkose, C. & Yalcin-Ozuysal, O. IRF6 Is Involved in the Regulation of Cell Proliferation and Transformation in MCF10A Cells Downstream of Notch Signaling. PLoS One 10, e0132757 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Thibault, D. L. et al. IRF9 and STAT1 are required for IgG autoantibody production and B cell expression of TLR7 in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 1417–1426 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang, H. S. et al. NRF2 facilitates breast cancer cell growth via HIF1a-mediated metabolic reprogramming. Int J. Biochem Cell Biol. 95, 85–92 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Li, J. et al. Overexpression of PFKFB3 promotes cell glycolysis and proliferation in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 22, 83 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. He, F., Antonucci, L. & Karin, M. NRF2 as a regulator of cell metabolism and inflammation in cancer. Carcinogenesis 41, 405–416 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Cai, X. et al. Lactate activates the mitochondrial electron transport chain independently of its metabolism. Mol. Cell 83, 3904–3920 e3907 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Giafaglione, J. M. et al. Prostate lineage-specific metabolism governs luminal differentiation and response to antiandrogen treatment. Nat. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-023-01274-x (2023).

  60. Yang, Z. et al. Lactylome analysis suggests lactylation-dependent mechanisms of metabolic adaptation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Metab. 5, 61–79 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Felmlee, M. A., Jones, R. S., Rodriguez-Cruz, V., Follman, K. E. & Morris, M. E. Monocarboxylate Transporters (SLC16): Function, Regulation, and Role in Health and Disease. Pharm. Rev. 72, 466–485 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Chiarugi, A., Dolle, C., Felici, R. & Ziegler, M. The NAD metabolome-a key determinant of cancer cell biology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 741–752 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schmidt, C., Sciacovelli, M. & Frezza, C. Fumarate hydratase in cancer: A multifaceted tumour suppressor. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 98, 15–25 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zecchini, V. et al. Fumarate induces vesicular release of mtDNA to drive innate immunity. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05770-w (2023).

  65. Wang, L. et al. Dietary Taurine Improves Growth Performance and Intestine Health via the GSH/GSSG Antioxidant System and Nrf2/ARE Signaling Pathway in Weaned Piglets. Antioxidants (Basel) 12 https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12101852 (2023).

  66. Fan, P. et al. Molecular Regulation Mechanisms and Interactions Between Reactive Oxygen Species and Mitophagy. DNA Cell Biol. 38, 10–22 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Blakely, E. L. et al. Pathogenic mitochondrial tRNA point mutations: nine novel mutations affirm their importance as a cause of mitochondrial disease. Hum. Mutat. 34, 1260–1268 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Grozio, A. et al. Slc12a8 is a nicotinamide mononucleotide transporter. Nat. Metab. 1, 47–57 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dal Molin, G. Z., Westin, S. N. & Coleman, R. L. Rucaparib in ovarian cancer: extending the use of PARP inhibitors in the recurrent disease. Future Oncol. 14, 3101–3110 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Zhang, Y. et al. NanoRanger enables rapid single-base-pair resolution of genomic disorders. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2024.07.003 (2024).

  71. Ramos-Mandujano, G. et al. An open-source, automated, and cost-effective platform for COVID-19 diagnosis and rapid portable genomic surveillance using nanopore sequencing. Sci. Rep. 13, 20349 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Bi, C. et al. Long-read individual-molecule sequencing reveals CRISPR-induced genetic heterogeneity in human ESCs. Genome Biol. 21, 213 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Bi, C. & Li, M. CRISPR-Cas9-induced double-strand breaks disrupt maintenance of epigenetic information. Genome Biol. 26, 411 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bi, C. et al. Prevalent integration of genomic repetitive and regulatory elements and donor sequences at CRISPR-Cas9-induced breaks. Commun. Biol. 8, 94 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zhang, Y., Chandrasekaran, A. P., Bi, C. & Li, M. Quantification of Genetic Heterogeneity Using Long-Read Targeted Individual DNA Molecule Sequencing. Curr. Protoc. 3, e888 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yuan, B. et al. Modulation of the microhomology-mediated end joining pathway suppresses large deletions and enhances homology-directed repair following CRISPR-Cas9-induced DNA breaks. BMC Biol. 22, 101 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Bi, C. et al. Simultaneous detection and mutation surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and multiple respiratory viruses by rapid field-deployable sequencing. Med 2, 689–700.e684 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Covarrubias, A. J., Perrone, R., Grozio, A. & Verdin, E. NAD(+) metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 119–141 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Imai, S. & Guarente, L. NAD+ and sirtuins in aging and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 464–471 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ray Chaudhuri, A. & Nussenzweig, A. The multifaceted roles of PARP1 in DNA repair and chromatin remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 610–621 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zhang, H. et al. NAD(+) repletion improves mitochondrial and stem cell function and enhances life span in mice. Science 352, 1436–1443 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wang, X. et al. Changes in the pH value of the human brain in Alzheimer’s disease pathology correlated with CD68-positive microglia: a community-based autopsy study in Beijing, China. Mol. Brain 18, 10 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Guberovic, I. & Frezza, C. Functional implications of fumarate-induced cysteine succination. Trends Biochem Sci. 49, 775–790 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Palsson-McDermott, E. M. & O’Neill, L. A. J. Gang of 3: How the Krebs cycle-linked metabolites itaconate, succinate, and fumarate regulate macrophages and inflammation. Cell Metab. 37, 1049–1059 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kim, H. J. Metabolic Acidosis in Chronic Kidney Disease: Pathogenesis, Clinical Consequences, and Treatment. Electrolyte Blood Press 19, 29–37 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Quade, B. N., Parker, M. D. & Occhipinti, R. The therapeutic importance of acid-base balance. Biochem Pharm. 183, 114278 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Masson-Delmotte V., et al. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896 (2021).

  88. Gekle, M. Kidney and aging - A narrative review. Exp. Gerontol. 87, 153–155 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Kang, K. P., Lee, S., Lee, K. H. & Kang, S. K. Mannitol-induced Metabolic Alkalosis. Electrolyte Blood Press 4, 61–65 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Jung, B. et al. Severe metabolic or mixed acidemia on intensive care unit admission: incidence, prognosis and administration of buffer therapy. A prospective, multiple-center study. Crit. Care 15, R238 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Gunnerson, K. J., Saul, M., He, S. & Kellum, J. A. Lactate versus non-lactate metabolic acidosis: a retrospective outcome evaluation of critically ill patients. Crit. Care 10, R22 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Gomez-Archila, L. G., Palomino-Schatzlein, M., Zapata-Builes, W. & Galeano, E. Development of an optimized method for processing peripheral blood mononuclear cells for 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomic profiling. PLoS One 16, e0247668 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Cochran, D. et al. Evaluating protocols for reproducible targeted metabolomics by NMR. Analyst 149, 5423–5432 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Pang, Z. et al. MetaboAnalyst 6.0: towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res 52, W398–W406 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1–21 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Gaspar, J. M. NGmerge: merging paired-end reads via novel empirically-derived models of sequencing errors. BMC Bioinforma. 19, 536 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Feng, J., Liu, T., Qin, B., Zhang, Y. & Liu, X. S. Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1728–1740 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Li, Z. et al. Identification of transcription factor binding sites using ATAC-seq. Genome Biol. 20, 45 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the KAUST Office of Sponsored Research (OSR), under award number BAS/1/1080-01 (ML) and BAS/1/1084-01 (LJ); and by KAUST Center of Excellence for Smart Health (KCSH), under award number 5932 (ML) and 5297 (LJ). We thank the members of the Li lab, Jinna Xu, Xuan Zhou, Yeteng Tian, and KAUST Imaging and Characterization Core Lab and Bioscience Core Lab for their help in this research.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Samhan Alsolami, Yingzi Zhang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bioscience Program, Biomedical Sciences Division (BioMed), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

    Samhan Alsolami, Yingzi Zhang, Yiqing Jin, Nadia Steiner, Kacper Szczepski, Baolei Yuan, Chongwei Bi, Mengge Wang, Siyi Fu, Pierre J. Magistretti & Mo Li

  2. KAUST Center of Excellence for Smart Health (KCSH), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

    Samhan Alsolami, Yingzi Zhang, Yiqing Jin, Nadia Steiner, Kacper Szczepski, Baolei Yuan, Chongwei Bi, Mengge Wang, Siyi Fu, Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte, Pierre J. Magistretti & Mo Li

  3. Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology (BMB), Sealy Institute for Drug Discovery (SIDD), University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA

    Upendra Singh & Lukasz Jaremko

  4. Bioscience Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

    Upendra Singh & Lukasz Jaremko

  5. Marine Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

    Shannon G. Klein & Carlos M. Duarte

  6. Altos Labs, San Diego, California, USA

    Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte

Authors
  1. Samhan Alsolami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yingzi Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Upendra Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yiqing Jin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nadia Steiner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kacper Szczepski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shannon G. Klein
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Baolei Yuan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chongwei Bi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mengge Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Siyi Fu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Pierre J. Magistretti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Carlos M. Duarte
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Lukasz Jaremko
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Mo Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.A. conducted cell culture experiments and related assays, including RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, Sanger sequencing, viability assay, and ddPCR, for the acidic pH experiments. S.A. and M.L. drafted and revised the initial manuscript and performed data integration and analysis. S.A., Y.Z. and M.L. led the revision of the manuscript and performed data integration and analysis. U.S. and K.S. conducted all NMR-related work. Y.Q. conducted cell culture experiments and related assays for restoration of NAD⁺ levels, including RNA-seq and viability assay. Y.Z. performed the bioinformatic analysis of bulk RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data, and performed RT-qPCR and ddPCR for mtDNA variant analysis. N.S. conducted all Seahorse assays. S.G.K. analyzed the bioreactor gas flow data. B.Y. carried out NANOLIVE imaging and data analysis. C.B. designed the ddPCR primers. C.B. and Y.Z. performed mitochondrial mutation analysis. S.F. performed western blot experiments and data analysis. S.A., Y.Z., M.L., U.S., L.J., C.M.D., S.G.K. and M.W. revised the manuscript. J.C.I.B., P.J.M., C.M.D., L.J. and M.L. conceived the study. M.L. supervised the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mo Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

An application based on methods described in this paper has been filed by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. The authors declare no other competing interests. M.L. is an Editorial Board Member for Communications Biology, but was not involved in the editorial review of, nor the decision to publish this article.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Christopher Hine and Mengtan Xing. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download DOCX )

Supplementary Data 1 (download CSV )

Supplementary Data 2 (download CSV )

Supplementary Data 4 (download CSV )

Supplementary Data 3 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 5 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Movie 1 (download AVI )

Supplementary Movie 2 (download AVI )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alsolami, S., Zhang, Y., Singh, U. et al. Stable bioreactor control reveals acidic pH–driven metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial dysfunction in human lymphoblastoid cells. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-10013-5

Download citation

  • Received: 04 June 2025

  • Accepted: 26 March 2026

  • Published: 15 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-10013-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research