Table 1 Types of photothermal agents (PTAs) and their implications
From: Avenues for integrating photothermal therapy in cancer clinic
Photothermal Agents | Examples | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
Organic dye compounds | Indocyanine green (ICG)117,118, Prussian blue119,120,121,122 IR dyes like BF2123,124, IR780, IR800, IR825, Porphysome125 | • Excellent PCE • Thermostable • Used for photoacoustic imaging purpose | • Photobleaching • Instability • Solvent toxicity • Poor tumour targeting ability |
Carbon nanomaterials | Carbon nanotubes126,127,128,129,Graphene and graphene oxide130,131 | • Excellent biocompatibility • Better bioavailability • Enhanced cargo-loading capacity | • Lower PCE • Poor biodegradability • Toxicity • Complex synthesis methods |
Metal-based agents | Zinc-based gold nanocomposite132,133, Copper-based NPs132,134,135,136, Gold nanostructures137,138,139, Plasmonic gold nanostars139,140,141,142, Plasmonic gold semi-shells143, SPIONS144,145 | • Excellent PCE • Easier surface modification • Thermostable • Non-toxic • Enhanced specificity | • Stability concerns (potential for aggregation) • Immunotoxicity • Limited selectivity |
Conjugate-based agents | Polypyrrole nanomaterials146,147, Conjugated polymers30,46,148, Carbon-silica nanocomposites149, Gold-decorated melanin nanoparticles118, Lanthanide ion-based up-conversion nanomaterial150, Biomimetic gold nanoformulation151 | • Enhanced PCE • Increased tumour targeting and accumulation • Multimodal imaging support • Versatile surface modifications | • Often complex synthesis and characterization procedures • Toxicity concerns • Limited thermostability |