Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Focusing on architectural beauty to reduce construction waste

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment volume 5, pages 749–750 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Construction and demolition waste is the most substantial waste stream in developed countries, prompting policymakers to enhance circularity, recycling and recovery rates. While strategies that simplify deconstruction and promote material reuse are important, prioritizing architectural beauty offers a compelling solution to extend the lifespan of buildings, reduce construction waste and enrich urban environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Gardens by the Bay, Singapore.

Anuchit Kamsongmueang/Getty

References

  1. Scruton, R. The Aesthetics of Architecture 34–38 (Princeton University Press, 2013).

  2. Sullivan, L. The tall office building artistically considered. Lippincott's Magazine 57, 403–409 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Potts, E. Teaching the circle. Proc. 112th ACSA Annual Meeting 537–544 (2024).

  4. Heisel, F. & Warke, V. Building on material: Towards circular construction in the first year design studio. Proc. 2021 ACSA Teachers Conference, Curriculum for Climate Agency: Design in Action 59–64 (2021).

  5. Nanda, U., Pati, D., Ghamari, H. & Bajema, R. Lessons from neuroscience: form follows function, emotions follow form. Intell. Build. Int. 5, 61–78 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pallasmaa, J. The Ethical and existential meaning of beauty. J. Des. Plan. Aesthetics Res. 1, 19–26 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andersson, D. E. & Andersson, Å. E. Sustainability and the built environment: The role of durability. Sustainability 11, 4926 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. US General Services Administration. Art in Architecture: Policies and Procedures (GSA, 2022).

  9. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung. Leitfaden Kunst am Bau. FIB https://www.fib-bund.de/Inhalt/Leitfaden/KunstamBau/leitfaden-kab-12-12-04.pdf (2012).

  10. Lavdas, A. A. & Salingaros, N. A. Architectural beauty: Developing a measurable and objective scale. Challenges 13, 56 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks J. Pallasmaa for his comments on an initial draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Liechtenstein School of Architecture, University of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Piotr Piotrowski

Authors
  1. Piotr Piotrowski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piotr Piotrowski.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piotrowski, P. Focusing on architectural beauty to reduce construction waste. Nat Rev Earth Environ 5, 749–750 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00609-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00609-y

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing