Table 1 Optimization of the reaction conditions for the fluoro-carbonylation of 1 and 2.
Entry | Pd (mol%) | Ligand (mol%) | CsF (equiv) | Yielda |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pd(OAc)2 (10) | PPh3 (10) | 2.0 | 73 |
2 | – | PPh3 (10) | 2.0 | 0 |
3 | Pd(OAc)2 (10) | – | 2.0 | 18 |
4 | Pd(OAc)2 (10) | PPh3 (20) | 2.0 | 77 |
5 | Pd(OAc)2 (10) | PPh3 (30) | 2.0 | 84 |
6 | Pd(OAc)2 (10) | PPh3 (40) | 2.0 | 77 |
7 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | PPh3 (30) | 2.0 | 95 |
8 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | TFP (30) | 2.0 | 83 |
9 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | PCy3 (30) | 2.0 | 43 |
10 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | P(o-Tol)3 (30) | 2.0 | 40 |
11 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | Xphos (30) | 2.0 | 49 |
12 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | DPPE (15) | 2.0 | 74 |
13 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | BINAP (15) | 2.0 | 84 |
14 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | DPEphos (15) | 2.0 | 86 |
15 | Pd(TFA)2 (10) | Xantphos (15) | 2.0 | >99 (92) |
16b | Pd(TFA)2 (1) | Xantphos (1.5) | 1.5 | >99 (92) |
