Extended Data Fig. 5: Expression of specific genes involved in energy expenditure is reduced in MTKO mice and increased in UBX mice. | Nature Metabolism

Extended Data Fig. 5: Expression of specific genes involved in energy expenditure is reduced in MTKO mice and increased in UBX mice.

From: Insulin-stimulated endoproteolytic TUG cleavage links energy expenditure with glucose uptake

Extended Data Fig. 5

a–e, RNA was prepared from quadriceps muscles of ad lib fed 10-week old WT, MTKO, and UBX mice, and qPCR was used to measure the relative abundances of selected transcripts. N=4 WT, 5 MTKO, and 4 UBX mice except for N=3 for UBX TUG-Cter data (a). a, Control reactions were used to verify knockout of TUG in MTKO mice and expression of the UBX-Cter transgene in UBX mice. b, Relative abundances of transcripts for Sarcolipin (Sln), Ucp1, and β3-adrenergic receptor (Adrb3) are shown. c, Relative abundances of the indicated transcripts involved in energy expenditure and lipid metabolism are shown. d, Relative abundances of transcripts encoding PGC-1α (Ppargc1a) and PPARγ (Pparg) are shown. e, Relative abundances of transcripts encoding the indicated calsequestrin proteins are shown. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of biologically independent samples, analyzed using two-tailed t-tests (a–e). f, Gene set enrichment analysis was done on transcripts that were differentially expressed in quadriceps of 11-week old, 4-6 h fasted UBX mice, compared to WT controls (N=3 mice in each group; transcripts were analyzed using CuffDiff as described in the Methods section). Transcripts were ranked in order of significance, and the top 2000 transcripts were analyzed using the GO Biological Process ontology gene set. The gene set corresponding to “Temperature Homeostasis” was significantly enriched (Fig. 3b; False Discovery Rate q value = 0.038)). Here, specific genes in this set that were differentially expressed in UBX vs. WT muscles are listed, together with their rank in the gene list, the fold-change in expression in UBX muscles compared to controls, the adjusted p-value in the RNA-seq data set (text is bold if p<0.05 after adjustment for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini method), and the running enrichment score calculated by GSEA software.

Back to article page