Fig. 1: Biochemical functionality of agonistic, hormetic and antagonistic effects of HM model compounds in vitro. | Communications Chemistry

Fig. 1: Biochemical functionality of agonistic, hormetic and antagonistic effects of HM model compounds in vitro.

From: Enabling systemic identification and functionality profiling for Cdc42 homeostatic modulators

Fig. 1

Cdc42 HM model compounds regulate Cdc42 GTP loading and its GEF-mediated activation. ZCL278 and ZCL279 (at low concentrations) increase Cdc42 GTP loading while ZCL367 decreases Cdc42 GTP loading, A ZCL278, C ZCL279 and E ZCL367 without GEF. ZCL278, ZCL279 (at high concentrations) and ZCL367 decrease GEF-mediated Cdc42 GTP loading, B ZCL278, D ZCL279 and F ZCL367 with GEF. HM model compounds act through GEF like mechanism, The amount of GTP loading on Cdc42 for ITSN as a full agonist were comparable to those for HMs in different concentrations (0.01–1 µM) of G ZCL278, H ZCL279 and I ZCL367 respectively. Control for all samples without ITSN was DMSO and Cdc42, for all samples with GEF was DMSO, Cdc42 and ITSN. All data are presented as mean ± SEM from duplicates or triplicates in at least two independent experiments. ANOVA compared treatments to their respective control (*p < 0.04, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0007, ****p < 0.0001). The GEF reaction was performed using the relative fluorescence unit (RFU) intensity of Mant-GTP exchange that monitors GDP release during the exchange reaction after treatment by different concentrations (0.1–100 µM) of ZCL278, ZCL279 and ZCL367 on Cdc42 in absence or presence of ITSN.

Back to article page