Extended Data Fig. 3: Liver-specific intervention of Wdr6 can ameliorate hepatic steatosis and IR, related to Fig. 2. | Nature Metabolism

Extended Data Fig. 3: Liver-specific intervention of Wdr6 can ameliorate hepatic steatosis and IR, related to Fig. 2.

From: Upregulation of WDR6 drives hepatic de novo lipogenesis in insulin resistance in mice

Extended Data Fig. 3

a, Schematic diagram of the experimental strategy to estimate the therapeutic effect of Wdr6 knockdown on hepatic steatosis and insulin sensitivity. 8-week-old C57BL/6J mice were fed HFD/CD for 2 weeks. In HFD group, mice were separated into 3 subgroups: one group was injected with AAV2/8-TBG-shWDR6 (TM-shWDR6 group (red), the other two groups were injected with AAV2/8-TBG-shNC (HFD withdrawal group was switched to normal diet (blue), TM-shNC group were still fed HFD (black). Mouse icons produced using Servier Medical Art by Servier (https://smart.servier.com/) under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). b, Liver B-Mode ultrasound imaging of the maximum plane of the mice after CD or HFD consumption for 2 weeks. c, Liver B-Mode ultrasound imaging of the hepatic/renal plane of the mice after CD or HFD consumption for 2 weeks. The area circled in red represents the kidney. d, Representative ORO staining of liver sections of the mice after CD or HFD consumption for 2 weeks. Scale bars, 50 μm. e, Liver TAG levels of the mice after CD or HFD feeding for 2 weeks, the amount being normalized to the protein content of the same sample. f, g, IPGTT and IPITT of mice described in (a). For (b-e), n = 4 biologically independent mice per group. (f, g), n = 4 biologically independent mice in HFD withdrawal group. n = 6 biologically independent mice in other groups. Data in (b), (c) and (e) are presented as mean ± SD, determined by unpaired two-sided Mann-Whitney test, data in (f), (g) are presented as mean ± SD, determined by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. * indicates statistically significance between TM-shNC vs. HFD withdrawal group, # indicates statistically significance between TM-shWDR6 vs. TM-shNC group, $ indicates statistically significance between TM-shWDR6 vs. HFD withdrawal group. *, #, $, P < 0.05, **, ##, $$, P < 0.01.

Source data

Back to article page