Table 1 Optimization of the reaction conditions of asymmetric carbo-acylation of alkenes.
From: Nickel-catalyzed enantioselective reductive carbo-acylation of alkenes
Entry | Precatalyst | Ligand | Solvent | Reductant | Yield (%) | ee (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NiBr2·glyme | L2 | EtOH | Zn | 29 | 26 |
2 | NiBr2 | L2 | EtOH | Zn | 0 | – |
3 | NiBr(COD)2 | L2 | EtOH | Zn | 28 | 24 |
4 | Ni(acac)2 | L2 | EtOH | Zn | 0 | – |
5 | NiI2 | L2 | EtOH | Zn | trace | – |
6 | NiBr2·glyme | L1 | EtOH | Zn | 9 | 71 |
7 | NiBr2·glyme | L1 | DMA | Zn | 14 | 60 |
8 | NiBr2·glyme | L1 | DMA | Mn | 50 | 64 |
9 | NiBr2·glyme | L1 | NMP | Mn | 20 | 54 |
10 | NiBr2·glyme | L1 | THF | Mn | trace | – |
11a | NiBr2·glyme | L1 | DMA | Mn | 62 | 63 |
12a | NiBr2·glyme | L3 | DMA | Mn | 19 | 33 |
13a | NiBr2·glyme | L4 | DMA | Mn | 50 | 66 |
14a | NiBr2·glyme | L5 | DMA | Mn | 55 | 63 |
15a | NiBr2·glyme | L6 | DMA | Mn | 44 | 67 |
16a | NiBr2·glyme | L7 | DMA | Mn | 47 | 57 |
17a | NiBr2·glyme | L8 | DMA | Mn | trace | – |
18a | NiBr2·glyme | L9 | DMA | Mn | 29 | 48 |
19a | NiBr2·glyme | L10 | DMA | Mn | 50 | 71 |
20a | NiBr2·glyme | L11 | DMA | Mn | trace | – |
21a | NiBr2·glyme | L12 | DMA | Mn | 64 | 85 |
22b | NiBr2·glyme | L12 | DMA:NMM = 4:1 | Mn | 45 | 87 |
23b | NiBr2·glyme | L12 | DMA:NMM = 2:1 | Mn | trace | – |
24c | NiBr2·glyme | L12 | DMA:NMM = 4:1 | Mn | 65 (61)d | 88 |
