Table 6 Two-sided independent sample T-test results of the effects of firm WFB for different groups in Experiment 4.

From: Work–family interference in urban China: gender discrimination and the effects of work–family balance policies

Construct

N

Mean (s.d.)

Diff

s.e.

95% C.I.

t

d.f.

Effect size (r)

Suest

Experiment 4 (Sample size 598): Irrelevant observer contempt for the male worker

Higher subjective SES

High WFB

17

2.529 (1.259)

0.170

0.452

(−1.096, 0.755)

−0.38

28

0.072

0.25

Low WFB

13

2.359 (1.182)

Lower subjective SES

High WFB

282

2.595 (1.232)

−0.051

0.109

(−0.164, 0.266)

0.47

566

0.020

Low WFB

286

2.646 (1.371)

Higher income

High WFB

55

2.624 (1.234)

0.166

0.255

(−0.672, 0.340)

−0.65

101

0.065

0.79

Low WFB

48

2.458 (1.354)

Lower income

High WFB

244

2.583 (1.233)

−0.084

0.117

(−0.147, 0.313)

0.71

493

0.032

Low WFB

251

2.667 (1.365)

Higher education level

High WFB

263

2.591 (1.170)

−0.042

0.112

(−0.177, 0.263)

0.38

522

0.017

0.00

Low WFB

261

2.633 (1.384)

Lower education level

High WFB

36

2.593 (1.631)

−0.039

0.334

(−0.628, 0.706)

0.12

72

0.014

Low WFB

38

2.632 (1.227)

Female-dominated industry

High WFB

94

2.270 (1.208)

−0.193

0.198

(−0.198, 0.586)

0.98

174

0.074

1.00

Low WFB

82

2.463 (1.426)

Male-dominated industry

High WFB

205

2.738 (1.217)

0.041

0.125

(−0.286, 0.204)

−0.33

420

0.016

Low WFB

217

2.697 (1.336)

Born in urban areas

High WFB

197

2.646 (1.292)

0.007

0.135

(−0.272, 0.257)

−0.06

387

0.003

0.46

Low WFB

192

2.639 (1.362)

Born in rural areas

High WFB

102

2.484 (1.105)

−0.139

0.173

(−0.201, 0.480)

0.81

207

0.056

Low WFB

107

2.623 (1.370)

Back to article page