Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Wolbachia-driven host miRNAs mediate arthropod reproduction in a Wolbachia density-dependent manner
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 April 2026

Wolbachia-driven host miRNAs mediate arthropod reproduction in a Wolbachia density-dependent manner

  • Yi-Yin Zhang1,
  • Xin-Yu Shen1,
  • Xiao-Hui Xiong1,
  • Dian-Shu Zhao2 &
  • …
  • Xiao-Yue Hong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5209-39611 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 971 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacterial genetics
  • Entomology

Abstract

Wolbachia is a widespread endosymbiont and a promising tool for pest control due to its ability to manipulate arthropod reproduction. However, how Wolbachia shapes host microRNA regulation remains poorly understood. Here, we profile the Wolbachia-driven host miRNAs using small RNA-seq in spider mite Tetranychus truncatus to uncover their roles in reproduction and symbiosis. Enrichment analyses of predicted miRNA targets suggest that Wolbachia-driven miRNAs may be involved in Wolbachia–host interactions. Functional assays show that several Wolbachia-driven miRNAs influence host fecundity, with some also affecting Wolbachia density. Inhibition of novel-33 or novel-40 reduces host fecundity and is accompanied by reduced Wolbachia density, whereas inhibition of novel-65 reduces fecundity without altering density. These findings indicate that specific miRNAs contribute to the regulation of reproduction and Wolbachia density in T. truncatus, highlighting host miRNAs regulated by Wolbachia as a mechanism of host manipulation and offering opportunities for Wolbachia-based pest management.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

The cellular lives of Wolbachia

Article 10 July 2023

Analysis of Aedes aegypti microRNAs in response to Wolbachia wAlbB infection and their potential role in mosquito longevity

Article Open access 09 September 2022

Wolbachia enhances ovarian development in the rice planthopper Laodelphax striatellus through elevated energy production

Article Open access 13 December 2025

Data availability

Raw sequencing data for the miRNA and mRNA libraries have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject IDs PRJNA1253370 and PRJNA1253798, respectively. Sample information is provided in Supplementary Data 3. Source data underlying the main figures are provided in Supplementary Data 4. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Further information and requests for resources or materials should be directed to, and will be fulfilled by, the corresponding author.

References

  1. Gotoh, T., Noda, H. & Hong, X. Y. Wolbachia distribution and cytoplasmic incompatibility based on a survey of 42 spider mite species (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Japan. Heredity 91, 208–216 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Porter, J. & Sullivan, W. The cellular lives of Wolbachia. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 750–766 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hilgenboecker, K., Hammerstein, P., Schlattmann, P., Telschow, A. & Werren, J. H. How many species are infected with Wolbachia?-A statistical analysis of current data. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 281, 215–220 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ribeiro, P. et al. Pervasive horizontal transmission of Wolbachia in natural populations of closely related and widespread tropical skipper butterflies. BMC Microbiol. 25, 5 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Werren, J. H., Baldo, L. & Clark, M. E. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 741–751 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beckmann, J. F., Ronau, J. A. & Hochstrasser, M. A. deubiquitylating enzyme induces cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17007 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shropshire, J. D., Leigh, B. & Bordenstein, S. R. Symbiont-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility: what have we learned in 50 years? eLife 9, e61989 (2020).

  8. Lau, M. J., Ross, P. A. & Hoffmann, A. A. Infertility and fecundity loss of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti hatched from quiescent eggs is expected to alter invasion dynamics. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009179 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maciel-de-Freitas, R. et al. Wolbachia strains wMel and wAlbB differentially affect Aedes aegypti traits related to fecundity. Microbiol. Spectr. 12, e0012824 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zug, R. & Hammerstein, P. Bad guys turned nice? A critical assessment of Wolbachia mutualisms in arthropod hosts. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 90, 89–111 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weeks, A. R., Turelli, M., Harcombe, W. R., Reynolds, K. T. & Hoffmann, A. A. From parasite to mutualist: rapid evolution of Wolbachia in natural populations of Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 5, e114 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fry, A. J., Palmer, M. R. & Rand, D. M. Variable fitness effects of Wolbachia infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 93, 379–389 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shropshire, J. D., Leigh, B. & Bordenstein, S. R. Male age and Wolbachia dynamics: investigating how fast and why bacterial densities and cytoplasmic incompatibility strengths vary. mBio 12, e02998-21 (2021).

  14. Zheng, X. et al. Incompatible and sterile insect techniques combined eliminate mosquitoes. Nature 572, 56–61 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lim, J. T. et al. Efficacy of Wolbachia-mediated sterility to reduce the incidence of dengue: a synthetic control study in Singapore. Lancet Microbe 5, e422–e432 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zabalou, S. et al. Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility as a means for insect pest population control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15042–15045 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jin, P.-Y., Tian, L., Chen, L. & Hong, X.-Y. Spider mites of agricultural importance in China, with focus on species composition during the last decade (2008–2017). Syst. Appl. Acarol. 23, 2087 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ullah, M. S., Gotoh, T. & Lim, U. T. Life history parameters of three phytophagous spider mites, Tetranychus piercei, T. truncatus and T. bambusae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 17, 767–773 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu, Y. X. et al. A change in the bacterial community of spider mites decreases fecundity on multiple host plants. MicrobiologyOpen 8, e00743 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, Y. X. et al. Incidence of facultative bacterial endosymbionts in spider mites associated with local environments and host plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e02546 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Y. K., Chen, Y. T., Yang, K., Qiao, G. X. & Hong, X. Y. Screening of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) for reproductive endosymbionts reveals links between co-infection and evolutionary history. Sci. Rep. 6, 27900 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, K. et al. Wolbachia dominate Spiroplasma in the co-infected spider mite Tetranychus truncatus. Insect Mol. Biol. 29, 19–37 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xia, X. et al. Wolbachia affects reproduction in the spider mite Tetranychus truncatus (Acari: Tetranychidae) by regulating chorion protein S38-like and Rop. Insect Mol. Biol. 30, 18–29 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, Y. X., Song, Z. R., Zhang, Y. Y., Hoffmann, A. A. & Hong, X. Y. Spider mites singly infected with either Wolbachia or Spiroplasma have reduced thermal tolerance. Front. Microbiol. 12, 706321 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, Q., Dou, W., Taning, C. N. T., Smagghe, G. & Wang, J. J. Regulatory roles of microRNAs in insect pests: prospective targets for insect pest control. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 70, 158–166 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lucas, K. & Raikhel, A. S. Insect microRNAs: biogenesis, expression profiling and biological functions. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 24–38 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Asgari, S. Role of microRNAs in insect host-microorganism interactions. Front Physiol. 2, 48 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lozano, J., Montanez, R. & Belles, X. MiR-2 family regulates insect metamorphosis by controlling the juvenile hormone signaling pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3740–3745 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, S. et al. Host miRNAs are involved in hormonal regulation of HaSNPV-triggered climbing behaviour in Helicoverpa armigera. Mol. Ecol. 27, 459–475 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Belles, X. MicroRNAs and the evolution of insect metamorphosis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 62, 111–125 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lu, M. Y. & Chtarbanova, S. The role of micro RNAs (miRNAs) in the regulation of Drosophila melanogaster’s innate immunity. Fly 16, 382–396 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xie, J. et al. miR-275/305 cluster is essential for maintaining energy metabolic homeostasis by the insulin signaling pathway in Bactrocera dorsalis. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010418 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, Y. et al. Insect-specific microRNA Involved in the development of the silkworm Bombyx mori. PLoS ONE 4, e4677 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roy, S., Saha, T. T., Zou, Z. & Raikhel, A. S. Regulatory pathways controlling female insect reproduction. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 63, 489–511 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lucas, K. J., Zhao, B., Liu, S. & Raikhel, A. S. Regulation of physiological processes by microRNAs in insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 11, 1–7 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ling, L., Kokoza, V. A., Zhang, C., Aksoy, E. & Raikhel, A. S. MicroRNA-277 targets insulin-like peptides 7 and 8 to control lipid metabolism and reproduction in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E8017–E8024 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, L., Zhang, K. J., Rong, X., Li, Y. Y. & Liu, H. Identification of Wolbachia-responsive miRNAs in the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus. Front. Physiol. 10, 928 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rong, X., Zhang, Y. K., Zhang, K. J. & Hong, X. Y. Identification of Wolbachia-responsive microRNAs in the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. BMC Genomics 15, 1122 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bishop, C., Hussain, M., Hugo, L. E. & Asgari, S. Analysis of Aedes aegypti microRNAs in response to Wolbachia wAlbB infection and their potential role in mosquito longevity. Sci. Rep. 12, 15245 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hussain, M., Frentiu, F. D., Moreira, L. A., O’Neill, S. L. & Asgari, S. Wolbachia uses host microRNAs to manipulate host gene expression and facilitate colonization of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9250–9255 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Osei-Amo, S., Hussain, M., O’Neill, S. L. & Asgari, S. Wolbachia-induced aae-miR-12 miRNA negatively regulates the expression of MCT1 and MCM6 genes in Wolbachia-infected mosquito cell line. PLoS ONE 7, e50049 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, J. et al. XPO5 promotes primary miRNA processing independently of RanGTP. Nat. Commun. 11, 1845 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fast, E. M. et al. Wolbachia enhance Drosophila stem cell proliferation and target the germline stem cell niche. Science 334, 990–992 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Iovino, N., Pane, A. & Gaul, U. miR-184 has multiple roles in Drosophila female germline development. Dev. Cell 17, 123–133 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, G., Hussain, M., O’Neill, S. L. & Asgari, S. Wolbachia uses a host microRNA to regulate transcripts of a methyltransferase, contributing to dengue virus inhibition in Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10276–10281 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. She, L. et al. Wolbachia mediates crosstalk between miRNA and Toll pathways to enhance resistance to dengue virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 20, e1012296 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xia, X., Peng, C.-W., Lu, Y.-J., Zheng, X.-Y. & Hong, X.-Y. Transfection and colonization of Tetranychus truncatus Wolbachia strain wTtru in cell lines of the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 23, 2420–2431 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. He, Z. et al. How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI. BMC Genomics 20, 608 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. He, K. et al. Multiple miRNAs jointly regulate the biosynthesis of ecdysteroid in the holometabolous insects, Chilo suppressalis. RNA 23, 1817–1833 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sun, K., Jee, D., de Navas, L. F., Duan, H. & Lai, E. C. Multiple In vivo biological processes are mediated by functionally redundant activities of Drosophila mir-279 and mir-996. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005245 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, Y. L. et al. The microRNA miR-184 regulates the CYP303A1 transcript level to control molting of Locusta migratoria. Insect Sci. 28, 941–951 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Feng, K. et al. Cuticle protein mediates the evolution of stress resistance by generating a decoy circular RNA in spider mite. Sci. Adv. 11, eads3361 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Baldo, L. et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7098–7110 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Chen, L. et al. The genome sequence of a spider mite, Tetranychus truncatus, provides insights into interspecific host range variation and the genetic basis of adaptation to a low-quality host plant. Insect Sci. 30, 1208–1228 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290–295 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Friedlander, M. R., Mackowiak, S. D., Li, N., Chen, W. & Rajewsky, N. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 37–52 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wen, M., Shen, Y., Shi, S. & Tang, T. miREvo: an integrative microRNA evolutionary analysis platform for next-generation sequencing experiments. BMC Bioinforma. 13, 140 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rehmsmeier, M., Steffen, P., Hochsmann, M. & Giegerich, R. Fast and effective prediction of microRNA/target duplexes. RNA 10, 1507–1517 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Enright, A. J. et al. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 5, R1 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Mann, M., Wright, P. R. & Backofen, R. IntaRNA 2.0: enhanced and customizable prediction of RNA-RNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W435–W439 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K. & Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, R14 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mao, X., Cai, T., Olyarchuk, J. G. & Wei, L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics 21, 3787–3793 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sun, W., Jin, Y., He, L., Lu, W. C. & Li, M. Suitable reference gene selection for different strains and developmental stages of the carmine spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus, using quantitative real-time PCR. J. Insect Sci. 10, 208 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ghazy, N. A. et al. A leaf-mimicking method for oral delivery of bioactive substances into sucking arthropod herbivores. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1218 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Phatak, P. & Donahue, J. M. Biotinylated micro-RNA pull down assay for identifying miRNA targets. Bio Protoc. 7, e2253 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Searle, S. R., Speed, F. M. & Milliken, G. A. Population marginal means in the linear model: an alternative to least squares means. Am. Stat. 34, 216–221 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal 9, 378–400 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lenth R. V. et al. emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.11.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. (2025).

  71. Zhao, D. X., Zhang, X. F., Chen, D. S., Zhang, Y. K. & Hong, X. Y. Wolbachia-host interactions: host mating patterns affect Wolbachia density dynamics. PLoS ONE 8, e66373 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kaiyang Feng from the College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, for technical consultation and support with the RNA pull-down assay. We also appreciate the valuable suggestions and manuscript proofreading provided by Dr. Yu-Xi Zhu from Yangzhou University, Dr. Tong-Pu Li from Nanjing Forestry University, and Zhang-Rong Song from the University of Florida. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 32020103011, 32202290) and by the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province, China (KYCX22_0760).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China

    Yi-Yin Zhang, Xin-Yu Shen, Xiao-Hui Xiong & Xiao-Yue Hong

  2. Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Dian-Shu Zhao

Authors
  1. Yi-Yin Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin-Yu Shen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiao-Hui Xiong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dian-Shu Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao-Yue Hong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yi-Yin Zhang, Xin-Yu Shen, and Xiao-Yue Hong contributed to the conceptualization of the study. Yi-Yin Zhang, Xin-Yu Shen, and Xiao-Hui Xiong carried out the investigation. Methodology was developed by Yi-Yin Zhang, Xin-Yu Shen, Xiao-Hui Xiong, and Xiao-Yue Hong. Yi-Yin Zhang and Dian-Shu Zhao were responsible for formal analysis. The original draft was written by Yi-Yin Zhang, Xin-Yu Shen, and Dian-Shu Zhao. Xiao-Yue Hong supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Yue Hong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Jan Hubert, Sassan Asgari and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Hannes Schuler and Kaliya Georgieva. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Suppl Figures (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Dateset 1 (download DOCX )

Dataset 2 (download XLSX )

Dataset 3 (download XLSX )

Dataset 4 (download XLSX )

Reprting Summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, YY., Shen, XY., Xiong, XH. et al. Wolbachia-driven host miRNAs mediate arthropod reproduction in a Wolbachia density-dependent manner. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-10077-3

Download citation

  • Received: 09 July 2025

  • Accepted: 07 April 2026

  • Published: 17 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-10077-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing