Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Chemistry
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications chemistry
  3. articles
  4. article
Modulation of sonochemical reactions by cavitation driven thermal degradation of aqueous salts solutions
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 March 2026

Modulation of sonochemical reactions by cavitation driven thermal degradation of aqueous salts solutions

  • A. Troia  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4199-82201,
  • M. Gallone2,
  • V. Vighetto  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-86322,
  • F. Pellegrino3,
  • S. Hernández  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-02732,
  • V. Cauda  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-15332 &
  • …
  • V. Maurino3 

Communications Chemistry , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1398 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy transfer
  • Synthesis and processing

Strategies for controlling or increasing the yield of radical reactions generated by ultrasonic cavitation in aqueous media have been the object of research for many years. Past studies have focused on the role of organic solvents in increasing Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) formation or have investigated the effect of ultrasound on accelerating the OH radicals generation from Fenton reactive. More recently, piezoelectric micro-nanoparticles have shown a synergistic effect in activating specific reactions and increasing radicals production from ultrasound. Here we report the generation of ROS together with H2 evolution or increase of oxidizing species during ultrasonic treatments of homogeneous concentrated aqueous solutions of simple salts as acidic phosphates, potassium sodium tartrate and alkaline nitrates. An increase in organic dye degradation efficiency, and the increase of reducing or oxidizing species compared with pure water has been found. The activation mechanism revealed a new, unexpected, approach to enhance the efficiency of sono-catalyzed reactions in aqueous media for environmental or energy applications.

Similar content being viewed by others

Ultrasonic activation of inert poly(tetrafluoroethylene) enables piezocatalytic generation of reactive oxygen species

Article Open access 09 June 2021

Mechanical force-switchable aqueous organocatalysis

Article Open access 30 September 2024

Synthesis of 4-tosyl quinazoline derivatives with the assistance of ultrasound irradiation as a guide to the reaction pathway

Article Open access 22 May 2025

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (a.troia@inrim.it) upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Suslick, K. S. Sonochemistry. Science 247, 1439–1445 (1990).

  2. Flint, E. B. & Suslick, K. S. The temperature of cavitation. Science 253, 13979 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flannigan, D. J. & Suslick, K. S. Plasma formation and temperature measurement during single bubble cavitation. Nature 434, 52–55 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, K. J. & Jarman, P. D. The spectra of sonoluminescence. Aust. J. Phys. 23, 319 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ndiaye, A. A. et al. Nonequilibrium vibrational excitation of oh radicals generated during multibubble cavitation in water *†. J. Phys. Chem. A. 116, 4860–4867 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Riesz, P. & Takashi, K. Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 13, 247–270 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ohl, C.-D., Kurz, T., Geisler, R., Lindau, O. & Lauterborn, W. Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 357, 269–294 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suslick, K. S. & Price, G. J. Applications Of Ultrasound To Materials Chemistry. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 29, 295–326 (1999).

  9. Mason, T. J. Sonochemistry and the environment – Providing a “green” link between chemistry, physics and engineering. Ultrason. Sonochem. 14, 476–483 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wood, R. J., Lee, J. & Bussemaker, M. J. A parametric review of sonochemistry: Control and augmentation of sonochemical activity in aqueous solutions. Ultrason. Sonochem. 38, 351–370 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Singla, N. Sit energy aspects of acoustic cavitation and sonochemistry fundamentals and engineering2022, Pages 349-373 Chapter 21 - Raising challenges of ultrasound-assisted processes and sonochemistry in industrial applications based on energy efficiency, Book Chapter ISBN 978-032391937-1, 978-032398490-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91937-1.00017-7.

  12. Asakura, Y. & Yasuda, K. Frequency and power dependence of the sonochemical reaction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 81, 105858 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murali Krishna, C., Riesz,P. & Takashi, K. Free radical formation by ultrasound in aqueous solutions. Aspin trapping study. Free Radical Res. 10, 27–35 (1990).

  14. Sharifishourabi, M., Dincer, I. & Mohany, A. Implementation of experimental techniques in ultrasound-driven hydrogen production: a comprehensive review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 62, 1183–1204 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henglein, A. & Kormann, C. Scavenging of OH radicals produced in the sonolysis of water. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 48, 251–258 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen, H. E., Seland, F., Sunde, S., Burheim, O. S. & Pollet, B. G. Optimum scavenger concentrations for sonochemical nanoparticle synthesis. Sci. Rep. 13, 6183 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buettner, J., Gutierrez, M. & Henglein, A. Sonolysis of water-methanol mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. 95, 1528–1530 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kohno, T., Mokudai, T. & Ozawa, Y. Niwano Free radical formation from sonolysis of water in the presence of different gases Masahiro 1,*. J. Clin. Biochem Nutr. 49, 96–101 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gielen, B. et al. Influence of dissolved gases on sonochemistry and Sonoluminescence in a flow reactor. Ultrason. Sonochem. 31, 463–472 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sheng Hong, K., Xu, H., Konishi, H. & Li, X. Direct Water Splitting Through Vibrating Piezoelectric Microfibers in Water. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 997–1002 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sheng Hong, K., Xu, H., Konishi,†, H. & Li, X. Piezoelectrochemical effect: a new mechanism for azo dye decolorization in aqueous solution through vibrating piezoelectric microfibers. J. Phys. Chem. C. 116, 13045–13051 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmad, M. et al. Photocatalytic, sonocatalytic and sonophotocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B using ZnO/CNTs composites photocatalysts. Ultrason. Sonochem. 21, 761–773 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morosini, V., Chave, T., Virot, M., Moisy, P. & Nikitenko, S. I. Sonochemical water splitting in the presence of powdered metal oxides. Ultrason. Sonochem. 29, 512–516 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lianga, Z., Feng Yana, C., Rtimib, S. & Bandarac, J. Piezoelectric materials for catalytic/photocatalytic removal of pollutants: Recent advances and outlook. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 241, 256–269 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bößl, F., Comyn, C. T. P., Cowin, P. I., García-García, F. R. & Tudela, I. Piezocatalytic degradation of pollutants in water: Importance of catalyst size, poling and excitation mode. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 7, 100133 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. You, H. et al. Harvesting the vibration energy of BiFeO3 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 58, 11779–11784 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, Y. et al. Ultrasonic activation of inert poly (tetrafluoroethylene) enables piezocatalytic generation of reactive oxygen species. Nat. Commun. 12, 3508 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thi, P. et al. Demonstration of enhanced piezo-catalysis for hydrogen generation and water treatment at the ferroelectric curie temperature. iScience 23, 101095 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nie, G., Yao, Y., Duan, X., Xiao, L. & Wang, S. Advances of piezoelectric nanomaterials for applications in advanced oxidation technologies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 33, 100693 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Qian, W., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Bowen, C. R. & Yang, Y. Piezoelectric materials for controlling electro-chemical processes. Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 149 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li, S. et al. Mechanically induced highly efficient hydrogen evolution from water over piezoelectric snse nanosheets. Small 18, 2202507 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, C. et al. Design strategies and effect comparisons toward efficient piezocatalytic system Author links open overlay panel. Nano Energy 107, 108093 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, K. et al. The mechanism of piezocatalysis: energy band theory or screening charge effect? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202110429 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, Y. et al. High efficiency water splitting using ultrasound coupled to a BaTiO3 nanofluid. Adv. Sci. 9, 210524 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bößl, F., Menzel, V. C., Chatzisymeon, E. I. & Tudela, I. Effect of frequency and power on the piezocatalytic and sonochemical degradation of dyes in water. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 14, 100477 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bößl, F. & Tudela, I. Piezocatalysis: can catalysts really dance? Curr. Opin. Green. Sustain. Chem. 32, 100537 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jiang Y. et al. Unveiling mechanically driven catalytic processes: beyond piezocatalysis to synergetic effects https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5c02660.

  38. Mohanty, R., Mansingh, S. & Parida, K. Boosting sluggish photocatalytic hydrogen evolution through piezo-stimulated polarization: a critical review. Mater. Horiz. 9, 1332–1355 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jing, L. et al. Piezo-photocatalysts in the field of energy and environment: designs, applications, and prospects. Nano Energy 112, 108508 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dong, H., Zhou, Y., Wang, L., Chen, L. & Zhu, M. Oxygen vacancies in piezocatalysis: a critical review. Chem. Eng. J. 487, 150480 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Domingo, N. Understanding piezocatalysis, pyrocatalysis and ferrocatalysis. Front. Nanotechnol. 6, 1320503 (2024).

  42. Hossain, I. & Blanchard, G. J. Ionic liquids exhibit the piezoelectric effect Md. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 2731–2735 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mason, W. P. Piezoelectricity, its history and applications. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70, 1561–1566 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nagamiya, T. On the theory of the dielectric, piezoelectric, and elastic properties of NH4H2PO4. Prog. Theor. Phys. 7, 275–284 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Scott, J. F., Duiker, H. M., Beale, P. D., Butler, D. & Eaton, S. Properties of ceramic KNO3 thin-film memories. Phys. B+C. 150, 160–167 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Samara, G. A.;The effects of deuteration on the static ferroelectric properties of kh2p04 (KDP). Ferroelectrics 5, 25–37 (1973).

  47. Koda, S., Kimura, T., Kondo, T. & Mitome, H. A standard method to calibrate sonochemical efficiency of an individual reaction system. Ultrason. Sonochem. 10, 149–156 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bhai Rajamma, D. et al. Sonochemical dosimetry: a comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods. Ultrason. Sonochem. 72, 105413 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nan Liu, Y. et al. Hydrogenation/oxidation induced efficient reversible color switching between methylene blue and leuco-methylene blue. RSC Adv. 7, 30080 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zalata, A., Hafez, T., Mahmoud, A. & Comhaire, F. Andrology: relationship between resazurin reduction test, reactive oxygen species generation, and γ-glutamyltransferase. Hum. Reprod. 10, 1136–1140 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Merabet, N., Kerboua, K. Sonolytic and ultrasound-assisted techniques for hydrogen production: a review based on the role of ultrasound. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47, 17879e17893 (2022).

  52. Ma, R. et al. Thermally-enhanced sono-photo-catalysis by defect and facet modulation of Pt-TiO2 catalyst for high-efficient hydrogen evolution. Ultrason. Sonochem. 90, 106222 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ruszczycky, M. W. & Anderson, V. E. Tartrate dehydrogenase reductive decarboxylation: stereochemical generation of diastereotopically deuterated hydroxymethylenes. Bioorg. Chem. 32, 51–61 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mathivanana, V., Harisb, M. & Chandrasekaran, J. Thermal, magnetic, dielectric and anti microbial properties of solution-grown pure and doped sodium potassium tartrate crystals crystals. Optik 127, 1804–1808 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Freeman, E. liS. The Kinetics of the Thermal Decomposition of Potassium Nitrate and of the Reaction between Potassium Nitrite and Oxygen113. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 838–842 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kimura T. et al. Standardization of ultrasonic power for sonochemical reaction. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 3, S157–S161 1996

  57. Fraím, E., Serna-Galvis, A. & Torres-Palma,R. A. An experimental class to illustrate the physical and chemical effects of ultrasound as an introduction to practical advanced oxidation processes. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 112, 107196 2025

  58. Bannov, S. I. & Nevostruev, V. A. Formation and properties of NO32−, NO3 and ONOO radicals in nitrate-containing matrices. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 68, 917–924 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bhai Rajamma, D., Anandan, S., Saadah, N., Yusof, M. & Pollet, B. G. Muthupandian Ashokkumar; Sonochemical dosimetry: a comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods. Ultrason. Sonochem. 72, 105413 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wang, Y. et al. Inhibition effect of KHCO3 and KH2PO4 on ethylene explosion. ACS Omega 8, 7566–7574 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jiang, H., Bi, M., Li, B., Ma, D. & Gao, W. Flame inhibition of aluminum dust explosion by NaHCO3 and NH4H2PO4. Combust. Flame 200, 97–114 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wang, Q. et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of Mg(OH)2/ NH4H2PO4 composite dry powder in suppressing methane explosion. Powder Technol. 417, 118255 (2023).

  63. Yu, M. et al. Macroscopic behaviors and chemical reaction mechanism for the inhibition of NH4H2PO4 powder in hybrid methane/coal dust deflagrations. Fuel 356, 129558 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Fijołek, L. & Nawrocki, J. Phosphate helps to recover from scavenging effect of chloride in selfenhanced ozonation. Chemosphere 212, 802–810 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rosso, J. A., Rodriguez Nieto, F. J. & Gonzalez, M. C. Reactions of phosphate radicals with substituted benzenes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 116, 21–25 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Vlase, T., Vlase, G. & Doca, N. Kinetics of thermal decomposition of alkaline phosphates. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 80, 207–210 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wang, Q. et al. Inhibiting effects of gas– particle mixtures containing CO2, Mg(OH)2 particles, and NH4H2PO4 particles on methane explosion in a 20-L closed vessel. J. Loss Prev. Process Indus. 64, 104082 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Korobeinichev, O. P., Shvartsberg, V. M., Shmakov, A. G. & Knyazkov, D. A. Rybitskaya Inhibition of atmospheric lean and rich CH4/O2/Ar flames by phosphorus-containing compound. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31, 2741–2748 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Li, Z. et al. The characteristics and mechanism of core-shell structure fly ash/KH2PO4 composite inhibitor in suppressing coal dust explosions J. Loss Prevention Process Indus. 94, 105533 (2024).

  70. Yu, C. F. et al. Ren Inhibiting effect investigation of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate on oxidative pyrolysis characteristics of bituminous coal. Fuel 333, 126352 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Jayaweera, T. M. et al. Flame inhibition by phosphorus- containing compounds over a range of equivalence ratios. Combust. Flame 140, 103–115 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Xu, H., Glumac, N. G. & Suslick, K. S. Temperature inhomogeneity during multibubble sonoluminescence**. Angew. Chem. Int. 49, 1079–1082 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wang, D., Bao, Q. W. & Han, H. Dancing bubble sonoluminescence in phosphoric acid solution. Chin. Phys. B 33, 117803 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Aghelmaleki, A., Afarideh, H., Cairós, C., Pflieger, R. & Mettin, R. Effect of mechanical stirring on sonoluminescence and sonochemiluminescence. Ultrason. Sonochem. 111, 107145 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Peng,K., Tian, S., Zhang, Y., He, Q. & Wang, Q. Penetration of hydroxyl radicals in the aqueous phase surrounding a cavitation bubble. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 91, 106235 (2022).

  76. Cairós, C., Schneider, J., Pflieger, R. & Mettin, R. Effects of argon sparging rate, ultrasonic power, and frequency on multibubble sonoluminescence spectra and bubble dynamics in NaCl aqueous solutions. Ultrason. Sonochem. 21, 2044–2051 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Nikitenko, S. I. & Venault, L. Moisy Scavenging of OH radicals produced from H2O sonolysis with nitrate ions. Ultrason. Sonochem. 11, 139–142 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Dalodière, E., Virot, M., Moisy, P. & Nikitenko, S. I. Effect of ultrasonic frequency on H2O2 sonochemical formation rate in aqueous nitric acid solutions in the presence of oxygen. Ultrason. Sonochem. 29, 198–204 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pardo, A., Romero, J. & Ortiz, E. High-temperature behaviour of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate IOP Conf. Ser.: J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 935, 012050 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Margulis, M. A. & Margulis, I. M. Theory of local electrification of cavitation bubbles: new approaches. Ultrason. Sonochem. 6, 15–20 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Margulis, M. A. The kinetic equations of the electron-diffusion model of the space–time distribution of radicals in a cavitation field. Russian J. Phys. Chem. A 82, 1407–1411 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Margulis, M. A. & Margulis, I. M. Current state of the theory of local electrification of cavitation bubbles. Russian J. Phys. Chem. A 81, 129–138 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Pilgunov, V. & Efremova, K. Electro-hydromechanical processes in mineral oil flow IOP. Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 779, 012032 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Cerreta, M. K. & Berglund, K. A. The structure of aqueous solutions of somedihydrogen orthophosphates by laser Raman spectroscopy. J. Cryst. Growth 84, 577–588 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sun, C. & Xue, D. Hydrogen bonding nature during ADP crystallization. J. Mol. Struct. 1059, 338–342 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Alexandru, H. V. Second-order transition in Rochelle-salt saturated solutions. Phys. Rev. A 45, 15 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Troia a, A., Galati a, S., Vighetto b, V. & Cauda, V. Piezo/sono-catalytic activity of ZnO micro/nanoparticles for ROS generation as function of ultrasound frequencies and dissolved gases. Ultrason. Sonochem. 97, 106470 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Troia, A., Olivetti, E. S., Martino, L. & Basso, V. Sonochemical hydrogenation of metallic microparticles. Ultrason. Sonochem. 55, 1–7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Troia, A. & Madonna Ripa, D. The role of vapour pressure in multibubble sonoluminescence from organic solvents. Ultrason. Sonochem. 18, 1180–1184 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. R. Spagnolo for financial support of these experimental investigations and Dott. M. Pelassa for his scientific and technical contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ultrasounds & Chemistry Lab, Advanced Metrology for Quality of Life, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (I.N.Ri.M.), Turin, Italy

    A. Troia

  2. Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy

    M. Gallone, V. Vighetto, S. Hernández & V. Cauda

  3. Department of Chemistry, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

    F. Pellegrino & V. Maurino

Authors
  1. A. Troia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Gallone
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Vighetto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Pellegrino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Hernández
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. V. Cauda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. V. Maurino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.T. conceived the study, performed the experiments and formulated hypothesis and conclusion of the work. V.C. and V.V. supported the experiments (EPR) and theoretical evaluation. S.H. and M.G support the experiments (GC) and statistical analysis V.M. and F.P. contributed to theoretical model of radical reactions and for the analysis of the measurements. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Troia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Chemistry thanks Timothy Mason and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary informations (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Troia, A., Gallone, M., Vighetto, V. et al. Modulation of sonochemical reactions by cavitation driven thermal degradation of aqueous salts solutions. Commun Chem (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-026-01961-4

Download citation

  • Received: 15 July 2025

  • Accepted: 20 February 2026

  • Published: 05 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-026-01961-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Chemistry (Commun Chem)

ISSN 2399-3669 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing