Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Urban Sustainability
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj urban sustainability
  3. articles
  4. article
Urban blue and green spaces: distribution, social equity, and ecological implications in Great Britain
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 March 2026

Urban blue and green spaces: distribution, social equity, and ecological implications in Great Britain

  • Matthew C. Morgan1,
  • Rodney Forster1,
  • Charlotte R. Hopkins1 &
  • …
  • Africa Gómez1 

npj Urban Sustainability , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1126 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Environmental social sciences
  • Environmental studies
  • Geography

Abstract

Cities are closely linked to the ‘triple planetary crisis’, climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss, and urbanisation affects human physical and psychological health. Urban blue-green spaces can lessen impacts by regulating temperature and water, purifying air, and supporting biodiversity, but research remains focused on green spaces. We investigate blue space cover across 500 towns and cities in Great Britain by including high-resolution blue spaces into existing land cover maps. We then assessed how blue and green cover, and land-cover diversity vary across socioeconomic deprivation gradients. Blue space covers less area than green space but is more evenly distributed across socioeconomic gradients. Higher land-cover diversity in deprived areas suggests urban regeneration may contribute to habitat homogenisation. These findings provide the first nationwide comparison of blue space cover, providing a holistic assessment of their ecosystem service distribution. In addition, we highlight the social relevance of overall land-cover diversity for sustainable urban development.

Similar content being viewed by others

The impact of blue-green spatial landscape pattern on population distribution pattern in Chinese cities

Article Open access 18 July 2025

A population-based retrospective study of the modifying effect of urban blue space on the impact of socioeconomic deprivation on mental health, 2009–2018

Article Open access 29 July 2022

Promoting urban biodiversity for the benefit of people and nature

Article 25 March 2025

Data availability

All data and code used in this study are accessible on GitHub (https://github.com/MCMorgan06/Bluest_Cities_UK) and Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16038672).

Code availability

All data and code used in this study are accessible on GitHub (https://github.com/MCMorgan06/Bluest_Cities_UK) and Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16038672).

References

  1. United Nations. World Cities Report: Envisaging the Future of Cities, https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2022-envisaging-the-future-of-cities (2022).

  2. Simkin, R. et al. Biodiversity impacts and conservation implications of urban land expansion projected to 2050. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117297119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Espey, J., Keith, M., Parnell, S., Schwanen, T. & Seto, K. C. Designing policy for Earth’s urban future. Science 383, 364–367 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McKinney, M. L. Urbanization, Biodiversity, and ConservationThe impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. Bioscience 52, 883–890 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, N., Singh, S. & Mall, R. K. Urban ecology and human health: implications of urban heat island, air pollution and climate change nexus. Urban Ecol. 317, 334 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, Z. et al. Surface warming in global cities is substantially more rapid than in rural background areas. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 1–9 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singh, R. B. & Singh, S. Rapid urbanization and induced flood risk in Noida, India. Asian Geogr. 28, 147–169 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, X. et al. Linking urbanization and air quality together: a review and a perspective on the future sustainable urban development. J. Clean. Prod. 346, 130988 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brito, H., Brymer, E. & Araújo, D. An ecological dynamics perspective on designing urban nature environments for wellbeing and health-enhancing physical activity. Front. Public Health 10, 877208 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barragan-Jason, G., Loreau, M., de Mazancourt, C., Singer, M. C. & Parmesan, C. Psychological and physical connections with nature improve both human well-being and nature conservation: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Biol. Conserv. 277, 109842 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng, X., Yu, Y. C., Yang, S., Lv, Y. & Sarker, M. N. I. Urban resilience for urban sustainability: concepts, dimensions, and perspectives. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 14, 2481 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tzoulas, K. et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81, 167–178 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tate, C. et al. The contribution of urban green and blue spaces to the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals: an evidence gap map. Cities 145, 104706 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kabisch, N., van den Bosch, M. & Lafortezza, R. The health benefits of nature-based solutions to urbanization challenges for children and the elderly - a systematic review. Environ. Res. 159, 362–373 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diener, A. & Mudu, P. How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces’ mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective—with implications for urban planning. Sci. Total Environ. 796, 148605 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Labib, S. M., Lindley, S. & Huck, J. J. Spatial dimensions of the influence of urban green-blue spaces on human health: a systematic review. Environ. Res. 180, 108869 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hutchins, M., Qu, Y., Seifert-Dähnn, I. & Levin, G. Comparing likely effectiveness of urban Nature-based Solutions worldwide: the example of riparian tree planting and water quality. J. Environ. Manage. 351, 119950 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grellier, J. et al. BlueHealth: a study programme protocol for mapping and quantifying the potential benefits to public health and well-being from Europe’s blue spaces. BMJ Open 7, e016188 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson, C. W., Aspinall, P. & Roe, J. Access to green space in disadvantaged urban communities: evidence of salutogenic effects based on biomarker and self-report measures of wellbeing. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 153, 10–22 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aronson, M. F. J. et al. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 189–196 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robinson, J. M., Mavoa, S., Robinson, K. & Brindley, P. Urban centre green metrics in great britain: a geospatial and socioecological study. PLoS ONE 17, e0276962 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. White, M. P., Elliott, L. R., Gascon, M., Roberts, B. R. & Fleming, L. E. Blue space, health and well-being: a narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits. Environ. Res. 191, 110169 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brückner, A., Falkenberg, T., Heinzel, C. & Kistemann, T. The regeneration of urban blue spaces: a public health intervention? reviewing the evidence. Front. Public Health 9, 782101 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stanford, H. R., Hurley, J., Garrard, G. E. & Kirk, H. Exploring the secret gardens of the city: an assessment of human-nature interactions on informal green space using citizen science data. Urban For. Urban Greening 98, 128414 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hyseni, C., Heino, J., Bini, L. M., Bjelke, U. & Johansson, F. The importance of blue and green landscape connectivity for biodiversity in urban ponds. Basic Appl. Ecol. 57, 129–145 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Higgins, S. L. et al. Urban freshwaters, biodiversity, and human health and well-being: setting an interdisciplinary research agenda. WIREs Water 6, e1339 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lozano, F. et al. Recovery of local dragonfly diversity following restoration of an artificial lake in an urban area near Buenos Aires. Basic Appl. Ecol. 58, 88–97 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Morgan, M. C., Forster, R., Hopkins, C. R. & Gómez, A. Just add water: urban blue spaces increase avian richness and functional diversity. Journal of Urban Ecology 12, juag006 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wood, K. A. et al. A global systematic review of the cultural ecosystem services provided by wetlands. Ecosyst. Serv. 70, 101673 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Völker, S. & Kistemann, T. I’m always entirely happy when I’m here!’ Urban blue enhancing human health and well-being in Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany. Soc. Sci. Med. 78, 113–124 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, N., Foley, R., Georgiou, M., Tieges, Z. & Chastin, S. Urban blue spaces as therapeutic landscapes: `A Slice of Nature in the City'. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 15018 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Winiwarter, V., Haidvogl, G., Hohensinner, S., Hauer, F. & Bürkner, M. The long-term evolution of urban waters and their nineteenth century transformation in European cities. a comparative environmental history. Water Hist. 8, 209–233 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald, R. I. et al. Water on an urban planet: urbanization and the reach of urban water infrastructure. Glob. Environ. Change 27, 96–105 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Barragán, J. M. & de Andrés, M. Analysis and trends of the world’s coastal cities and agglomerations. Ocean Coast. Manag. 114, 11–20 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Smith, N., Georgiou, M., King, A. C., Tieges, Z. & Chastin, S. Factors influencing usage of urban blue spaces: a systems-based approach to identify leverage points. Health Place 73, 102735 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leivesley, J. A., Stewart, R. A., Paterson, V. & McCafferty, D. J. Potential importance of urban areas for water voles: arvicola amphibius. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 67, 15 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fluet-Chouinard, E. et al. Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries. Nature 614, 281–286 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Amorim, E., Ramos, S., Elliott, M., Franco, A. & Bordalo, A. A. Habitat loss and gain: Influence on habitat attractiveness for estuarine fish communities. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 197, 244–257 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Khirfan, L., Mohtat, N. & Daub, B. Reading an Urban Palimpsest: How the Gradual Loss of an Urban Stream Impacts Urban Formas Connections and Ecosystem Functions. Front. Water 3, 754679 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Thornhill, I. et al. Blue-space availability, environmental quality and amenity use across contrasting socioeconomic contexts. Appl. Geogr. 144, 102716 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Davidson, N. C. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar. Freshw. Res. 65, 934–941 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sayer, C. A. et al. One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction. Nature 638, 138–145 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bennett, O. Freshwater Habitat Restoration https://post.parliament.uk/research-briefings/post-pn-0709 (2024).

  44. Office for National Statistics. Towns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, England and Wales: Census 2021 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/housing/datasets/townsandcitiescharacteristicsofbuiltupareasenglandandwalescensus2021 (2021).

  45. Burns, F. et al. State of Nature Report www.stateofnature.org.uk (2023).

  46. Richardson, M., Hamlin, I., Elliott, L. R. & White, M. P. Country-level factors in a failing relationship with nature: Nature connectedness as a key metric for a sustainable future. Ambio 51, 2201–2213 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Natural England. Green Infrastructure Framework Map v2.1 https://designatedsites.naturalengland.org.uk/GreenInfrastructure/Home.aspx (2024).

  48. The Canal and Rivers Trust. Area of accessible green and blue space per 1000 population (England) https://data.catchmentbasedapproach.org/datasets/theriverstrust::area-of-accessible-green-and-blue-space-per-1000-population-england/about (2021).

  49. Mullen, A. L. et al. Using high-resolution satellite imagery and deep learning to track dynamic seasonality in small water bodies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL102327 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Environment Agency, Chief Scientist’s Group. The state of the environment: the urban environment https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/state-of-the-environment/the-state-of-the-environment-the-urban-environment (2021).

  51. Potter, J. D., Brooks, C., Donovan, G., Cunningham, C. & Douwes, J. A perspective on green, blue, and grey spaces, biodiversity, microbiota, and human health. Sci. Total Environ. 892, 164772 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Masselink, G., Russell, P., Rennie, A., Brooks, S. & Spencer, T. Impacts of Climate Change on Coastal Geomorphology and Coastal Erosion Relevant to the Coastal and Marine Environment around the UK https://www.mccip.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-07/08_coastal_geomorphology_2020.pdf. https://doi.org/10.14465/2020.ARC08.CGM (2020).

  53. Wolff, C., Bonatz, H. & Vafeidis, A. T. Setback zones can effectively reduce exposure to sea-level rise in Europe. Sci. Rep. 13, 5515 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Doody, J. P. Coastal squeeze and managed realignment in southeast England, does it tell us anything about the future?. Ocean Coast. Manag. 79, 34–41 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Subraelu, P. et al. Land in water: the study of land reclamation and artificial islands formation in the UAE coastal zone: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Land 11, 2024 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Harvey-Fishenden, A. & Macdonald, N. The development of early reservoirs to supply water to arterial canals in England and Wales. Landsc. Hist. 42, 79–98 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hunter, W. & Middleton, E. Visit to the staines reservior works. J. Sanit. Inst. 22, 571–573 (1901).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Waltham, N. J., McCann, J., Power, T., Moore, M. & Buelow, C. Patterns of fish use in urban estuaries: engineering maintenance schedules to protect broader seascape habitat. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 238, 106729 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ghomeshi, M. & Walczak, B. Water as an agent of urban regeneration in postindustrial areas. BUILDER 303, 85–87 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Burda, I. M. & Nyka, L. Innovative urban blue space design in a changing climate: transition models in the Baltic Sea Region. Water 15, 2826 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jones, I. Redundant spaces and sustainable development in post-industrial weak market cities: the cases of Kingston upon Hull and Sunderland. (Newcastle University, 2022).

  62. Edwards, R. S. & Holmes, G. D. Studies of airborne salt deposition in some north Wales forests. Forestry 41, 155–174 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Trees for Cities. Tree Planting in Coastal Towns and Cities https://www.treesforcities.org/resources/coastal-planting-guide (2023).

  64. Schüle, S. A., Hilz, L. K., Dreger, S. & Bolte, G. Social inequalities in environmental resources of green and blue spaces: a review of evidence in the WHO European Region. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 1216 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Munford, L., Bambara, C., Davies, H., Pickett, K. & Taylor-Robinson, D. Health Equity North https://www.healthequitynorth.co.uk/app/uploads/2023/04/HEN-REPORT.pdf (2023).

  66. Tieges, Z., Georgiou, M., Smith, N., Morison, G. & Chastin, S. Investigating the association between regeneration of urban blue spaces and risk of incident chronic health conditions stratified by neighbourhood deprivation: a population-based retrospective study, 2000-2018. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 240, 113923 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Haeffner, M., Jackson-Smith, D., Buchert, M. & Risley, J. Accessing blue spaces: social and geographic factors structuring familiarity with, use of, and appreciation of urban waterways. Landsc. Urban Plan. 167, 136–146 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gao, J., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, L. & Wu, L. Urban blue space quality promotion and health of residents: evidence from Qingdao, China. Water 17, 3127 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Williams, T. L. & Needham, C. R. Transformation of a city: Gentrificationas influence on the small business owners of Harlem, New York. Sage Open 6, 2158244016673631 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Saha, A. Sustaining multicultural places from gentrified homogenisation of cities. Cities 120, 103433 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Davis, B., Foster, K. A., Pitner, R. O., Wooten, N. R. & Ohmer, M. L. Innovating methodologies for examining gentrification-induced social and cultural displacement: an illustration of integrating photovoice into story map. Urban Aff. Rev. Thousand Oaks Calif 60, 367–386 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Martoglio, J., Cornier, B., Monty, A. & Mahy, G. Urban brownfields and their potential for nature conservation: what citizen science tells us?. Urban Ecosyst. 28, 1–13 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Cox, L. & Rodway-Dyer, S. The underappreciated value of brownfield sites: motivations and challenges associated with maintaining biodiversity. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 1, 19 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Macgregor, C. J. et al. Brownfield sites promote biodiversity at a landscape scale. Sci. Total Environ. 804, 150162 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hu, X. & Lima, M. F. The association between maintenance and biodiversity in urban green spaces: a review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 251, 105153 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Patton, A. J. Why mow?: a review of the resulting ecosystem services and disservices from mowing turfgrass. Crop Sci. 65, e21376 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ghaderian, M., Hakimian, P. & Shahab, S. The trajectory of water sensitive urban design: integrating water management with urban planning and design. Aust. Plan. 61, 29–42 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Monberg, R. J., Howe, A. G., Ravn, H. P. & Jensen, M. B. Exploring structural habitat heterogeneity in sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) for urban biodiversity support. Urban Ecosyst. 21, 1159–1170 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wild, T. C., Bernet, J. F., Westling, E. L. & Lerner, D. N. Deculverting: reviewing the evidence on the ‘daylighting’ and restoration of culverted rivers: deculverting: reviewing the evidence. Water Environ. J. 25, 412–421 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wilkinson, C. L. et al. Rehabilitation of a tropical storm-water drain creates a novel fish assemblage. Ecol. Eng. 161, 106150 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C. & Pratlong, F. Introducing the ‘15-minute city’: sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities 4, 93–111 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kabisch, N. & Egerer, M. Resetting the clock by integrating urban nature and its biodiversity into the 15-minute city concept. Nat. Commun. 16, 9281 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Office for National Statistics. Population estimates for the UK, England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland: mid-2022 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2022 (2024).

  84. DEFRA. Statistical Digest of Rural England https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/population-statistics-for-rural-england (2021).

  85. Office for National Statistics. Built Up Area Boundaries GB BGG https://geoportal.statistics.gov.uk/datasets/ons::built-up-areas-december-2022-boundaries-gb-bgg/about (2022).

  86. Marston, C., Rowland, C. S., O’Neil, A. W. & Morton, R. D. Land Cover Map 2021 (10m classified pixels, GB). NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre https://doi.org/10.5285/a22baa7c-5809-4a02-87e0-3cf87d4e223a (2022).

  87. Ordnance Survey. OS VectorMap District https://osdatahub.os.uk/downloads/open/VectorMapDistrict (2023).

  88. Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2019 (2019).

  89. Gao, T., Zhang, T., Zhu, L., Gao, Y. & Qiu, L. Exploring psychophysiological restoration and individual preference in the different environments based on virtual reality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 3102 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Slater, S. J., Christiana, R. W. & Gustat, J. Recommendations for keeping parks and green space accessible for mental and physical health during COVID-19 and other pandemics. Prev. Chronic Dis. 17, E59 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Karimi, A. & Raymond, C. M. Assessing the diversity and evenness of ecosystem services as perceived by residents using participatory mapping. Appl. Geogr. 138, 102624 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Sultana, M., Corlatti, L. & Storch, I. The interaction of imperviousness and habitat heterogeneity drives bird richness patterns in South Asian cities. Urban Ecosyst. 24, 335–344 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  93. R. Studio Team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R https://posit.co/download/rstudio-desktop/ (2025).

  94. R. Core Team. The R Project for Statistical Computing https://www.r-project.org/ (2025).

  95. Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html (2025).

  96. Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw 4, 1686 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Wood, S. N. Mixed GAM Computation Vehicle with Automatic Smoothness Estimation v 1.9-1 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mgcv/index.html (2023).

  98. Wei, T. & Simko, V. R package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/corrplot/vignettes/corrplot-intro.html (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the University of Hull for funding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK

    Matthew C. Morgan, Rodney Forster, Charlotte R. Hopkins & Africa Gómez

Authors
  1. Matthew C. Morgan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodney Forster
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charlotte R. Hopkins
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Africa Gómez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.M., R.F., C.H. and A.G. contributed to the conceptualisation of the study. M.M. was responsible for all data handling, processing, analysis, and visualisation, and led all writing and formatting. M.M., R.F., C.H. and A.G. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew C. Morgan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary_Material_Bluest_Cities_MMorgan (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgan, M.C., Forster, R., Hopkins, C.R. et al. Urban blue and green spaces: distribution, social equity, and ecological implications in Great Britain. npj Urban Sustain (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-026-00349-6

Download citation

  • Received: 18 July 2025

  • Accepted: 26 January 2026

  • Published: 17 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-026-00349-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • 5 Questions With Our Editorial Board
  • Editor's Perspective: World Cities Day
  • Editors' Perspective: Urban Transformations
  • Letter from the Editor
  • npj Urban Sustainability Editors Achieve Clarivate's "Highly Cited Researchers 2024" Recognition

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Urban Sustainability (npj Urban Sustain)

ISSN 2661-8001 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene